美国造船业为何崩溃 - 以及重建的推动
Why U.S. Shipbuilding Collapsed — And The Push To Rebuild It
译文简介
美国曾是全球船舶制造的领导者。然而，由于人才短缺、过时的操作程序和陈旧的设施，该行业——对美国能源安全和国防至关重要——正面临危机。
正文翻译
America used to be a world leader in shipbuilding. But with a shortage of talent, antiquated operating procedures and outdated facilities the industry — essential to U.S. energy security and defense — is in crisis. China dominates the global commercial shipbuilding industry accounting for 53% of global market share followed by South Korea and Japan. The U.S. accounts for about 0.1%. But that could soon change. In southern Philadelphia, $5 billion is being invested by South Korean shipping conglomerate Hanwha. It hopes to turn this decades old shipyard into a state of the art facility. To look at how shipyards are being revitalized, CNBC traveled to Wisconsin’s Great Lakes region and to one of America's oldest shipyards in Philadelphia.
美国曾是全球船舶制造的领导者。然而，由于人才短缺、过时的操作程序和陈旧的设施，该行业——对美国能源安全和国防至关重要——正面临危机。中国在全球商业船舶制造业中占据主导地位，市场份额达53%，其次是韩国和日本。美国的市场份额约为0.1%。但这种情况可能很快会改变。在费城南部，韩国航运巨头韩华正在投资50亿美元，希望将这个已有数十年历史的船厂改造成一个现代化设施。为了了解船厂如何复兴，CNBC前往威斯康星州的大湖区和美国最古老的船厂之一费城进行实地考察。
美国曾是全球船舶制造的领导者。然而，由于人才短缺、过时的操作程序和陈旧的设施，该行业——对美国能源安全和国防至关重要——正面临危机。中国在全球商业船舶制造业中占据主导地位，市场份额达53%，其次是韩国和日本。美国的市场份额约为0.1%。但这种情况可能很快会改变。在费城南部，韩国航运巨头韩华正在投资50亿美元，希望将这个已有数十年历史的船厂改造成一个现代化设施。为了了解船厂如何复兴，CNBC前往威斯康星州的大湖区和美国最古老的船厂之一费城进行实地考察。
评论翻译
很赞 ( 2 )
收藏
China hires engineers, USA hires lawyers. You do the math.
中国雇用工程师，美国雇用律师。你自己算一下。
@crooksnchase
there isnt a worker shortage. There is a pay shortage.
并不是工人短缺，而是工资短缺。
@swaco11
USA didn't lost ship building to China, they lost it long before China. in 1960 to 1990 the leading Ship builder was Japan, In 2000 the leaders were Japan and South Korea, Only in 2010 China became the top builder.
美国并不是把造船业拱手让给中国的，他们早在中国崛起之前就失去了。1960年至1990年，领先的造船国是日本；到2000年，领先者是日本和韩国；直到2010年，中国才成为顶尖造船国。
@binsun7581
US shipping building was lost to other countries like Korea and Japan long before China became a shipbuilding powerhouse.
美国的造船业早已被韩国和日本等其他国家取代，远在中国成为造船强国之前。
@konigstiger3252
What's wrong with usa is we somehow allow the financial sector to eclipse the real sectors
美国的问题在于，我们不知为何允许金融部门超过现实产业。
@Everydayskeptic
U want to attract young workers pay more it's so simple but apparently it's "one of there biggest challenges"
想吸引年轻工人，就提高工资，这么简单，但显然这“是他们最大的挑战之一”。
@SourCandy436
Wall Street prefer light asset companies with ROI over 15% (aka tech and financial services). That’s part of the problem
华尔街更喜欢资产轻型、投资回报率超过15%的公司（即科技和金融服务）。这就是问题的一部分。
@leewardgaze3083
What a waste send someone to S Korea to train for $54k a year? They'll leave as soon as a better offer comes. That's poverty wages in 2025
真是浪费，送一个人去韩国培训年薪54,000美元？他们一有更好的报价就会离开。这在2025年可算得上是贫困工资了。
@johnwhoo6194
When it is so easy to make big bucks by speculating in Wall Street, who wants to do manual labor work?!
当在华尔街投机这么容易就能赚大钱时，谁还想做体力劳动呢？！
@jacksonbartlett7589
so a refusal to invest in your equipment, workers, and product to pay out shareholders on a short term basis. I'm shocked
这就是拒绝投资设备、工人和产品，以便短期内向股东支付分红。我感到震惊。
@patpower80085
Corporations went for cheap labor and flags of convenience over national security.
公司们选择廉价劳动力和便利国籍而不是国家安全。
@yongchen8204
It is not just shipping industries in crisis; semiconductors fabrication is in crisis; so does garment manufacturing; IT industries; backend office support industries; aircraft industries (Boeing uses 70% of its components manufacturing abroad; agricultural problem , service industries and every other industries are at crisis. The only industry America is dominated left is lawyers, politicians and stockholders and providers.
不仅仅是航运业在危机中；半导体制造、服装制造、IT产业、后勤支持行业、航空工业（波音70%的组件在国外制造）、农业问题、服务行业以及其他所有行业都处于危机之中。美国唯一剩下的主导行业是律师、政客、股东和供应商。
@supercadet111
What I gathered from this, is that the majority of the heavy ship building in the US, is done by subsidiaries of foreign companies.
我从中了解到，美国的大部分重型造船都是由外国公司的子公司完成的。
@AaronBurt-gh6yb
Philly Shipyard producing 20 vessels a year would be huge
费城船厂每年生产20艘船将是巨大的进步。
@GSBbusiness
This feels less like a labor shortage and more like a value crisis where finance beats production and suits outnumber people who actually build things
这感觉更像是价值危机，而不是劳动力短缺，金融行业压倒了生产，穿西装的人超过了真正造东西的人。
@erik_h_42
I worked at the largest shipyard in Louisiana, building ships for the navy. I helped install and did programming for the first robotic cutting machines used at the shipyard. Then in the early 2000's the contracts dried up and they closed the yard down, costing the state several thousand well paying jobs. I'm glad that they seem to be serious about bring shipbuilding back, but not that they are selling all of our remaining yards to foreign companies.
我曾在路易斯安那州最大的船厂工作，为海军建造船只。我帮助安装并编程了船厂使用的第一台机器人切割机。然后在2000年代初，合同减少，船厂关闭，导致该州损失了几千个高薪工作。我很高兴他们似乎认真考虑恢复造船业，但不喜欢他们正在将我们剩下的船厂出售给外国公司。
@DanBurgaud
Try hiring hedge funds managers and stock brokers to build ships.
I heard they can build 10 ships with excel spreedsheets in a week.
试着雇佣对冲基金经理和股票经纪人来造船吧。我听说他们可以用Excel表格在一周内建造10艘船。
@brendanfennell3552
In reference to the South Korean shipyards and steel welders , over the past two years the Korean's are now employing Welders from Thailand and Sri Lanka to keep up with shipyard orders from European Shipping Companies
关于韩国船厂和钢焊工，过去两年，韩国开始雇用来自泰国和斯里兰卡的焊工，以跟上来自欧洲航运公司的船厂订单。
@glitcherPROXx
I guess selling our jobs to overseas companies kinda back fired ehh
我想把我们的工作外包给海外公司有点反效果，哈哈。
@xi-op7gg
Education has always been the backbone of any economy and no one knows this better than China. 140 naval engineers graduate yearly in the US. In China, that number is 10,000, PER YEAR. Let that sink in for a bit.
教育一直是任何经济的支柱，没有人比中国更清楚这一点。美国每年毕业140名海军工程师，而中国每年有10,000名。让这个数字沉淀一下。
@Outkast2_2
There are too many seats in board rooms for that to happen lol. We aren't going to build anything here in 20 years
董事会的席位太多，这种情况不可能发生，哈哈。我们在20年内不会在这里造任何东西。
@abdul-qf2fe
Renovating, equipping, and qualifying US shipyards will be the first step required to revive the shipbuilding industry and infrastructure in order to lay the groundwork and foundations for a competitive strategy that allows rapid advancement in this field. placing new orders for ships should not be an issue for the US, considering its huge size in terms of shipping and military needs. Additionally, some support from South Korea and Japan, traditional allies of the US, will surely help accelerate this transition.
翻新、装备和认证美国船厂将是复兴造船业和基础设施所需的第一步，以便为快速发展的竞争策略奠定基础和基础。考虑到美国在航运和军事需求方面的巨大规模，提出新的船舶订单不应成为问题。此外，来自韩国和日本的支持，作为美国的传统盟友，肯定会加速这一转型。
@franklincastillo3748
corporate greed general dynamics refuses to hire and train workers, I was welding 2 mouths and they let me go for working a little slow for there taste.
企业贪婪，通用动力拒绝雇佣和培训工人。我焊接了两个月，他们因为我工作得慢一点就把我解雇了。
@donchaput8278
Glad the huge push for everyone to go to college lesson is over and the trade industry is coming back. The cost of things don't come down so the pay needs to go up so we can get competitive labor. BUILD MORE SHIPS
我很高兴大家都去上大学的巨大推动已经结束，贸易行业正在回归。物价不会下降，所以工资需要提高，这样我们才能获得有竞争力的劳动力。多建船！
@robwyyi
It begins by the work force. When a work force that can’t read a blue print or what the difference ac power & dc power is leaves industry at a lost.
一切都始于劳动力。当一个无法阅读蓝图或了解交流电和直流电差异的劳动力离开行业时，行业就会陷入困境。
@Mobuto25
Nobody wants to work anymore with their hands, where is dirty, outside where is hot or cold depending on the season on top of being dangerous no matter how much they get paid. The new generation all they care about is a clean job keyboard job with A/C.
现在没有人愿意再做体力劳动，哪里脏，外面又热又冷，季节变化无常，而且无论工资多少都危险。新一代只关心干净的键盘工作，还有空调。
@zdj-h9m
Are the new Korean investments in Philly allowed to source parts from outside the US, Korea included? They should be totally compliant with the Jones Act, right?
新的韩国投资在费城是否允许从美国以外的地方采购零件，包括韩国？它们应该完全符合琼斯法案，对吧？
@DonnaDettrick
In the 1960’s the steel industry in the USA according to my father, had not kept up in updating technology since WWII. Japan had built newer steel manufacturing facilities, and provided better quality steel mills that successfully reduced the cost of production. Better quality steel and lower costs at that time ended much of the USA’s steel industry. I remember my father’s job and the company he worked for ended. Probably there were other factors that contributed to this loss. This video reminds me of that time. Does American industry periodically have this problem? I wonder if history is repeating itself. Is this also a case that American industries moved overseas to cut costs? Or did industry fail to keep up with the world? Does this happen routinely in industry? I’m not sure.
根据我父亲的说法，在1960年代，美国的钢铁工业自二战以来没有跟上技术更新。日本建造了更新的钢铁制造设施，提供了更高质量的钢铁，使生产成本成功降低。在那个时候，更高质量的钢铁和更低的成本结束了美国的大部分钢铁工业。我记得我父亲的工作和他所在公司的结束。可能还有其他因素促成了这一损失。这个视频让我想起了那个时期。美国工业是否定期出现这个问题？我怀疑历史是否在重演。这也是美国工业为了降低成本而搬到海外的案例吗？还是说工业未能跟上世界的步伐？这种情况在工业中是否经常发生？我不太确定。
@tedg1609
The locals always stealing hubcaps off the ships there in Philly.
当地人总是会偷走费城船上的轮毂罩。
@mlpf8288
The video failed to mention the one-sentence answer to the question why US Shipbuilding capacity declined: The Passenger Vessels Services Act and the Jones Act.
The Jones Act was mentioned, but never obviously as the singular cause of US shipbuilding decline.
视频没有提到一个句子的答案，为什么美国造船能力下降：客运船舶服务法和琼斯法案。琼斯法案被提及，但从未明显地作为美国造船下降的唯一原因。
@willgates8383
Proves once again that SKorea and Japan, are both military occupied vassal states of the U.S., no other reason for S Korea to build U.S. ship building industry
再次证明韩国和日本都是美国的军事占领附庸国，韩国建设美国造船工业没有其他理由。
@dfrty6g451
Western countries jobs were not 'stolen' by China. The jobs were given to China by the rich and wealthy in the West so they became richer!
They talk about 'Patriotism' but they just use this as a tool to deflect criticism and blame to other countries for decisions they made.
西方国家的工作并不是被中国“偷走”的。这些工作是由西方的富人和富裕阶层给予中国的，以便他们变得更富有！他们谈论“爱国主义”，但只是把这当作工具来转移批评，把责任推给其他国家。
@davidanalyst671
you can't believe how surprised i am to learn that megacorps, philadelphia, and the federal government arent able to find a way to work together to make america a functioning country with a functioning navy
我真是震惊，竟然发现跨国公司、费城和联邦政府无法找到合作的办法，让美国成为一个运作正常的国家，有一个正常运作的海军。
@wrighty338
China's automated shipyards such as xinneng Shipyard make 400 vessels per year.
中国的自动化造船厂，如新能造船厂，每年制造400艘船。
@2cents411
Corporations have raised the price of living so high, they can no longer afford to pay workers enough to work manual labor!
公司把生活成本提高得如此之高，以至于他们无法支付工人足够的工资来从事体力劳动！
@gregoryfranks7347
the problem is that no ship company is hiring no EXPIRIENCE workers of all ages they want trained employees of which there is none. I'd get a job if they trained me but they don't.
问题在于，没有船舶公司雇用任何年龄段没有经验的工人，他们只想要经过培训的员工，而这样的员工几乎没有。如果他们给我培训，我会找工作，但他们不愿意。
@dboucher26
America’s problem is that priorities are driven almost entirely by profit for the ultra-wealthy. Instead of focusing on meaningful improvement, policies often sacrifice overall quality of life to keep enriching those at the top. Nearly everything operates on a for-profit basis, and even many politicians seem more focused on enriching themselves than on addressing the real needs of the people they represent. America is headed towards total collapse.
美国的问题在于，优先事项几乎完全由超富裕者的利润驱动。政策往往牺牲整体生活质量，以持续丰富顶层人士，而不是专注于有意义的改善。几乎一切都以营利为基础，甚至许多政治家似乎更关注于让自己变得富有，而不是解决他们所代表的人民的真实需求。美国正走向全面崩溃。
@kimkristensen2816
South Korea should pull out its investments and people the way they are treated by ICE and the US Government. America will never be a manufacturing nation again when the entire defence budget is smaller than even intrest on governent debt. And skilled manpower will never be available with current visa rules, lack of education being that the US rankes 32 in math, 37 in literacy and 54% of the adult population reed below 6th grade level. As for labor shortage, 1 in 5 americans considers emigrating.
韩国应该撤回其投资和人员，因为他们在ICE和美国政府的待遇。美国永远不会再成为制造业国家，因为整个国防预算甚至还不及政府债务的利息。而且根据目前的签证规则，熟练劳动力将永远无法得到，考虑到美国在数学方面排名第32，在读写能力方面排名第37，54%的成年人在阅读水平上低于六年级。至于劳动力短缺，每五个美国人中就有一个考虑移民。
@groundbasedinterceptor
The United States Navy must use Korea and Japan as well as other allies with itself to build its navy. IF China is a big enough threat, it needs to utilize what it can before it is too late.
美国海军必须利用韩国和日本以及其他盟友共同建设自己的海军。如果中国是一个足够大的威胁，就需要在为时已晚之前利用现有资源。
@BrianMc-te5jx
NAFTA did more damage to the us worker than anything in history. Thank robber barons for passing it.
北美自由贸易协定（NAFTA）对美国工人的伤害比历史上任何事情都要严重。感谢那些通过该协议的掠夺者。
@CyborgZeta
Worker pay. The US has lost so much manufacturing, shipbuilding included, because the companies didn't want to pay American labor costs. Workers wanting a decent wage is always a bridge too far.
工人薪资。美国失去了这么多制造业，包括造船业，因为公司不愿意支付美国的劳动成本。工人想要体面的工资总是一个无法逾越的障碍。
@seancollins9745
Ship building is a strategic problem, we have no capacity to rearm for any serious conflict, in any period of reasonable time. it takes FAR to long to build new carriers and they're severely overpriced.
造船是一个战略性问题，我们没有能力在合理的时间内重新武装以应对任何严重冲突。建造新的航母所需时间太长，而且价格严重高估。
@esponru5602
Well they better pay more if they want more welders because under current policies is very unlikely that companies will be allowed to bring foreign cheap workers
如果他们想要更多焊工，那就得提高工资，因为在目前的政策下，公司很可能不被允许引进廉价的外国工人。
@lixwii64
What is the point of building a ship here when the costumers can just go where they can build a lot faster with the same price.
在这里建造一艘船有什么意义，当客户可以选择去其他地方，以相同的价格更快地建造？
@DotADBX
Problem with most shipyards in NA is they were designed with the same deisgn premise that built ships in ww2 which were far simpler then what we build today.
All these shipyards essentially need to be ripped down to the ground and redesigned from the ground up using modern design philosophies especially taken from car manufacturing should be building massive boats like we build cars.
北美大多数造船厂的问题在于，它们的设计理念与二战时期建造的船只相同，而那时的船只远比今天我们建造的要简单。这些造船厂基本上需要彻底拆除，重新从头设计，采用现代设计理念，特别是借鉴汽车制造的经验，应该像制造汽车一样建造大型船只。
@tzehui1999
Good Luck! But deep down I know that they are fighting a losing battle...korea bringing this to US only raise the cost...thats all. Perhaps only the critical build area whereby the military can afford to pay 1.5 times the amount charged in the international market
好运！但我内心深处知道，他们正在进行一场注定要失败的斗争……韩国把这个带到美国，只会抬高成本……就这样。也许只有那些军方能够负担得起国际市场价格1.5倍的关键建造区域。
@MrCTruck
There’s something that is very karmic about the US losing all of its skills and education as it rushes to ramp up manufacturing industries again. Short term profit has a long term cost
美国失去所有技能和教育的现象是非常有因果关系的，因为它急于重新推动制造业。短期利润带来了长期成本。
@kimraymond2749
Perhaps not relevant to ships, but based on my experience in the US through the 80s. The US is often slow to adopt stuff. It still uses feet and inches. In the 1980s the big advance in cabinetry was 32mm System. They were still building face frx because their plyood and panels lacked dimensional consistency. 32mm was something Europe had been using since WW2.
或许与船只无关，但根据我在80年代在美国的经历，美国在采用新事物方面通常比较慢。它仍然使用英尺和英寸。在1980年代，橱柜制造的重大进展是32mm系统。当时他们仍在建造面框，因为他们的胶合板和面板缺乏尺寸一致性。32mm系统是欧洲自二战以来就开始使用的。
@SouthernWelder31
Shipbuilding pays well been in the industry for 3 years off in on, too many layoffs and people showing favoritism
造船业的工资不错，我在这一行业工作了三年，时好时坏，裁员太多，而且人们表现出偏袒。
@gator7082
I'm tired of hearing about lack of talent. We gave up manufacturing and sent it overseas like everything else. Younger generations can't be blamed for older generations selling them out for slave wages and profits. I'm in my mid 50's and run into people in their teens and 20s who could work circles around anyone else if given the chance.
我厌倦了听到缺乏人才的说法。我们放弃了制造业，把它转移到海外，就像其他一切一样。年轻一代不能被指责为老一代为了微薄的工资和利润出卖了他们。我现在五十多岁，遇到过一些十几岁和二十几岁的人，如果给他们机会，他们可以轻松超过其他任何人。
@pauldannelachica2388
The US should give opportunity to work. With in there shipyard. Other devoted allied countries like the philippines south korea japan australia canada
美国应该提供工作机会。在那里造船厂中。其他奉献的盟国，如菲律宾、韩国、日本、澳大利亚和加拿大。
@mosestekper7659
America is soo 20th Century. The 21st century is for China and SEA. They should do what the UK did and focus on services.
美国真的是太20世纪了。21世纪属于中国和东南亚。他们应该学习英国的做法，专注于服务业。
@MotivatedI
There is too much focus on giving student loans for useless degrees. We have normalized doing the bare minimum. Other countries are hungry and invest in the right skills. Will be good to catch up but there is a major shift that needs to happen and that’s in the minds and skills. It won’t be a one year or four year work.
我们过于关注为无用学位提供学生贷款。我们已经将做到最低限度的行为正常化。其他国家渴望发展，投资于正确的技能。虽然追赶上去是好的，但需要发生重大转变，这在于思维和技能。这不是一年或四年的工作。
@Theoryofcatsndogs
If not because of protectionism law and military demand, ship build in US is no way going to work. Just the labour cost alone makes it very expensive to build in US. 1 US welder's pay and benefit can hire 8-10 welder in China and they are willing to work much longer hours.
如果不是因为保护主义法律和军事需求，美国的造船根本无法运作。仅仅是劳动成本就使得在美国建造变得非常昂贵。一个美国焊工的工资和福利可以雇佣8到10个中国焊工，他们愿意工作更长的时间。
@andrewewels3054
For every welder worker building Navy ships the US company needs , one defence contact lawyer, one pattern lawyer, one contact sue lawyer, one HR manager, one officer manager, one planning manager, one environmental survey,one drug testing nurse, one CEO and Admiral at the golf course and country club ,one health and safety advisor , one corrupt Congressman or woman receiving a bag of carpet bag money, and six private security guards !
美国公司每需要一名建造海军舰艇的焊工，就需要一个国防合同律师、一个专利律师、一个合同诉讼律师、一个人力资源经理、一个办公室经理、一个规划经理、一个环境调查员、一个药物测试护士、一个高尔夫球场和乡村俱乐部的CEO和海军上将、一个健康与安全顾问、一个收受“黑金”的腐败国会议员，以及六名私人保安！
@williamlouie569
US gave up more than manufacturing, shipping and anything that requires labors. They also gave up knowledge and skill that go with manufacturing! Good luck trying to bring all infrastructures to support these!
美国放弃的不仅仅是制造业、运输业和任何需要劳动力的行业。他们还放弃了与制造业相关的知识和技能！祝你好运，试图带回所有支持这些的基础设施！
@jeepguy4499
Cooperate greed killed the industry. Just like every other industry. They pinched the Pennie’s and squeezed the workers until they went out of business.
企业贪婪扼杀了这个行业。就像其他行业一样。他们斤斤计较，把工人挤干，直到他们破产。
@panamanianviking3153
Print the money, buy the bonds, control the long yield, due the dollar. Then we can reshore. If not, then bend the industrial knee, and continue producing capital market returns, trade deficits and selling debt.
印钞、买债券、控制长期收益、贬值美元。然后我们才能将生产带回美国。如果不这样做，那就屈服于工业的膝盖，继续产生资本市场回报、贸易赤字和出售债务。
@hyuxion
just look at the chart, US ship building was number one because European ship yards were destroyed during WW II, in other words, USA need another world war to climb back to number 1.
Which makes sense, as ship building was never a high profit business, no sane American business would want to get into that buisiness if not for government orders.
看看这张图表，美国的造船业曾经是第一，因为欧洲的造船厂在二战期间被摧毁。换句话说，美国需要另一场世界大战才能重新回到第一的位置。这是有道理的，因为造船从来不是一个高利润的行业，如果没有政府订单，没有理智的美国企业会想进入这个行业。
@JoshuaFallHarvestSuhMD
We are extracting, constructing, producing, building, fixing, maintaining, designing, transporting and manufacturing all by ourselves. Aryans are now competing against East Asians and we are using our own resources for ourselves.
我们正在独立进行开采、建设、生产、修复、维护、设计、运输和制造。雅利安人现在正与东亚人竞争，我们正在利用自己的资源为自己服务。
@jamesleland536
The only ships they will build are military, paid by America.
The Commercial ships will cost double compared to South Korea or Japan.
Throwing money away isn’t brilliant economics.
他们将建造的唯一船只是军事舰艇，费用由美国支付。商业船只的成本将是韩国或日本的两倍。把钱扔掉并不是聪明的经济学。
@Todt1967
Money talks. Restoring shipbuilding, manufacturing or any other blue collar industry requires wages that encourage top tier folks to move towards. With high wages and benefits will come the respect that blue collar Americans used to command before the 1980's shift to maximizing profits. Straightforward and it will never happen.
金钱至上。恢复造船、制造业或任何其他蓝领行业需要工资来吸引顶尖人才。随着高工资和福利的提升，蓝领美国人曾经享有的尊重也会随之而来，这是1980年代最大化利润转变之前的事情。很简单，但这永远不会发生。
@lucmarchand617
Us lost shipbuilding after war when japan need rebuilt own economy so spend lots new technology and research.When oiltanker start get biggers japan was on top for long times.The wreck this year off coast england oiltanker from stena was from China.The shipyards show up help investigation +inspect ships.The quality of work help on this pure simple.
美国在战争后失去了造船业，因为日本需要重建自己的经济，因此在新技术和研究上投入了大量资金。当油轮开始变大时，日本在很长一段时间内处于领先地位。今年在英格兰海岸发生的这起油轮失事就是来自中国。船厂参与了调查并检查了船只。工作的质量在这一点上帮助很大。
@plessis2023
America went warship production heavy and allowed monopolies in shipwright companies. And let commercial shipwrighting be outsourced. Greed kills econmies , we are reaping what we sowed decades ago by allowing monopolies again. Sudsidy is corporate welfare . Need to give incentives for companies build things and invest in workers not stockholders.
美国在军舰生产上投入重金，并允许造船公司形成垄断。而商业造船则被外包。贪婪扼杀了经济，我们正在收获几十年前允许垄断所造成的后果。补贴是企业福利。我们需要为公司提供激励，让他们创造产品并投资于工人，而不是股东。