美国空军人员在伊朗导弹袭击沙特阿拉伯时受伤

@andrewhefner289
Good thing the commanders at the Saudi base didn't line up 2 squadrons of refuelers, wing tip to wing tip on the apron in broad daylight.

幸好沙特基地的指挥官没有在白天把两支加油机编队，机翼紧挨着停在停机坪上。

@sprocket5526
One would think that lining up aircrafts like ducks is pretty bad idea

人们会认为，把飞机排成一行就像鸭子一样是个很糟糕的主意。

@bigleemac
Absolutely boils my blood, putting Marines on that island is insane, actually quoting a battle that cost 7000 lives!
Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, have no lessons been learnt?

这真让我怒火中烧，把海军陆战队派到那个岛上简直疯狂，居然还引用了一场导致7000人丧生的战役！越南、伊拉克、阿富汗，难道没有吸取教训吗？

@AllanSmith-d9b
First rule of warfare. Put all of your hardware within easy missile strike....

战争的第一条规则。把你所有的装备放在容易受到导弹打击的地方……

@dragonmares59110
It really feels like the US learned absolutly nothing from the conflict in Ukraine...

感觉美国从乌克兰冲突中完全没有学到任何东西……

@NoahSpurrier
We’ve got insane idiots commanding our troops.

我们有疯狂的傻瓜在指挥我们的部队。

@edc1569
So they didn’t think shaheds stored in mountains were going to be a problem. Incompetence here is off the charts.

所以他们没想到储存在山里的沙赫德会成为问题。这里的无能真是令人震惊。

@fishsaltwater5616
Hope group troops is a bluff. The first HD video of a marine trying to unsuccessfully fend off a fiber optic drone will not play well in US.

希望大部队是个虚张声势。第一段关于一名海军陆战队员试图无效抵御光纤无人机的高清录像在美国播放不会好看。

@indydarkstar
who could have guessed putting a part time faux news host in charge of our military would lead to disaster

谁能想到把一个兼职假新闻主持人放在我们军队的指挥位置会导致灾难。

@Ieo9017
Ukraine has been, what, 4 years? The US military learned NOTHING about counter-drone in 4 years. Why are those planes in the open? We've spent the last 4 years making fun of the Russians for doing exactly what we're doing...and we're arguable doing it worse!

乌克兰冲突已经持续了大约4年？美国军方在这4年里对反无人机完全没有吸取任何教训。那些飞机为什么还停在外面？过去四年我们一直在嘲笑俄罗斯人做我们正在做的事情……而且我们的表现可以说更糟！

@ES-je3em
It’s pretty funny how we laughed at the Russians for making these mistakes and now it’s obvious United States has learned nothing. We are making the same mistakes the Russians made years ago.

真有趣，我们嘲笑俄罗斯人犯这些错误，而现在显然美国什么也没学到。我们正在犯和俄罗斯几年前一样的错误。

@briangulley6027
You can't win a war without a man with rifle standing on the obxtive.

没有一个手握步枪的人站在目标上，就无法赢得战争。

@davebrown386
When giving injured statistics could you state how many returned to service. And Lindsay Graham is an idiot. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

在提供伤亡统计时，能否说明有多少人返回了服役。而林赛·格雷厄姆是个傻瓜。谢谢你对此事的关注。

@major__kong
Why do American presidents keep equating bombs on target with winning? Made the same mistake in Vietnam.

为什么美国总统总是将炸弹落在目标上等同于胜利？在越南犯过同样的错误。

@P0rgyTirebiter
I'm curious to know if the public has an appetite for battles leaving 7,000 dead and 20,000 injured, it's disheartening to realize our CIC is not conflicted whether or not such things matter

我很好奇公众是否能接受造成7000人死亡和20000人受伤的战斗，令人沮丧的是，我们的首席指挥官对这种事情是否重要毫无冲突。

@bradsillasen1972
Just the facts, Maam. Another outstanding contribution to public awareness.

就事论事，女士。这又是一次对公众意识的杰出贡献。

@GraemeBeardsley
Mate that wasn't a bad report. Quite a bit of balance and realism which we need a lot more of.

伙计，这不是一份糟糕的报告。相当平衡和现实，而我们需要更多这样的东西。

@InHellBaby1
Total incompetence. Have we learned nothing from the war in Ukraine?

完全的无能。我们从乌克兰战争中难道什么都没学到？

@Mr.mysterious76
This war was never about "liberation" of Iranian people and y'all know it. Iranians have rallied around the flag. Iranian missiles and drone productions are still ongoing distributed underground and on surface all over the country on top of the massive stockpiles they already have. China and Russia are also probably producing drones and missile parts for Iran which they'll send eventually assuming they're not already. For the first time since WW2, the US is facing a country that can develop it's own weapons indigenously and actually fight back.

这场战争从来就不是为了“解放”伊朗人民，你们都知道。伊朗人团结在国旗周围。伊朗的导弹和无人机生产仍在进行中，分布在全国各个地方，地下和地面上，加上他们已经拥有的大量库存。中国和俄罗斯也可能在为伊朗生产无人机和导弹部件，他们最终会发送过来，假设他们现在还没有。自二战以来，美国首次面临一个能够自主开发武器并实际反击的国家。

@BacklogSemantics
My greatest frustration with all of this, is that there was a whole massive body of literature and simulation around this exact conflict.
If you worked remotely adjacent to national security and defense, then you had at least seen white papers about this stuff in passing.
None of it was considered. We didnt even build up our strategic oil reserves. No one who knew anything about this signed off on it.
Absolute fucking shitshow.

我对此事最大的挫败感在于，关于这场特定冲突有大量文献和模拟。如果你在国家安全和防御方面工作过，那么你至少在旁听中见过这些东西的白皮书。没有任何一个被考虑到。我们甚至没有增加战略石油储备。没有一个了解此事的人对此表示同意。绝对是一场该死的混乱。

@austJW
Senator Graham I think is entirely accurate in invoking iwo Jima as a parallel and it's interesting to see his excitement in sending the marines into harms way.

格雷厄姆参议员完全准确地将硫磺岛作为类比，看到他兴奋地派遣海军陆战队进入危险境地很有趣。

@leo_martinez8330
The top brass in the United States still believe we are in the 2000s, Where the enemy's only response was by land and generally didn't cause major problems, soldiers in civilian clothes were the biggest obstacle. Today it's 2026, and in 4 years of the Ukrainian war, the US learned nothing. They forgot that we are in the age of drones, simple and cheap drones that cause enormous destruction. They can't say that their generals are surprised to see that the enemy has the capacity to destroy their bases. They had 4 years to learn that today drones dominate the field. It doesn't matter if you have the best tank, the best plane, the best bomber; the one that rules the modern battlefield is the drone.

美国的高层仍然认为我们处于2000年代，那时敌人的唯一反应是通过陆路，而一般不会造成重大问题，穿便衣的士兵是最大的障碍。如今是2026年，在乌克兰战争的四年里，美国一无所获。他们忘记了我们处于无人机时代，简单且廉价的无人机造成了巨大的破坏。他们不能说他们的将军们看到敌人有能力摧毁他们的基地感到惊讶。他们有四年的时间去了解今天无人机主宰战场。无论你拥有多好的坦克、飞机或轰炸机，统治现代战场的是无人机。

@tayzonday
Words always mean more coming from those who have served in global theaters like you and Mark Kelly. We need more unfazed sobriety and less of whatever has taken its place.

来自像你和马克·凯利这样的全球战区退伍军人的话总是更有分量。我们需要更多不动摇的冷静，少一些取而代之的东西。

@SmallKiwiTech
What’s the difference in lead up time to Desert Storm and Epic Fury? It’s almost like the increased battlefield complexity requires MORE planning and assets, not significantly less.

“沙漠风暴”和“史诗狂怒”的准备时间有什么区别？似乎增加的战场复杂性需要更多的规划和资源，而不是显著减少。

@photoisca7386
When is America going to realise making demands of others as if they are in charge no longer works.

美国什么时候才意识到对他人提出要求就像他们在掌控一切一样已经行不通了。

@mikehamilton1498
It is becoming increasingly clear that whomever is making decisions is not listening to advisors. This does not look like a well-planned "excursion".

越来越明显的是，无论谁在做决定都没有听取顾问的意见。这看起来不像是一个经过精心计划的“远征”。

@GoEagles-n3v
before we set boots anywhere, there damn well better be a plan for dealing with fpv drones and the like. otherwise, increase tonnage dropped and don't effin forward deploy high value air assets within enemy range

在我们把军队部署到任何地方之前，必须有应对FPV无人机等的计划。否则，就增加投放的吨位，不要在敌方范围内前置高价值的空中资产。

@mrblack888
I am just waiting for the true losses to be published once this is over with. The public will be justifiably outraged.

我只是在等这场战争结束后真实损失的公布。公众将会合理地感到愤怒。

@70mavgr
Iran was preparing for many months. They dispersed their ballistic missile and drone installations all over the country. Making it very difficult to track and neutralize.

伊朗准备了好几个月。他们将弹道导弹和无人机设施分散在全国各地，这使得追踪和摧毁变得非常困难。

@dwaneoconnor5978
So we park our tankers on the ramp like sitting ducts? Just like after Pearl Harbor attack and MacArthur in the Philippines asleep at the switch and gets all his planes destroyed on the ground.

我们就像静止的鸭子一样把加油机停在跑道上吗？就像珍珠港袭击后，麦克阿瑟在菲律宾睡着了开关，导致他的所有飞机都在地面上被摧毁。

@supergroovy8346
The most insane thing is, before they Killed Ayatollah:
1. The strait was open and in full control of the US and Iran wasn't demanding any control of it.
2. Iran was ready to make a deal where they would give up all uraniam and put their nuclear reactors under full monitoring.

最疯狂的事情是，在他们杀掉阿亚图拉之前：
1.海峡是开放的，完全由美国控制，伊朗并没有要求对此进行控制。
2.伊朗准备达成协议，放弃所有铀，并将他们的核反应堆置于全面监控之下。

@velisvideos6208
It is somehow fitting for this operation that the 15 point plan by the US has 14 points.
At least they got it about 93% correct.
The rest of Operation Epic Fail might not go so well.

对于这次行动来说，美国的15点计划有14个要点，这在某种程度上是合适的。至少他们的正确率达到了93%。其余的“史诗失败”行动可能不会那么顺利。

@johnnunn8688
If those are photos of the location of the aircraft at the time of this attack, why aren’t the aircraft dispersed, rather than sitting all together?

如果这些是攻击发生时飞机的位置照片，为什么飞机没有分散开，而是聚在一起？

@daviddealba1988
This conflict is dragging on despite the destruction of a great amount of Iranian military hardware, namely missile and drone facilities. I'm no military expert by any means, but I think air-refuel and AWACs aircraft are always in short supply, so this strike may have been quite significant to the present war effort against the Islamic Republic.

尽管已经摧毁了大量伊朗军事硬件，即导弹和无人机设施，但这场冲突仍在拖延。我并不是军事专家，但我认为空中加油机和预警机总是供不应求，因此这次打击对当前针对伊斯兰共和国的战争努力可能相当重要。

@DanielWard-c5g
You mean this isn’t a TV show where DJT can just say “you’re fired” to Iran? Who knew they were proud of their country and would defend it? Thank you Ward for actual news, good or bad without the rah-rah. I’m so sad for our amazing men and women putting their lives on the line, blowing up every thing in sight without a clear strategy to their mission.

你是说这不是一档电视节目，特朗普不能对伊朗说“你被解雇了”？谁知道他们对自己的国家如此自豪并会为之辩护？感谢沃德提供真实新闻，无论好坏，没有那些口号。我为我们的优秀男女感到悲伤，他们冒着生命危险，毫无明确策略地摧毁眼前的一切。

@chrishooge3442
Iran is going to rig everything to blow. "If we can't have it, you can't have it either." They will shut down the Strait, bombard our forces, and take every oil, gas, and desalinization plant offline. It will take a decade or more for the global economy to recover. We'll put at risk limited Marine and Amphibious assets. One of those boats will burn. I'm no fan of Iran but this is dumb on so many levels. We're going to lose elite units and critical naval assets...for what?

伊朗会把一切都弄爆。“如果我们不能拥有它，你们也不能拥有。”他们会封锁海峡，对我们的部队进行轰炸，并关闭所有石油、天然气和海水淡化厂。全球经济将需要十年乃至更长时间才能恢复。我们会让有限的海军和两栖资产面临风险。其中一艘船会着火。我并不喜欢伊朗，但这在很多方面都很愚蠢。我们将损失精英部队和关键海军资产……为了什么？

@jimmynickelz
Your lack of enthusiasm about this conflict is showing even though your trying to just tell the story. Thank you for doing what you do Sir.

尽管你试图只是讲述故事，但你对这场冲突缺乏热情还是显而易见的。谢谢你做你所做的事情，先生。

@Aeolos67
We have no idea how many of our men and women in uniform have been hurt in this special military operation. They're always in out thoughts and prayers.

我们不知道在这次特殊军事行动中有多少我们的军人受伤。他们始终在我们的思念和祈祷中。

@GintaPPE1000
And to make matters worse, this administration just suspended KC-46 deliveries and is still trying to cancel the E-7 Wedgetail, even after Congress and the USAF have both told them we need it.
At this point there appears to be no goal beyond burning as much US combat power as possible to give China a clear field at Taiwan.

更糟的是，这届政府刚刚暂停了KC-46的交付，仍在试图取消E-7 Wedgetail，尽管国会和美国空军都告诉他们我们需要这个。在这一点上，似乎没有其他目标，只是尽可能消耗美国的战斗力量，以便给中国在台湾（地区）提供清晰的机会。

@dixonMibaum
The idea that 2 amphibious warships with, what, 1500 trigger pullers on each of them (at most) are going to be able to take and hold anything is alarming. This would take a full mobilisation. Where is US congress?

两个两栖战舰上最多各有1500名战斗人员，居然能占领并控制任何东西，这真让人感到震惊。这需要全面动员。美国国会在哪里？

@wojciechczupta
this happens when you let children rule the most important country on the planet. I can imagine astonishment of Chinese leaders. They don't need to move a finger. USA destroys itself from inside.

当你让孩子掌控这个星球上最重要的国家时，就会发生这种事情。我可以想象中国高层的震惊。他们根本不需要动一根手指，美国就自我毁灭了。

@iancummins1383
The important thing is that everyone has a good time

重要的是每个人都能玩得开心。

@RHawkAdventures
Never could understand why all aircraft are so nicely lined up. Why not stage them randomly?

我从来无法理解为什么所有飞机都排得这么整齐。为什么不随机停放呢？

@richardfrances7679
Thank you Ward for the truth on your channel and breaking it down for my non military ears to understand….really important stuff…

感谢沃德在你的频道上讲述真相，并将其简化，让我这些非军事人员也能理解……真的很重要的内容……

@blujava
i wonder how much damage were going to absorb until new parameters are set for protecting our assets.

我想知道我们将承受多少损失，直到为保护我们的资产设定新的参数。

@sdflyr
This is extraordinary incompetence from our military. There is no valid reason or acceptable excuse for the tanker fleet being exposed like this. That’s not a government issue it is a military leadership issue.

这是我们军方极其无能的表现。没有正当理由或可接受的借口来解释加油机舰队被如此暴露。这不是政府的问题，而是军事领导层的问题。

@fredbyoutubing
The US had hundred of thousands of troops on both sides of Iran for two decades and a direct confrontation would still have been catastrophic. Imagine putting a fraction of that on a small island in the drone warfare era.

美国在伊朗两侧驻扎了数十万军队达二十年，直接对抗仍然会是灾难性的。想象一下将其中一小部分部署到一个小岛上，在无人机战争时代。

@WarrenBacon-gh7zw
What idiot general ordered those planes housed there? Criminal negligence that requires a general court martial.

哪个愚蠢的将军下令将那些飞机放在那里？这属于刑事疏忽，应该进行军法审判。

@digitalscribbler68
The Air Force can't afford to lose a bunch of tankers. They are already stretched a bit thin.

空军不能承受失去一大批加油机的代价。他们已经有些捉襟见肘了。

@markn.3813
Always appreciate your level headed, straight down the middle analysis. Silly and useless comments aside from some people here, I just do not understand why aircraft haven't been more dispersed on airfields. All it takes is one lucky hit to do some serious damage even if you have degraded Iran's missile capabilities by 95%. And before anyone lays everything on the CIC or SECWAR, remember we have a command structure and guy who gives orders and expects people to execute and carry out planning properly using their experience and knowledge, like it should be.

始终感谢你的冷静、客观的分析。撇开这里一些人的傻乎乎和无用的评论，我不明白为什么飞机在机场没有更分散停放。即使你将伊朗的导弹能力削弱了95%，只需一次幸运的攻击就能造成严重损害。而在任何人将一切都归咎于指挥官或国防部长之前，请记住我们有指挥结构，以及会下达命令并期望人们根据他们的经验和知识妥善执行和规划的人，这本来应该如此。

@mutleyeng
one wonders if US ground forces would have any idea how to deal with fpv drones

人们不禁想知道美国地面部队是否知道如何应对FPV无人机。

@NarrowboatDave
Back in the early 80s we were told that satellites then had the ability to read a newspaper. This military exchange shows that was and is; an utter lie.

在80年代初，我们被告知当时的卫星能够阅读报纸。这次军事交流显示这完全是谎言。

@UR_HR
The radar for the THAAD at the same air base was destroyed early in march. Downplayed by the US as light damage, but showed on the Daily Mail satellite image analysis (on YT), it was destroyed

同一空军基地的THAAD雷达在三月初被摧毁。美国对此轻描淡写为轻微损坏，但在《每日邮报》的卫星图像分析（在YouTube上）中显示，它实际上是被摧毁了。

@everettrhay4855
If I remember correctly, we landed on Iwo with a significantly larger force, more naval assets and uncontested airspace. I fear those brave young men might be sacrificed.

如果我没记错的话，我们在硫磺岛登陆时有更大规模的部队、更多的海军资产以及没有争夺的空域。我担心那些勇敢的年轻人可能会被牺牲。

@drfury39
There are no negotiations. The 10 day delay was necessary because the required ground force is/was not in place yet. Im speculating, but thats what seems clear to me.

没有谈判。10天的延迟是因为所需的地面部队尚未到位。我在推测，但这对我来说似乎很清楚。

@Pwrwe
The stupidity of the military never alters. What idiot decided to line up airplanes and put them so close together?

军方的愚蠢永远不会改变。哪个傻瓜决定把飞机排成一列，并把它们放得如此接近？

@pollyskirt1
Yes its pretty close to Iran , a risk in having air to air tankers lined up in a parking area ,should have been dispersed its an old lesson seemingly never learned,thanks for the report Ward .

是的，它离伊朗很近，把空对空加油机停在停车区是个风险，应该分散停放，这似乎是一个从未吸取的老教训，感谢沃德的报告。

@KnEpH131
Talk about underestimation. The genius that decided to keep the tankers and such out in the open, within Iranian reach, knowing full well they were retaliating, needs to be put in courts martial, fined, imprisoned, and publicly ridiculed.

真是低估了。那个决定让加油机和其他设备暴露在外、让伊朗可以轻易打击的人，明知道他们会进行报复，应该被送上军法法庭，被罚款、监禁并公开嘲笑。

@jonskowitz
My biggest fear in life over the past 20 years is leadership coming into power that believed the narrative of WW2 instead of the the reality and acting on those beliefs.

在过去20年里，我最大的恐惧就是领导层掌权，他们相信二战的叙述而非现实，并基于这些信念采取行动。

@MrWestsideconnexion
Operational malpractice by the US Air Force Command. Iranians have real time satellite imagery. The planes were sitting ducks.

这是美国空军指挥部的操作失误。伊朗人有实时卫星图像。那些飞机就像活靶子。

@toddthemariner7882
There will be much more of this! For you, Max and the countless other content creators who cheered on this nonsense prior to its start, you are a big part of the problem!

未来会有更多这样的事情！对于你、马克斯和在开始之前为这种无稽之谈欢呼的无数内容创作者来说，你们是问题的一部分！

@charlestosi5199
Do you foresee partial reduction of total aircraft on USN aircraft carriers by basing them ashore? This would keep the carriers out of swarms’ way and increase the utilization of Navy squadrons and still leave enough assets on board to protect mother.

你认为通过将部分飞机部署在陆基上，是否会减少美国海军航母上的总飞机数量？这样可以让航母避开群体攻击，同时提高海军中队的使用率，并且仍然留有足够的资产在船上以保护母舰。

@RealLeadershipRequired
When adding up the cost of the war, don't forget repairing aircraft and ships, buying new aircrafts and ships, and the cost paid by those injured and laid to rest. It's not just $1 billion per day for missiles and deployment.

在计算战争成本时，不要忘记修理飞机和舰船、购买新飞机和舰船的费用，以及那些受伤和去世者所付出的代价。这不仅仅是每天10亿美元用于导弹和部署。

@WhoDaresWins64
The US is like that foolish 5 year old that you continually tell to not touch the hot stove top, but they do again and again, getting burnt worse everytime.

美国就像那个愚蠢的五岁小孩，你不断告诉他不要碰热炉子，但他一次又一次地去碰，每次都被烫得更厉害。

@user-oi4tj4pp8q
I don't know why America doesn't seem to have learned anything from the Russian failures in their attack on Ukraine

我不知道为什么美国似乎没有从俄罗斯对乌克兰攻击中的失败中吸取任何教训。

@j.c.4145
Striking the KC-135s lined up like ducks in a row, shows how commercial satellite imagery reconnaissance may lead to missile successful targeting and striking by Iran. Knocking out aerial tankers and wounding service members parked so foolishly at ONE (?) base is a blunder owned by the CENTCOM Commander, the Chairman of the JCS and the Secretary of War. Just wait until Sentaor Graham's Marine invasion of Kharg Island occurs. Iowa Jima was a costly, bloody invasion. In any event, great analysis and far better than the talking heads on American cable TV news channels.

击中像排成一行的KC-135加油机，显示了商业卫星图像侦察如何导致导弹成功锁定并打击伊朗。击毁空中加油机并伤及愚蠢地停在同一个基地的军人，这是CENTCOM指挥官、参谋长联席会议主席和国防部长共同承担的失误。等到格雷厄姆参议员对卡尔岛的海军入侵发生时就看看吧。硫磺岛是一次代价高昂、血腥的入侵。总之，伟大的分析，比美国有线电视新闻频道的谈话头要好得多。

@Mphonik2013
I am not a military tactician, but I think you have one of a few options when it comes to protecting your military assets. Option one place them out of range which is not always practical. Option number two have the ability to take out 100% of arial attacks, which is extremely difficult. Option number three eliminate 100% of the arial threat at its source, difficult to achieve. Option four Make your assets both physically protected and invisible to foreign surveillance and intel.

我不是军事战术家，但我认为在保护军事资产方面有几种选择。第一种选择是将它们放在安全范围之外，这并不总是实际可行。第二种选择是能够消灭100%的空中攻击，这非常困难。第三种选择是在源头消灭100%的空中威胁，达成这一目标也很难。第四种选择是让你的资产既得到物理保护，又对外部监视和情报隐形。

@JohnnyFastbuck
10% loss in theater, but only 1% of total tanker fleet. If they can't defend an airbase 200 miles away for Iran, how can they defend an island 20 miles from the Iranian mainland.

在战区损失10%，但仅占整个加油机机队的1%。如果他们无法保卫距离伊朗200英里的空军基地，他们如何能保卫距离伊朗大陆20英里的岛屿？

@esters44
What did you expect? Do you really think Iranian's are stupid? You can only push someone so far—at some point, they’re going to respond, and rightfully so.

你期待什么？你真的认为伊朗人愚蠢吗？你只能把某人推得太远——在某个时刻，他们会做出反应，这是合情合理的。

@darthgator639
This is the thing that bothers me. Many years of lessons learned in drone warfare. This is reality now, and legacy weapon systems may not be effective any more. Small smart munitions, with large effect on target. Change your ways or go the way of the dodo's.

这让我感到困扰。这些年来在无人机战争中吸取了许多教训。这就是现在的现实，而传统武器系统可能不再有效。小型智能弹药对目标影响巨大。改变你的做法，否则就会走向灭绝。

@stephenleiperdefault1113
If that first picture is true my first question is why were the aircraft placed like that? Did we learn nothing from WW2? That is just naive layout which a 1st/2nd Lt would work as an easy target

如果那张第一张照片是真的，我首先想问的是为什么飞机会这样停放？我们从二战中什么都没学到吗？这种布局太天真了，初级军官都会觉得这是一个简单的靶子。

@valkry007
a devastating blow against American crucial specialized and limited supply aircraft ! they need to be stationed out of harms way or better defended. this is a bigger blow than than a loss of fighters. not to mention the loss of American lives, sincere condolences to the families.

这是对美国关键专业和有限供应飞机的毁灭性打击！他们需要被部署在安全的地方，或者更好地防御。这比失去战斗机的打击更大，更不用说失去的美国生命，对遇难者的家庭表示诚挚的哀悼。

@jonasbaine3538
Terrible leadership. Launching into a war with no coalition of nations is stupidity

可怕的领导。没有国家联盟就发起战争是愚蠢的。

@Joseph-i7v3v
Hummnn..I thought PEARL HARBOR.. taught America do not park aircraft that close to each other..getting large aircraft under harden cover difficult in such early notice..but no excuse for parking planes basically wing tip to wing tip..commander should lose his authority to run this air operation..until hostility,s are over..!

嗯……我本以为珍珠港事件教会了美国不要把飞机停得那么近……在如此短的时间内将大型飞机放在坚固的掩体下是很困难的……但将飞机停得几乎是翼尖对翼尖，这没有任何借口……指挥官应该失去指挥这一空中行动的权力，直到敌对行动结束为止！

@Pantdino
Politicians don't worry about dead soldiers because soldiers tend to be from the middle and lower classes, not the rich Americans and AIPAC who donate to his fund and thus control him.

政治家们并不担心阵亡士兵，因为士兵往往来自中下层阶级，而不是那些捐款给他的基金并因此控制他的富裕美国人和亲以色列美国公共事务委员会（AIPAC）。

@Video-tu4vn
I do wonder how often senior military personnel struggle with their duty to serve the government of the day, no matter how much they disagree or question the wisdom with their policy and strategy. I know thy are professionals and they train to fight wars but it must weigh on their minds when they are sending the men and women under their command into battle.

我确实想知道高级军官在尽职尽责地为当今政府服务时，会有多么艰难，尽管他们与政策和战略的智慧有许多分歧或质疑。我知道他们是专业人士，并接受过打仗的训练，但当他们将指挥下的男女送入战场时，这必定会让他们感到沉重。

@markb7818
1. I thought the reason you have the tankers involved is to enable the strike assets to be based out of harms way to travel into theatre from a safe place.
2. I thought the KC 135s have plenty of range to keep them similarly remote from theatre.
3. Given that, it’s tricky to understand why this much of the tanker fleet is (presumably that now reads ‘was’) stationed on the closest parking lot to Iran
Not a lot the base commander can do if he pointy head strat guys say it’s a great place to keep em

1.我以为你让加油机参与的原因是为了让打击资产能够从安全的地方出发，避免直接进入战区。
2.我认为KC-135加油机的航程足够远，可以让它们保持在距离战区较远的地方。
3.鉴于此，很难理解为什么这么多加油机（显然现在可以说是“曾经”）被停在距离伊朗最近的停车场。
如果那些高层战略人员说这是一个很好的停放地点，基地指挥官也无能为力。

@charlottelanvin7095
Multiple strikes have occurred on US sites and assets in allied Gulf countries. EWR arrays, signal interception bases and communications assets have been destroyed. US assets and Israel anti missile defenses are thus degraded. This has been widely reported in non US (and not just Iranian) news sources including the BBC. The NYT has only very recently reported on this massive destruction of US assets. The US public is the last to know the truth.

美国在海湾国家的多个站点和资产上发生了多次袭击。预警雷达阵列、信号拦截基地和通信资产已被摧毁。美国资产和以色列的反导防御能力因此受到削弱。这在非美国（不仅仅是伊朗）的新闻来源中广泛报道，包括BBC。纽约时报最近才报道了美国资产的大规模毁坏。美国公众是最后一个知道真相的。