网友讨论人工智能和大规模裁员的真相

@LeoPeter5
Honestly, this whole AI-and-layoffs situation feels like companies shifting blame. They keep saying “AI made us do it,” but half the time they’re just cutting costs because shareholders want bigger numbers. AI is just the new excuse.
 
老实说，这整个关于人工智能和裁员的情况感觉像是公司在推卸责任。他们总是说“人工智能逼我们这么做”，但很多时候他们只是为了减少成本，因为股东想要更高的数字。人工智能只是一个新的借口。
 
@lazarocarlos4018
Yeah, it’s wild. I work in retail, and we got “automation upgrades” last year. Most of it is barely functional lol. The layoffs weren’t because robots are smarter—it’s because management wanted to trim staff. People forget these decisions are human, not machine.
 
是啊，太疯狂了。我在零售业工作，去年我们进行了一些“自动化升级”。大部分功能几乎无法使用，哈哈。裁员并不是因为机器人更聪明，而是管理层想裁员。人们忘记了这些决策是由人做出的，而不是机器。
 
@drakebraydon7124
Back to the AI topic—people need to understand that the layoffs aren’t about lack of jobs but about skills changing. And if companies are downsizing unpredictably, having guidance from someone who knows how markets move is a bonus. I keep telling folks: don’t panic, just prepare.
 
回到人工智能的话题——人们需要明白，裁员并不是因为缺少工作，而是因为技能的变化。如果公司在不确定的情况下裁员，有一个了解市场变化的人给出指导是一个额外的好处。我一直告诉大家：不要惊慌，做好准备就行。
 
@tosunpasa4294
I’m from Florida and got connected to her through a neighbor. She helped me rebuild after I got laid off from the logistics sector—AI hit our department hard. She doesn’t overpromise, just gives real options.
And for anyone curious: research her name online — you’ll see what people mean.
 
我喜欢她在《智能投资哲学》一书中的写法，她说成功不是靠运气，而是靠在环境变化时做出明智的决策。这正好与这次人工智能裁员的混乱相吻合。人们以为世界要结束了，但有时这只是意味着你需要一本更好的行动指南。
 
@patricia_nura3378
I’ve noticed her name coming up more often lately. People around here mention her as someone who really helps them stay steady when everything in the markets feels uncertain. One friend of mine actually rebuilt his digital-asset portfolio using some of her ideas after he got laid off from an ‘AI restructuring.’ Kind of rare when online advice actually ends up being useful.
 
人工智能不会很快停止，但人类的创造力也不会停止。人们只需要正确的信息来应对这场混乱。是的，Jennafer是为数不多的能用简单英语将事情讲清楚的人之一。她已经是我推荐的首选——有强大的业绩记录，稳健的方法，真心帮助那些想保持领先的人。
 
@Rubenjimen
I like how she wrote in her book The Philosophy of Smart Investing that success isn’t about luck—it’s about smart decisions even when the environment changes. That fits perfectly with this AI layoff mess. People think the world is ending, but sometimes it just means you need a better playbook.
 
要明白，人工智能并不会取代整个开发团队。随着AI编程助手的出现，一个20人的团队缩减到8人，再加上Copilot。以AI的速度，20个人的工作已经做不完了。
 
@normantyler3944
AI isn’t stopping anytime soon, but neither is human creativity. People just need the right info to navigate the chaos. And yeah, Jennafer is one of the few voices that breaks things down in plain English. She’s been my top recommendation for a while now—strong track record, steady approach, and genuinely helpful for anyone trying to stay ahead.
 
 
 
@ShortThePig
Understand that AI is not replacing the whole Dev Team. With advent of Aai Coding agents, a Team of 20 is shrunk to 8 and add Copilot. At the speed of AI, there is not enough work for 20 ppl to do anymore.
 
 
 
@Corgi11111
ai infrastructure costs are causing the layoffs. The monetary benefit in implementing AI is not realized yet, and probably won’t be for another decade. They need $$$ for data centers and chips!!!! That why they’re getting rid of folks!!!!
 
人工智能基础设施的成本导致了裁员。实施AI的经济效益还没有显现出来，可能要等十年才会看到。现在他们需要资金来建设数据中心和购买芯片！这就是他们裁掉员工的原因！
 
@Steve_Takes
Get a brokerage account and buy shares yourself. Don't just sit on the outside complaining
 
开个经纪账户，自己买股票。别只是站在外面抱怨。
 
@nickplays2022
At least in the US, you can buy company stocks and become a shareholder
 
至少在美国，你可以买公司股票，成为股东。
 
@jbranche8024
For some partly true.  Business is always changing.  You are not a born family member but an important team member when needed.  AI will continue to offer more features, benefits, resources, and productivity improvements.  People need to Adapt, train, adjust skills etc, or be faced with longer unemployment times, having to move, maybe work remotely.  Think about Your value is your skills, potential benefit, speeding growth of the company.  Productivity task completion time.  Not a big social, hangout, that is always fun, easy, but should be rewarding
 
有些地方是对的。商业一直在变化。你不是天生就是一个家庭成员，而是在需要时的重要团队成员。人工智能将继续提供更多功能、好处、资源和生产力提升。人们需要适应，接受培训，调整技能等等，否则就会面临更长的失业期，可能还得搬家，也许得远程工作。想想看，你的价值在于你的技能、潜在的好处、加速公司增长的能力、生产力任务的完成时间。不是一个大社交、聚会，那些总是很有趣、轻松的地方，但应该是值得回报的。
 
@shibayamatomoki8430
It was greenwashing in 2010s, now it’s AI-washing in 2025…
 
2010年代是绿色洗涤，现在是2025年的人工智能洗涤……
 
@shermc4587
Layoff due to AI. Layoff due to Robot, Layoff due to internet. Layoff due to computer. Layoff due to automation. Layoff due to globalization. Layoff due to global warming. Layoff due to oil running out.
 
因人工智能裁员，因机器人裁员，因互联网裁员，因计算机裁员，因自动化裁员，因全球化裁员，因全球变暖裁员，因石油耗尽裁员。
 
@XxDrEvilxX
AI should be able to take over CEO jobs if anything
 
如果有什么工作应该由人工智能接管的话，那就是CEO。
 
@nunyabyzzzz
The craziest thing is I'd rather have a rational ChatGPT as my boss than some fool beancounter who can only think in time slots of 3 months.
 
最疯狂的事是，我宁愿让一个理性的ChatGPT当我的老板，也不愿让一个只能在三个月的时间段内思考的傻会计来当。
 
@dt6esdff413
CEO are political position my dude, they're hired by people to make profit on the side too, insider trading and whatnot, AI are way too honest to be a CEO...
 
CEO是政治职位，老兄，他们是被雇来一边盈利，一边做一些内幕交易之类的，人工智能太诚实，根本不适合当CEO……
 
@pokemon9573
Corporate Greed and a convenient excuse that blindly boosts investor confidence
 
企业贪婪和一个方便的借口，盲目提升投资者信心。
 
@babthew
This is the problem when have stockholders that don’t know anything tell you how to run your business. Running the economy to its lowest just to get a return on investment.
 
这就是当你有些不了解业务的股东告诉你如何经营公司时的问题。只为了获得投资回报，把经济压到最低点。
 
@cawheeler27
It’s good to see that some main stream outlets aren’t completely bought into the AI hype. Liesman was right, there’s a lot of assumptions be made about AI replacing jobs that simply isn’t supported by the evidence. There are far more structural economic reasons for why layoffs subdued hiring are happening right now.
 
很高兴看到一些主流媒体并没有完全被人工智能的炒作所迷惑。Liesman说得对，现在很多关于人工智能取代工作的假设并没有得到证据的支持。实际上，造成裁员和招聘疲软的原因更多的是结构性的经济原因。
 
@ChristianJacquet9
Exactly! The “AI took my job” narrative just makes headlines, but if you look closer, it’s just companies tightening up after years of easy money. Productivity gains from AI aren’t even close to offsetting the slowdown in spending and higher borrowing costs.
 
没错！“人工智能抢了我的工作”这种说法只是吸引眼球的头条新闻，但如果你仔细看看，实际上只是公司在经历了多年轻松赚钱后开始收紧政策。人工智能带来的生产力提升根本无法抵消支出放缓和更高借贷成本的影响。
 
@SnoopDogg88888
This analysis is spot on. The comments these folks make is 100% accurate. It helps with tasks, coding , writing , researching , but can’t really do an entire job . It can’t even do customer service!!!!
 
这个分析完全正确。这些人说的评论百分百准确。人工智能可以帮助完成任务、编程、写作、研究，但无法完成整个工作。甚至连客户服务都做不好！！！
 
@alphaomega1351
Been saying this for the longest!  Anyone who has ever worked in corporate America  knows that 90% of ALL the jobs are BS!
You spend most of your day sitting around or in pointless meetings.  The only time of business is when the occasional project comes along.  
This was the case way before AI.  
 
我一直在说这个！任何在美国公司工作过的人都知道，90%的工作都是废话！你大部分时间都在闲坐或参加无意义的会议。真正忙碌的时候是偶尔有个项目要做。这种情况在人工智能之前就已经存在了。
 
@tobeboom
I use AI every day, it’s a glorified search engine.  Not anywhere near what they are advertising.  I spend more time trying to get it do what I need than it would take me to do it myself, and you spend your whole life cutting out fluff and  fill words to be direct and precise and it fills the page with crap to try and sound smart.
 
我每天都在用人工智能，它不过是一个高级的搜索引擎。根本没有广告上说的那么厉害。我花更多时间试图让它做我需要的事情，而不是我自己做。这种情况就是你一辈子都在删掉废话和填充词，想要直接和精确，而它却填一堆乱七八糟的东西，试图让自己听起来聪明。
 
@F0XRunner
Companies are firing en masse because they over hired in 2021-2022. That doesn't make the layoffs any less painful and not being AI related doesn't mean they are going to stop. I had two people laid off from my team just last week.
 
公司大规模裁员是因为他们在2021-2022年招了太多员工。这并不意味着裁员就不那么痛苦，也不意味着不与人工智能相关就会停止裁员。上周，我团队有两个人被裁掉了。
 
@jltrain-zgamingrailfan202x3
I have actually been wondering for a while now since hearing stories in the past months regarding layoffs relating to AI. Thanks for posting this CNBC.
 
我实际上一直在想，自从听到关于与人工智能相关的裁员故事之后，已经有一段时间了。感谢你发布了这个CNBC的消息。
 
@CursedAmbition
What's crazy is that people line up for these tech companies that routinely wipe out 10% of their staff annually.
 
最疯狂的是，人们排队去这些技术公司，而这些公司每年都定期裁掉10%的员工。
 
@saulgoodman2018
It's just used as a scare tactic.
AI is not calling people to be fired.
 
这只是一个恐吓手段。人工智能并不是在叫人被裁掉。
 
@MyVlogTherapy
Yes however jobs and businesses are getting gaslight, with people telling them “well you better get AI because you’re going to get left behind,” “everyone is using AI why aren’t you?” Ect ect.. I think people should stop pressuring people of what they need to invest in this or else.. that’s what’s driving the firings. Projecting..
 
是的，但工作和企业现在被“气灯”了，大家都在说：“你最好开始用人工智能，否则你就会被甩在后面”，“大家都在用人工智能，为什么你不行？”之类的。我觉得人们应该停止给别人施加压力，告诉他们必须投资人工智能，否则……这就是导致裁员的原因。 projecting...
 
@pendleton123
I work in Corporate. Our company had layoffs earlier this year. AI isn't a direct use for my department but management told us start learning how to use it. As our Department aren't directly threatened by AI but the threat will be others that know how to use AI.
 
我在公司工作。我们公司今年年初进行了裁员。人工智能对我们部门没有直接的影响，但管理层告诉我们要开始学习如何使用它。因为虽然我们的部门不直接受到人工智能的威胁，但会受到那些会使用人工智能的人的威胁。
 
@chunhungyang
To me, AI empowers top management to equip themselves and take direct action in real-world operations, thereby eliminating several intermediate management layers that waste hours in endless meetings while fiercely guarding their silos. And we don't need more advanced gpt on this MGT process , what we have on grok , chatgpt 5, Gemini 2.5 pro are already good enough in this marketing world ..again , just my thoughts
 
对我来说，人工智能使高层管理者能够装备自己并在实际操作中采取直接行动，从而消除了许多浪费时间在无休止会议中的中层管理层，这些人还拼命捍卫他们的“孤岛”。我们不需要更先进的GPT来处理这个管理过程，像Grok、ChatGPT 5、Gemini 2.5 Pro这些已经在营销领域足够好了… 再说这只是我的想法。
 
@deeplife9654
Not a single job has been replaced by AI yet, but it may replace some jobs in the future. AI = Another Indian. American companies are employing more people in India than in the USA.
 
到目前为止，还没有任何工作被人工智能取代，但未来可能会取代一些工作。人工智能 = 另一个印度人。美国公司在印度雇佣的人比在美国还多。
 
@937553
When the person is let go, no AI or other person is replacing them. Its all for cost cutting
 
当某个人被解雇时，并没有人工智能或其他人取代他们。这一切都是为了削减成本。
 
@sithracer
why is no one reporting on what the gov is doing with all the revenue it receives since not being distributed? these funds are accumulating....
 
为什么没人报道政府怎么处理它所收到的所有收入，这些资金没有被分配出去？这些资金正在积累……
 
@SrikarKura
I agree that generative AI is enhancing human capabilities rather than replacing jobs. Most of the layoffs we’re seeing today stem from economic or structural factors, not from AI itself. In fact, organizations that embrace AI responsibly are finding new ways to boost productivity and create roles that didn’t exist before.
 
我同意，生成式人工智能是在增强人类能力，而不是取代工作。我们今天看到的大多数裁员是由经济或结构性因素引起的，而不是人工智能本身。事实上，那些负责任地拥抱人工智能的组织正在找到提高生产力的新方法，并创造出以前不存在的职位。
 
@Teetopjon
I was told I’m being laid off, I’m not sure if I was laid off because of AI, but I’m certain that it’s becoming harder to get hired due to AI. AI auto rejects many applications
 
我被告知我要被裁员，我不确定我是否是因为人工智能被裁的，但我确定因为人工智能，现在找工作变得更难了。人工智能自动拒绝了很多申请。
 
@malcomgrant8596
We are a country of for profit and the shareholders always get their way even with charities
 
我们是一个以盈利为目的的国家，股东总是能够如愿以偿，即使是在慈善机构中也是如此。
 
@lg4ky
Imagine losing your job to a computer then the power goes out and you get a phone call to please come back to work…
 
想象一下，失去了工作被电脑取代，然后停电了，你接到电话请求你回去工作……
 
@didzisstalidzans5232
It should not replace, but it should make individuals more productive thus decreasing number of headcount.
 
它不应该取代人类工作，但应该使个人更加高效，从而减少员工数量。
 
@calidreams5379
It’s been at least a decade since they replaced humans with automated answering systems and I suppose they are saving money but it’s a still a TERRIBLE SYSTEM, not an improvement.
 
至少十年了，他们就用自动化的电话应答系统取代了人工，我猜他们是在节省钱，但这仍然是一个糟糕的系统，根本不是改进。
 
@on__off2923
i always laugh when people say AI will take people's jobs, given that we're still at the ABC stage of AI. It's too early to worry as we're still building data centers and training models...Alot of people who claim AI will take jobs just don't seem to understand what AI is all about.
 
每次听到有人说人工智能会取代人类工作，我总是觉得很好笑，因为我们现在才刚处于人工智能的ABC阶段。现在担心还为时过早，因为我们还在建设数据中心和训练模型……很多宣称人工智能会取代工作的人的理解似乎完全不了解人工智能是什么。
 
@-XFigure
We're only on the cusp of this trend.. alot of speculation, but we're about three revisions from real meaningful agentic replacement
 
我们现在只是在这个趋势的边缘……有很多猜测，但我们离真正有意义的智能替代还有大约三次修订的距离。
 
@warrenlanham9088
Amazon did lay off tens of thousands because of AI... just not because AI is doing their jobs... quite the opposite really.
They laid all those ppl off because they need to spend billions buying the equipment to bring their AWS up to speed in regards to AI compute without dramatically affecting cap ex.
Ppl keep taking about how "it looks like they were wrong about AI taking jobs" when the reality is the infrastructure to run the kind of AU needed to take those jobs doesn't even exist yet
 
亚马逊确实裁掉了数万名员工，但不是因为人工智能在做他们的工作……其实恰恰相反。
他们裁掉那些人是因为他们需要花费数十亿美元购买设备，以便让他们的AWS在人工智能计算方面跟上步伐，而不显著影响资本支出。
人们总是谈论“看起来他们错了，人工智能并没有取代工作”，但现实是，运行那种人工智能所需的基础设施连现在都还没有完全存在。
 
@bkakus
When will we see company layoff all janitors and say AI took over the jobs? I mean some robots are getting there, but not There yet.
 
什么时候我们会看到公司裁掉所有清洁工，然后说人工智能取代了这些工作？我的意思是，有些机器人已经在接近那个水平了，但还没到那儿。
 
@jg5875
AI is just like prior technologies like automation, machine learning, data science, etc. Makes people/organizations more productive and only replaces some low-skilled human jobs. AI will NOT take all human jobs.
 
人工智能就像以前的技术一样，比如自动化、机器学习、数据科学等。它使人们和组织更高效，只会取代一些低技能的工作。人工智能不会取代所有人类的工作。
 
@sommmeguy
Robots should be treated like foreign workers. Before an employer can "hire" a robot, they should first demonstrate that no human could do the job. Then they should apply for a license/visa that would need to be renewed on an annual basis. The revenues from the licensing should be reseved to provide bridging finances for workers and businesses that have been replaced by AI and robots.
 
机器人应该像外籍工人一样对待。在雇佣机器人之前，雇主应该首先证明没有人类能够做这个工作。然后，他们应该申请一个许可证/签证，需要每年更新一次。许可证的收入应该用于为被人工智能和机器人取代的工人和企业提供过渡资金。
 
@Cookiemaster333
Ok. So these two statements are from the same video. 1) "AI will replace entry level jobs, but not people in higher position" 2) "A lot of people talk about work, but don't actually do work. Companies thus need to fire middle management"....???..... I mean, I totally agree with the latter statement, but having both hypothesis in the same video is quite confusing.
 
好吧。这两个陈述来自同一个视频。1）“人工智能会取代入门级工作，但不会取代高层职位的人。” 2）“很多人谈论工作，但实际上并没有做工作。所以公司需要裁掉中层管理。” ……??? ……我的意思是，我完全同意后者的说法，但把这两种假设放在同一个视频里，实在是有点困惑。
 
@Atem_S.
It's not AI it's corporate bloating. A lot of people getting fired are the ones that was hired during Covid. The Companies do not need them anymore so they are downsizing. Also,  some realized they are over paying some staff for job that 2 new intern can do for half the price. It's all about generating profits!
 
这不是人工智能，而是企业膨胀。很多被解雇的人是疫情期间雇佣的。公司不再需要他们了，所以他们在裁员。而且，有些公司意识到，他们在支付给一些员工的薪水过高，而两名新实习生可以做同样的工作，而且薪水只有一半。这一切都与产生利润有关！
 
@dr.rubaiatrubaiatjoy
It is economic situation I think . america president disrupt their economic situation and forced big company to cut off people.any way america rich people not all time care for human
 
 
我认为这是经济形势的问题。美国总统破坏了他们的经济形势，迫使大公司裁员。无论如何，美国的富人并不总是关心人类。
 
@phillipgoat00
AI is not taking job, offshoring is.  I was working as a support engineer, and that company fired every single american except seniors and hired in india, latam, mexico, a bunch of them. Where I am right now, same thing, they hire in low income, but highly educated countries like brazil, europe and Hong Kong. Americans not that much.
 
人工智能并没有取代工作，外包才是。我曾作为支持工程师工作，那家公司解雇了所有美国员工，除了高级职位的，雇佣了印度、拉美、墨西哥的很多人。现在我所在的公司也一样，他们在收入较低但高学历的国家招聘，比如巴西、欧洲和香港（特区）。美国人并没有那么多。
 
@albanx1
it is not AI, it just greed, push from shareholders, to inflate share prices. These companies now are driven by shareholders and middle class management that do not know what technology and innovation is. Once upon a time these big companies were driven by goals, innovation, advance in technology... today is just shareholders to bump prices
 
这不是人工智能，而是贪婪，是股东的推动，目的是为了抬高股价。现在这些公司由股东和不懂技术与创新的中产阶级管理层主导。曾几何时，这些大公司是由目标、创新和技术进步驱动的……但现在只是股东推动股价上涨。
 
@BigNoseDog
AI has become the perfect cover story for companies who want to lay off workers. The market will see your use of AI as evidence that you’re becoming more productive. And because you’re cutting workers, you’re lowering costs and hence becoming more profitable. The stock market loves both of these things.
 
人工智能已经成为公司裁员的完美借口。市场会把你使用人工智能视为你变得更高效的证据。因为你在裁员，你降低了成本，从而变得更加盈利。股市喜欢这两点。
 
@raff1584
People used to look for the right tools to make work more efficient and more profitable for the company, these days I’ve been seeing companies having a shiny AI tool and making people use it for whatever work they do even if that makes the job less efficient and poorly done.
 
过去人们会寻找合适的工具来提高工作效率和公司的盈利能力，但现在我看到的是，很多公司拥有闪亮的人工智能工具，并强迫员工使用这些工具来完成工作，即使这让工作变得不那么高效，甚至做得很差。
 
@GREATLFG
how many AI graphics used in this video clip? How many job it eliminated?
 
这个视频片段中用了多少人工智能图像？它取代了多少工作？
 
@jimbob1353
There are going to be jobs cut because of AI. When the bubble bursts and everyone realizes they have spent way too much stocks are going to crash and they will need to cut jobs. It’s not going to be because the chat bots stole your job.
 
因为人工智能，会有工作被裁掉。当泡沫破裂，每个人意识到他们在股票上的投入过多时，股市将会崩盘，他们将不得不裁员。这不是因为聊天机器人抢了你的工作。
 
@XxvaxionxX
There's a reason why Japanese companies survive so long. They don't do layoffs as much as Western companies. The employees feel safe and some even work in the same company their entire lives
 
日本公司能够长期生存是有原因的。他们不像西方公司那样频繁裁员。员工感到安全，有些人甚至终其一生都在同一家公司工作。