中国天宫空间站对比国际空间站：为何内部感觉比NASA的更现代？

@KevinHall_6503
Designing with efficiency in mind shows everywhere on Tiangong.

以效率为核心的设计体现在天宫的方方面面。

@Steven-s2f
We appreciate Tiangong's cool technology. But ISS still hold its glory at the time. Both are great mile stone of humanity.

我们欣赏天宫的先进技术。但国际空间站（ISS）目前仍保有它的辉煌。两者都是人类伟大的里程碑。

@eyuma3120
that shaky treadmill scares me

那台晃动的跑步机吓到我了

@TheKkpop1
ISS is about to retire, Tiancong is adding more technology surprises every day.

国际空间站即将退役，天宫每天都在增添更多科技惊喜。

@russellpaulsson
No, india also have one

不，印度也有一个

@DavisXu-v4m
India is developing space technology in order to send its garbage into space and solve the country's waste problem.

印度发展航天技术是为了把垃圾送上太空，解决本国的垃圾问题。

@V.Kliffet
Because China has only recently built it.

因为中国是最近才建成的。

@dennisrichardson78
ISS panels are massive but feel clunky now.

国际空间站的太阳能板巨大，但现在感觉笨重了。

@joshuakennethrodriguez37
Tiangong’s steerable arrays seem more elegant.

天宫的可转向太阳能阵列看起来更优雅。

@Dylan_Robert_Gutierrez
Lithium-ion upgrades helped ISS, but it’s still catching up.

锂离子电池升级帮到了国际空间站，但它仍在追赶。

@johnwood31
Smaller, modular power systems just make more sense today.

如今更小、模块化的电力系统才更合理。

@jaBsonjohnsanchez
Solar array design really shows the generational gap.

太阳能阵列的设计确实体现了代际差距。

@jay-shakeli9761
When can US (or Western) launch a new space station? I'm looking forward to it.

美国（或西方）何时能发射新的空间站？我很期待。

@adj2
Bigelow Aerospace and Sierra space are the only US companies I’ve heard were working on anything related to a space station. Well beside the gateway station which was supposed to be around the moon. I haven’t heard anything about Gateway in years. Since budgets were cut & the directive is to go to the moon. Don’t expect to see anything anytime soon. After the ISS retired were are astronauts going to go in earth orbit, its not like you can do much science and experiments in a dragon capsule.

我所知道的、在研发空间站相关项目的美国公司，只有比格洛航天（Bigelow Aerospace）和塞拉太空（Sierra Space）。当然，除了那个计划绕月的门户站。我好几年没听到门户站的消息了。由于预算削减，且现在的指令是前往月球。别指望短期内能看到任何成果。国际空间站退役后，宇航员将去哪里进行地球轨道任务？在龙飞船里可做不了多少科学实验。

@StevenCampsOut
They really need to develop exercise equipment that can generate electrical current in a pinch. Bicycles for instance.

他们真的需要开发在紧急情况下能发电的健身设备。比如自行车。

@StevenCampsOut
They really need to develop exercise equipment that can generate electrical current in a pinch. Bicycles for instance.

他们真的需要开发在紧急情况下能发电的健身设备。比如自行车。

@jamesofallthings3684
Shit ass AI. Also I wouldn't step foot in China let alone something the built that's supposed to protect me from imminent death.

垃圾AI。而且我不会踏入中国一步，更不用说他们建造的,号称能在生死关头保护我的东西了。

@bluffdotcom5504
China is doing just fine without sorry ass like you.

没有你这种可怜虫，中国照样发展得很好。

@EagleKnight35
I would not want to go to a stinking shithole like the US.
I also would not want to travel in a US made jumbo jet for fear of getting sucked out of it if its door gets ripped off from the main body while in mid air.
I also would avoid travelling in US stinking trains with cockroaches all over the place.

我可不想去美国这种臭气熏天的垃圾地方。
我也不想乘坐美国制造的巨型喷气式飞机，怕它在半空中舱门被扯掉时我被吸出去。
我还会避免乘坐美国那种到处是蟑螂的臭火车。

@Dr._Atom
Ok Trump bot, don't forget to keep eating your own soybeans

好的，特朗普机器人，别忘了继续吃你自己的大豆。

@jackyjackson604
Over 40 million foreign tourists to China this year.... so where is the imminent death on the international news ... You think their government can shut the mouth of western MSM ?

今年有超过四千万外国游客来中国旅游....那为什么国际新闻上没有出现“中国崩溃”的论调呢... 你觉得他们的政府能堵住西方主流媒体的嘴吗 ？

@ImagesOfCountries
@jamesofallthings3684, You obviously have not visited China in person recently. If and when you do visit China, I have not the slightest doubt that you, like other Westerners, will be departing with jaw-hanging awe even at the airport... LoL

@jamesofallthings3684，你显然最近没有亲自去过中国。如果你（或当你）去中国访问时，我毫不怀疑，你会像其他西方人一样，甚至在机场就会震惊得合不拢嘴地离开……哈哈

@quisqueyanguy120
1998 vs 2020 tech not a fair comparison, don't you think? I bet if we (USA) deploy a new station in this decade it will be just as advanced or more advanced than China's.

1998年的技术与2020年的技术对比不公平，你不觉得吗？我敢打赌，如果我们（美国）在这十年内部署一个新空间站，它将和中国的一样先进甚至更先进。

@bluffdotcom5504
The last USA-only space station was Skylab, operational in the mid-1970s. ISS is a Russian space station. So don’t hold your breath about the next made in USA space station.

上一个纯美国空间站是1970年代中期运行的天空实验室。国际空间站是俄罗斯的空间站。所以别对下一个美国制造的空间站抱太大期望。

@ComdZero
Just like your 6th gen fighters. Looks so pretty on PPT.

就像你们的第六代战斗机一样。在PPT上看起来真漂亮。

@dingbhatty
China going it alone, proving she doesn't need any help from anyone, not even their treachery.

中国独立自主，证明她不需要任何人的帮助，甚至不需要那些背叛行为。

@zhanhoboss6230
China has no choice. because it's banned from ISS.

中国别无选择。因为它被禁止使用国际空间站。

@Chinook-tj9bv
The Tiangong is brand new-ish compared to the ISS. China had to build its own because the Americans excluded China from having anything to do with its space program. So, China building the Tiangong is like the country telling Politicians like Trump and Biden to go f@k off.

与国际空间站相比，天宫算是崭新的。中国必须自己建造，因为美国人将中国排除在他们的太空计划之外。所以，中国建造天宫就像这个国家在告诉特朗普和拜登这样的政客滚开。

@LewisMaríaMar
Different philosophies, different eras.

不同的理念，不同的时代。

@rachelsmith_644
The ISS was built to be human-heavy; Tiangong feels system-heavy.

国际空间站是为侧重人员活动而建的；天宫感觉是侧重系统。

@wendymurphy5624
Tiangong feels like a testbed for deep space missions.

天宫感觉像是深空任务的试验平台。

@GomezEmil-b5f
AI assistance on stations is going to be huge long-term.

空间站上的人工智能辅助从长远来看将非常重要。

@AlvarezAnna-i5g
Less dependence on ground control is where things are headed.

减少对地面控制的依赖是未来发展方向。

@PhillipsSunna
More autonomy onboard makes sense for the future.

在轨更高的自主性对未来是有意义的。

@MitchellAndris
The crawling arm feature feels especially futuristic.

那个爬行机械臂功能感觉特别有未来感。

@RiveraEmilia-e9y
Two arms that can back each other up is just smart engineering.

两条可以互相备份的机械臂就是聪明的工程设计。

@ClarkAraceli
The robotic arm redundancy on Tiangong is impressive.

天宫的机械臂冗余设计令人印象深刻。

@VictorThang-b5p
India will be next ?All in a dream.

印度会是下一个？全是做梦。

@SengpoSatbang
endian is capable to build a pile of human feces that can reach the moon.
Do not underestimate their open-defecation skills..

印度（endian）有能力建一堆能抵达月球的人类粪便。
不要低估他们的露天排便技能..

@ImagesOfCountries
IMHO, if India can curry favor with China, it can progress faster than ever...

依我看，如果印度能讨好中国，它就能取得比以往更快的进展...

@VictorThang-b5p
Chinese people knew the heart of every indian people.They are not going to help them at all times.fyi

中国人民了解每个印度人的心。他们不会总是帮助他们的。仅供参考。

@markb2773
The ISS normally houses 7 astronauts (4 from Dragon and 3 more from Soyuz) Please fact check better.

国际空间站通常容纳7名宇航员（4名来自龙飞船，另外3名来自联盟号）请更好地核实事实。

@JamesRobertSmith
China has trillions of dollars coming out of their ass. Their industrial capacity is the most massive and profitable in human history. They're going to leave the USA. Eating. Their. Dust.

中国有数万亿美元唾手可得。他们的工业产能是人类历史上最庞大、最盈利的。他们会让美国望尘莫及。

@supa3ek
The ISS is NOT nasa........
Its soviet built !!!!

国际空间站不是NASA的........
它是苏联建造的！！！！

@AntonioSerranoMx91
ISS: old trash.

国际空间站：老旧的垃圾。

@goonhoongtatt1883
Be precise in your language. Not 2 major space stations. There's only 2. Period.

注意语言的准确性。不是2个主要空间站。只有2个。完毕。

@zdj-h9m
Theirs must be a cartoon only. How can it be possibly more modern than ours?

他们的肯定是卡通片而已。怎么可能比我们的更现代？

@paulvancamp1436
Why is my 27-year-old car not as good as a new one

为什么我开了27年的车不如一辆新车

@Chickenworm9394
One simple answer: ISS is 20th Century, while China's Tiangong is 21st Century

一个简单的答案：国际空间站是20世纪的，而中国的天宫是21世纪的

@ABC-oz5zy
The inside of the Chinese space station seems more modern because it IS more modern.
Who would have thought?

中国空间站的内部看起来更现代，因为它就是更现代。
谁会想得到呢？

@BACA01
Nobody flies to Chinese space station except Chinese. And nobody know s how it actually looks. It looks like it's for show right from the thumbnail image of this video.

除了中国人没人飞往中国空间站。而且没人知道它实际看起来什么样。从这视频的缩略图看它就像是为了作秀。

@gaim44
This guy is a China hater he watches China Uncensored which is anti-China propaganda YouTube channel.

这家伙是个中国黑，他看“中国解密”这个反华宣传的YouTube频道。

@BACA01
@gaim44 Don't you like the truth? Only *** bots don't like the truth.

@gaim44 你不喜欢真相吗？只有中G机器人才不喜欢真相。

@gaim44
@BACA01 Its your claim not mine to prove so show us the proof :)

@BACA01 那是你的说法，不是我的，需要你来证明，所以给我们看看证据 :)

@rais1953
And that's because the US alone refuses to allow the Chinese to participate in the ISS. So they had to build their own.

而那只是因为美国单方面拒绝让中国参与国际空间站。所以他们不得不自己造一个。

@BACA01
@rais1953 And they built one for show

@rais1953 然后他们造了一个作秀用的。

@gaim44
@BACA01 You keep stating your claim but offer no proof to your claim so prove it or your just a troll:)

@BACA01 你一直在陈述你的说法，但没为你的说法提供任何证据，除非证明它，否则你只是个喷子 :)

@BACA01
@gaim44 I already offered the proof in the very first comment, and i see it hurted you very deep. Your toy station does not even look like a space station at all. You make everything for show off. Just to show everybody that you are on the scene also.

@gaim44 我早在第一条评论里就提供了证据，而且我看出来这深深地伤害了你。你们的玩具站看起来根本不像空间站。你们做每件事都是为了炫耀。只是为了向大家显示你们也在场。

@gaim44
@BACA01 Just because YOU think it looks like a toy doesnt explain WHY it it is so you have no PROOF to your claim maybe you should do some RESEARCH and not just watch China Uncensored for your information:)

@BACA01 仅仅因为你认为它看起来像玩具，并不能解释为什么如此，所以你的说法没有证据，也许你应该做些研究，而不是只看“中国解密”来获取信息 :)

@Rex-ww4cw
​@gaim44 He literally watched China Uncensored. You can't wake people up that are this brainwashed to the core.

@gaim44 他确实看“中国解密”。你无法唤醒那些从骨子里被洗脑的人。

@gaim44
@Rex-ww4cw They troll called China f......t..LOL

@Rex-ww4cw 那喷子管中国叫FXS..哈哈

@BACA01
@gaim44 It not me that has to show the proof but you. I stated it very clearly, and as of you, You've long since lost the credibility that you can be trusted on a global level. No one believes you because you lie all the time.

@gaim44 需要出示证据的不是我，而是你。我说得很清楚，至于你，你早就失去了全球层面的可信度。没人相信你，因为你总在撒谎。

@gaim44
@BACA01 You made the CLAIM so the burden of PROOF is on you. You clearly answered me with only your OPINION which isnt PROOF.I cant be trusted because I do not accept your OPINION ? I lie all the time ? I didnt make claim..LOL its for show..LOL .No one believes me? Buddy I didnt make the CLAIM you did>>LOL

@BACA01 是你提出的说法，所以举证责任在你。你只是用你的观点来回答我，这可不是证据。就因为我不接受你的观点，我就不可信了？我总在撒谎？我没提出说法..哈哈 它是作秀..哈哈。没人相信我？老兄，我没提出说法，是你提出的>>哈哈

@BACA01
@gaim44 My proof is in my first comment already and it is not to hard to distinct between the real space station and a toy even for space amateur. And I see how it got to you.

@gaim44 我的证据已经在我的第一条评论里了，即使是太空业余爱好者，区分真正的空间站和玩具也不难。我看得出这话让你多难受。

@kfa4892
Was your brain eaten by a zombie?

你的脑子被僵尸吃了吗？

@Rex-ww4cw
Dude watched China Uncensored. That explained it

老兄看“中国解密”。这就解释了一切

@ozymandiasultor9480
You have a mistake in the title, ISS is not NASA's space station, it is the International Space Station, the name says all.

你标题有个错误，ISS不是NASA的空间站，它是国际空间站，名字说明了一切。

@Chickenworm9394
Without the contributions of the Russians, the ISS would not even exist

没有俄罗斯的贡献，国际空间站根本不会存在。

@SpaceZonea
Oh, true,Thanks for the correction

哦，是的，谢谢指正

@TheKkpop1
It's not international space station without China

没有中国，就不是国际空间站

@davidmarknguyen1991
Electric propulsion on a crewed station is a big step forward.

载人空间站上的电力推进是一大进步。