中国的发展速度为何如此之快? (1)
How Did China Develop SO Fast? (You Won't Believe...)
译文简介
网友:将技术融入日常生活——中国是最快的——比如无现金经济、基础设施、公共安全、机器人、服务、通信、公共交通、医疗保健、电动汽车、电动自行车、污染等,没有人能接近。他们组织得非常好。
正文翻译
中国的发展速度为何如此之快?
评论翻译
很赞 ( 20 )
收藏
Honestly if you look at the history of western europe and anglo sphere war and chaos on this planet will never stop .
老实说,如果你看看西欧和盎格鲁圈的历史,你会发现这个星球上的战争和混乱永远不会停止。
@robertwang7825
Adoption of technology into everyday lives - China is the fastest - non cash economy , infrastructure, public safety, robots , services , communication, public transport, healthcare, EVs , E bikes, pollution, etc. Nobody comes close. Very organized.
将技术融入日常生活——中国是最快的——比如无现金经济、基础设施、公共安全、机器人、服务、通信、公共交通、医疗保健、电动汽车、电动自行车、污染等,没有人能接近。他们组织得非常好。
@fightignorance3598
The Chinese keep working while the west keeps talking. While Chinese government has lifted millions from poverty and improved the welfare of her citizens ( bringing true dignity and justice and freedom to them) the west keeps running Hugh deficit (yet not failing to benefit their elite and oligarchs), debilitating the welfare of her citizens in every aspect .
中国人一直在工作,而西方一直在谈论。当中国政府使数百万人摆脱贫困并改善了公民的福利(给他们带来真正的尊严、正义和自由)时,西方却一直在运行巨额赤字(但并没有忘记让他们的精英和寡头受益)并在各个方面削弱了公民的福利。
@Niseedyyube6486
There's no need to discuss or argue about this. Chinese don't care about such discussion, they just do. If they are not yet leading, they will make damn sure they will soon.
没有必要讨论或争论这个问题。中国人不在乎这样的讨论,他们只是做。如果他们还没有领先,他们会确保他们很快就会领先。
@NagomRM
As an Ethiopian, i love China
作为一个埃塞俄比亚人,我爱中国。
@gregorylumpkin2128
What impresses me most of all is that China is a peaceful and productive society. They have raised the standard of living of the citizens tremendously, while the west is falling into debt, unless of course you are one of a few oligarchs who run the show.
最让我印象深刻的是中国是一个和平且富有生产力的社会。他们极大地提高了公民的生活水平,而西方则陷入债务,除非你是少数掌控一切的寡头之一。
@legpol
For China to rise from a very backward civilization to such an advanced one, did it receive any help from other people such as the West?
中国从一个非常落后的文明发展到如此先进,是否得到了西方等其他国家的帮助?
@masnur7007
The West couldn't even help itself duh!
西方甚至无法帮助自己!
@winfredcoorengel7203
Better said. Self serving west and may I add depending on time China was not a backward society it is a thousands of years old society.Compare that to the US a mere few hundred years. We are talking about a society that invented gunpowder, paper,silk,compass, to name some of the most recognizable achievements.
说得好。自私的西方,我还可以补充说,中国并不是一个落后的社会,它是一个有几千年历史的社会。相比之下,美国只有几百年的历史。我们谈论的是一个发明了火药、纸张、丝绸、指南针等最显著成就的社会。
@legpol
I think we were talking about whether China had accepted any help from the West; we were not talking about how advanced China was historically. Even if China were very highly advanced for thousands of years, China might still have accepted financial aid, monetary help, donations, free money.
我认为我们讨论的是中国是否接受了西方的帮助;我们不是在讨论中国历史上有多先进。即使中国几千年来非常先进,中国可能仍然接受了财政援助、货币帮助、捐赠、免费的资金。
@tomsunwifi2767
oh pleeease, shall we mention most of western US, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, Guam, Indian reservations?
哦,拜托,我们要提到美国西部的大部分地区、夏威夷、波多黎各、关岛、印第安人保留地吗?
@winfredcoorengel7203
financial aid,free money, donations, monetary help ! You can't be serious asking that question. Have you forgotten the 19th and 20 th century partial colonization opium wars destruction and plunder of their wealth. And yes America was involved in all of that along with Great Britain ,Japan ,the Netherlands and France. The western corporations set up shop to enrich themselves and yes China required these companies to share technologies if they wanted to take advantage of a skilled and cheap labor force. BTW They were more than happy to comply.
财政援助、免费资金、捐赠、货币帮助!你不能严肃地问这个问题。你忘记了19世纪和20世纪的部分殖民化鸦片战争摧毁和掠夺了他们的财富吗?是的,美国与英国、日本、荷兰和法国一起参与了所有这些。西方公司在中国开设公司赚了大钱,是的,如果他们想利用熟练且廉价的劳动力,中国要求这些公司分享技术。顺便说一句,他们非常乐意遵守这些要求。
@fianorian-ce2qr
At the WELT Economic Summit in February 2025, Musk pointed out that for most of human history, China has been a leading and powerful country in the world. He mentioned that over 1800 years from the Qin and Han Dynasties to the Ming and Qing Dynasties, China's GDP accounted for more than 30% of the global total. He also listed China's scientific and technological achievements, such as the the Four Great Inventions and 62 major technologies, such as iron smelting and shipbuilding, were first born in China
在2025年2月的WELT经济峰会上,马斯克指出在人类历史的大部分时间里,中国一直是世界上最领先和最强大的国家。他提到从秦汉到明清的1800多年里,中国的GDP占全球总量的30%以上。他还列举了中国的科技成就,如四大发明和62项主要的技术,如炼铁和造船,都是首先在中国诞生的。
@OlegLecinsky
You might consider educating yourself a bit regarding who made China a "very backward civilization" first. They were #1 economy in the world before Opium Wars.
你可能会考虑教育自己一下,是谁首先使中国成为一个“非常落后的文明”?在鸦片战争之前,他们是世界第一经济体。
@skydragon23101979
If you are talking about what you mentioned I would say no. If you are talking about help in terms of idea sharing and technology sharing there is of course part of it. The west’s donations or aid is all against China’s values.
如果你在谈论你提到的内容,我会说没有。如果你在谈论思想共享和技术共享方面的帮助,那当然有一部分。西方的捐赠或援助都是违背中国价值观的。
@達亮楊
Help is undeniable, but they also take a lot of benefits from China.
帮助是不可否认的,但他们也从中国获得了许多好处。
@skydragon23101979
The problem is China never accepted any of those.
问题是中国从未接受过任何这些。
@legpol
Yes, as you have said, China was made very backward by the West. My question was, was China also made advanced by the West. Yes, China was #1 before the opium wars. After the opium wars, in the years after 1979, did China receive free money from the West?
是的,正如你所说,中国被西方变得非常落后。我的问题是中国是否也被西方变得先进?是的,中国在鸦片战争之前是第一。在鸦片战争之后,1979年之后的几年里,中国是否从西方获得了免费的资金?
@legpol
Yes, the West’s donations or aid is all against China’s values. The question was: did China accept the West's donations?
是的,西方的捐赠或援助都是违背中国价值观的。问题是:中国是否接受了西方的捐赠?
@skydragon23101979
China learned from Singapore with regards to reform and opening up. Singapore rejected all “aid” from western countries instead Singapore only welcome investments and loans but zero aid. That is what China did as well. of course a lot of actions done privately by individuals and corporations also termed as “aid” by western countries China couldn’t interfere unless that is found to contradict or break China’s laws.
中国在改革开放方面向新加坡学习。新加坡拒绝了所有来自西方国家的“援助”,新加坡只欢迎投资和贷款,但不接受援助。中国也是这样做的。当然,许多由个人和公司私下进行的行动也被西方国家称为“援助”,中国无法干涉,除非发现这些行动违背或违反中国的法律。
@jackshultz2024
While China has been investing trillions in their social and industrial infrastructure, research and development, building bridges with the rest of the world, the US invested in military infrastructure in 800 bases around the world, in fruitless endless pointless wars and tax cuts for the wealthy. The ROI on these investments has proven to be negative.
当中国在社会和工业基础设施、研发、与世界其他国家建立桥梁方面投资数万亿美元时,美国在全球800个基地投资军事基础设施并进行了无果的、无休止的、无意义的战争和为富人减税。这些投资的回报已被证明是负面的。
@JohnsonDang67
Actually Us recently invest less on military just maintain only invest on there own personal pockets. You can see Boeing facing quality problems currently so many Boeing plane facing issue and crash. As for military side hypersonic missiles failed, 6th generation fighter jet got no progress, F35 recently got issues as well. All cut budget but Us government side said increase so money goes where?
实际上,美国最近在军事上投资较少,只是在维持,它们只投资于他们自己的口袋。你可以看到波音目前面临的质量问题,许多波音飞机面临问题和坠毁。至于军事方面,高超音速导弹失败了,第六代战斗机没有进展,F35最近也出现了问题。所有预算都被削减,但美国政府方面说增加了,所以钱去了哪里?
@dskthia
We all know very well where all those overpriced cost went. Into the pockets of the congressmen and women who are such enthusiastic supporters of those programmes.
我们都知道那些过高成本去了哪里,它们进入了那些对这些计划如此热情支持的国会议员的口袋。
@9064peterpan
Congress has long ben sold to Israel that's why Netanyahu, a war criminal, got repeated standing ovations during his speech. Poor, poor Unites States of Israel.
国会早已被卖给以色列,这就是为什么内塔尼亚胡,一个战犯,在他的演讲中多次获得起立鼓掌的原因。可怜的,可怜的以色列合众国。
@rap3208
The US defense budget is still bigger than the next ten countries' budget.
美国的国防预算仍然比接下来的十个国家的预算总和还要大。
@sebastian_arroyave_author
The ROI is actually very positive but for a handful of people. It was never supposed to benefit Americans
投资回报实际上非常积极,但只对少数人有利,因为它从未打算让美国人受益。
@jvs333
Been to China twice. It was like going into the future (2050).
Returning to the states was like returning to the past (1970s)
我去过中国两次,就像进入了未来(2050年)。
回到美国就像回到了过去(1970年代)。
@Wizardley
As a Canadian in China, and long term veteran of China business, we are light years ahead of the western world. Is now up to the west to choose to work with us to bring this balance globally
作为一个在中国的加拿大人和长期从事中国业务的老手,中国比西方世界领先数光年,现在取决于西方选择与我们合作以在全球范围内实现这种平衡。
@willieteb7993
"light years ahead"? Wow! That is a big statement.
“领先数光年”?哇!这是一个大胆的声明。
@LetsGoUSA
Not if you go visit Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Nanjing etc.... You will be amazed! It's like a sci-fi movie..
如果你去参观深圳、广州、南京等……你会感到惊讶!那里就像一部科幻电影。
@wzep263
Be there, see for yourself! China has everything to offer and nothing to hide. Does it have problems? Yes, of course, like any other nations, but they swiftly see to it and work on solving problems, learn a lesson quick, and they go on to tackle other problems! That is the Chinese way of progress! My 30 years experience working in China for big brands and multinationals.
去那里,亲眼看看!中国有一切可以提供,没有什么可隐瞒的。它存在问题吗?是的,当然,就像任何其他国家一样,但他们会迅速处理并解决问题并快速吸取教训,然后继续解决其他问题!这就是中国进步的方式!我在中国为大型品牌和跨国公司工作了30年。
@spikermike2843
Big statement backed by big facts - renewable energy more than world combined; EVs more than world combined; Electrified rail more than world combined; Dedesertification more than world combined; Steepest pollution reduction among all nations last decade ...
大胆的声明背后有大量的事实支持——中国的可再生能源生产超过世界总和;电动汽车超过世界总和;电气化铁路超过世界总和;沙漠化治理超过世界总和;过去十年中所有国家中污染减少的曲线最陡峭……
@skydragon23101979
That’s where you are totally wrong what is China best at assimilation any race and all races and ethnic groups given enough time will be assimilated into the Han tribe.
这就是你完全错误的地方,中国最擅长的是同化所有种族和民族,只要有足够的时间,他们都会被同化到汉族中。
@calvinang1
Most of us in Asia are already well that China is advanced in many fields. TQ
我们大多数在亚洲的人已经很清楚中国在许多领域都很先进,谢谢。
@patrickgz
asia has been in forefront in providing cheaper alternatives to the world, japan korea for cheaper machines including cars telecommunications, taiwan for cheaper compatible computers. cheaper medicines from india. cloth, food from others. China is continuing the asian tradition with investment, phones, 5g, ev and more. the list goes on. even non asian contributed, software from usa.
亚洲一直在为世界提供更便宜的替代品的前沿,日本和韩国提供更便宜的机器,包括汽车和电信,台湾(地区)提供更便宜的兼容计算机。印度提供更便宜的药品。其他国家提供布料和食物。中国正在继续亚洲的传统,提供投资、手机、5G、电动汽车等,名单还在继续。甚至非亚洲国家也有贡献,如美国的软件。
@stevehoe5017
China is starting to accelerate more and more; going forward. All hands on deck driving for innovations, material sciences, 3D Printing technology, etc. to achieving higher value and quality products.
中国正在开始越来越加速向前发展,所有人都在推动创新、材料科学、3D打印技术等以实现更高价值和更高质量的产品。
@junaidisalam5718
gosh, these people really don't learn anything from the recent news...
while other country only talking, China already has 6th gen fighter jets, the only country with its own Space Station, the most 5G patents and first 6G network, largest naval fleet, best drone producer and best A I technology
天哪,这些人真的没有从最近的新闻中学到任何东西……
当其他国家只是在谈论时,中国已经有了第六代战斗机,它是唯一拥有自己空间站的国家,最多的5G专利和第一个6G网络,规模最大的海军舰队,最好的无人机制造商和最好的人工智能技术。
@peanut0brain
Hypersonic missile for ships that can avoid radar
还有可以避开雷达的舰载高超音速导弹。
@TacticalMayo
It's not an opinion. It's a fact. Everyone knows what's coming. There isn't a thing that's going to stop it. You people just don't want to expect. If you want to ignore it, you're hoping. Somehow you'll tell yourself otherwise and everything is fine. We are coming.
这不是一个观点,这是一个事实。每个人都知道即将发生什么,没有什么能阻止它,你们只是不想期待这一点。如果你想忽略它,你就是在寄予希望。无论如何,你会告诉自己其他一切都没问题。我们来了。
@kennethAmos8929
So true….. and we should all be working with them instead off working against them…..
Working against them is simply plain stupidity
太对了……我们应该与他们合作而不是与他们对抗……
与他们对抗简直是愚蠢的。
@colombard140
Prof, I really enjoy watching your video. You are right to say that China has surpassed most of the West technologically.
In fact it has surpassed the USA economically as well since in 2014 if we consider the Purchasing Power Parity GDP (PPP GDP) rather than the rather crude Nominal GDP, because what you can buy locally with a given amount of local currency is far more relevant than what you can get with the same value of foreign money in a distant foreign country. According to the IMF China'S PPPGDP is USD 34trillionsandtheUSAPPPGDPisonly28 trillions.
Using the PPPGDP, we can also conclude that China’s currency is grossly undervalued since the ratio of its PPPGDP to that of its nominal GDP is way above 1.0..
Because we are using the USD as a comparative baseline, the ratio PPPGDP/Nominal GDP of the USA is 1.0 and any country with a ratio of greater than 1.0 suggests an undervalued currency, less than 1.0 means an overvalued currency and 1.0 suggests that the currency is fairly valued.
教授,我真的很喜欢看你的视频。你说中国在技术上已经超越了大多数西方国家是对的。
事实上,自2014年以来,如果考虑购买力平价GDP(PPP GDP)而不是粗略的名义GDP,中国在经济上也超越了美国,因为用一定数量的本地货币在当地购买的东西远比用相同价值的外国货币在遥远的国外购买的东西更相关。根据国际货币基金组织的数据,中国的PPP GDP是34万亿美元,而美国的PPP GDP只有28万亿美元。
使用PPP GDP,我们还可以得出结论,中国的货币被严重低估了,因为其PPP GDP与名义GDP的比率远高于1.0。
由于我们使用美元作为比较基准,美国的PPP GDP/名义GDP比率为1.0,任何比率大于1.0的国家都表明其货币被低估,小于1.0则意味着货币被高估,比率为1.0表明货币被公平估值。
@yu-jd5jg
A Standard McDonald's burger in the US costs 2x more than it costs in China
在美国,一个标准的麦当劳汉堡的价格是中国的两倍。
@TacticalMayo
This is nonsense. This is not true at all
这是胡说八道,这根本不是真的。
@kenlek869
Denying an uncomfortable truth doesn't make it go away.
否认一个令人不安的真相并不会让它消失。
@TacticalMayo
It's not true because the only thing that matters is GDP per capita. PPP does not matter at all.
这不是真的,因为唯一重要的是人均GDP,PPP根本不重要。
@AIPretendingToBeHuman
Nature agrees with you
2024 Nature Index just came out.
World Research Leaders:
China (23,171)
USA (20,291)
Germany
UK
Japan
France
Canada
South Korea
India (2,334)
10.Switzerland
Institution Ranking (7 of the top 10 are Chinese)
Chinese Academy of Sciences, China
Harvard, USA
Max Plank Society, Germany
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, China
University of Science and Technology, China
Peking University, China
French National Center for Scientific Research, France
Nanjing University, China
Zhejiang University, China
Tsinghua University, China
自然指数赞同你的说法:
2024年自然指数刚刚发布。
世界研究领导者:
中国(23,171)
美国(20,291)
德国
英国
日本
法国
加拿大
韩国
印度(2,334)
瑞士
机构排名(前10名中有7个是中国机构)
中国科学院,中国
哈佛大学,美国
马克斯·普朗克学会,德国
中国科学院大学,中国
中国科学技术大学,中国
北京大学,中国
法国国家科学研究中心,法国
南京大学,中国
浙江大学,中国
清华大学,中国