被昂撒殖民的白奴、黑奴、中国人和印度人《被埋葬的美国白奴史》（四·完·评）

Shamu says:
@Anon That was a leftover from British colonial rule, which in the most important sense actually never ended in Canada. People who needed farm labor, or at times logging or even small mine labor or sticking shelves and cleaning, would buy such orphans. They were not adopted for love of family, and that was not on the adopting families. They too were poor and easily ground into dust by the WASP system. They required cheap labor to maximize survival. So the easiest way was to adopt an orphan or two and work them even harder than their own children were worked.
And the propaganda that still wants that buried is the same propaganda that is itching to promote any lie that Catholic orphanages murdered no telling how many children, especially Indian children.
Anglo-Zionism is the heart of the problem.
And you can bet that every auction, there were paid actors for the Government whose job was to drive down the prices. The Yankee or Saxon trader historically has the same reputation as the Jewish trader: lying cheat of the worst sort.

这是英国殖民统治的遗留问题，从最重要的意义上说，加拿大的殖民统治实际上从未结束。需要农活的人，有时是伐木工人，甚至是小矿工，或者粘架子和打扫卫生的人，会买这些孤儿。他们不是出于对家庭的爱而被收养的，这也不是收养家庭的责任。它们也很穷，很容易被WASP（注：盎格鲁白人新教徒，泛指盎格鲁精英）集团磨成灰尘。他们需要廉价劳动力来最大限度地维持生存。所以最简单的方法就是收养一两个孤儿，让他们比自己的孩子更辛苦地工作。
而那些仍然想要掩盖这一点的宣传，正是那些渴望宣扬任何谎言的宣传，即天主教孤儿院杀害了不知道有多少儿童，尤其是印度儿童。
盎格鲁-犹太复国主义是问题的核心。
你可以打赌，每次拍卖，都有政府雇佣的演员，他们的工作就是压低价格。历史上，美国商人或撒克逊商人与犹太商人有着同样的名声，都是最罄竹难书的骗子。

anon[209] · Disclaimer says:
@Anon Holy shit. Blacks were bid on higher and higher.. while Whites were bid on lower and lower. It just can’t get more fucked up than that. Can you imagine what all was done to these kids? Stuff like this makes me loathe Whites much more than Jews. Jews didn’t do things like this to their own. At least they had the fucking decency to circle the wagons to outsiders even if they inwardly treated each other bad. Whites are fucking traitors.

天呐。黑人（奴隶）的出价越来越高……而白人（奴隶）的出价越来越低。没有比这更糟糕的了。
你能想象他们对这些孩子做了什么吗?这样的事情让我更讨厌白人而不是犹太人。犹太人不会对自己的同胞做这样的事。至少他们还能体面地把马车绕到外面去，即使他们内心对彼此不好。
白人，是他妈的叛徒。

Son of a Jedi says:
Makes painful reading

这样的文章读起来真让人痛苦。

gidoutahere says:
@Son of a Jedi Indeed. During the “Civil” War ships from Ireland would dock in the New York Harbor and offload Irish teenagers which were promptly attired in unx Army uniforms and sent to the nearest battles. Lincoln hung quite a number of these boys as “deserters”. See the great actor Anthony Quinn’s biography. Quinn’s father slipped away from this draft and headed west on foot and didn’t stop until the people turned brown. Quinn’s father married a Mexican woman who went into California to birth Anthony so he could be an American.

确实。在“内战”期间，来自爱尔兰的船只停靠在纽约港，卸下爱尔兰青少年，他们立即穿上联邦军的制服，被派往最近的战场。林肯把很多这样的孩子当作"逃兵"绞死了。看看伟大的演员安东尼·奎因的传记。
奎因的父亲从军队招募中溜走，步行向西走去，直到人们变成棕色才停下来。奎因的父亲娶了一个墨西哥女人，这个女人去加州生下了安东尼，这样他就能成为美国人了。

Observator says:
thousands of the contracts would have survived and our museums would be full of them
Very good observation. As a rare book dealer, I have seen and handled many colonial era indentures (the word is simply the archaic term for contract) regarding land sales and rental, but never have had or heard of one dealing with servitude. Supposedly, the tradition was to burn them on completion of the term, but still, at least some would surely have survived.
The American colonies began as private commercial ventures, chartered by London stock companies, financed by shareholders who expected a return on their investments. Slavery was fundamentally every capitalist’s wet dream, a system that legalized the theft of employees’ wages. Slavery for Africans became prominent because so many whites were able to run away and blend in with the communities they fled to, while dark skin could not be easily concealed. Old newspapers also contain many ads for runaway indentured servants that are little different from runaway slave notices. Interestingly the Constitution does not use the term “slaves” but rather “persons from whom service is due” which covers a lot more ground.

“（如果真的是光明正大的劳务契约，）成千上万的合同将会保存下来，我们的博物馆将会填满它们”
很好的观察。
作为一名少有的书商，我看到并处理过许多殖民时期关于土地出售和租赁的契约(这个词只是合同的古老术语)，但从未见过或听说过任何涉及奴役的契约。据说，传统是在契约结束时烧掉它们，但是，至少有一些肯定会幸存下来。
美洲殖民地最初是私人商业企业，由伦敦股票公司特许经营，由期望投资回报的股东提供资金。从根本上说，奴隶制是每个资本家的梦遗，一种使窃取员工工资合法化的制度。非洲人的奴隶制之所以变得突出，是因为许多白人能够逃离并融入他们逃往的社区，而深色皮肤不容易被掩盖。旧报纸上也有许多关于逃跑契约仆人的广告，这与逃跑奴隶的广告没有什么不同。
有趣的是，宪法没有使用“奴隶”一词，而是使用“应提供服务的人”，这涵盖了更多的领域。

Emslander says:
@Observator I have to question this interpretation of the contracted servitude immigrants. Anything so pervasive as you describe would be subject to much litigation. In all the history and law sources I’ve studied for three university degrees, I’ve never seen a single case.
On the other hand, black slavery and slaveholding has been the subject of some of the most important legal precedents in the jurisprudence.

我不得不质疑这种对契约奴役移民的解释。任何像你所描述的那么普遍的事情都会受到很多诉讼。在我获得三个大学学位的所有历史和法律资料中，我从未见过一个案例。
另一方面，黑人奴隶制和蓄奴一直是法理学中一些最重要的法律判例的主题。

mermaid says:
There should also be a discussion about the Chinese slave trade and poisoning of a nation from opium which the same Khazars introduced into china. The current Fentanyl crises seem to be a payback from China. The Chine sllaves were treated much worse then the black and Irish slaves. And again: the Khazars were the perpetuators.

也应该讨论一下中国奴隶贸易，以及同样是可萨犹太人引入中国的鸦片，毒害了一个民族。目前的芬太尼危机似乎是C的报复。中国奴隶的待遇比黑人和爱尔兰奴隶差得多。再说一遍:可萨人是那个贯穿始终之人。

Thomasina says:
@mermaid There have been some excellent articles posted at this site on the devastation of the opium trade in China.
I have a hunch that the current Fentanyl crisis in the U.S. is being led and financed by the very same tribe of perpetrators that caused the opium crisis in China.
If China were solely responsible for the Fentanyl crisis and the U.S. government were truly opposed to this loss of American lives, you can bet this news would be plastered all over the Western media 24/7, but it’s not. They would have stopped this practice dead in its tracks if they wanted it stopped, but they don’t.
While no doubt there are some Chinese players getting rich from this trade, the facilitators, the powerful people allowing it to happen, must be making a fortune and don’t want to see it ending any time soon. It’s got nothing to do with “payback”, but everything to do with an easy way for the powerful to make money. This time it just happens to be American lives being lost.
When you read history and follow the money to the top, it’s the same thing over and over again: ordinary people suffer, their lives are destroyed, whole countries are destroyed, while the wealthy are laughing all the way to the bank.

在这个网站上有一些关于中国鸦片贸易破坏的优秀文章。
我有一种预感，美国目前的芬太尼危机是由导致中国鸦片危机的同一群肇事者领导和资助的。如果C是芬太尼危机的唯一责任方，而美国政府真的反对美国人的生命损失，你可以打赌这条新闻会在西方媒体上铺天盖地，但事实并非如此。如果他们想阻止这种做法，他们就会把它扼杀在摇篮里，但他们没有。
毫无疑问，有一些C玩家从这种交易中发家致富，而那些促成这种交易的人，那些允许这种交易发生的有权势的人，肯定发了大财，他们不希望看到这种交易很快结束。这与“回报”无关，而是与权贵赚钱的捷径有关。这一次，恰好是美国人失去了生命。
当你阅读历史并跟随金钱走向顶峰时，你会发现同样的事情一遍又一遍地发生:普通人受苦，他们的生活被毁，整个国家被毁，而富人却一路笑着进了银行。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处

Commentator Mike says:
@mermaid Indians and Sri Lankans were also kidnapped/cheated into slavery under guise of “indentured labourers”

印度人和斯里兰卡人也以“契约劳工”的名义被绑架/欺骗为奴隶。

Malla says:
Nobody was kidnapped, this is pure B.S. such practices would have been easily possible by a Mughal Government but not by a British Imperial Government of its time.
Indian migrants were brought to a magistrate’s office, where the emigration agreement is read to them, and, if they assent, is executed. They then proceeded from their district to the depot at Calcutta or Madras, where the conditions of service are again explained to them, and they were always at liberty to withdraw if they wished. The system of indenture imposed obligations and conferred rights both on employer and labourer. The penalties which either employer or labourer incurred for violation of the terms are set out in the agreement which the emigrant signed. The period of contract of an Indian emigrant who emigrated under the safeguards of the indenture system was mere five years.
A committee on this issue were impressed by the independent evidence as to the care and consideration with which employers generally treated their Indian labourers, but made a series of recommendations which were given careful consideration.
Indians went to the Caribbean because blacks after given freedom from slavery turned out too lazy and incompetent. Native Americans in the interior were more competent than blacks but were found “too proud” to work. Thus more industrious, hardworking and smarter Indian labourers had to be brought in. A few Chinese went too who were found even more industrious and hard working than Indians. Indian labourers were sent to Fiji as the natives were again lazy and incompetent. Indians have now taken over the economies of many Caribbean countries and the blacks screech and scream for being left behind and commit loads of crimes against Indians especially “muh dicking.” Indeed in Guyana or Trinidad, I do not remember, influenced by the Indian Independence Movement, the Indians there started an anti-colonial movement against Britain while Blacks supported continuation of British Rule to protect them against the more smarter and entrepreneurial Asian Indians. But now Indians run most businesses. similarly in Fiji, the native Fijians do not like Indian domination of their economy and one Fijian George Spreit even took over the country by a failed coup to kick all Asian Indians out.

没有人被绑架，这纯粹是一派胡言。
莫卧儿王朝政府很容易采取这种做法，但当时的大英帝国政府却不可能。印度移民被带到地方法官的办公室，在那里向他们宣读移民协议，如果他们同意，就会被执行。然后，他们从自己的地区出发，前往加尔各答或马德拉斯的兵站，在那里又向他们解释了服役的条件，如果他们愿意，他们随时可以自由退出。契约制度规定了雇主和劳动者双方的义务和权利。雇主或劳工因违反这些条款而受到的处罚载于移民所签署的协议中。在契约制度保障下移民的印度移民的合同期限仅为五年。
关于这个问题的一个委员会对独立的证据印象深刻，这些证据表明雇主普遍关心和考虑他们的印度劳工，但提出了一系列建议，这些建议得到了仔细的考虑。
至于印度人去加勒比海是因为黑人在从奴隶制中获得自由后变得懒惰和无能。内陆的印第安人比黑人更有能力，但被认为“太骄傲”而不愿工作。因此，必须引进更勤劳、勤奋和更聪明的印度劳工。一些中国人也去了，他们被发现比印度人更勤奋和努力。印度劳工被派往斐济，因为当地人又懒惰又无能。印度人现在已经接管了许多加勒比国家的经济，黑人尖叫着被抛在后面，并对印度人犯下了大量的罪行。
事实上，在圭亚那或特立尼达，我不记得了，受印度独立运动的影响，那里的印度人开始了反对英国的反殖民运动，而黑人则支持英国继续统治，以保护他们免受更聪明、更有创业精神的印度人的侵害。但现在印度人经营着大多数企业。同样在斐济，当地的斐济人不喜欢印度人统治他们的经济，一个斐济人乔治·斯普雷特甚至通过一场失败的政变接管了这个国家，把所有的印度人赶出去。

ProudBLM says:
@Malla “Indians went to the Caribbean because blacks after given freedom from slavery turned out too lazy and incompetent“……Quote, This is a monstrous Indian LIE. You’re pushing nothing more than Indo Guyanese communist propaganda, after slavery ended the production of sugar actually exploded when the ex-slaves got PAID this was seen all over the W.I, agriculture work was the ONLY work these ppl knew for the past few generations, it was British planters who claimed in London that they didn’t want to be dependent on 1 ethnic group for their profits and began to try other groups until they found STARVING illiterate Indians suffering from constant famines and they jumped on board a ship going anywhere for the possibility of a FULL stomach, Indians in Jamaica Failed because Jamaicans would beat the shit outta Indians in public since the Jamaicans knew they were there to displace Afros economically & hinder their political rights hence Jamaica is a much better place than Guyana it has few Coolies to create political problems unlike Trinidad etc. Any black run Anglo Island state is STILL way better than any part of the pakistan & India, Bangladesh shithole and Indians NEVER started any “Independence” movement in the Caribbean stop with the constant gypsy LIES, You have been EXPOSED.

一派胡言。
在奴隶制结束后，当前奴隶得到报酬时，糖的生产实际上无以为继。但农业是过去这几代人唯一知道的技能。是英国的种植园主在伦敦声称，他们不想依靠一个群体来获取利润，开始尝试其他群体，直到他们发现饥饿的印度文盲遭受持续的饥荒，他们跳上一艘开往任何地方的船，只为有可能吃饱肚子。
牙买加的印度人失败了，因为牙买加人知道他们在那里是为了在经济上取代非洲人，阻碍他们的政治权利，所以牙买加是一个比圭亚那好得多的地方，不像特立尼达等国那样，牙买加很少有苦力制造政治问题。
任何黑人统治的盎格鲁岛国家都比巴基斯坦、印度和孟加拉国这种s坑好得多。此外，印度人从来没有在加勒比地区发起过任何“独立”运动，停止谎言，你已经暴露了。