香港警方击毙一名手持 30 厘米长刀的男子

@aburaselshontu
I think as I can see from the video that the knife holder was going to stab the women if police didn't use lethal weapon

从视频内容来看，我认为要是警方当时没有使用致命武器
那个拿刀的家伙肯定就要捅那个女人了

@Connetification
Stab the woman or not. He took someone as hostage. Justified.

不管他有没有刺向那名女子，他挟持了人质，警方的处置完全合理

@raymondwong2159
 @Connetification  a hostage situation doesnt always require shooting, in this case they had absolutely no choice.

人质事件并非每次都需要开枪处置，但在这起事件中，警方确实别无选择。


@clutchmaticxb
​​ @Connetification she became a hostage because she refused to let go her bag. she could have been shot as well as she was in the line of fire. Best action in this situation is to let your belongings go
 
她之所以沦为人质，就是因为她死活不肯松手放开她的包。她本来也可能会挨枪子儿的，因为她挡在了射击路线上。在这种情况下，最明智的做法就是放弃你的财物


@ceon_yan0901
​​​ @clutchmaticxb  It is a crossbody bag. She had no time to let go of the bag in such short period of time. It happened in the blx of an eye and she had no time to react. Also you can see that the woman is not holding her bag at all, her hands was not holding anything, it was because the man pulled her bag and it seems stuck around her neck, so she cannot let go of it. But I appreciate your advice, if it happen to us in the future and we have time to react, better save our lives than our property. Property can be bought again but our lives cannot.

这是一个斜挎包。事发太过突然，她根本没时间把包松开。整件事发生在转瞬之间，她完全来不及反应。
而且你也能看到，这名女子根本就没有抓着包，她的双手什么都没拿。

是那个男人拽住了她的包，包带好像卡在了她脖子上，所以她才没办法挣脱。
不过还是很感谢你的建议，要是以后我们遇到类似情况，且还有时间反应的话，肯定是保命要紧，财物都是身外之物。
没了财物可以再买，但生命一旦失去就再也回不来了。


@never4ever386）
 @Connetification You don’t just shoot someone because they hold  a hostage. This trigger happy American mentality is what’s wrong with the world. But the policewomen shooting him as he was about to stab the lady was definitely justified

不能仅仅因为有人挟持了人质，就直接开枪击毙他。这种动辄开枪的美式思维，正是当今世界的弊病所在。
但在这起事件里，那名女警在嫌犯即将刺向女子的瞬间果断开枪，此举无疑是完全合理的。

@koushinGLF
 @never4ever386  Let's see if you can say that again once you are the hostage.

等你自己成了人质，你再说这话试试

@SquidGameFan_2972
It was probably just centimetres from her neck, police acted in the last second, if not, I think she would have died

刀刃当时离她的脖子恐怕只有几厘米的距离，警方在千钧一发之际果断采取了行动。若非如此，我想她恐怕已经没命了。

@dannywong5611
HK Police did an outstanding job!

香港（特区）警察表现出色！

@rotikacangmerah
I hope the lady gets treatment for trauma too 

我希望那位女士能得到心理创伤治疗

@DavidFoo-kh4ri
The police "difficult but decisive decision" probably saved many lives

警方这一“艰难但果断的决定”可能挽救了许多生命

@reckless110
The police did the right thing. There's no point in sparing these criminals who seek to destroy innocent lives.

警方的做法完全正确。对于这些企图残害无辜性命的罪犯，根本不值得手下留情。


@teenytinyT
No other police force I know of can respond to calls for help that fast (I mean arriving at the crime site), before any members of the public get hurt. Also surprised at how fast their response to shoot was considering the knife looked to be only 30-50cm away from the lady. Very professional indeed

据我所知，没有其他执法机构能在这么短的时间内响应求助电话（我是说赶到犯罪现场），而且是在任何平民受伤之前。
考虑到刀子距离那位女士看起来只有30-50厘米，警方开枪的反应速度之快也让我很惊讶。确实非常专业

@hlamp
Let alone shooting, I think it’s very rare that they unholster guns compared to other places, so they were VERY decisive.

别说开枪了，我觉得相比于其他地方，他们拔枪的情况都很少见，所以这次他们的行动是非常果断的

@BITStudioCode
reasonable lethal force

合理的致命武力

@masutabeshow
The officer did the right thing.

警官做了正确的事。

@CommanderSlayers
Mind you unlike American police, officers in Asia never usually pulls out a gun on a suspect even if things are going south and even then they would just point their gun only. Firing is only seen as a last resort should the situation be VERY dire which is crazy to see.

需要注意的是，和美国警方不同，亚洲地区的警察即便在局势恶化的情况下，通常也不会对嫌疑人掏枪，就算真的掏枪，也仅仅是举枪警告而已。
开枪射击只会被视为万不得已的最后手段，且仅在局势极度危急时才会使用，这一点真的很令人敬佩。

@jevonoryvil3012
The guy must be going through some tough times, but he crossed a line when he dragged an innocent into the mess, all chances and sympathies are deservedly out the window at that point.

那家伙肯定正经历什么难处，但当他把一个无辜的人拖进这摊浑水时，就已经越界了。到了这个地步，所有的同情心理所当然地都应该被抛之脑后

@bunbun4048
This happens daily in the US. Lol

这种情况在美国每天都在发生。哈哈

@JamesSpazer
The police just saved millions of tax payers money by getting rid of that guy.

警方除掉此人，省下了纳税人的数百万资金

@Stigmaru
There was a homeless guy carrying a huge machete in DTLA and I called the cops. They never came. But hey we now care more about pulling people out of their homes and cars to check if they are citizens.

洛杉矶市中心有个流浪汉扛着一把大砍刀，我报了警，但警方压根没派人来。不过你猜怎么着？如今警方反而更热衷于把民众从家里、车里揪出来，盘查他们的公民身份。

@Seramics
Amazing police job, lightning fast n decisive to save an innocent life.

警方处置太出色了，反应迅如闪电、果断利落，成功救下了一条无辜的生命。

@Shpicys
If this was in the US, there would be protest on why the man was a "victim" and should not have been shot.

这事要是搁在美国，肯定会有人上街抗议，叫嚣着这名男子是 “受害者”，不该被开枪击毙。

@jakeistired
lots of knife incidents in asia recently, very sad

近来亚洲地区持刀伤人事件频发，实在令人痛心。

@Rishabh-Dev
Direct killed him? Why no use of tazer gun first?

直接击毙了？ 为什么不先用电击枪呢？


@KCRC_YELLOW_HEAD
They dont have tazers

他们没有电击枪

@extremel.z.s3140
Even if they had tazers, it might not work as some people got higher endurance than others

就算配备了电击枪，也未必能奏效
因为有些人的忍耐力（或痛觉耐受度）比常人要高得多。

@azul1964
Police did a correct decision. He reacted to the guys actions. However if the police had shot earlier, when the guy is closing the girl, the police could have used non lethal shot

警察做出了正确的决定。他们是根据那家伙的行为做出的反应
不过，要是警方能在嫌疑人逼近女子时就提前采取行动，原本是可以使用非致命性手段的。

@SamFishingChannel
I don’t understand why police are sometimes blamed when they use lethal force against people who pose a real and immediate danger. If police don’t act, innocent people can be seriously harmed or killed. That puts officers in an impossible position: if they don’t intervene decisively, they’re blamed for failing to protect the public; if they do, they’re blamed for using force. This kind of scrutiny can make it harder for police to act quickly in critical situations. At the same time, it can send the message that there are few consequences for serious wrongdoing, which may embolden criminals—especially those with power or influence who often seem to evade accountability. It’s deeply frustrating and reflects how broken and unfair the system can feel.

我实在无法理解，为什么警察在面对真实且紧迫的危险时使用致命武力，有时要遭到指责

倘若警方不采取行动，无辜民众就可能受到重伤甚至死亡。
这让警察陷入了两难的绝境：要是不果断出手干预，会被指责未能保护公众安全；要是果断采取行动，又会因使用武力而遭到诟病。

这种严苛态度，会让警方在危急关头更难迅速做出反应。与此同时，这还会传递出一种不良信号 —— 犯下严重过错的人几乎不会受到什么惩戒，
而这或许会助长犯罪分子的嚣张气焰，尤其是那些有权势或人脉的人，他们往往能轻易逃避责任追究。
这种现状实在令人深感挫败，也恰恰反映出这个体系有时会显得多么僵化失衡、有失公允。


@MachaFish
See, in this case, this was absolutely justified. A sad situation, yes. 
But clearly lethal force was necessary in order to save the life of the woman, who was clearly an innocent victim. 
I live in the United States. A few years ago, a local police officer shot an unarmed man in the back. 
Huge difference. 
I don't think I would feel nearly as scared walking the streets of Hong Kong, as I would walking outside of my apartment right now. 
That poor woman must be traumatized. I hope she is able to recover and move on from this awful incident. I hope her life is more peaceful in the future.

你看，就这件事而言，警方的处置绝对是正当合理的。诚然，这是一场令人痛心的悲剧。
但为了救下那名明显无辜的受害女子，使用致命武力显然是当时的必要之举。

我本人住在美国。几年前，当地一名警察从背后开枪打死了一名手无寸铁的男子。
这两件事有着天壤之别。
我现在觉得，走在香港（特区）的街道上可能远没有走出我自家公寓大门那么让我感到害怕。

那位可怜的女士想必会留下严重的心理创伤。希望她能挺过这场噩梦，走出这起可怕事件的阴影。也祝愿她往后的人生能重归安宁


@kindface
The police did the right thing.
Nothing more need be said.

警方做了正确的事。
无需多言。


@trafficgod8882
I fully support what the police did. I read with disbelief that there are negative comments about the police here. I wonder what would people who posted these negative comments about the police say if the hostage was one of their loved ones. Well done Hong Kong Police,  the officers involved acted with bravery, dedication and precision. In contrary to giving the police negative comments, I would give them a medal.

我完全支持警方的所作所为。看到网上竟然有批评警方的负面言论，我实在难以置信

我在想，如果当时那个被劫持的人质是那些发表负面评论者的至亲，不知道他们还会说什么
干得好，香港（特区）警察！涉事警员表现出了勇敢、敬业和精准的判断
比起对警方恶语相向，我更想为他们颁发奖章。

@TrainDaBestJP
this is the real use of a weapon. Not like how ICE did it. Nice job, hope that woman stays safe.

这才是武器的真正用途。不像移民执法局那样。干得好，希望那个女人平安无事。


@wh3596
I'm surprised it too so long.  In North America (Canada and especially the US) the police will shoot the "Actor" within seconds.  Even if the "Actor" is welding a stapler with no one around him.

我很惊讶这事居然拖了这么久。在北美地区（加拿大，尤其是美国），警方会在几秒钟内就开枪击毙这名 “滋事者”—— 哪怕此人只是拿着订书机，周围根本没有旁人。

@trevornorman7563
have always found the Chinese police friendly and helpful, i am glad they also are responsive in the right way when they need to be to save a life. from the uk, well done the police

我一直觉得中国警察待人友善、乐于助人。我也很欣慰，在需要挺身而出拯救生命的时刻，他们同样能以恰当的方式迅速响应。我来自英国，为这些警察的表现点赞！

@247_corn_master
wow!! well done HK police. if this happens in america, many more would be dead. they would gather much more police with automatic rifles, they will unleash hundreds of bullets far away. bloodbath

哇！香港（特区）警方干得太漂亮了！这事要是发生在美国，伤亡人数只会多得多。
那边的警方会调来大批荷枪实弹的警员，扛着自动步枪，在老远的地方就扫射上百发子弹，简直就是一场血腥屠杀。


@gpcheng87
The police definitely did the right thing! Looks like the woman also did the right thing - stay calm and make yourself small to protect your vital organs and not get in the way of the police. Hope she recovers mentally

警方的做法绝对是正确的！看得出来，这位女士的应对也很妥当 —— 保持冷静，蜷缩身体护住要害部位，同时不干扰警方的行动。希望她能早日走出心理创伤。

@your_boyfriend272
To all disagree that the police shoot him, let me put you in the victim situation where the knife wielding guy going to stab you once he sees you and you can't do anything because you can't do anything and no one going to save you from all of those people around you because they don't want to get killed alongside with you. Now you know why the police shoot the criminal instead saving them, their first rule save the victim 2nd rule disarm the suspeck if they see resistance they can use force to stop the suspect in  an instant that's what my grand father rules when he was active police chief before.

那些质疑警方开枪行为的人，不妨换位思考一下：假设你就是受害者，当那个持刀歹徒一见到你就挥刀刺来，
你却无力反抗，周围的人也因为害怕和你一同丧命而袖手旁观、无人施救 

到了这个时候，你就会明白警方为什么选择击毙歹徒，而非对其手下留情。警方的首要原则是拯救受害者，其次才是解除嫌疑人的武装。
一旦遭遇嫌疑人反抗，警方有权立刻使用武力将其制伏。这是我祖父当年担任警察局长时，一直奉行的准则。