印度人比中国人更聪明吗？为什么美国大型企业的大多数首席执行官是印度人，而不是中国人、韩国人或日本人？

Chen Zhigong (陳治功) Follow

The answer is quite clear.
Look at the top 500 companies in the world. 109 companies are Chinese, Japan 51, South Korea 15. These three eastern Asian countries dominate 1/3 of the list
What about India ? Sorry, only 7 of the top 500 companies in the world are Indian.

答案非常明确。
看看全球 500 强企业。109 家是中国公司，日本 51 家，韩国 15 家。这三个东亚国家占据了榜单的三分之一。.
印度呢？很遗憾，全球 500 强企业中只有 7 家是印度的。
图1

So as you can see, most Chinese, Japanese or Korean elites would choose to go back to their own country to start their career after their studies or work internships in the US. Because their countries do have the powerful enterprises, then why stay and work abroad ?

The phenomenon that there are so many Indian CEOs in the American firms is called 人才流失(Human capital flight/Brain Drain), that’s what the Indian really should concern about more than showing off their “abroad CEOs”, because the American enterprises where these Indian elites work for, have nothing to do with India and Indian economy.
由此可见，大多数中日韩精英在美国完成学业或工作实习后，都会选择回国发展事业。既然母国拥有实力雄厚的企业，何必留在海外工作？
美国企业中出现如此多印度裔 CEO 的现象被称为"人才外流"，这其实才是印度人真正应该关切的问题——而非炫耀那些"海外 CEO"，因为这些印度精英效力的美国企业与印度本土经济毫无关联。

Jay Jackson
I wish this is like facebook and I can put a love sign or laugh sign at your answer haha.
But, maybe the questioner is just truly curious about this trend as to why it happened, or just try to show “Indian is smarter than Chinese” haha.
But, When a person try to put another national/race down in order to make him/herself “looks better/smarter”, I smell “feeling of inferiority by questioner”.
But, its truth that some Indian like to compare themselves with Chinese.

真希望这能像脸书一样，能在你的回答后面加个爱心或大笑的表情符号，哈哈。
不过，提问者可能真的只是好奇为什么会出现这种现象，或者单纯想表达"印度人比中国人聪明"的想法，哈哈。
但是，当一个人试图通过贬低其他民族/种族来让自己"显得更优秀/更聪明"时，我闻到了"提问者的自卑感"。
不过确实有些印度人喜欢拿自己和中国作比较。

Jason Li
Not only that, there are Chinese companies respectivly ranking #2,3, & 4 in top 10 rankings and Japanese Toyota rank #7 in 2018 list. Also China now has 120 companies in top 500.

不仅如此，在 2018 年世界十强企业中，中国公司分别占据第二、第三和第四位，日本丰田位列第七。如今中国更有 120 家企业跻身世界 500 强。

Phelomina Sigamani
Don’t expect Indian to run Chinese n Japanese companies by Indians do you? You hve to speak Chinese n write Chinese n Japanese, they don’t speak or do business with western models it’s Chinese models etc. That’s why the Chinese n Japanese are not CEOs of American n European big companies, one have to speak well n eloquently in English with a smile not with stern face.

难道你会指望印度人来管理中国和日本的公司吗？你必须会说中文、写中文和日文，他们不和西方模式打交道，而是遵循中国模式等等。这就是为什么中国人和日本人不会成为美国和欧洲大公司的 CEO，你必须能用英语流利且优雅地交谈，面带微笑而不是板着脸。

T Zhao
You do know CEOs are just very high paid workers in most of these corporations. They don't actually own the companies and can be let go by the “True Owners” ,the board members with majority holding stocks - usually White Americans.

你要知道，在这些大企业里，CEO 本质上不过是拿着天价薪水的打工人。他们并不真正拥有公司，随时可能被"真正的主人"——那些持有多数股份的董事会成员（通常是美国白人）扫地出门。

Rabbit Florist
No, no, all of this is just an illusion. India does not participate in the Earth ranking competition. The ranking of the Indian segment is far ahead of that of the people on Earth. India is participating in the cosmic ranking competition.
India is the number one country in the universe. South Korea is the best in the world, and Vietnam ranks first in Asia. As for China, come on! A country that has been in chaos for over 30 years. Even its own people haven't been able to stabilize it yet. How could it possibly have the qualifications to participate?

不，不，这一切都只是错觉。印度并不参与地球排名竞赛。印度赛段的排名早已远超地球上的人类。印度参与的是宇宙级别的排名竞赛。
印度是全宇宙第一的国家。韩国是全球最强，越南是亚洲第一。至于中国，得了吧！一个混乱了三十多年的国家，连自己的人民都还没能安定下来，怎么可能有资格参与呢？

Tigar
The top Indian company, Reliance Industries Ltd (RIL), ranking 88th, while China’s ICBC is number one in the Forbes 2025.

印度顶尖企业信实工业有限公司位列第 88 名，而中国的工商银行在《福布斯》2025 榜单中排名第一。

Priyank Gupta
I think it has more to do with the assimilation of Indian people abroad compared to Chinese or Koreans . Indians who go abroad know better English and can cope up with cultural changes than Chinese. So you will find more indians doing well in the American or even European scenario.
Relgarding the top companies most of the Chinese companies are state owned or sponsored and their foot print being limited to China. Yes revenues are higher and growing because of the bigger market in China and the government policies of not allowing foreign companies to get a hold of the Chinese market through manipulations in policies . So the latter part had much more to do with the government policies and ofcourse the Chinese /japanese way of copying (if you consider that intelligence ).
I will say an average Chinese is more productive than an average Indian and it has much to do with culture and religion and education system .intelligence is very subjective and case dependent .

我认为这与印度人在海外的适应能力比中国人或韩国人更强有关。出国的印度人英语更好，也能更快适应文化差异。因此你会发现更多印度人在美国甚至欧洲环境中表现出色。
就顶尖企业而言，中国大部分企业属于国有或国家扶持性质，其业务范围主要局限于中国境内。尽管营收规模更大且持续增长，这主要得益于中国庞大的市场规模以及政府通过政策调控限制外资企业掌控中国市场的战略。因此，后一种情况更多与政府政策导向有关，当然也涉及中国/日本式的模仿创新（如果你认为这也算智慧的话）。
我认为普通中国人的生产效率高于普通印度人，这与文化传统、宗教信仰和教育体系密切相关。智力水平是高度主观且因具体情境而异的评判标准。

Thirumalai Prasanna
Totally true! Also we can add few points: Bcz they are Lazy, ignorant, scared of corrupt politicians, scared of taking new challenges, already adopted to a comfy life style, no platform for entrepreneurs and so on.

完全正确！还可以补充几点：因为他们懒惰、无知、害怕腐败政客、畏惧接受新挑战、已经适应了安逸的生活方式、缺乏企业家发展平台等等。

Glenn Lee
looking at the hi tech firms, the chip makers, of the world, most are lead by East Asians in China, Korea, Japan and America; in America, Huang, Tan, Su……..

放眼全球高科技企业和芯片制造商，多数由中国、韩国、日本和美国的东亚裔领导；在美国，黄仁勋、苏姿丰、陈福阳.....

Kien Phung
Indians are not smarter than Chinese, they are sneakier, know to kiss ass and they are excellent in self-promotion. They could not create their own high-tech companies, just inherited existing companies.

印度人并不比中国人聪明，他们更狡猾，善于拍马屁，并且非常擅长自我推销。他们无法创建自己的高科技公司，只是继承了现有的企业。

AI Konn
Indians are good for scam to worming up corporate and government positions. They can’t do actual works besides scam show presentation.

印度人擅长靠诈骗手段爬上企业和政府职位。他们除了装模作样的骗术表演外，干不了实际工作。

James Chrisholm Follow
India was colonised by the Brits for 500 years under the British Raj. They have been used as administrators, mercenaries and workers for a long time. Many were used in the civil service. There are a huge number of Indians in the commonwealth as well as as in UK. They are educated in the English system since the British destroyed their sanskrit based education and replaced it with the British cirriculum. After centuries of colonisation, many of them think and behave like the British and cultural barriers are much lower. Many are educated and working in the States as well.
Not surprising that many of them work in the English speaking firms as they have been for hundreds of years. The whites trusted them as stewarts to run the colonies.
Moreover, they are more expressive and congenial which are traits that the Americans admire. The Chinese are more reserved and shy, moreover, oratorical skill is not a cultural imperative i.e. they prefer to prove with their work than talk. Moverover, the trust in Chinese or any other East Asian is very limited due to the fear of the “Chinese peril” and the recent xenophobia over trade.
It’s nothing to do with smartness, it has to do with familiarity based on colonial relations and cultural traits.

印度曾在大英帝国统治下被殖民 500 年。长期以来，印度人一直被用作行政人员、雇佣兵和劳工，许多人任职于公务员系统。英联邦国家和英国本土都有大量印度裔人口。由于英国摧毁了印度原有的梵语教育体系并以英式课程取代，他们接受的是英式教育。经过数百年殖民统治，许多印度人的思维和行为方式已趋近英国人，文化隔阂大为减弱。还有大批受过教育的印度人在美国工作。
他们在英语企业中工作数百年并不令人意外。白人曾信任他们作为管家来管理殖民地。
此外，印度人更具表现力且亲切随和，这些特质深受美国人欣赏。中国人则更为内敛含蓄，且演讲能力并非文化必修课——他们更倾向于用工作实绩而非言辞来证明自己。更重要的是，由于对"黄祸论"的恐惧以及近期贸易引发的排外情绪，美国社会对中国或其他东亚族群的信任度极为有限。
这与聪明才智无关，而是基于殖民历史渊源和文化特质的亲近度使然。

Luca Yang Follow
If there’s any conclusion that can be drawn from this phenomenon, it’s that
The Indian elites who choose to stay in the USA have achieved better careers than Chinese, Korean and Japanese.
Maybe it’s because Indians are smarter, or maybe it’s that the smartest choose to become Americans, while the smartest Chinese, Korean and Japanese would go back to their motherlands.
Another possibility is that the Indians suit the positions of chief managers better, while smart Chinese, Korean and Japanese are engineers, analysts etc.
As a result, further survey is required.

如果说能从这种现象中得出什么结论的话，那就是选择留在美国的印度精英确实比在美国的中韩日三国的精英发展得更好。
或许是因为印度人更聪明，又或许是因为最聪明的印度人选择成为美国人，而中韩日最优秀的人才都选择回归故土。
另一种可能是印度人更适合担任高管职位，而聪明的中国人、韩国人和日本人则多从事工程师、分析师等工作。
因此，还需要进一步调查。

Daniel Chan Follow
Yes, Indians are smarter than the Chinese. Indians being CEOs of US firms, not Chinese (although she has larger population than India), Korean , Japanese is a significant undeniable proof.
Indians are not just smarter than the Chinese, Koreans or Japanese; they are smarter than Germans, French, Italians, Russians,Spanish, etc (excluding Americans) because Americans don't give them CEO jobs. In fact, it is safe to say that most races are not as smart as Indians because Americans don't employ them as CEOs as much as they do to Indians (it's a clear and uncontroversial fact).
So, only Americans are possibly smarter than Indians because American CEOs of big American firms still outnumber Indian CEOs.

印度人确实比中国人更聪明。虽然中国人口比印度更多，但印度人而非中国人、韩国人或日本人成为美国大公司的首席执行官，这一事实是不可否认的重要证据。
印度人不仅比中国人、韩国人或日本人更聪明；他们比德国人、法国人、意大利人、俄罗斯人、西班牙人等（不包括美国人）都更聪明，因为美国人不会给他们 CEO 的职位。事实上，可以放心地说，大多数种族都不如印度人聪明，因为美国人雇佣他们担任 CEO 的频率远不及印度人（这是一个明确且无争议的事实）。
因此，只有美国人可能比印度人更聪明，因为大公司的美国 CEO 数量仍然多于印度 CEO。

Winnugroho Wiratman Follow
I’m not either Chinese, Koreans, Japanese, nor Indian. I wrote this from my own prespective.
Language. Indians have better English ability compare to Chinese, Korean, and Japanese. This ability makes them easily to work, adapt, and express themselves in American firms.
The ability to express their mind. Apart from language ability, Indians are used to exrpress what's on their mind. Like to debate on many things and speak up their opinions on many things. This habit is considered to be lack in the other 3, especially Japanese. To speak up your mind is also considered to be a good value in American firm.
Opportunity back home. Japanese, Korean, and Chinese choose to have carrier back home because they have the opportunity to have a good life there.
Maybe I am generalizing or maybe there are other factors. I want to hear it.

我既不是中国人、韩国人、日本人，也不是印度人。以下内容仅代表我个人观点。
语言优势。相比中国人、韩国人和日本人，印度人的英语能力更强。这种能力使他们更容易在美国公司工作、适应环境并表达自我。
善于表达想法。除了语言能力外，印度人习惯于表达心中所想。他们喜欢就许多事情展开辩论，并发表自己的观点。这种习惯在其他三个群体（尤其是日本人）中较为欠缺。在美国企业中，敢于直抒己见也被视为宝贵的品质。
在本国的发展机会。日本人、韩国人和中国人选择回国发展，是因为他们在本土拥有获得美好生活的机遇。
或许我的观点有些笼统，也可能存在其他影响因素。我很想听听大家的见解。

Zee Li Follow
Because while Indian elites are going to USA to pursue their American dream, Chinese elites prefer to stay in China.

因为当印度精英前往美国追逐"美国梦"时，中国精英更倾向于留在本国发展。

Ng Say Joe Follow
In my country Malaysia we have many Indians and Chinese, so I think I’m qualified to give my answer here. From my experience, Indians tend to overpromise and under-deliver, while Chinese tend to be conservative and deliver what is promised.
Since I’m Chinese myself so I might be bias, but from my observation, Chinese are usually very hardworking and smarter. While Indians are very smooth and persuasive talkers and better politicians.
So in big corporations, when it comes to American CEO positions therefore I think Indians are more suitable for it. However, Chinese are good executors, so for companies that value executor rather than politician -styled CEO I think Chinese would perform better.

在我的国家马来西亚，我们这里有许多印度人和华人，所以我认为我有资格在这里给出我的答案。根据我的经验，印度人往往承诺过高而兑现不足，而华人则趋于保守并兑现承诺。
由于我自己是华人可能带有偏见，但据我观察，华人通常非常勤奋且聪明。而印度人则非常圆滑、善于说服他人，是更出色的政治家。
因此在大企业中，当涉及到美国 CEO 职位时，我认为印度人更适合担任。不过中国人是优秀的执行者，对于那些更看重执行力而非政治家式 CEO 的企业，我认为中国人会表现得更出色。

Chan Seow Khoon Follow
I am from Singapore which is multi raciial , there are Chinese 60%, Indian15%, malay20%, eurasian and other race5% , I found that during my school days the Chinese usually top the class because they are the majority and occasionally the Malay or the Indian also do top the class.
My conclusion all humans are equal there are intelligent one as well as not intelligent

我来自多元种族的新加坡，华人占 60%，印度人 15%，马来人 20%，欧亚混血及其他种族占 5%。我发现学生时代通常是华人名列前茅，因为他们占多数，但偶尔也会有马来人或印度人拔得头筹。
我的结论是所有人都是平等的，既有聪明的也有不聪明的。

Siloo Kapadia Follow
It is not a matter of being “smarter” as it is a matter of trying harder to fit into Americano society. Yes, Indians also segregate themselves very much so. However, more often than not Indian immigrants will try harder to blend into the corporate social fabric.
For example, I knew of a Chinese-Americano (not immigrant) who worked in the Postal services. She told me that occasionally they had special get-togethers for Chinese postal workers only! I cannot imagine Indians doing that. Indians will work overtime to play golf, and hob nob with their non-Asian counterparts in the company.
That does not mean that all Indians are like that. We too have our “Indian-only” segment that is very strong in USA. I used to know a few of them and often had arguments about it, as I believe that once you are in a country you should try hard to adopt and adapt, not stay separate.
In the future, as India continues its rise I believe we will see a sharp decline in capable Indian immigrants, especially to places in decline like USA. This is some ways is already happening. Many Indians who go to USA also want to return.

问题不在于谁更"聪明"，而在于谁更努力融入美国社会。确实，印度裔也经常自我隔离。但更多情况下，印度移民会更努力融入企业社交圈。
比如，我认识一位华裔美国人（非移民）在邮政系统工作。她告诉我，中国邮政员工偶尔会举办专属华人的聚会！这让我难以想象印度人会这么做。印度员工宁可加班打高尔夫，也要和公司里的非亚裔同事打成一片。
但这并不意味着所有印度人都是如此。在美国，我们也有非常抱团的"印度人专属圈"。我曾认识其中一些人并经常为此争论，因为我认为既然来到一个国家，就应该努力融入适应，而不是固守小圈子。
未来随着印度持续崛起，我相信有能力移民的印度人会急剧减少，尤其是对像美国这样走下坡路的国家。某种程度上这已经在发生。许多赴美印度人也渴望回归故土。

Michael J Follow
I think the main reason is Indians have been exposed to British culture and indeed most Indians could speak English. Partial reason is India has been colonized by British for a sometime.
In business world, If you’re hirer and interviewer, would you hire someone who could not speak international language such as English? Unlike India, China, Korea and especially Japan have not picked up the English language as much as Indians do. Moreover, in the case of Japanese or in some cases of Chinese companies, the hirers insist that interviewees should speak Japanese or Chinese mainly because it was the the western companies want to engage them for businesses and all business negotiations done rather not in English in this case but in their native languages. This is certainly true to some extend where my friends work in such companies and I was told likewise.
I would say knowing English language have given Indians the opportunity to join top managements of companies in Silicon Valley unlike the East Asians counterparts.
My 2 cents thoughts.

我认为主要原因是印度人接触过英国文化，而且大多数印度人确实会说英语。部分原因是印度曾长期被英国殖民。
在商业世界里，如果你是招聘者和面试官，你会雇佣一个不会说英语等国际通用语言的人吗？与印度不同，中国、韩国尤其是日本对英语的掌握程度远不及印度人。此外，就日本企业或某些中国企业而言，招聘方坚持要求应聘者必须会说日语或汉语，这主要是因为西方企业想与他们开展业务往来时，所有商业谈判往往不是用英语进行，而是使用他们的母语。这种情况确实存在一定普遍性——我朋友就在这类公司工作，他们也是这么告诉我的。
我认为正是英语能力让印度人获得了进入硅谷企业高管层的机会，而东亚人则相对较少。
一点浅见。

Semar Manganov Follow
In my experience, American company feel comfortable with Indian n Philippines employee due to the English spoken, salary isnot too expensive, quality of education, the compensation package of required facilities arenot too many, hard working and be able to handle scolding from the big boss & big pressures.

根据我的经验，美国公司更青睐印度和菲律宾员工，原因包括英语流利、薪资要求不高、教育质量良好、所需福利待遇不多、工作勤奋且能承受老板责骂与高压环境。

Hue Nhuan Follow
Remember that India was a British colony which means educated Indians were indoctrinated into the "Western way" for many decades now. Thus, their mastery of the English language surpasses their Asian counterparts. Consequently, companies, especially Fortune 500 companies feel more confident entrusting Indian candidates to their management team. Thus, Fortune 500 companies can fulfill their quotas of minorities in upper management roles who are not only higly educated but can communicate effectively as opposed to their other Asian counterparts who may not be an effective English speaker. Once the other Asian countries can speak effectively on a consistent basis, they will ascend to significant upper level management roles.

别忘了印度曾是英国殖民地，这意味着受过教育的印度人几十年来一直受到"西方文化"的熏陶。因此他们对英语的掌握程度超越了其他亚洲国家。相应地，企业——尤其是财富 500 强企业——更有信心将印度裔候选人纳入管理团队。这样一来，财富 500 强企业就能满足高管层少数族裔的配额要求，这些印度裔高管不仅受过高等教育，还能有效沟通，而其他亚裔高管可能存在英语表达障碍。当其他亚洲国家的候选人能持续保持有效沟通时，他们也将晋升至重要高管职位。

YoujiH Follow
Indian elites are, overall, smarter than Chinese, Korean and Japanese elite, because their education and life plan are geared toward education, work and immigration in West. And that is the problem of India where its elite are largely disconnected from domestic mass.
The best school in India send its graduates (who are taught in English) to UK, USA, Australia, Canada, etc. Their achievements in West may make Indian proud but the system is perverse. India is effectively subsidising development in West by educating then sending its best and brightest.
Chinese, Korean and Japanese study in their own language as their textbook in science, math and engineering are all in their own language. After doing their undergraduate study in their best university, most get their job in corporation, university and government in their own country. Only very few then seek to do graduates study in West. The pool of talent who may choose to work in West is extreamly small (though, China due to sheer size produce large number of exchage students).
In India, their textbook at advance level are not even in their domestic language. And primary education for poor in India are atrocious. Many teachers often don't bother to show up. This doesn't happen for poor in Japan, Korea or China. China has lifted it's one billion population out of poverty. For a developing country, China do extreamly well. In 2015, China's four welthy provinces, Jiangsu, Guangdong, Beijing, and Shanghai, with a total population of over 230 million, participated in PISA.
Programme for International Student Assessment - Wikipedia
These four province placed 6th in math, 10th in science and 27th in reading, and actually beat South Korea in math (7th) and science (11th).
India, on the other hand, is staying out of PISA out of embarrassment, because last time two wealthy province participated in 2009, India ranked 72 out of 74. And official reason for non participation is that PISA is culturally biased because, for example, it math test use avocado instead of mango, despite avocado not being common fruits in Korea, China or Japan either.
Why Does India Refuse to Participate in Global Education Rankings?
So, India do have very smart people who are educated in English since childhood, geared toward life and success in West. But they are swamped by poorly educated mass. So, overall, Indian are not smarter than Japanese, Chinese or (South) Korean, and believe it or not, possibly worse than North Korea. The last time North Korea participated in HDI (human development index) was 1995 and it's ranking was 75 out of 174. India's ranking for 2016 is 131 out of 188.

总体而言，印度精英阶层比中韩日精英更精明，因为他们的教育和人生规划都以西方教育、工作和移民为导向。这正是印度的问题所在——其精英阶层与国内大众严重脱节。
印度最顶尖的学府将其毕业生（接受英语授课）输送到英国、美国、澳大利亚、加拿大等国。这些人才在西方取得的成就或许令印度人自豪，但这种制度实则畸形。印度实质上通过培养并输送本国最优秀的人才，变相资助了西方国家的发展。
中国、韩国和日本的学生使用母语学习，因其理工科教材均为本国语言。在本国顶尖大学完成本科教育后，绝大多数人选择进入本土企业、高校或政府机构工作。仅有极少数人后续赴西方攻读研究生。可能选择在西方就业的人才池极为有限（不过中国因体量庞大，仍会输出相当数量的留学生）。
在印度，他们的高级教材甚至不用本土语言编写。而印度穷人的基础教育状况令人震惊，许多教师经常懒得露面。这种情况在日本、韩国或中国的贫困群体中不会发生。中国已经让十亿人口摆脱了贫困。作为一个发展中国家，中国表现得非常出色。2015 年，中国四个富裕省份——江苏、广东、北京和上海（总人口超 2.3 亿）参与了国际学生评估项目。
国际学生评估项目 - 维基百科（链接）
这四个省份在数学排名第 6、科学第 10、阅读第 27，韩国是数学（第 7）和科学（第 11），中国的成绩实际超过了韩国。
另一方面，印度因尴尬而回避参与国际学生评估项目测试——2009 年其两个富裕省份参赛时，在 74 个国家中排名第 72 位。官方给出的不参与理由是国际学生评估项目存在文化偏见，比如数学题用鳄梨而非芒果举例，尽管鳄梨在中日韩也非常见水果。
印度为何拒绝参与全球教育排名？
印度确实存在从小接受英语教育、适应西方生活的精英群体，但他们被庞大的低教育水平人群所淹没。总体而言，印度人并不比中日韩国民更聪明，信不信由你，甚至可能不如朝鲜——朝鲜最后一次参与人类发展指数排名是 1995 年，在 174 国中位列第 75 名，而印度 2016 年在 188 国中仅排第 131 位。

Siddhi Naik Follow
There are a lot of Indian immigrants who are CEO of many US firms because the firm wants itself to show as open and diverse culture not only that by showing many Indians that you can become CEO of top companies USA constantly gets inflow from India of talented and rich students who not only pay huge fees which many americans cannot afford but they also stay back and contribute hence america always has a stock of intelligent hardworking minds. The Chinese student studying in USA are greater than Indians and are equally smart and hard working but Chinese dont become CEOs because as soon as they pass out their leaders give them a lot of incentives to work in China. They personally visit them and make them offers they cant refuse. Indian leaders are yet to realise this and are stuck in vote bank divide and rule politics. Many Indians are proud of the fact that CEOs are Indian mainly because Indias still colonised mind get validation that they are intelligent whose confidence has been systematically shattered through invasions and ridiculing of their cultures. Most of these students education is subsidised by hard working tax payers money most of their peaceful nights are protected by defense forces who lay their lives but when the time comes to give back all the benefits go to america see how america plays its cards there is a reason it is the only superpower. Many countries have realised this like France who have set a target of getting 10000 Indian students to study in France in 2020 which they achieved in the first try. How dumb we Indians really are we may be smart and hardworking but we need to be cunning as well.

众多印度移民能够成为美国企业的 CEO，主要是因为这些企业想彰显开放多元的文化形象。不仅如此，通过展示印度裔也能执掌顶尖企业，美国持续吸引着印度天赋异禀且家境优渥的留学生——他们不仅支付着多数美国人难以承担的高额学费，毕业后更会留美贡献才智，使美国始终保有勤奋聪慧的人才储备。在美中国留学生数量虽超过印度裔，同样聪颖勤奋，却鲜少出任 CEO，因为他们毕业伊始就会收到祖国提供的难以拒绝的优厚回国条件，领导人甚至会亲自游说。而印度政客仍沉迷于选票政治与分而治之的把戏，尚未意识到人才争夺的重要性。许多印度人以 CEO 的印度血统为荣，本质上仍是殖民心态作祟——被入侵史与文化贬损长期摧毁的民族自信，需要通过他人认可来确认自身才智。 这些学生的大部分教育费用都是由辛勤工作的纳税人资助的，他们平静的夜晚是由那些舍生忘死的国防军人们守护的。然而当需要回报时，所有好处都流向了美国——看看美国是如何运筹帷幄的，它能成为唯一超级大国绝非偶然。许多国家已经意识到这点，比如法国就设定了 2020 年吸引万名印度学生赴法留学的目标，结果首次尝试就超额完成。我们印度人实在太天真了，或许我们聪明又勤奋，但同样需要学会狡黠处世。

Raj Nayyer
This has to be tge dumbest answer of all time. In a world that is now incredibly globalised. It doesn't make a difference where do you study or work. Stop 1990s idiotic brain-drain phenomenon which is irrelevant now for stable country that are a part of a globalised community.

这简直是有史以来最愚蠢的回答。在当今高度全球化的世界里，在哪里学习或工作根本无关紧要。别再提 1990 年代那种愚蠢的人才外流现象了，这对已融入全球化体系的稳定国家来说早已过时。

Jayant Yadav
I agree with Raj.. It is such a dumb answer especially when you assess the networking, connectivity & globalization in this present age.. Successful indians abroad make nation proud ..It facilitates more intercultural exchanges & remittances enriching the ties between both countries

我赞同 Raj 的观点。在评估当前时代的社交网络、互联互通和全球化程度时，这种回答显得尤为可笑。海外成功的印度人让国家引以为豪，他们促进了更多跨文化交流和侨汇往来，从而丰富了两国之间的联系。