中国宁德时代正在打造一个价值万亿美元的电动船舶产业

@geoffreykeating8172
Why can't ships charge as they move through the

船在水里航行时为啥不能边走边充电呢？

@TexasRiverRat31254
Thank you! Meanwhile the USS Ford at $13 BILLION dollars isn't "battle ready" because it' doesn't have enough toilets......

谢谢！与此同时，耗资130亿美元的“福特号”航母却因为厕所不够用而无法“战斗部署”……

@larryc1616
Sailors are shitting bricks from fear of hypersonic death is clogging up all the toilets.

水兵们都被高超音速武器吓到拉不出屎，把所有厕所都堵死了。

@superfuss1984
They found a Shirt in the Plumbing with written "I dont want to Die here" on it....

他们在管道里发现了一件写着“我不想死在这儿”的T恤……

@fawadali135 @superfuss1984
the US leaders are perfectly happy to send someone else’s kid to die. While they and their kids go to Epstein Island.

美国政客们巴不得送别人家的孩子去送死，而他们自己和孩子却去爱泼斯坦岛逍遥快活。

@SafepathUS
Seems as they're crapping themselves because of so many other aircraft carriers and plus Iran's hypersonic missiles made by China and that's not counting submarines etc etc

看起来他们是被那么多其他国家的航母，还有伊朗那些中国制造的高超音速导弹给吓到失禁了，这还没算上潜艇之类的呢

@davidlazarus67
LMFTFU The USS Ford is not toilet ready.

笑死我了，“福特号”连厕所都没准备好。

@booneulidan1077
uSS Ford battle ready but NOT toilet ready. It is already smelling pungent all the way to hell!!!

“福特号”战斗准备就绪，但厕所没准备好。那味儿已经一路飘到地狱了！！！

@Robo_au-j9o
Don't need toilets , they all gunna shit themselves together when hypersonics punch thru the flight deck and exit out thru the keel

根本不需要厕所，等高超音速导弹穿透飞行甲板、从龙骨穿出的时候，他们全都得一起拉裤子。

@FunnyBunny-pd5xx
The Gerald R Ford is already engaged in battling sewage.lol

“杰拉尔德·R·福特号”已经在跟污水系统作战了，哈哈。

@CowboyBillUSA
Now throw a micro molten salt thorium nuclear reactor onboard, and you have unlimited-range ships with an electric-drive propulsion system.

现在只要在船上装个微型熔盐钍基核反应堆，就能拥有无限续航的电力推进舰船了。

@antwango
BINGO!! and damn you beat me to it!! I also added that BYD have some sort of automated bespoke BYD cargo vessel... and im pretty sure either the plaN or the coastguard has shown off an automated patrol drone ship catamaran thing

说对了！！！可恶，被你抢先一步了！！我还想补充，比亚迪好像搞了个定制化的全自动比亚迪货船……而且我敢肯定，要么是解放军海军，要么是海警，已经展示过一种双体无人巡逻艇了。

@JoJo-f7j6l @antwango
Please seek out a competent mental health professional

建议去找个靠谱的心理医生看看

@ZweiZwolf
Thorium reactors will be on Chinese military ships, as nuclear ships can't dock at some commercial ports.

钍基反应堆会用在中国军舰上，因为核动力船没法停靠某些商业港口。

@FabioCapela @ZweiZwolf
The issue with nuclear reactors and most ports is the risk of a meltdown — but for a sealed Thorium reactor, a meltdown is physically impossible in a literal sense; if the reaction becomes uncontrolled, the increase in temperature slows down the nuclear reaction and makes the reactor shut down instead.

核反应堆和大多数港口的问题在于熔毁风险，但对于密封式钍基反应堆来说，物理上就不可能发生熔毁。一旦反应失控，温度升高反而会减缓核反应，让反应堆自动停机。

@hungmeow8284
THAT WILL BE USED ON THEIR MILITARY SUBS, AIRCRAFT CARRIERS, CRUISERS, FRIGATES AND CIVILIAN WITH HELP OF RUSSIA ICE BREAKERS IN THE BALTIC

这玩意儿会用在他们的军用潜艇、航母、巡洋舰、护卫舰上，民用方面则会借助俄罗斯的破冰船在波罗的海航行。

@FrancoisEustache-ed6gd
nuclear reactors have to be able to run all the time and generate the same base load electricity. You have to find ways to dissipate that energy when the motors are not running.

核反应堆必须持续运行并输出稳定的基载电力。当推进电机不工作时，你得想办法把这些多余的能量消耗掉。

@superfuss1984
You can charge Batteries for Swapping on it. Or run a On-Onboard Desalination with the Excess and sell the Water in Harbours...

可以在上面给换电用的电池充电，或者用多余的电力搞海水淡化，然后在港口卖水……

@astargen @FrancoisEustache-ed6gd
Extra power can be discharged to the sea.

多余的电力可以直接排进海里。

@ZweiZwolf @FrancoisEustache-ed6gd
How fortunate for China being by far the world leader in energy storage, with the world's largest and most efficient electrical batteries.

中国真是幸运，作为全球绝对领先的储能大国，拥有全球最大、最高效的电池技术。

@Tarcus32
We aren’t going to see nuclear powered commercial ships. The nuclear reactor would be a nightmare for an insurance company and how would you guarantee or inspect maintenance for such an item? That thing could easily be a mobile ticking time bomb that could explode in any country it docks in.

我们不会看到核动力商船的。核反应堆对保险公司来说就是噩梦，而且你怎么保证或检查这种东西的维护状况？这玩意儿很容易变成一个移动的定时炸弹，在任何一个停靠的国家都可能爆炸。

@mrchongnoi
DJT is going old school. Coal and Oil. Soon he will bring back Steam engines for trains.

懂王这是要复古了，煤炭和石油。下一步是不是要把蒸汽火车头也请回来了？

@trevornorman7563
the septic tanks will be going back to sails soon for get coal or oil

看来化粪池船很快就要回归风帆时代，好去运煤和石油了。

@oldnhazy8796
Yep. No more plastics, or coding, or any other of that stuff we've been fed over the years about how to do better. The future in the US is blacksmithing. Someone's got to make those steam engines.

没错。什么塑料、编程，还有这些年灌输给我们的那些“进步”玩意儿都不要了。美国的未来是铁匠铺，总得有人去造那些蒸汽机啊。

@davidrobinson2571 @oldnhazy8796
Most US Nuclear powered carriers and submarines and warships use steam turbine engines ..

美国大部分核动力航母、潜艇和战舰用的都是蒸汽轮机发动机……

@Chubbchubb2313
Did you happen to hear JD Vance declare "new age of Power, Conquest, Colonization, and Slavery " .He forgot to mention GENOCIDE .And don't forget Hegseth: he's the "General Patton" wannabe.Notice no one in Trump Cabinet actually has seen real Military Service/Combat.

你听说JD·万斯喊出“权力、征服、殖民和奴役的新时代”了吗？他还忘了提“种族灭绝”。别忘了赫格塞斯，他可是个想当“巴顿将军”的主。注意看，特朗普内阁里压根没人真正上过战场打过仗。

@mahbrum @Chubbchubb2313
Are you sure it wasn't Rubio that stated that? I saw a clip of Rubio stating that.

你确定不是卢比奥说的吗？我好像看过卢比奥说这话的片段。

@Robo_au-j9o
Diaper Don wants to bring back steam catapults and trump class battleships

尿布唐（指特朗普）想把蒸汽弹射器和“川普级”战列舰都带回来。

@skyw4278
Good morning from rural canada

来自加拿大乡村的早安问候。

@TomMcCo
I grew up rural canada (Nova Scotia) but have lived in Bogota Colombia for many years. I listen for no other reason than to get a realistic picture of what is going on in China. Something legacy media has been incapable of doing.

我在加拿大乡村（新斯科舍省）长大，但在哥伦比亚波哥大住了多年。我听这个频道，纯粹是为了了解一个真实的中国，这是西方主流媒体完全做不到的。

@Robo_au-j9o @TomMcCo
MSM , Gordon Chan still saying China's economy is collapsing, but it's US that's collapsing

西方主流媒体（MSM）和戈登·陈还在嚷嚷中国经济要崩溃，其实崩溃的是美国自己。

@Beav56
This will happen far sooner than people are ready for, something like swapping containers full of charged batteries at any port...

这事发生的速度会比人们预想的快得多，比如在任何港口直接更换装满电的电池集装箱……

@ZweiZwolf
It's already happening in China.

这在中国已经开始了。

@jawadad73
any idea how expensive 'popping in and out of a port is for vessels? and there aint many ports between Aucland NZ and Panama city...

知道船进出港口的费用有多贵吗？而且从新西兰奥克兰到巴拿马城之间也没几个港口啊……


@RJ-pe6uj
China is the future for the World.

中国就是世界的未来。

@mosfet9915
...Nope. China is the "here and now".

不对，中国就是“此时此地”。

@FunnyBunny-pd5xx
Beijing has already proved in a six month period it is more profitable to export/sell China's Green Energy Technology to other countries,than The US Military Industrial Complex selling its weaponary.

北京已经用半年时间证明，向他国出口/销售中国的绿色能源技术，比美国军工复合体卖武器更赚钱。

@wlyiu4057
Not yet. It has to ultimately defeat America in the Sino-American war and expunge it from the pages of history. Only then can you speak of China being the future.

还没到时候。中国必须在中美战争中彻底击败美国，并将其从历史书上抹去。只有那时，才能说中国代表未来。

@cruzn4ever169 @wlyiu4057
look again China HAS expunged usa and Made usa irrelevant.

再看看吧，中国已经把美国踢出局，让它变得无关紧要了。

@wlyiu4057 @cruzn4ever169
Do not fool yourself with wishful thinking.

别用一厢情愿的想法欺骗自己。

@wlyiu4057 @rockets4kids
These are just words. Narratives. What actually matters is the outcome of organized violence, namely, the Sino-American war. It isn't just inevitable. It isnecessary.

这些都只是空话和叙事。真正重要的是有组织暴力的结果，也就是中美战争。这不仅是必然的，更是“必要”的。

@ZweiZwolf @wlyiu4057
It won't happen, because the US doesn't fight equals much less superiors. The US only bullies weaker, developing countries. In WW1 and WW2, the US didn't step in until AFTER the rest of the world was committed. 80% of German forces were fighting Russia. The entire Japanese army was tied down in China, which is how Russia just crushed the garrison in Manchuria. Last year, the Rand Corporation advised the US to avoid provoking China, to dissuade Taiwan from declaring independence because they implicitly understand they would lose a hot war, and wouldn't necessarily "win" a nuclear exchange (Russia and NK would also be drawn in, while Pakistan might decide to take out Israel).

这不会发生的，因为美国从不跟势均力敌、更别说比它强的对手正面硬刚。美国只敢欺负弱小的发展中国家。一战二战，美国都是等全世界都打起来了才下场。

80%的德军在跟苏联死磕，整个日本陆军都被中国拖住，这才让苏联轻松碾碎了关东军。去年，兰德公司就建议美国不要挑衅中国，要劝阻台湾（地区）“独立”，因为他们心里清楚，真打热战美国必输，核战也不一定能“赢”（俄罗斯和朝鲜会被卷入，巴基斯坦甚至可能顺手灭了以色列）。

@johnstephens6809
I have followed you for almost 3 yrs. You are the best for future. Studies.

我关注你快三年了，你对未来的研究是最棒的。

@georgekostaras
China single handedly fighting climate change and building productivity in one go

中国正单枪匹马地同时应对气候变化和提升生产力。

@SevenBee-q2j
CATL is another astounding Chinese company, innovating every year new ideas it takes the US &West take a decade to look at, then get wrong.

宁德时代是又一家令人惊叹的中国企业，每年都在创新，而这些新点子，美西方往往要花十年才注意到，然后还搞错了。

@kngharv
hence, it's on US' entity list!

所以，它上了美国的实体清单！

@FabioCapela
AFAIK CATL has more engineers and scientists on its payroll focused on pushing forward battery tech than every single battery company outside China added together. The only company that can compete with it in battery R&D is the also Chinese BYD.And to make things even more interesting, I believe China forces Chinese companies to collaborate to an extent western ones don't, so not only even smaller Chinese battery companies get access to new battery tech companies outside China don't, the leaders — CATL and BYD — benefit from research done by the smaller players too.

据我所知，宁德时代在电池技术研发上投入的工程师和科学家，比中国以外所有电池公司的总和还多。唯一能在电池研发上与之竞争的，也只有同为中国的比亚迪。

更有意思的是，我认为中国会推动国内企业进行某种程度的合作，这是西方公司做不到的。因此，不仅是中国的小型电池公司能接触到西方没有的新技术，像宁德时代和比亚迪这样的龙头企业，也能从小公司的研究成果中获益。

@JoJo-f7j6l @FabioCapela
50 cents

给你五毛钱

@PhiloSurfer @JoJo-f7j6l
Your only comeback is such puerile comment - shows your level of intelligence and faculty.

你的回应就只有这种幼稚的评论，充分暴露了你的智商和能力水平。

@prajnasamadhi60 @JoJo-f7j6l
Don't project yourself into play.

别把自己代入进去。

@garyoakham9723
Meanwhile the us just declared measles a hoax

与此同时，美国刚刚宣布麻疹是个骗局。

@cruzn4ever169
Wow - This analysis leaves me speechless. I want to Live in China ❤

哇——这个分析让我无话可说。我想去中国生活

@grandwonder5858
China builds ships
USA builds bombs

中国造船，
美国造炸弹。

@peternguyen9386
China builds everything
USA destroy everything

中国建设一切，
美国毁灭一切

@danielg7868
That about sums it up.

总结得太到位了。

@Robo_au-j9o
Now if US built bombs faster than they used them they could have a stockpile, but stockpiles we're all used up on GENOCIDE in Gaza

要是美国造炸弹的速度能赶上它们使用速度，或许还能有点库存。可惜库存全在加沙搞种族灭绝用光了。

@ColinZakery
The best food for thought channel going. Thank you Kev

目前最有思想深度的频道。谢谢Kev。

@marvinfok65
It is an enormous impact for the world as the hundreds of thousands of ocean going vessels releasing huge amount of carbon dioxide.

这对世界影响巨大，毕竟成千上万艘远洋船舶排放着巨量的二氧化碳。

@RomanVarl
Short-voyage electric ferries/riverboats is the future

短途电动渡轮/河船才是未来。

@rfengr00
Polar routes will factor into this too.

极地航线也会成为其中的重要一环。

@davidlazarus67
Especially if they are sodium ion, which is more resistant to low temperatures.

尤其是如果用钠离子电池的话，因为它更耐低温。

@thomasrogers9146
China IS THE FEATURE.
AMERICA IS TOO BUSY FIGHTING WARS.

中国就是未来。
美国忙着打仗呢。

@dondomingo6578
Yeah. Our leaders work tirelessly for their financial backers: Israel

是啊，我们的领导人不知疲倦地为他们的金主——以色列——服务。

@NormanMoffatt-t7k
Take the engine room out of a merchant ship and you have a lot of free space.

把商船的机舱拆了，你就有了大片的自由空间。

@davefroman4700
Considering CATL has batteries in development that are over 600wh/kg now? I can see this becoming a reality a lot sooner than most people think.

考虑到宁德时代正在研发能量密度超过600Wh/kg的电池？我觉得这比大多数人想的要更快成为现实。

@ramonching7772
Oh oh. CATL is going to become a US national security threat.

哦豁，宁德时代要变成美国的“国家安全威胁”了。

@Robo_au-j9o
US are biggest security threat globally

美国才是全球最大的安全威胁。

@QuietManRules
The Dragon is fully awake

巨龙已然苏醒

@MyWayOrTakeAHike
Freight ships should tow floating batteries behind them which can be switched to a fresh one when power runs low.

货船应该在后面拖一个浮动电池，电量低了就换一个新的。

@samiktiri
The Chinese will single handedly destroy oil demand . Drip by drip , slowly but surely .

中国人会亲手终结石油需求，一滴一滴地，缓慢但坚定地。

@patallen229
Oil for products is always going to be here. But the stupidity of burning it for energy is going away

石油作为化工原料会长期存在，但把它烧掉来获取能量的愚蠢做法，终将被淘汰。

@FabioCapela @patallen229
Not quite.For everything made from oil, we have at least one alternative that doesn't require drilling for oil; the US made sure to create the full suite of petrochemical substitutes back in the 70s Oil Crisis. We just use oil because due to how much of it we already drill for, it has become very price competitive, to the point it makes no business sense to try to go for alternatives; fuels are essentially subsidizing petrochemicals.If we stop burning oil for fuel, then petrochemicals will need to pay for the full cost of prospecting, extracting, transporting, and refining oil — at which point the alternatives become very enticing, and potentially more cost-effective than petrochemicals.

不完全是这样。对于所有石油制品，我们至少都有一种无需开采石油的替代品；早在70年代石油危机时，美国就确保了全套石化替代品的研发。我们现在用石油，只是因为开采量太大，导致价格极具竞争力，以至于用替代品在商业上根本不划算，本质上是燃料在补贴石化产品。

如果我们停止烧油作燃料，那么石化产品就得承担勘探、开采、运输和炼化的全部成本——到那时，替代品就会变得非常有吸引力，甚至可能比石化产品更便宜。

@ZweiZwolf
China hit Peak Oil about 2 years ago, and is tapering very slowly as they close in on their 2030 Peak Carbon goal. China will be almost flat through 2030 as they build the world's largest strategic reserves, while usage emissions fall rapidly. In 2030, China will formally confirm "Peak Carbon" and then stop buying from Western-lixed regimes as they push to 2060 "Net Zero Carbon".

中国大约在两年前就达到了石油消费峰值，目前正在缓慢下降，以实现2030年“碳达峰”目标。到2030年之前，中国的石油消费将基本持平，同时快速降低使用排放，并建立全球最大的战略储备。

2030年，中国将正式确认“碳达峰”，之后将停止从与西方有关联的政权购买石油，并全力冲刺2060年“碳中和”目标。

@ratbert1
Saw an interview with a Chinese academic, he said “the Stone Age didn’t end because we ran out of stones, it ended because we made better materials eg metal, similarly the fossil fuel age will not end because we run out of fossil fuels, it will end because we develop better alternatives”.

看到一位中国学者的采访，他说：“石器时代结束，并非因为我们用光了石头，而是因为我们发明了更好的材料，比如金属。同样，化石燃料时代也不会因为我们耗尽了化石燃料而终结，而是因为我们开发出了更好的替代品。”

@Zerpentsa6598
It scares the US because when the world needs to buy less oil with USD, the US is cooked.

这让美国感到害怕，因为一旦世界不再需要用美元买油，美国就完蛋了。

@j_k_rz
Do Androids Dream of Electric Ships?

仿生人会梦见电动船吗？


@machutmiagml
This would be mind boggling if the Chinese pull this off

如果中国人真能做到这一点，那简直难以置信

@marvinfok65
China is changing the world it had never seen before.

中国正在改变这个世界，其方式是前所未有的。

@Pod_Mthayzo
Impeccable presentation as always ❤

一如既往的完美呈现❤

@ianjco60
Northern route already done, shorter and geopolitically safer, combined with offshore wave power charging and or battery swapping.

北极航线已经打通，更短且地缘政治上更安全，再结合海上波浪能充电或电池更换。

@davidlazarus67
How can a copycat nation be ahead in robotics? Simple it’s not a copycat anymore.

一个“山寨”国家怎么会在机器人领域领先？很简单，因为它早就不是山寨了。

@Zerpentsa6598
Japan started the same way. In fact, everyone starts by copying. You learn by copying as a child. Then you copied your teachers and mentors.

日本也是这么起步的。事实上，所有人一开始都是靠模仿。小时候学东西就是靠模仿，后来模仿老师和导师。

@davidlazarus67 @Zerpentsa6598
Not just Japan, South Korea as well. Even the USA was a copycat country for years. They copied the top brands and technologies from Europe.

不只是日本，韩国也一样。就连美国也曾当了多年的“山寨”国家，从欧洲抄袭顶级品牌和技术。

@akakakakakak3084
Every countries has been copycated in order to learn fast, even a child is a copycat when the parents teach the child how to talk and write

每个国家为了快速学习都曾“山寨”过，就像小孩学说话写字时也是在模仿父母

@FrancoisEustache-ed6gd
For large cargo ships IMO swappable 4th generation Small Modular Nuclear Reactor with a ten years cycle make more business sense.

对于大型货船而言，IMO（国际海事组织）认为，采用可更换的第四代小型模块化核反应堆（十年换料周期）在商业上更有意义。