中国登月火箭刚完成了NASA不可能完成的任务 (后续评论)

@danieldipalma704
They say the first person to land on the Moon will be named Long Gon !

他们说，第一个登上月球的人会叫“Long Gon”（龙宫？）！

@TheGoodContent37
Then why they fail to calculate re entry for their rockets anf fall over villages?

那他们为什么连火箭再入轨迹都算不好，结果还掉到村子里？

@bryankeithjohnson1951
The orbital rendezvous profile near the Moon is high-risk, high-reward. This is top-tier engineering.

在月球附近搞轨道交会对接这种方案就是高风险高回报，妥妥的顶级工程水准。

@crabbcake
But your comment isn't 'top-tier' .

但你的评论也算不上“顶级”。

@drwthmpsn7457
Like NASA did back in 1969.

就像 NASA 早在 1969 年干过的一样。
@谢小卓

@drwthmpsn7457 Not a single person on Earth knows how it was done in 1969.

@drwthmpsn7457 1969年那事到底怎么做到的，地球上根本没一个人知道。

@drwthmpsn7457

​ @谢小卓 : even you tube has videos. LOR was thought up as a way to allow the Saturn V to do the moon missions. You've seen the Apollo command module? You've seen the lunar lander? NASA got both to lunar orbit, the lander landed and launched for rendezvous with the command module for the trip home. This worked well enough for 6 missions to land on the moon. If you have no interest to look up info, why bother posting?

@谢小卓：连 YouTube 上都有视频。月球轨道交会对接（LOR）就是为了让土星五号能执行登月任务才想出来的。
你看过阿波罗指令舱吧？也看过登月舱吧？NASA 把这俩都送到了月球轨道，登月舱下去着陆后再起飞，和指令舱在轨道上对接会合，然后一起回家。这套方案够靠谱，成功让 6 次任务在月球着陆。
你要是根本不想自己查资料，那还发帖干嘛？

@twnetf
After viewing this video, I am 100% sure the Apollo program is fake!

看完这个视频，我百分之百确定阿波罗计划是假的！

@AlexGAlexG
If aliens ever turn up and be like "Take us to your leader".... we're gonna look like right simpletons when we're like.... "Errr which one? where abouts did you land.... we dont all work together and certainly dont get along"

要是哪天外星人真来了，说“带我们去见你们的领袖”……我们估计得尴尬死，只能回一句：“呃……你说哪个？你们降落在哪儿啊？我们又不是一条心，更别提大家还老不对付。”

@davidgmaloof
Given the vast distances between the stars, I doubt we need to worry about aliens visiting us any time soon.

考虑到恒星之间的距离那么远，我觉得短期内根本不用担心外星人会来拜访我们。

@CouldntBeMoreRight
Aliens are already here, since the 50s, we just don't talk about them much

外星人早就来了，从上世纪50年代就已经在这儿了，只是我们基本不怎么提而已。

@Starship007
China first moon base. USA behind

中国先建第一个月球基地，美国落后了。

@jamesjonathangonzalez1970
That net-style rocket retri concept is wild! I’d love to see a dedicated video just on the physics of that.

用网来回收火箭这个思路也太离谱了！真想看到一条专门讲它背后物理原理的视频。

@crabbcake
where do you want to watch it ? in the states or in China ?

你想在哪儿看？在美国还是在中国？

@gaim44
@crabbcake Who cares LOL

@crabbcake 谁在乎啊 LOL

@DreamKeeperLive
Why there is no footage of the rocket touching the water . I was look far and wide , but it just cut every time just before water. Very strange.

为什么没有火箭落水的画面？我到处找了半天，但视频每次都在快要碰到水面前就切掉了，挺奇怪的。

@baltoon
Китай - это прогресс.

中国就是进步。

@maewae936
China maxing

中国太猛了

@shandani7215
China has very good AI robots. Why not train the robots and have them do manual tasks.

中国的 AI 机器人已经很厉害了，为什么不把机器人训练起来，让它们去干这些体力活呢？

@twt3716
They are gonna do it. Just a matter of when. Good luck to them.

他们肯定能做到，只是时间早晚的问题。祝他们好运。

@jasonduan1566
China captured aliens on the back of the moon and then burned them with cigarette butts to force them to hand over the latest technology.

中国在月球背面抓了外星人，然后用烟头烫他们，逼他们交出最新科技。

@skrajina8037
LETS GO China!

中国加油！

@lostinspace-m6y
The Artemis 2 Mission is a sure thing on the first of April; scrubbing the mission is still an option on April the second

阿尔忒弥斯2号任务铁定会在4月1日发射（注：愚人节）；不过到了4月2日，临时取消任务还是有可能的

@gregorylayne9044
Five years behind schedule

比原计划晚了五年。

@MicheleLLOYD-bk2mt
Keep whistling in the dark like a frightened little schoolboy....... sad really

继续像个吓坏了的小学生一样，在黑暗里硬着头皮吹口哨吧……真挺可悲的。

@lostinspace-m6y
You'll get over it.

你会慢慢习惯的。

@fredrik3685
Elon "Next Year" Musk will go to Mars. Yes you guessed right, already " Next Year".

“明年就去火星”的马斯克又来了。对，你没猜错，又是“明年”。

@Freedom1776usa
Looks like stage 1 missed its mark when landing.
Are you sure the escape rocket was supposed to fire off?

看起来一级在着陆时没对准落点。
你确定逃逸火箭是应该点火的吗？

@goysloplife
Said it was only a mater of time lol

早就说了这只是时间问题，lol。

@Дмитрий-в8с6б
Китай не остановить!!! Это не американская бутафория!!!

中国势不可挡！！！这可不是美国那种摆拍作秀！！！

@motivator7173
Дуна будет за Китаем!!!

月球是中国的了！！！

@roons1068
The more you know the crazier it is that the US went there in 1969. China couldn't even feed itself properly.

越了解就越觉得不可思议，美国居然在1969年就登月了。那时候中国连饭都不一定吃得饱。

@drzhanga
yet, somehow the US "forgot" how to do it in 2026.

可美国不知怎么的，到了 2026 年就“忘了”该怎么做了。

@americo01able
Amazing!! I see it as a Great Advance for All human kind

太惊人了！！我觉得这对全人类来说都是一次巨大的进步。

@sofatesofate
only able to copy them fucks

只能复制那些傻逼玩意儿。

@WoYaoDieManBUFF
There are only two reasons the U.S. can’t land on the Moon again:
1. Engineers in the relevant fields became “worthless,” got laid off, ended up broke and falling below the “kill line” (KILL LINE), became homeless, and eventually died. The U.S. treated these valuable talents like trash.
2. Hollywood’s “great achievement.”
Pick one—your choice.

美国无法再次登陆月球的原因只有两个：
1.美国相关领域的工程师因为已经毫无价值被解雇穷困潦倒跌落到斩杀线，也就是KILL LINE，成为了无家可归的流浪汉，最后死了，美国把这些宝贵的人才都当垃圾一样看待。
2.好莱坞的伟大成就。
二选一，你们选吧。

@tomleeroy5847
maybe we can ask them to pop by the US's Lunar lander site and finally put the argument of if the US landed there to rest

也许我们可以让他们顺便去美国的登月着陆点逛一圈，彻底把“美国到底有没有登月”这场争论给了结。

@Steven-vo4ee
LM10A supposedly has 7x YF-100K engines on the first stage, not 5x.

据说LM-10A一级装的是7台YF-100K发动机，不是5台。

@GZBenGor
Without the second stage installed, the total mass was too low. With all seven engines running, you’d get about 892 tons of liftoff thrust, which is overkill—acceleration would be too high and could exceed the vehicle’s design limits. That’s why two engines weren’t lit for this test.

没装二级火箭，总重量太轻了，七台发动机全开的话，总共892吨的起飞推力，推力超标了，加速度过大，会超过舰体设计极限，所以有两台发动机这次测试没开

@OskaPa
at least someone is doing something

至少还有人真的在做点事。

@HackedToaster
I see the wolf amendment is working very well

我看“沃尔夫修正案”运行得挺不错的。

@Sarcoma1
that landing net i had in mind in years i was wondering why spacex dont have that system and now i see China did same shit i was thinking years ago

我好多年前就琢磨过那种“着陆网”的方案，一直纳闷为啥 SpaceX 不搞这套。现在一看，中国居然把我当年想到的那套也做出来了。

@reptilexcq2
The moon belongs to China since ancient time!

月球自古以来就属于中国！

@TamNguyen-yk9mn
I'm afraid CIA will sabotage the mission. I hope their security is at its best.

我担心中情局会破坏这次任务，希望他们的安保能做到最好。

@Gandalfthegrey59
China is really leading the way.

中国真的走在前面，太厉害了。

@bluefin4547
SpaceX already done it.

SpaceX 早就做到过了。

@EmanuelRupe
They didn't land where the box was set up.

他们没降落在那个箱子搭好的位置。

@depppp-i9g
They never actually tried to do so

他们其实从来就没真正试过这么做。

@eng.edersonberti
China chegando na lua, onde esta a bandeira EUA?

中国都登月了，美国的国旗呢？

@thatDigitalDen
China is seriously committed to technology! I’m incredibly impressed by their accomplishments and the massive projects they manage. It’s truly impressive.

中国真的很重视科技！他们取得的成就，还有能推进的那些大型项目，真的让人特别佩服，太厉害了。

@Tardos_Mors
Как войти в состав Китая ?

如何加入中国国籍？

@Freedom1776usa
Those grid fins look familiar

那些栅格翼看着挺眼熟的。

@MightySteve001
The grid fins are familiar. The Soviet developed them first.

"这些栅格舵看着很眼熟"， 最早是苏联先搞出来的。

@fredrik3685
Congratulations to from

祝贺中国，来自欧盟的祝福。

@40davegardner
I don't know how I feel about the legitimacy of the first moon landing, but when you consider that it's not been done since because it's so difficult, yet the technology we have now is so far advanced than it was back then, it does make me wonder.

我也说不准第一次登月到底靠不靠谱，但想想看，这事儿后来一直都没再搞成过，因为实在太难了；可现在的技术又比当年先进太多，这就真让人忍不住怀疑了。

@SKubric
AI dont worry my US friends

AI，别担心，我的美国朋友们。

@MayankMadhav-w3l
Did Appolo mission not document it's claimed successful missions. Why would it be so hard to repeat what was done on 1969 by either US or mighty China?

阿波罗任务难道没有把他们宣称的成功登月过程记录下来吗？那为什么不管是美国还是强大的中国，要重现1969年做到的事会这么难呢？

@bobbynamrangwa7091
can you imagine that appolo landed in moon 1969 , until now no any documentary how they prepare importantly why they didn't try 2nd time ?

你能想象吗？阿波罗在1969年就登月了，可直到现在都没什么像样的纪录片讲他们到底怎么准备的。
更关键的是，为什么他们后来就不再试第二次了？

@xuansu9036
Because all of the technology used in Apollo have been obsoleted and technicians who worked with it and built Apollo have all retired and most possibly dead already. So even though documentation may still remain, but it’s as good as not exist at all for a new mission to moon.

因为阿波罗当年用的那些技术现在都过时了，参与研制和操作的技术人员也都退休了，很多可能早就不在了。
所以就算还有文档留着，对新的登月任务来说也几乎等于没用。

@MayankMadhav-w3l
​​ @xuansu9036 new tech is build on or improved on old tech, and all of us who learn and work on far larger memory, computing and more complex electronics could recreate the old obsolete if it really worked. I am only wondering why even US finds it costlier, riskier and harder today than it was in 1969?

@xuansu9036 新技术都是在旧技术基础上发展、改进出来的。我们这些学过、做过更大容量存储、更强算力和更复杂电子系统的人，如果当年的东西真那么好用，现在也完全能把那些早就淘汰的技术复刻出来。
我只是想不明白：为什么连美国自己都觉得，如今做起来反而比1969年更贵、更冒险、更难？

@xuansu9036
@M @MayankMadhav-w3l NASA budget was nearly 6 percent of total federal budget during Apollo. It wasn’t cheap at all.

NASA 在阿波罗时期的预算差不多占联邦总预算的 6%，一点都不便宜。

@gaim44
@MayankMadhav-w3l It’s harder for NASA because of congress funding and restrictions

对 NASA 来说更难，主要是因为国会的拨款和各种限制。

@mutual_assured_destructions4P
@xuansu9036 that doesn't make any sense. So we went to Mars but we'd forgotten how to do that, just believe in us. Try telling that to a lawyer against your case in court.

@xuansu9036 这根本说不通啊。照你这么说，我们当年都去过火星了，但后来又把怎么做给忘了——你就信我们吧。
你试试在法庭上跟对方律师这么说，看你的案子还怎么赢。

@SunshineHelloworld
America no more

美国不行了。

@buttercupfarms
All this but apparently they went in the 60’s? Righto

折腾了这么多，但他们不是说早在60年代就登过月了吗？行吧。

@YanLipavsky
Great !! Good job China face-blue-smiling

太棒了！！干得漂亮，中国!

@youcefboutaleb-e7g
If they succeed, the Chinese will be the first humans to walk on the moon.

如果他们成功了，中国人将会成为第一批登上月球行走的人类。

@ezekielchariot
They can collect and bring back the American flag for a wash and iron !

他们还能顺便把美国国旗带回来洗一洗烫一烫呢！

@yogayoggie2209
If any country can achieve extraordinary, it will be China.

如果有哪个国家能做出非凡成就，那一定是中国。

@RBeach-51r
Are you kidding, tofu concrete, falling bridges and buildings, bad damn construction. Go to the moon? You can't cross a bridge safely.

你开玩笑吧？DF渣工程、桥梁和楼房动不动就塌，施工烂得要命。还想上月球？你们连过个桥都不安全。

@fadate7292
The moon samples that China brought back from lunar mission contained Communism. That proves that Communism was a key constituent of the universe.

中国这次月球任务带回来的月壤样本里居然“含有共产主义”。这说明共产主义是宇宙的关键组成元素。

@vantairen
What the heck is this?

什么玩意？

@KittyKittyCat-vf8zd
China does not roll the dice like we did with the starliner.

中国不像我们对“星际客机”那样瞎赌一把。

@folkert2007
Nobody is going to Mars. What will happen is industrial and military exploitation of the moon an

没人会去火星。真正会发生的是对月球进行工业和军事开发利用。

@nickl1177
Always remember US banned China fr its ISS. They are not to be cooperate with.

永远别忘了，美国把中国排除在国际空间站项目之外，不允许合作。

@Nitrogen786
WHY GO THROUGH ALL THIS TROUBLE.. FINANCIAL MAN POWER TECHNOLOGY. TESTING BUILDING N ALL. JUST GO TO MOON LIKE AMERICA DID. FAKE IT... N IF U GO THE WAY U WANT IN REALITY N GIVE REAL DATA N LIVE FEED USA WILL BE PISSED.

干嘛费这么大劲啊……砸钱、投入人力和技术，又测试又建造什么的。直接学美国那样“登月”不就行了，拍个假的就完事。
反正你要真按自己的路子去做，拿出真实数据、搞实时直播，美国肯定得气炸。

@mutual_assured_destructions4P
haha, SMART!

哈哈，聪明！

@birdseyeview1543
NASA is not in panic, we have no money, they fired half of us, so don't expect much

NASA并没有陷入恐慌，我们只是没钱了，他们裁掉了我们一半的人手，所以别指望能有什么大动作。

@animalfarm7467
Good to see China gives value to the lives of their crews by developing an effective escape capsule. I still remember the anecdotes of NASA mission staff listening to the Challenger astronauts screaming as they plunged to their deaths after a faulty O-ring seal produced by the cheapest supplier let them down and the Space Shuttle exploded. There were anecdotes of some of the crew still being alive as they hit the water. At the time, NASA was considered an acronym for “Need Another Seven Astronauts”.

很高兴看到中国重视航天员的生命安全，研制了有效的逃生舱。
我至今还记得一些说法：挑战者号出事时，因为最便宜的供应商做的 O 形密封圈出了问题，航天飞机爆炸，NASA 的任务人员据说听到了航天员在坠落过程中绝望的尖叫。
还有传闻说，有些机组成员在撞上海面时可能还活着。那阵子，NASA 甚至被人讽刺成 “Need Another Seven Astronauts（还得再来七个宇航员）”。

@김제임스-t4x
우리도.분발해야함.

我们也得加把劲。

@RKYT0
doesnt it make sense to build an orbital gasoline station if we want to fly to the moon more often then? The Fuel you need to get to the orbit is also a large amount. This way you could make your space ship smaller, I'd guess. A smaller space ship again needs less fuel to overcome earth gravitiy, again less space needed for fuel -> smaller rocket.

如果我们想更频繁地飞去月球，那建个轨道上的“太空加油站”不是很合理吗？把燃料先运到近地轨道本身也要花掉一大堆燃料。
这样一来飞船就能做得更小一些吧。飞船变小后，摆脱地球引力需要的燃料也更少，燃料占的空间也更小——于是火箭还能继续做得更小。

@vast634
China is accelerating. Europe is inventing new regulations...

中国在加速前进，欧洲却在忙着制定新规……

@DongaRoad
That net style landing system is stolen from NASA , said by Americans.

那种“网式”着陆系统是从 NASA 偷来的——美国人自己这么说的。

@yaphonghor4409
So, whoever invented the first car should be a trillionaire collecting design fee for centuries?

那照这么说，第一个发明汽车的人是不是就该成万亿富翁，几百年都躺着收设计费？

@LTrotsky21stCentury
Meanwhile, the U.S. is occupied.

与此同时，美国却忙得不可开交。

@hahahuhu9828
or U5 did fake the moon landing and fake the moon sample

或者美国确实造假了登月，还伪造了月球样本。

@snowbell7884
the Moon is China's EEZ other country should stay away from the Moon

月球是中国的专属经济区，其他国家都该离月球远点。

@jamespkinsella5018
I have no hope for profit controled space companies!
The future is Super Power, supported organisations that work for humanity, not profit, as spacex used to dream off.
View of an EU citizen

我对那些以利润为导向的太空公司完全不抱希望！
未来应该是由超级大国支持、为全人类服务而不是为赚钱的组织——就像 SpaceX 以前曾经梦想的那样。
——一位欧盟公民的看法

@Fqdunjy
China does not need Musk. China only needs other countries to have Musk and tell them what to do.

中国不需要马斯克。中国只要别的国家有马斯克，然后告诉他们该怎么做就行了。

@kmmiller8704
China will land the first men on the Moon , for REAL .

中国会成为第一个把人真正送上月球并成功登月的国家。

@jsc3417
Did it miss the target? Was it supposed to land on that platform next to the rocket?

它是不是没打中目标？本来是要降落在火箭旁边那个平台上吗？

@hellojack623
No. As this was the first test. For security reasons. The platform just performed the recovery simulation in parallel by the side.

不是。这毕竟是第一次测试，出于安全考虑，平台只是旁边同步做了个回收模拟。

@jamhardxt
looks like spacex still did it better...

看起来 SpaceX 还是做得更好……

@Bionicbuddha_X
China is being smart by sticking to the reliable Kerolox fuel for thier first and second stage just like Falcon Heavy. Only the smaller additional third stage carries hydrolox fuel.
Meanwhile SLS is taking a big risk with a very large shuttle driven hydrolox first stage. The bigger the liquid hydrogen tank, the higher chance it will leak and cause mission delays. Stupid.

中国挺聪明的，一级二级继续用更可靠的煤油/液氧（Kerolox）推进剂，跟猎鹰重型一样。只有更小的加装三级才用液氢/液氧（Hydrolox）。
反观 SLS，用一个超大的、源自航天飞机的液氢/液氧一级，风险太大。液氢箱越大，越容易漏，结果就是任务一拖再拖。真蠢。

@matsv201
That rocket is basically clone of Falcon 9

那枚火箭基本就是猎鹰9号的复制品。

@gaim44
@matsv201 And your problem with that is???

@matsv201 你对此有什么意见吗？？？

@AlexanderSergeevlch
​ @gaim44 Проблема в том, что ты слишком дерзко разговариваешь, извинись

问题是你说话太冲了，道个歉吧

@gaim44
@AlexanderSergeevlch Nope:)

@AlexanderSergeevlch 绝不 ：）

@matsv201
@gaim44 That its Stolen Space X planes, so it basically is a falcon 9 in every way apart from name

@gaim44 那就是抄了SpaceX的火箭呗，除了名字不一样，基本各方面都跟猎鹰9一模一样。

@Bionicbuddha_X
​ @matsv201 but larger and taller and with a 3rd stage. NASA could have asked SpaceX to do the same with Falcon 9 which was already human rated anyway.
Instead they need to keep thier shuttle contractors employed and happy...and you end up with this.

@matsv201 但它更大、更高，而且还有第三级。NASA 其实完全可以让 SpaceX 用猎鹰 9 做同样的事，反正猎鹰 9 早就通过载人认证了。
结果他们非得让那些航天飞机时代的承包商继续有活干、心里舒坦……于是就搞成现在这样。

@gaim44
@matsv201 So sue them:)

那就去告他们呀：)

@gaim44
@Bionicbuddha_X Its not NASA its congress that funds NASA:)

不是 NASA 的问题，是国会给 NASA 拨款、说了算 :)

@matsv201
@Bionicbuddha_X Its ever so slightly larger, having 20 tons of capacity compare to falcon 9 15.6 tons. Well its claimed to have 20 tons of capacity.
Falcon 9 is to small for any long duration mission with humans. Delivering people to the space station, that is allright, but actually some longer mission don´t work.
That is probobly true for the Chinese copy as well.
"Instead they need to keep thier shuttle contractors employed and happy"
That is ture, but there is a bit more complexity. That new rocket was ordered decades ago, and when it was ordered it kind of made sense. Really falcon 9 can´t do that job. but now with new glen and starship the situation is a bit diffrent

@Bionicbuddha_X 它也就稍微大一点，运力说是20吨，对比猎鹰9号的15.6吨。当然这20吨也只是他们宣称的数据。
猎鹰9号对于任何需要长期载人的任务来说都太小了。把人送到空间站还行，但真要执行更长时间的任务就不太行。
这点对那个中国版“复制品”大概也一样。
“他们只是需要让航天飞机那帮承包商继续有活干、别闹情绪。”

这话没错，但事情更复杂一点。这枚新火箭是几十年前就下的单，当时这么做确实有道理。说真的，猎鹰9号干不了那个活儿。但现在有了新格伦和星舰，情况就不一样了。

@RBeach-51r
Just like "Falcon Heavy," *** copies everyone elses technology.

就跟“猎鹰重型”一样，中G就是在抄别人家的技术。

@gaim44
@RBeach-51r So sue then

那就去告啊。

@RBeach-51r
​@gaim44 Be sensible. Only Elon can sue them.

@gaim44 理智点。只有埃隆才有资格告他们。

@gaim44
@RBeach-51r Why doesnt he oh thats right he has no rights or power in China..LOL

@RBeach-51r 为什么他不去做——哦对了，他在中国既没权利也没实力……LOL

@matsv201
​ @RBeach-51r well its China, so nobody can

@RBeach-51r 嗯，毕竟是中国嘛，所以谁也做不到。

@gaim44
@matsv201 Poor Elon poor baby

@matsv201 可怜的埃隆，可怜的小宝贝。

@RBeach-51r
​@gaim44 Funny thing, *** copies phony tech to set them back years. The *** copies NASA lunar lander from 1968. Nothing original from the ***.

@gaim44 真讽刺，***老爱抄些假技术，结果把自己耽误好几年。现在又在抄1968年NASA的登月着陆器。***一点原创都没有。(***政党或名字 上下同)

@RBeach-51r
​@gaim44 At least Elons boosters land back on the launching pad and not in the water or fall on Chinese citizens.

@gaim44 至少马斯克的助推器能降回发射台，不是掉进海里，也不会砸到中国民众身上。

@Rockall57
People need to ask why is it taking SpaceX loads of launches to still not getvas far forward as BO and China

大家得问问，为啥 SpaceX 发射了那么多次，到现在进度还是没波音和中国快。

@doctoribanez
Capitalism versus Communism. Space X is privately owned.

资本主义对上共产主义。SpaceX 是私人公司。

@M_Jono
​ @doctoribanez Space X runs with US government NASA fund

@doctoribanez SpaceX 是靠美国政府、NASA 的资金在运转的。

@gregorylayne9044
Because they are already 75 years ahead of Chinese and BO and you are talking out of your aszo.

因为他们本来就比中国和波音领先了75年，你这纯属在那儿胡扯。

@porta_jahn
Wtf are you talking about?? The Chinese system is COPYING key aspects of SpaceX innovation. SpaceX caught the world LARGEST rocket with chopsticks on the launch pad whereas China still requires ocean retri. SpaceX is years ahead.

你在说啥呢？？中国的系统是在“照搬”SpaceX创新里的关键做法。SpaceX已经能在发射台上用“筷子”接住世界上最大的火箭了，而中国现在还得靠海上回收。SpaceX领先好几年。

@gaim44
@porta_jahn When you have 100% funding from the government you dont have to worry about things like trying to catching rockets with chop sticks also Elon stole the chop sticks from China:)

@porta_jahn 当你拿着政府100%全额拨款，就不用操心什么“用筷子去接火箭”这种事了。而且马斯克那套“筷子”还是从中国偷学的 :)
@谢小卓

Actually, Chinese people all think SpaceX is a great company. It is very successful commercially.

其实中国人都觉得 SpaceX 是家很厉害的公司，商业上也特别成功。

@boy_markus
your microphone has some nasty high frequency resonances! please check!! not so nice to listen to on a macbook for example

你的麦克风有些很刺耳的高频共振！麻烦检查一下！！比如用 MacBook 听起来就不太舒服。

@aliaydin5348
US gave all the power to rich people to get richer instead of investing into future

美国把所有权力都交给富人，让他们越来越有钱，而不是去投资未来。

@dunai2012
If NASA is sincerely determined to compete with China in moon landing, it should have developed a brand new rocket from scratch rather than rely on SLS. NASA has aplenty of time and enough funds which ended up being wasted.

如果 NASA 真心想在登月上和中国竞争，就该从零开始研发一款全新的火箭，而不是死守 SLS。NASA 时间充裕、资金也不少，结果全被浪费了。

@gaim44
NASA did have a rocket before SLS it was called the Constellation but congress cancelled it

NASA 在 SLS 之前确实有个火箭项目，叫“星座计划”（Constellation），不过后来被国会给取消了。

@kernalrom
Nothing like going to sleep under a red moon

没有什么比在红月亮下睡觉更惬意了。

@tat3179
You do realise that the US have already been to the moon since 1969, right?

你知道美国早在1969年就已经登月了吧？

@gaim44
@tat3179 Yes and still waiting for them to go back:)

@tat3179 是啊，我还在等他们再回去呢 :)
@周馳浩

@tat3179 Maybe he is saying the USSR, first hard landing and first soft landing on the moon.

@tat3179 也许他的意思是：苏联最先在月球实现了硬着陆，也最先实现了软着陆。

@EagerBoxer-ud51N
​ @tat3179 nasa said they lost the technology

@tat3179 NASA 说他们把那套技术弄丢了

@cixsmiley3618
Take the politics out of it been the most grown up nation recently.

别扯政治了，中国最近才是最成熟、最理性的国家。

@Monopek_Cannibal
3:07, If it is not the United States doing this, then it is "evil" and it should be "liberated" immediately, especially if this country has a lot of oil or huge reserves of rare earth metals (scandium, dysprosium, gadolinium, terbium). ✌

3:07，要是不是美国在干这事，那就成了“邪恶”的，得立刻“解放”，尤其是这个国家还有很多石油，或者稀土储量特别大（钪、镝、钆、铽）

@simmogj
*'s not running around dancing to YMCA tunes and being a bozo. He's runming his country and getting on with business. The US space progrm has been hijacked by grifters and bled dry.

***没满世界跟着《Y.M.C.A.》（川普御用党歌）瞎蹦跶、装小丑。他是在管好自己的国家、踏踏实实干正事。美国的太空计划早被一群骗子劫持，榨得一点不剩。
(***名字或政党 上下同)