2025年百万富翁最多的国家

jackandjillonthehill
I feel like people don’t appreciate just how wealthy wealthy Americans are.
Having a few million USD goes a really long way when the USD has been persistently above the PPP equilibrium level with most other countries.

我觉得人们并没有意识到美国富人究竟有多富有。
当美元汇率持续高于与其他大多数国家购买力平价的均衡水平时，拥有几百万美元资产的实际价值和购买力会远超其表面金额。

InvestIntrest
I feel like most Americans don't appreciate how wealthy Americans are.

我觉得大多数美国人都没有意识到美国人究竟有多富有。

Charlie_Pelligroso
Positive US news is Reddit poison

关于美国的正面新闻在Reddit上就是毒药

Mail_Order_Lutefisk
How anyone can be positive when a literal fascist is literally totalitarianing everything up and cheesemakers are emulating doomsday preppers is beyond me. I’m literally shaking. 

当一个货真价实的法西斯分子正在彻底掌控一切，而奶酪制造商们都在模仿末日求生者那样疯狂囤货时，我真不明白还有谁能做到乐观。我现在吓到浑身都在发抖。

LettingHimLead
Hit downvote until I saw the third “literal” and knew you had to be taking a piss.

我本来想点个踩，直到看到第三个“literal”（可翻译成 “字面意义的、确实、真正地”），才明白你肯定是在开玩笑。

Jedtin22
Is this a conservative sub or something like why you guys supporting Trump?

这是个保守派的子版块吗还是类似子版块？不然你们为什么都支持特朗普？

LettingHimLead
What did I say that supported Trump? I just appreciated the parody of people who think everyone who disagrees with them are literal nazis and the US is literally falling to fascism and the world is literally ending.

我说什么了就表明我支持特朗普了？我只是觉得，那种认为所有和自己意见不合的人都是货真价实的纳粹、美国正在实实在在走向法西斯主义、世界真的要末日了的观点，被拿来恶搞还挺有意思的

Jedtin22
I mean Trump is a fascist tho is that really debatable to you?

我的意思是，特朗普本来就是个法西斯分子，这在你看来真的有争议吗？

LettingHimLead
A literal one?

货真价实的那种吗？

Jedtin22
Yes look up the definition of a fascist

对，你去查一下法西斯主义者的定义就知道了

rustvscpp
fascism: A system of government marked by centralization of authority under a dictator, a capitalist economy subject to stringent governmental controls, violent suppression of the opposition, and typically a policy of belligerent nationalism and racism.
Let's see, there's still 3 axis of government in the US, of which Trump only leads one.
Which means he obviously is not a dictator. See the first point.
Yes, we're in a capitalist economy, so I'll give you that one.
violent suppression of law breakers. I can see how you might twist that one.
Belligerent nationalism. Yes and no. He also has been extremely active in working with other countries to strike deals, and end wars.
Racism... Trump is far less racist than most people I see yelling "racism!"

法西斯主义：一种由独裁者集中权力的政府体制，其资本主义经济受到严格的政府管控，对反对派进行暴力镇压，通常还实行好战的民族主义和种族主义政策。
我们来对照一下：美国政府仍设有三权分立体系，特朗普仅掌控其中一权。这意味着他显然不是独裁者。请看定义中的第一点。
是的，我们确实处于一种资本主义经济体制中，这一点我同意。
对违法者的暴力镇压？我能想象到你是如何曲解这一点的。
好战的民族主义？既对也不对。他同时也非常积极地与其他国家合作达成协议、推动结束战争。
至于种族主义……与那些满口“种族主义”的人相比，特朗普的种族主义倾向要小得多

above-the-49th
As an outsider, it’s hard to not see him as not trying to centralize control. With his public asks to the head of the doj. His public fights with the treasury. The deployment of the national guard against the will of state governors?

作为局外人，很难不认为他在试图在集权。比如他公开向司法部负责人提出要求，公开与财政部发生争执，还有违背州长意愿部署国民警卫队 —— 这些不都是例子吗？

Jedtin22
Trump said he wants to be a dictator and he’s supports and himself keep saying Trump 2028

特朗普表示他想成为独裁者，且其支持者及他本人持续提及“特朗普2028”这一口号

Late_Part2643
Is a sub of people with brain cells. No one said anything about supporting trump. It is more about how the rest of reddit is obsessed with dommer propaganda.

这是一个由有脑子的人组成的子版块。没人说过支持特朗普的话。重点在于，Reddit上其他大部分人才是对“dommer”（这个词可能是评论者打错了，有可能是doomer——末日论者，结合后面的宣传就是“末日论宣传”）宣传走火入魔了。

InvestIntrest
Nobody is necessarily supporting Trump. We just don't have TDS like most of uber leftist Reddit.

我们不一定是在支持特朗普。我们只是不像大多数极左派的Reddit用户那样患有“特朗普厌恶综合征”（结合语境和上下文，TDS可以翻译成美国网络上有名的梗特朗普厌恶综合征）

Jedtin22
Tds?

TDS（全称为“Trump Derangement Syndrome”，中文通常译为“特朗普厌恶综合征”，简单来说，它被定义为那些对特朗普表现出极度批评甚至敌视态度的人患有急性偏执症状。据传五共和党议员提案：将特朗普厌恶综合征列为精神疾病？）

Jedtin22
Oh i looked it up lMao yall are crazy .how dare we criticize dear leader I guess

哦，我查了一下，笑死我了，你们也太疯狂了吧。难道我们连批评一下亲爱的领袖都不行吗？

MyBedIsOnFire
What's it mean?

这是什么意思？

Massive-Question-550
i think you need to simmer down just a little. people keep screaming hitler but its the whole boy who cried wolf situation that if you keep equating every single action to literal GENOCIDE no one will believe you if they actually do start popping people off.

我觉得你得稍微冷静一点。大家总是嚷嚷着“希特勒”，但这完全是“狼来了”的情况。如果你把每一个举动都等同于于实实在在的种族灭绝，那么当他们真的开始大规模清除异己时，就没人会相信你了。

Esoteric_Derailed
I feel like most Americans don't appreciate how 1 in every 8 Americans depends on foodstamps‍♂️

我觉得大多数美国人都没有意识到，每8个美国人中就有1人依赖食品券生活。

InvestIntrest
So 12%... meaning 88% do not rely on them. That's actually pretty good.

所以是12%……也就是说88%的人并不依赖食品券。这实际上已经相当不错了。

Esoteric_Derailed
If you say so‍♂️

如果你非要这么说的话

InvestIntrest
Just to clarify. Every country, even ones like Sweden, which we laud for their social programs, have poverty. For example, poverty is at 16% in Sweden.
12% on food stamps in the US isn't bad.
https://pip.worldbank.org/country-profiles/SWE

首先澄清一点。每个国家都存在贫困问题，即使像瑞典这样因其社会福利项目而备受我们称赞的国家也不例外。例如，瑞典的贫困率就达到了16%。
美国有12%的人领取食品券，这个数据并不算差。

Esoteric_Derailed
Europe measures poverty differently.
When you earn less than 60% of the median national income, you are considered to be poor. This does not mean that you depend on government handouts to be able to feed yourself.

欧洲衡量贫困的标准与美国不同。
当你的收入低于全国中位数收入的60%时，你就被视为贫困人口。但这并不意味着你必须依靠政府救济才能养活自己。

InvestIntrest
This is the world banks standard. They rank all countries the same.

这是世界银行的标准。他们用同一标准对所有国家进行排名。

codex561
The US is so rich that literally nobody goes hungry, and you can buy lobster without having any income via food stamps.

美国是如此富有，以至于实际上没有人挨饿，而且你甚至可以通过食品券在没有收入的情况下买到龙虾。

BobSacamano47
Because it's expensive AF here

因为这里的东西贵得要死。

InvestIntrest
It's mostly relative. Americans are second in median income but 9th in cost of living. That means we make out pretty well comparatively.
https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/cost-of-living-by-country

这主要是相对而言的。美国人的收入中位数位居世界第二，但生活成本仅排第九。这意味着相比之下，我们的日子过得相当不错。

jackandjillonthehill
I grew up in rural west Texas and, though we had the rare Texas oil billionaires, I didn’t really understand ‘wealth’ until I lived for some time in NYC. The amount of casual wealth around in NYC is pretty intense. I don’t think most of the people I grew up with would quite get it.

我在德克萨斯州西部的农村长大，虽然那里偶尔也有德州的石油亿万富翁，但我直到在纽约市生活了一段时间后，才真正理解了“财富”是什么。纽约市周围那种随意挥洒的财富程度，真的非常惊人。我觉得我成长过程中认识的大多数人可能都无法理解这一点。

Ecotech101
We buy more shit here. It's not even like a mandatory thing, we're just culturally irresponsible.

我们这儿的人买的破烂玩意儿更多。这甚至算不上什么必须买的东西，我们就是从文化层面上就爱乱花钱

AssistanceCheap379
Tbf, when the median income is $40,000/year and the average income is $63,000/year, it seems a little bit off. I mean, it doesn’t sound like much, the average is only 56% over the median, but half of people have less than $40,000 a year.
The average wealth is $1.06 million, with the median being under $200,000. The average is 600% over the median. Which is pretty insane, but not as incredible as the wealth inequality.
The top 10% of Americans hold over 2/3rds of all wealth, with the bottom 50% holding 2.5% of wealth.
And the top 1% owns 30% of all wealth in the US.
Over 11% of Americans meanwhile are under the poverty line, which is $15,650 for one adult or $32,150 for a family of 4 in the contiguous US.
So while America as a nation is wealthy, with extremely wealthy individuals and the best paid upper class, middle class and lower class, it also has a high poverty rate.
It’s also worth mentioning that if going by OECD data, the US poverty rate is more like 18%. For comparison, Canada has 12%, Sweden 8%, Finland and the Netherlands are 7%.
South Korea, Turkey, Japan, Spain, Latvia and Estonia have a lower poverty rate than the US. In fact most of the currently considered “Western countries” have a lower poverty rate than the US. Except for Israel.
TL;DR: a large portion of Americans have very little wealth with over 2/3rd of the wealth being concentrated at the top 10% and 30% of the wealth being concentrated into the hands of the top 1%.

说实话，当美国的人均中位数收入为每年4万美元，而平均收入为6.3万美元时，这个差距看起来有点不太对劲。我是说，表面上看，平均收入只比中位数高出56%，差距听起来好像不算大，但事实是，有一半的美国人年收入低于4万美元。

在财富方面，情况更为悬殊：平均财富为106万美元，而中位数财富却不到20万美元——平均值是中位数的600%以上。这已经相当疯狂了，但财富不平等的实际程度甚至更惊人。

美国最富有的前10%人群掌握了全国超过三分之二的财富，而最底层的50%人口仅拥有2.5%的财富。最顶层的1%则拥有全美30%的财富。

与此同时，超过11%的美国人生活在贫困线以下。在美国本土，单身成年人的贫困线标准为15650美元，四口之家为32150美元。

因此，尽管美国作为一个国家整体非常富裕，其上层、中产和低收入阶层的收入在全球范围内都属于最高水平，但它同时也拥有较高的贫困率。

值得一提的是，根据经合组织（OECD）的数据，美国的贫困率实际上更接近18%。作为对比，加拿大的贫困率为12%，瑞典为8%，芬兰和荷兰为7%。

韩国、土耳其、日本、西班牙、拉脱维亚和爱沙尼亚的贫困率都低于美国。事实上，目前大多数被视为“西方国家”的国家，其贫困率都低于美国，以色列除外。

总结一下：很大一部分美国人财富极少，全国超过三分之二的财富集中在最富有的10%人群中，而其中30%的财富更是集中在最顶尖的1%手中。

Jomax101
Absolutely agree - HOWEVER - this is very skewed due to populations obviously
The U.S. has 23.8million millionaires out of 340million people, Australia has 1.9million out of 28million
That is 7% of the population for both countries
All of my siblings are millionaires in their 30s on paper (in aus) because they’ve owned homes for a number of years at this point, I guarantee they don’t live the lives most people expect from 30 yr old “millionaires” because 95% of their net worth is tied up in house equity, they certainly aren’t struggling day to day, but they also all drive regular cars, maybe go on holiday once a year, don’t have summer homes or beach houses as you might expect when you hear “millionaire”
The truth is being a millionaire isn’t what it used to be when the average house is nearly a million dollars
I wonder what countries actually live the best life on an average income because I just don’t think it’s possible for it to be a country where 40-60% of ur net take home pay goes to rent or a mortgage
$5-10million+ is the new “millionaire” in my opinion

完全同意——但这一点显然因为各国人口规模不同而存在偏差。
美国有2380万百万富翁，总人口为3.4亿；澳大利亚有190万百万富翁，总人口为2800万。
这意味着两国百万富翁占总人口的比例均为7%。
我的几个兄弟姐妹在澳大利亚，30 多岁时账面资产就已达到百万富翁水平，因为他们多年来一直拥有房产。但我敢肯定，他们的生活方式远非大多数人对“30岁百万富翁”的想象：他们净资产的95%都集中在房产上。他们日常生活当然不拮据，但全都开着普通汽车，可能一年只度假一次，也没有乡间别墅或海滨住宅——这些可是一般人听到“百万富翁”时会联想到的东西。
事实是，如今“百万富翁”的含金量早已今非昔比，尤其是在平均房价接近百万美元的情况下。
我在想，究竟哪个国家的普通人用平均收入能过上最好的生活？因为我认为，在一个需要将税后收入的40%到60%用于支付房租或房贷的地方，人们几乎不可能过上真正舒适的生活。
在我看来，拥有500万到1000万美元甚至更多，才算是新的“百万富翁”标准。

SmallTalnk
It's probably more useful for populist politicians (from both the right and the left) to keep leveraging dissatisfaction.
That's why the left had "occupy wall street", that's why the right had "biden's egg prices".
The only way to push for fringe extremist policies is to make people feel miserable and preventing them from noticing how great their lives actually are.
If you live a happy, wealthy and healthy life, you don't cry about migrants steeling jobs, or CEOs earning too much.

对民粹主义政客（无论是左翼还是右翼）来说，持续利用民众的不满情绪可能更有利。
这就是为什么左翼会有“占领华尔街”运动，而右翼则会炒作“拜登治下的鸡蛋价格”问题。
推行边缘化的极端政策的唯一方法，就是让人们觉得自己生活困苦，并阻止他们意识到自己实际的生活有多么优越。
如果你过着幸福、富裕且健康的生活，你就不会抱怨移民抢走了工作，或者抱怨CEO的薪酬太高。

garlicroastedpotato
I really did come here with that exact thought.
Rich people in Europe own yachts and go to car races.
Rich people in America own Europe.
Even on the poor end. Half of the world lives on less than a dollar a day. America doesn't even have homeless people that poor.

我来这儿的时候，脑子里确实就是这么个想法。
欧洲的富人会买游艇、去看赛车比赛。
而美国的富人，拥有的是整个欧洲。
就算是在底层，情况也不同：世界上有一半人每天的生活费不到一美元，而美国甚至都没有穷到那种夸张程度的无家可归者。

Boring_Doubt9754
USA is wealthy but not even winning this list. Switserland and probally Netherlands are the "better" stat.

美国虽然富裕，但在这份榜单上甚至没能拔得头筹。瑞士，或许还有荷兰，才是数据表现“更优”的国家。

TryingMyWiFi
The merit of the us in this matter is to achieve these numbers in a massive scale in a continent sized country. It's easier to have more equality in a tiny wealthy country .

美国在这方面值得称道之处在于，它在一个大洲规模的国家里实现了这些可观的数据。相比之下，在一个面积很小的富裕国家实现更高的平等要容易得多。

Boring_Doubt9754
I agree but the USA has lower quality of life and pay less taxes

我同意，但美国的生活质量较低，而且纳税也更少。

whinger23422
If your referring to ‘per capital’, Australia as well.

如果你指的是“人均”数据，澳大利亚也是如此。

ApogeeSystems
To rephrase for countries in the west " Amount of people owning atleast one home"

换句话说，对于西方国家来说，就是“拥有一套及以上住房的人口数量”。

Rocky-Jockey
I was gonna say - for Canada in Australia that is basically just being a homeowner in the vicinity of a city.

我正想说——在加拿大和澳大利亚，这基本上就等同于在城市周边拥有房产。

ellowat
In the UK, 1 in 4 pensioners are millionaires and there’s 13 million pensioners. So that’s 3.25M before counting the under 65s.
Maybe the graph is cash based/non main home assets millionaire as it’s several million people short for the UK.
And that’s millionaire in pounds, not USD, so the graph is even more wrong.
Edit: A quick google says 2.8 million households have assets over $1.5m in the UK, and a household is on average 2.4 people.

我正想说——在英国，每4名退休人员中就有1人是百万富翁，而退休人员总数有1300万，这意味着仅65岁以上人群中的百万富翁就达到了325万，这还没算上65岁以下的人群。
也许这张图表统计的是“现金或非主要住宅资产达到百万富翁标准”的人数，因为它对英国的数据明显少了几百万人。
而且，这里的“百万富翁”指的是拥有百万英镑的财富，而不是百万美元，所以这张图的数据就更加不准确了。
修改：快速搜索了一下，数据显示英国有280万个家庭的资产超过150万美元，而一个家庭平均有2.4人。

tiggers97
I’m betting it’s close to 800,000-1M millionaires in the UK, after removing homes.

我估计，如果扣除房产，英国的百万富翁人数接近80万到100万。

ellowat
I think there’s probably under 800k homes worth north of a million pounds in the UK. Likely half that

我认为在英国，价值超过 100 万英镑的房产可能不足 80 万套，更可能只有这个数字的一半。

Oracle-of-Guelph
The actual number based on liquid assets in Canada is 300-400,000. The housing bubble has probably decreased that number because of how many people are putting everything into real estate.

基于加拿大流动资产的实际数据，百万富翁人数为30万到40万。由于太多人将资金投入房地产，房产泡沫可能已经使这一数字有所下降。

zeke780
Agreed, would love to know what the percentage of people with a million in stocks/cash is. Has to be an order of magnitude lower

同意，我很想知道拥有百万股票/现金的人口比例是多少。这个数字肯定要低一个数量级。

DasArtmab
I remember reading it was roughly 2% in the US. So according to this chart, about 6.7m

我记得曾读到过，在美国这个比例大约是 2%。因此，根据这份图表推算，大约是约为670万。

MARSHALCOGBURN999
Looks like America takes home the gold again

看来美国再次夺得了金牌。

LibraryIntelligent91
Gold in wealth inequality is not a flex.

在财富不平等方面“夺冠”可不是什么值得炫耀的事。

CaptainKoala
Wealth inequality doesn’t really apply for this stat.
The average American millionaire is in their 60s. Almost anyone can have a net worth over $1 million by that age by just having a 401k or other retirement account and contributing modestly if you start in your early 20s.
From this source: Americans in their 60s have an average retirement savings of $1.2 million. (That’s just retirement savings, that ignores other investments or home ownership or other factors).
If you’re talking broadly about millionaires in America, most of the people you’re talking about are just normal people who have been saving for retirement for their whole lives.

这个统计数据其实并不适用于讨论财富不平等。
美国的普通百万富翁年龄在60多岁。如果你从二十岁出头就开始工作，并定期向401k（译者注：401K计划是美国《国内税收法》第401条k项规定的企业补充养老保险制度，由雇员和雇主共同缴费建立个人账户，适用于私营盈利性公司）或其他退休账户存入适量资金，那么到这个年纪时，净资产超过100万美元对几乎任何人来说都是可以实现的。
援引数据来源：60多岁的美国人平均拥有120万美元的退休储蓄（这仅仅是退休储蓄，还不包括其他投资、房产或其他资产）。
所以，当你广泛地谈论美国的百万富翁时，你所说的大多数人其实只是普通人，他们一生都在为退休而储蓄而已。

ExotiquePlayboy
Maybe a million is a lot in other countries. But in Canada, in Toronto, where any shit box house is $1 million, if you have a house as an asset you’re basically a millionaire. But in reality you’re poor. Meanwhile if you’re worth a million in Texas where a house is $300k, that person has money.

也许在其他国家，百万身家算得上富有。但在加拿大，在多伦多，随便一个破房子都值100万加元，只要你名下有套房子作为资产，你就算百万富翁了。但实际上你可能很穷。而与此同时，在房价30万美金的德克萨斯州，一个身家百万的人才是真正有钱。

innsertnamehere
It would be 1 million USD - so you would need to own a home $1.4m CAD or above. There are a lot fewer houses in that price range, even in Toronto. Probably less than half of houses would go for that.
Also - far less people own a home in central Toronto than you think. There are 800,000 detached dwellings in Toronto, and a LOT of them are actually worth less than $1.4 million, and even fewer owned outright without a mortgage.
Many of these charts also exclude primary residence from the calculation.
Lets say that even half of the detached homes in Toronto are owned outright and worth more than $1.4 million - that's 400,000 people.
Ultimately most people in Canada live outside of Toronto in lower cost areas.
It's no different than talking about the US and saying that every home owner in the Bay Area is a millionaire.

这里指的是100万美元，所以你需要拥有一套价值140万加元或以上的房产才算。即使在多伦多，能达到这个价位的房子也少得多，可能还不到一半的房屋能卖到这个价格。
此外，真正拥有市中心多伦多房产的人数也远比你想象的要少。多伦多共有约80万套独立屋，其中很多实际上价值低于140万加元，而全款拥有的则更少。
这类图表中，有不少还会在统计时剔除主要住宅（即自住住房）的价值。
假设多伦多的独立屋中，只有一半是全款拥有且价值超过140万加元，那也只有40万人左右。
归根结底，大多数加拿大人居住在多伦多以外的生活成本较低的地区。
这就像谈论美国时说“旧金山湾区的每个房主都是百万富翁”一样，只是一种以偏概全的说法。

sheldon4president
Owning the home means you paid 100% of it too

拥有房产意味着你已经全额付清了房款。

InMemoryOfZubatman4
I would anticipate that most people with million dollar houses have mortgages on those properties, so they are not paid off yet and may not be worth a million when they are.

我认为，大多数拥有百万美元房产的人，其名下这些房产都存在抵押贷款，这些房贷尚未还清。而且等到贷款还清时，这些房产的价值可能也未必还能值一百万美元了。

blood_vein
Definitely not for the older population, most houses are paid off and they are retired but they are not rich, just regular people

对老年人群体来说确实不是这样，大多数房子已经还清贷款，他们也已退休，但并不富裕，只是普通人而已。

Doug-O-Lantern
Yeah, according to this, roughly 5% of Canadians are millionaires, which I am sure is true but is also a fairly meaningless datapoint.

是的，根据这个数据，大约有5%的加拿大人是百万富翁，我相信这是真的，但这个数据点其实没啥意义。

Material-Macaroon298
How is this meaningless?

这怎么会没意义呢？

unnecessary-512
Houses in Austin are not 300k. A normal house will start at 1 million otherwise you’re going to have a long commute if you want a cheap house

奥斯汀（Austin，美国得克萨斯州的首府）的房子可不是30万美元。一套普通的房子价格起步就要100万美元，要是想选便宜点的房子，那你上班通勤时间肯定会很长。

ExotiquePlayboy
In Dallas the average is $300k: https://www.zillow.com/home-values/38128/dallas-tx/

在达拉斯，房子的均价为 30 万美元。

unnecessary-512
Not in a good school district…Dallas proper will be at least 500k

那可不是在优质学区。达拉斯市区的房子至少也要50万美元起。

Poundcake2RedVelvet
I would rather be house poor than rent rich

我宁愿做“房奴”，也不愿做“租房富人”。

Tola76
Would be interesting to see it as a percentage of the population.

若能以人口百分比的形式呈现，想必会很有意思。

TaliyahPiper
Well the US has 340.1 million people so just under 7% of the population are millionaires. I don't really know why this sub is celebrating this stat as if it means the average American is wealthy.

美国目前约有3.401亿人口，因此百万富翁在其总人口中的占比略低于7%。我真不明白为什么这个论坛为何会为这一数据欢呼雀跃，好像这意味着普通美国人很富有似的。

Material-Macaroon298
7% is a LOT of people.
That’s 24 million people!
Thats almost as much as Australias entire population.

7% 的人数可不少。
那可是 2400 万人！
几乎相当于澳大利亚的全国人口了。

Okichah
Total population isn’t the right metric.
Children and spouses means that 7% provide benefits to more than just themselves.
We should celebrate people achieving a wealth status. The problem is in the huge wealth disparity with the ultra-rich and the ultra-poor and how we manage those issues.

总人口并非合适的衡量标准
由于孩子和配偶的存在，这7%的人所惠及的远不止他们自己。
我们应该为人们实现财富目标而庆祝。真正的问题在于巨富与赤贫之间巨大的财富差距，以及我们如何应对这些挑战。

doubagilga
There are 132 m households. So 17% of households.

美国家庭总数为1.32亿户，因此百万富翁家庭占17%。

Platypus__Gems
It's kinda nuts that countries like France, UK or Germany have almost half of China's millionaires, while being around 20 times smaller.
While people ofte talk about how much millionaire's China has and how that shows they aren't left-wing, the amount per capita is actually low.

像法国、英国或德国这样的国家，其百万富翁数量几乎达到中国的一半，而这些国家的人口却只有中国的二十分之一左右，这确实有点惊人。
人们常常谈论中国有多少百万富翁，并以此说明中国不是左翼国家，但实际上，中国的人均百万富翁数量其实还不算多。

Boring_Doubt9754
It gets even funnier with countries like Switserland and the Nethetlands.

如果看看像瑞士和荷兰这样的国家，情况就更有趣了。

femptocrisis
it fucking kills me we don't have more charts that break the US down by state when making comparisons like this.

一想到做这类对比时，居然没有更多按美国各州细分数据的图表，我就特别难受。

waronxmas79
Why does it matter?

这有什么关系呢？

Morak73
A chain retail manager from outside NYC accepted a Cleveland transfer, only if they kept his salary. He has a better quality of life (and larger house vs NY apartment) living off one paycheck a month.
If you haven't lived in different regions, you don't get how wildly different the costs of daily expenses are in different parts of the US.

一位来自纽约市以外地区的连锁零售店经理，接受了调往克利夫兰的工作安排，但前提是公司保持他原有的薪资水平。如今，他每月仅凭一份薪水就能维持生活，不仅生活质量更高，还住上了比纽约公寓大得多的房子。
要是你没有在不同地区生活过，就不会明白美国不同地方的日常开支差异有多么悬殊。

Butterbuddha
They wanna see CA pounding KY’s balls in stats like these, then compare with states voting red vs blue.

他们想看到加州在这种数据上狠狠碾压肯塔基州，然后拿这些数据去比较红州和蓝州。

Gaspote
Its basically like doing an average wealth with Poland, Portugal, Romania and Luxembourg then assuming they are all wealthy. Meanwhile it's Luxembourg fucking over the average.

这本质上就好比把波兰、葡萄牙、罗马尼亚和卢森堡的财富放在一起取个平均值，然后得出结论说它们全都富裕。而实际上，是卢森堡把这个平均值彻底拉高了。

Eravier
I know what you mean but Luxembourg wouldn’t change that average. It’s too small.

我明白你的意思，但卢森堡其实并不会显著影响这个平均值，因为它体量太小了

shotpun
Believe it or not, other countries also have territorial subdivisions

信不信由你，其他国家也有行政分区。

BobSacamano47
And states can be divided further. What's your point? It makes more sense to compare the USA to all of Europe than it does to any individual countries in Europe which are roughly the size of our states.

而且州还可以进一步细分。你到底想表达什么？将美国与整个欧洲进行比较，把它和欧洲任何一个国家（这些国家的规模大致和我们的州相当）比较要合理得多。

wannabe-physicist
You could say this for legitimately any country. Move away from Paris and London and see what happens to the numbers for France and the UK.

其实，对于任何一个国家，你都能得出这样的结论。只要离开巴黎和伦敦，再看看法国和英国的整体数据会发生什么变化。

the-samizdat
I am more interested in the entire EU block, instead I am left doing my own math.

我更感兴趣的是整个欧盟整体的数据，结果却只能自己动手计算。

xyzodd
as a dutch person i’m quite proud of our little country

作为一个荷兰人，我为我们这个小小的国家感到非常自豪。

Ok_Oil_201
Ratio wise NL has more millionaires than the US

从比例上来看，荷兰的百万富翁比例比美国还高。

turboninja3011
Now do millionaires without home equity.

现在来看看剔除房产净值后的百万富翁数量吧

Rakebleed
What a meaningless metric. Wealth is relative to CoL.

这真是个毫无意义的指标。财富是相对于生活成本而言的。

Better-Butterfly-309
Individual or household? How is this dumb shit quantified?

是按个人算还是按家庭算？这种蠢问题是怎么量化的？

Popular-Rush9346
Surprised France has more than Germany..

没想到法国的百万富翁数量居然比德国多……

Reasonable-Can1730
This is why housing is so expensive. People are parking their wealth in America. Tod for Americans already owning assets, not good for kids starting out

这就是为什么房价如此昂贵的原因。人们正在将他们的财富配置到美国的房产里。这对已经拥有资产的美国人来说是有利的，但对刚开始的年轻人来说则非常不利。

shugo7
How many of those millionaires are professional sport athletes?
And for Canada, how many of those are just home owners?

这些百万富翁中有多少是职业运动员？
而对于加拿大来说，其中又有多少仅仅是有房者（即仅凭借房产成为百万富翁）？

sw337
The NFL is by far the biggest league in terms of active players and even then 53 active players and 32 teams means at most 1696 players that’s a rounding error for 23.8 million people.

就现役球员人数而言，NFL无疑是规模最大的联赛，即便如此，每队53名现役球员、共32支球队，最多也只有1696名球员，相较于2380万的百万富翁群体，这连个零头都不到，完全可以忽略不计。

Alternative_Hour_614
1 in 9 Swiss citizens are millionaires. I’m pretty sure that’s #1 per capita on this infographic.

每9名瑞士公民中就有1人是百万富翁。我敢肯定，按人均计算，瑞士在这张图中位居榜首。

mr_birrd
In Zurich its nearly 20% of people there

在苏黎世，几乎有20%的人都是百万富翁。

tiggers97
I’d actually like to see a chart as a % of the countries population, and a second one as a % vs world population.

实际上，我想看两张图表：一张是占各国人口的百分比图表，另一张是占世界人口的百分比图表。

bluephoenix6754
What is a millionaire ? Anyone with 1M$ in cash ? And stocks ? Do propeties count too ?

什么是百万富翁？是指拥有100万美元现金的人吗？股票也算在内吗？房产是否也被计算为其中的一部分？

_-_-_-i-_-_-_
As a Finn I always laugh at this list.
Other Nordics have 300-500 thousand millionaires.
Finland has like two people with a million euros.

作为一名芬兰人，我每次看到这份榜单都会觉得好笑。其他北欧国家有 30 万到 50 万名百万富翁，而芬兰的百万欧元资产持有者好像只有两个人。

Thesius487
If there are 340m people in the usa, at 23.8m there are much more than 1 in 15 (6%) millionaires. Is this saying there are 23.8m households with a net worth of $1m or more? Not individuals?

如果美国有3.4亿人，那么2380万人的百万富翁数量远不止十五分之一（6%）。这个数据是说有2380万个家庭的净资产达到或超过100万美元吗？而不是指个人？

Amazing-Exit-2213
The justification for lowered tax rates for the rich ,"Trickle Down Economics" is that the investors at the top are "Job Creators". Currently the rise in the Stock Markets is driven almost exclusively by investments in AI, a technology that will eventually drastically reduce jobs. Remind me again why we're extending tax breaks for the rich.

为富人降低税率所提出的理由——“涓滴经济学”——是说顶层的投资者是“就业创造者”。然而目前股市的上涨几乎完全是由人工智能（AI）投资所推动的，而这项技术最终将大幅减少就业岗位。那么再提醒我一下，我们为什么要继续给予富人税收减免？

LibraryIntelligent91
This is not a good thing. Having a ton of millionaires while at the same time having unsafe schools, starving kids, homeless veterans, people going bankrupt over medical expenses means that your backwards ass society has collapsed.

这并不是一件好事。在拥有大量百万富翁的同时，另一方面却存在校园不安全、儿童忍饥挨饿、退伍军人无家可归、民众因医疗费用而破产的情况，这意味着你们这个落后的社会已经崩溃了。

Beavers17
Says the salty Canadian who has the same GDP per capita as Mississippi, which is lowest / second to lowest annually.

说这话的可是那位酸溜溜的加拿大人，你们的人均GDP和密西西比州（美国每年最低或倒数第二低）差不多。

unnecessary-512
This would be more useful if they showed it as percentage of population that are millionaires

如果他们能将数据以百万富翁占总人口的百分比形式呈现，这张图表会更有用。

OregonHusky22
Millionaire is kind of a worthless metric. It’s not 1982.

百万富翁这一衡量标准在如今没啥意义了。毕竟现在已经不是1982年了。

cantfixstupidtoo
Based off cash or land or what

是按现金？土地？还是按什么算？

Material-Macaroon298
All of the above.

以上全部

rokoruk
So back of the envelope roughly 10% of the adult population of the US is a millionaire? If this excludes primary residence that’s crazy

那么粗略估算，美国大约有10%的成年人口是百万富翁？如果这个数据还不包括自住房产，那就太疯狂了。

Optimal-Skin-6154
Yes but it includes real estate 

是的，但它包含了房地产。

BonsaiBobby
I'm curious what their definition of millionaire is. According to the Dutch statistics bureau, there are 452k 'millionaire households' (2024) in the Netherlands. Would that translate as 1.3M millionaires in the infographic? Or do they take into account the broader welfare and future pension claims?

我很想知道他们对百万富翁的定义是什么。根据荷兰统计局的数据，荷兰有45.2万个百万富翁家庭（2024年）。这在信息图中会换算成130万百万富翁吗？还是说他们会将更广泛的福利以及未来的养老金权益也纳入考量范围？

sapiosexual_redditor
India’s will be much higher, IF undeclared incomes where taken into account:-)

如果把未申报的收入也算进去，印度的数据会高得多

TaliyahPiper
Now show us wealth inequality

现在给我们看看财富不平等的情况吧。

Spare-Region-1424
Now take out the value of people’s homes

现在把人们房产的价值剔除掉。

Ok-Wall9646
My takeaway would be that everywhere I’d want to live has a healthy amount of rich people. Almost like ‘eating the rich’ is an abominable policy that improves no one’s lives.

我的看法是，所有我愿意居住的地方，都有数量可观的富人。这几乎说明，“吃富人”（注：此处指通过极端方式剥夺富人财富的主张）是一项糟糕透顶的政策，对任何人的生活都毫无改善作用。

Pale-Candidate8860
Considering how lightly populated Canada and Australia are, they are doing pretty good on millionaire count. Especially considering how many of those other countries have much larger populations.

考虑到加拿大和澳大利亚的人口相对稀少，它们在百万富翁数量上的表现已经相当不错了，尤其是与其他人口多得多的国家相比。

Convoke_
Zimbabwe have almost as many millionaires as the US

津巴布韦的百万富翁数量几乎和美国一样多。（此处在调侃津巴韦布的货币）