美韩关系濒临破裂：美国连伊朗这样的中等强国都无法应对，它对中国的安全保障又有何用

Hobbes the Cat
@Bannedforself
“What good is a guarantor that asks you to spend your resources to cover the liability it created?”
Yeah America made North Korea invade South Korea in 1950.
You mean like South Korea being unable to fight off North Korea by itself? So we should not have intervened in 1950? Now you tell us!!!!

“一个要求你用自己的资源来弥补它所造成的损失的担保人，又有何用？”
是啊，美国在1950年让朝鲜入侵韩国的对吧。
你的意思是韩国当年无法独自抵御朝鲜，所以美国当初不该在1950年介入？现在才来说这个？？？

Kong
@KongMD1
Cool.. Let’s see how that works for them. Bring the troops home. FAFO principle in-play.

行啊，那就看看他们自己怎么应付。把军队撤回本土吧，后果自负。

Timothy Brown
@TrueNorthish
Lol! An opinion piece from the Quincy Institute!
Remind me, is it an official position of theirs that the “Jewish lobby” controls US foreign policy or is that just the opinion of several of their members?

哈哈！昆西研究所的评论文章！
提醒我一下，他们是不是官方立场认为“犹太游说集团”控制美国外交政策，还是只是部分成员的个人观点？

Mary Krause
@krause53391
Ignore the Bots and Trolls Sari. Very interested summary

别理那些机器人和喷子，Sari。这篇总结很有意思。

Anu Peltola
@AnuPeltola22
What good was refusing to sell air defence systems to Ukraine just because USA said so?

仅仅因为美国这么说就拒绝向乌克兰出售防空系统，这有什么意义？

Alan Rosca
@alanrosca
Thank you for your informative posts. While it's okay (and normal) for people to disagree with various articles you post, improper language or attacks are not okay and reflect poorly on those who make them. Your voice is important; your posts are among the few that make X useful

感谢你分享这些有信息量的内容。大家对你发布的文章有不同意见是正常的，但使用不当语言或进行人身攻击是不可以的，只会让发言者显得更糟。你的声音很重要，你的内容是让X这个平台仍然有价值的少数之一。

Sari Arho Havrén
@SariArhoHavren
Thank you, I have been pondering recently whether it makes any sense to stay on X, let alone engage here.

谢谢你，我最近一直在思考是否还有必要继续留在X这个平台，更别说继续参与讨论了。

Alan Rosca
@alanrosca
I hope you'll stay here. For every anonymous user (and they're all anonymous) who makes those kinds of comments, there are far more who value your views and posts. Thanks!

我希望你能留下来。每一个发表那种评论的匿名用户背后，其实有更多的人是重视你的观点和内容的。谢谢！

E. Bearington-Smythe
@beebearninja
Indeed. The downside to getting a large group of humans together is that the small percentage of arseholes becomes numerically large. (1% of 250,000,000 is a large, large number).
Stay, block, report, please.

确实如此。把大量人聚在一起的坏处就是，即便只有很小比例的混蛋，数量也会变得很可观（2.5亿人的1%依然是一个巨大的数字）。
留下来，拉黑他们，举报他们。

E. Bearington-Smythe
@beebearninja
And then there are the bots which happen because Twitter has such a large userbase and that makes it worthwhile.

还有那些机器人账号，因为平台用户基数太大了，所以才有被利用的价值。

Kelsey Clayton-Duffy
@kathleen2_wll
What is this even? A joke article or straight propaganda?
Irans top government officials are dead. Their missiles launching has decreased. Whether anyone likes Trump or not the USA is actively winning the war and so is Israel.

这到底是什么？一篇玩笑文章还是赤裸裸的宣传？
伊朗的高层官员已经被消灭了，他们的导弹发射也减少了。不管喜不喜欢特朗普，美国现在正在赢得这场战争，以色列也是。

Sari Arho Havrén
@SariArhoHavren
What is the US “actively winning” exactly?

美国所谓“正在赢”的具体指什么？

Kelsey Clayton-Duffy
@kathleen2_wll
Have you see the regime mostly dead? Have you seen the damage to their Navy? Their ballistic missiles are less now also. I think that would be winning. The story isn’t ended, it’s on pause still. Even never trumpers agree from media.

你没看到他们的政权核心基本被消灭了吗？他们的海军受到了多大打击？他们的弹道导弹也减少了。我认为这就是在赢。事情还没结束，只是暂时停顿而已。连反特朗普的人在媒体上也这么认为。

SlimeyCretin
@Noblestorr
Did killing their top guys open the straight of hormuz?

杀掉他们的高层就能让霍尔木兹海峡恢复通行吗？

Kelsey Clayton-Duffy
@kathleen2_wll
Not yet but like I’ve said, the story is on pause, it’s not finished yet. Can’t jump to conclusions until the book is written

还没有，但我说过，这只是暂停，还没结束。在事情完全发展完之前不能下结论。

agent ndn
@TheAgentNDN
Not yet.
Yeah not at all you fucking putz

还没有。
是啊，根本没有，你这蠢货。

Kelsey Clayton-Duffy
@kathleen2_wll
You aren’t well informed but there’s no way the Iranians will keep control of the straight and any uranium it’s a two week pause. lol. It’s not a signed deal.

你了解得不够，但伊朗不可能继续控制海峡或掌握铀资源，哈哈。这只是两周的暂停，又不是正式协议。

Top Famous
@TopFamous555545
I cousins voted for Trump.
He's a Moron. Making deals withAl Qaida in Syria, sucking up to the terror regime of Pakistan.
He's gonna lose the Mid Terms very decisively.

我有亲戚投票给了特朗普。
他就是个蠢货，在叙利亚和基地组织做交易，还去讨好巴基斯坦这种恐怖政权。
他在中期选举中肯定会惨败。

Kelsey Clayton-Duffy
@kathleen2_wll
Every president loses midterms. It’s normal. It won’t hurt his foreign policy.

每个总统都会在中期选举中失利，这是正常现象，这不会影响他的外交政策。

Top Famous
@TopFamous555545
Still crap. Frankly at this point the Democrats Foreign Policy looks far better.

还是一团糟。说实话，现在民主党的外交政策看起来好得多。

Kelsey Clayton-Duffy
@kathleen2_wll
Which is what? Allow are enemies to get stronger and do whatever? lol.

那是什么？让敌人变得更强、为所欲为吗？哈哈。

AS is
@As_is74
why did US "need" two week pause if it was winning already?
If Iran requested it, US could have rejected it and kept winning...no?

如果美国已经在赢，为什么还“需要”两周暂停？
如果是伊朗提出的，美国完全可以拒绝然后继续推进胜利，不是吗？

Kelsey Clayton-Duffy
@kathleen2_wll
Money, ammunition saving , people.

为了节省资金、弹药和人员。

AS is
@As_is74
So why even start a war then?

那当初为什么还要发动战争？

Kelsey Clayton-Duffy
@kathleen2_wll
Prevent religious nuts to obtain nukes. The think they’ll get to heaven by killing innocent people with them and black mail the world by threatening to use them

阻止宗教极端分子获得核武器。他们认为用核武杀害无辜可以让自己上天堂，还会以使用核武来威胁全世界进行讹诈。

AS is
@As_is74
Went back to hybernate?
How stupid you have to be to believe talking points your zionst controlled government gives you every day?
Imagine on your death bed, you'll STILL be wondering what was the name of the brave American pilot that was rescued in a 166+ aircraft operation

又去冬眠了吗？
你得有多蠢，才会相信你那个被犹太复国主义控制的政府每天灌输给你的说辞？
想象一下你临终的时候，还在想当年那场动用了166架以上飞机的营救行动中，那位“英勇的美国飞行员”到底叫什么名字，哈哈

Kelsey Clayton-Duffy
@kathleen2_wll
Your antisemitism is showing. If you think anyone can control crazy Trump that’s hilarious

你的反犹情绪已经暴露无遗了。如果你觉得有人能控制那个疯狂的特朗普，那就太可笑了。

Atomic Boomer
@BallroomBernie
Guess that post didn't age well

看来那条帖子很快就打脸了。

Sari Arho Havrén
@SariArhoHavren
You mean the US handled Iran well?

你的意思是美国对伊朗的处理是成功的吗？

@bdv_666_ssj4
You’re amplifying pro Beijing and pro Moscow propaganda from the Quisling institute. Did you not check who wrote the article?

你在放大来自“卖国派研究所”的亲北京、亲莫斯科宣传。你难道没看是谁写的这篇文章吗？

Sari Arho Havrén
@SariArhoHavren
I did. And the former US ambassador was interviewed in the article. More importantly, Trump and his administration are doing Moscow’s bidding and have made it all easier for Beijing as well. Don't think Quisling makes much difference here.

我看过了，而且文章还采访了一位前美国大使。更重要的是，特朗普及其政府正在替莫斯科做事，同时也让北京更容易达成目标。在这种情况下，所谓“卖国派”标签并不重要。

@bdv_666_ssj4
So it's okay to give legitimacy to Moscow and Beijing's propagandists, because Trump is stupid, and because they quoted a 98-year-old former ambassador. What bizarre reasoning. It's a bad-faith propaganda piece designed to drive a wedge, and that's blatantly obvious.

所以因为特朗普愚蠢、又引用了一位98岁的前大使，就可以为莫斯科和北京的宣传赋予正当性？这逻辑也太离谱了。这就是一篇带有恶意、试图制造分裂的宣传文章，而且非常明显。

towardsfi
@towardsfi1
You must be stooooopid.
South Korea vs. China.
Or
South Korea and the support of the United States vs China.
Which one makes China pause and reflect?
There’s your answer.

你肯定蠢到不行，哈哈。
韩国单独对抗中国，
还是
韩国加上美国支持对抗中国。
哪一种会让中国有所顾忌？
答案很明显。

multiplesanta34
@multiplesanta34
There is no vs. Trump is convincing US allies that coming to an agreement with China is easier than coming to one with an unstable US. He’s setting US influence on fire.

根本不存在什么对抗关系。特朗普正在让美国盟友相信，与中国达成协议比与一个不稳定的美国达成协议更容易。他正在亲手毁掉美国的影响力。

Ric
@progressief_lib
That's the point the post was making: when push comes to shove, there is no SK and US vs. China.
It'll just be SK on its own.

这正是那条帖子想表达的：真到关键时刻，并不存在韩美一起对抗中国，
最终只会变成韩国独自面对。

MP
@soberecon
As a S.Korean I seriously am reuating the need of a US cooalition. Under trump the only people suffering are the allies.

作为一个韩国人，我真的在重新评估是否还需要和美国结盟。在特朗普时期，真正受损的反而是盟友。

GeZhu13
@GeZhu13
I think the worry for the South Korea is that they ended up as the next UAE. Being dragged into a conflict they didn’t need to or wish to take part in.
There is another option -
South Korea vs no one. That’s the actual one they want

我觉得韩国担心的是变成下一个阿联酋，被拖入一个他们既不需要也不想参与的冲突。
其实还有一种选择——
韩国不与任何人对抗，这才是他们真正想要的。

MP
@soberecon
None. China would be stupid to not attack taiwan in the next 12 months.

没有别的选择。如果中国在未来12个月内不进攻台湾（地区），那才是愚蠢。

AmericaReBorn
@CryptoSuit21
I know. This is just propaganda from the *** to try to split the allies apart.

我知道，这就是***用来分裂盟友的宣传。(***政党或名字 上下同)

Magnus Vice
@refugeeUS
You’re an Idiot too. It’s not even China. It’s NORTH KOREA. You all are dumbass

你也很蠢。根本不是中国，是朝鲜。你们全都是傻子。

metziih
@metziih
What exact support? That exact same support that directly led to the ruination of US "allies" in the Arabian peninsula?

到底是什么支持？就是那种直接把美国在阿拉伯半岛的“盟友”搞垮的支持吗？

ukwa
@isiAbuncha
Just like iran is "pausing" and "reflecting" right now.
Comprehension is not your forte and we understand

就像伊朗现在所谓的“暂停”和“反思”一样。
你理解能力不行，这一点大家都看出来了。

Julie Blackadder
@JulieBlackadder
Or just remove the versus element and establish good relations with China. Stoooooopid.

或者干脆别搞对抗，和中国建立良好关系。真是愚蠢。

Peter Rowley Wilson
@textivorous
Why would South Korea assume the US will meaningfully stand against China with them?

韩国为什么要假设美国会真正站在他们一边对抗中国？

Tariffs Are A Tax on Farmers
@PrickRoyal
US will tuck and run. Ukraine and Israel are not okay

美国会退缩跑路。乌克兰和以色列的情况也不好。

Cessna2409
@cessna2409
SK could just develop/steal a nuke in that case dumbass

那样的话韩国自己研发或搞到核武就行了，蠢货。

thomas wolk
@tomkiwi
The US hasn't fought any tough foe since Vietnam & we know how that turned out. All its military knows how to do is bomb & half the time their intelligence sucks & they kill innocent civilians. It only took a few days into the Iran bombing before they slaughtered 175 schoolgirls.

美国自越战以来就没打过真正强劲的对手，而结果大家都知道。它的军队只会轰炸，而且情报经常出错，导致平民伤亡。对伊朗的轰炸才几天，就已经造成175名女学生被杀。

top colas
@top_colas
im korean and literally noone thinks this way.

我是韩国人，根本没人这么想。

StockMulti
@StockMuti
LMao who’s writing this bullshit. It’s definitely Chinese sponsored here’s one for the Chinese bots. China is number #2 and will never be number 1

笑死了，这种垃圾是谁写的？肯定是中国资助的，哈哈。给中国水军一句话：中国是第二，永远不可能成为第一。

Dapper
@dapper200
“What good is the U.S. security guarantee against China when the United States cannot even handle a middle power such as Iran?
It's worthless.
Tell them to leave.

如果美国连像伊朗这样的中等国家都对付不了，那它对抗中国的安全承诺还有什么意义？
毫无价值。
让他们离开吧。

Victory2021
@Victory20213
Breaking Point? That’s not true. The relationship between South Korea and the U.S. government isn’t that bad, but President Trump alone has ruined everything, including other allies

所谓“临界点”？并非如此。韩国和美国政府的关系没那么糟，但特朗普一个人确实破坏了很多，包括与其他盟友的关系。

CMC | r3vilo
@cmc_r3vilo
Hahahaha look at the dumb Americans in the comments who do not get political situation and are just "we're America, we scare people".
They do, I get scared thinking these people reproduce

哈哈哈，看看评论里那些不懂政治局势、只会说“我们是美国，我们能吓到别人”的愚蠢美国人。
确实很可怕，一想到这些人还会繁衍后代就更可怕。

Diego Lopez
@loboboss57
Yes, because South Korea will far much better against China on its own…

是啊，韩国单独对抗中国肯定会更好，对吧……

usernameisinvalidx
@errorinvalidx
Thaad wasn't pulled
This is likely China propoganda

萨德系统并没有撤走。
这很可能是中国的宣传。

Joseph Fain
@JoPaFain
Perhaps you think SK would be better off if it had been overrun by communists and looked just like NK? At some point you have to be able to defend yourselves. The US has been doing it for 70 years at a cost to us tax payers. Enjoy being in the Chinese orbit.

你是不是觉得如果韩国当年被共产主义吞并、变成像朝鲜一样会更好？总有一天你们得学会自己防卫。美国已经替你们承担了70年，而且是纳税人付出的代价。那就去享受被纳入中国势力范围吧。

Christian Rhodes
@CThomasRhodes
Thinking the US could stand a chance against the industrial power of China is one of the most crazy things people ever entertain. Without resorting to nukes and everyone dying.

认为美国能在不动用核武、导致全球毁灭的情况下对抗中国的工业实力，这是最离谱的想法之一。

Shadow Brokers
@UAPIntel
I agree, let's pull out of Korea as well.

我同意，那就连韩国也一起撤军吧。

Investor X
@cryptoinvesttwx
Non-sense. The ROK needed the US like human needs air. She is a vassal state so the relationship is unequal.

胡说。韩国对美国的依赖就像人需要空气一样。本质上是附庸关系，所以是不平等的。

Randommartyr
@randommartyr
This should be a normal rational thought of a sovereign state who lost a lot due to geopolitical pressure imposed by . Of course it would be unnatural if you consider S. Korea as a vassal state of US

这本来应该是一个主权国家在承受美国地缘政治压力、付出巨大代价后产生的正常理性思考。如果你把韩国当成美国的附庸，那当然就显得“不正常”了。

Dale Cooper
@AgentCoopr702
South Korea exists because of our security umbrella. That's the value of it. They get to exist. What are you proposing exactly?

韩国之所以存在，是因为我们的安全保护。这就是它的价值——他们能够存在。那你到底想主张什么？

Denis D
@DenisD56
South Korea will unite with Japan and there might be another secretly interested party in Australia. Its fuel insecurity is seeing it scramble the region for supply, but some Western alliances run deep, hence its hesitance to alter the balance.

韩国会与日本联合，甚至澳大利亚可能也有潜在参与。能源不安全让其在地区内四处寻找供应，但西方联盟关系根深蒂固，因此它对改变现有格局仍然犹豫。

Ray says #WalkAway
@Africanis
Sure retard, the US is the sole reason South Korea exists today.

当然啦，美国就是韩国今天存在的唯一原因，对吧。

fusion17
@fusion174
So what?
People act like everything is black and white.
Some Australians say the same thing about the US.
China hit us with many ridiculous trade embargoes and tariffs for simply disagreeing with them on something.
NO major power is a saint. Pick one or go it alone.

那又怎样？
很多人把事情看得非黑即白。
一些澳大利亚人对美国也有类似看法。
中国仅仅因为意见不合就对我们实施各种荒谬的贸易禁令和关税。
没有任何大国是无辜的，要么选一边，要么自己走。

Shane Gries
@ShaneMGries
There are many dumb posts on X. This is the dumbest I've seen today.
Thank you for the laugh.

X上蠢帖很多，但这是我今天见过最蠢的。
谢谢你让我笑了。

justice&peace
@justicepolity
This post is conflating economic pain with existential risk. US is in Korea to ensure its survival - not guarantee that it will have a cushy existence where someone else fights their wars.

这条帖子把经济压力和生存威胁混为一谈。美国驻韩是为了确保其生存，而不是保证韩国可以过安逸生活、让别人替它打仗。

Roarfindingnemococoa
@Roarfindin59412
SKorea has a very very strong conventional military. If (when*) they get nukes in addition, everybody including the US will have to side eye them cause they absolutely wont be ignorable.

韩国拥有非常强大的常规军力。如果（或者说当）他们再拥有核武时，包括美国在内的所有国家都必须对其另眼相看，因为那时他们绝对无法被忽视。

Charles Park
@Charles71465072
Wtf. US is in South Korea to defend against North Korea, not China. ROK and PRC have decent relationship, except the US is trying to push them apart.

什么鬼。美国驻韩是为了防御朝鲜，不是中国。韩国和中国本来关系还可以，是美国在试图把他们分开。

HHH
@HHimalayanH
I don’t think Iran is a Middle Power anymore.

我觉得伊朗已经不能算是“中等强国”了。

The Grey Brief
@thegreybrief
lol this is from a guy working for Trita Parsi
Go speak to a Korean defense expert in ROK and you’ll easily find out how they really feel about the U.S.

哈哈，这出自一个给特里塔·帕西工作的人之手。
去跟韩国的国防专家聊聊，你很快就会知道他们对美国的真实看法。

Maximus
@DrMaximus_NYC
We will handle Iran. Get ready to scream “war crimes”

我们会搞定伊朗的。到时候准备好大喊“战争罪”吧。

AZMan
@DesertArizona
lMao things that are not happening... I love the standard of war against the 12th most powerful military is 100% in 5 weeks or less, from the air only.

笑死，这些根本不会发生……我真喜欢现在这种标准：只靠空袭，在5周内100%击败世界第12强军队。

Thomas Schmall
@oxpal
I am pissed that Trump is ruining all our economies by exploding oil prices - I can only imagine how much more pissed Asian nations must be that already have to cut on work days and fuel usage.

我很愤怒，特朗普把油价推高，正在毁掉我们的经济。我都不敢想那些已经不得不减少工作日和燃料使用的亚洲国家会有多愤怒。

Benjamin Hiatt
@benrhiatt
We didn't promise to invade China for Korea. Defending Korea (or Taiwan ) would be much easier than trying to topple the Iranian government while taking close to zero percent casualties.

我们可没承诺要为了韩国去入侵中国。防御韩国（或台湾（地区））要比试图推翻伊朗政府、同时又几乎不付出伤亡代价要容易得多。

bigdgramps
@bigdgramps46079
Yeah I think Korea ought to just defend itself against North Korea and China.
you sound like a Chinese bot

是啊，我觉得韩国就应该自己去对付朝鲜和中国。
你听起来就像个中国水军。

Anthony Liu
@liuah37340
lol you do not want to be China’s vassal state. Look at countries that already are and how they are doing.

哈哈，你绝对不想成为中国的附庸。看看那些已经是的国家过得怎么样就知道了。

Uncle Curtis
@GenerallyLeMay
Your periodic reminder that academic credentials have little correlation to common sense and a lot of correlation with saying the words the seal clapping left wants to hear.

提醒一下：学术头衔和常识几乎没有关系，却往往和说出那些迎合左派观众的话高度相关。

@CFC_ria9
We don't really think this too much but deploying THAAD to the Middle East was disappointing surely. But reconsidering the relation won't be coming up from the South Korea, but from the US, precisely, Trump. We are gonna hold our relations, but if Trump does something...

我们其实没有太多这样想，但把萨德部署到中东确实让人失望。不过重新审视关系不会是韩国这边提出的，而是美国，准确说是特朗普。我们会维持关系，但如果特朗普做出什么举动的话……

Motorhead
@BradMunchen
It's not only US-South Korea relations that are at a breaking point. I'd list the others, but it's easier to ask which US allies aren't at a breaking point. Russia, Hungary, & some smaller "wannabes".

不仅仅是美韩关系处在临界点。要列举其他例子很麻烦，不如反过来问：还有哪些美国盟友没到这个地步？俄罗斯、匈牙利，还有一些小的“跟风者”。

XterminatorQ
@QXterminator985
In South Korea, only idiot believes US security guarantee against China when they can't even touch North Korea.

在韩国，只有傻子才会相信美国能对抗中国的安全承诺，毕竟他们连朝鲜都奈何不了。

Oracle of Gwacheon
@calm7775
South Korea has US forces to help keep North Korea in check, not to fight China (why is this so hard to understand). If the US forces leave, SK will be compelled to own nuclear weapons. Then it is likely that Japan and Taiwan will follow. China would not want that.

韩国驻有美军是为了牵制朝鲜，而不是用来对抗中国（这有什么难理解的）。如果美军撤离，韩国将被迫发展核武，日本和台湾（地区）很可能会跟进，而这是中国不愿看到的。

MidwestHunter
@19chris16
Lol trying to spread bullshit a dn drive a wedge where there is nothing. Only because you idiots dug yourself into a hole you can't get back out of. How fucking pathetic you people have turned out to be.

笑死，试图散布垃圾信息、制造本不存在的分裂。只是因为你们这些人把自己搞进了一个无法脱身的困境。你们现在真是可悲至极。

Washie
@FreenBraveStar
What are you dense? The entire regime in Iran is dead. And Kimmy wants a delegation to work out a peace deal. You Europeans are so smooth brained it’s baffling. It’s incredible you say online for a decade calling Americans stupid. Lord. South Korea and the U.S. are super close.

你是脑子不好使吗？伊朗整个政权都已经被干掉了，而且金正恩还想派代表谈和平协议。你们欧洲人简直蠢得让人难以理解。你们在网上骂美国人愚蠢都骂了十年，真是离谱。韩美关系明明非常紧密。

Sam
@swirlwords
Im sorry. America is out of money. It gets worse. We're in debt with essentially everyone. Including you. . It appears our moral compass is malfunctioning as well. The next time we speak maybe in a new language.

很抱歉，美国已经没钱了，而且情况还会更糟。我们几乎欠所有人的债，也包括你。我们的道德指南针似乎也出了问题。下次再交流的时候，说不定都要换一种语言了。

Clément
@LimeCrusher
Frankly, it was only a matter of time.
I remember how some explained to us how abandoning Ukraine was not meaningful and that we didn't understand the nature of the relationship between the US and South Korea and bla bla bla....

说实话，这只是迟早的事。
我还记得有人曾跟我们解释，说放弃乌克兰没什么大不了，还说我们不理解美韩关系的本质之类的……

Idiots.
Hyperbolic Discounter
@HyperbolicDisco
However unsatisfying and imperfect the US alliance might be, it is much better than being enslaved by Kim Jong Un.

不管美方联盟有多不完美、不令人满意，也远远好过被金正恩统治。

Aquaadverse
@aquaadverse
Yeah, I'm sure all those Koreans facing being overrun by North Korea are spitting in the face of the US and wanting them to leave.

是啊，我“相信”那些面对朝鲜威胁的韩国人都会对美国翻脸，还希望美军离开。

Aria J
@AriaJ138084
How disingenuous. That is a quote by one Washington lawyer with an accompanying photo of someone demonstrating in Seoul. In 2017.

这也太不诚实了。那只是引用了一位华盛顿律师的话，配了一张2017年首尔有人抗议的照片而已。

roblox Brookhaven
@BrookhavenSofia
Wow Iran, China, russia are bombarding X with overwhelming propaganda against the USA.

哇，伊朗、中国、俄罗斯正在用铺天盖地的宣传在X上攻击美国。