一个美国人去了中国，走进一家医院，要求做核磁共振，付了70美元，第二天就拿到了结果。为什么美国的医疗体系如此失常且昂贵？

onepingonlypleashe
Likes: 3
Here in America it costs about $500-$1000 for an X-ray after all the bills are summed up, and that’s going through a major insurance provider via a fortune 500 company.

在美国，通过一家财富500强公司的大型保险公司，所有账单加起来，一次X光检查的费用大约在500到1000美元之间。

Tiny_Fractures
Likes: 1
No it doesn't?

没那么贵吧？

TyberWhite
Likes: 1
It does, but sometimes it’s even more. I was charged $2600 for a lumbar x-ray at a major New England facility.

就是那么贵，有时候甚至更贵。我在新英格兰一家大医院做腰椎X光检查，被收了2600美元。

r3drocket
Likes: 3
Yep, which is also why some practices are going back to how medical care worked in the 1800s - concierge care where you pay a monthly fee to your doctor. This is what I do with my dentist and it is cheaper than dental insurance. I pay him like 350$ for 4 cleanings and 25% off any additional dental work that is needed.

是的，这也是为什么一些诊所开始回归19世纪的医疗模式——“私人医生”服务，你每个月给医生付一笔固定费用。我的牙医就是这样，比牙科保险便宜。我付给他一年350美元，包含4次洗牙，其他任何额外的牙科治疗还能打75折。

Key_Inspection_8200
Likes: 753
Because of the filthy rich Insurance companies that are all for profit and not for healthcare.

因为那些肮脏、富得流油的保险公司，它们完全是为了盈利，而不是为了医疗保健。

MyCatIsLenin
Likes: 202
It's not just insurance companies. PE has begun to purchase hospitals and clinics. They see the writing on the wall wrt to private insurance, its days are numbered.

不仅仅是保险公司的问题。私募股权公司（PE）已经开始收购医院和诊所了。他们已经看到了私人保险行业气数已尽的预兆，它的日子不多了。

socialclubmisfit
Likes: 87
So pretty much they want everyone to have lower life expectancy just so they can make a few more millions.

所以基本上，他们就是想让所有人的预期寿命都降低，这样他们自己就能多赚几百万。

FuckYourUsername84
Likes: 66
Republican ethos

这就是共和党的精神内核。

Sznake
Likes: 18
Yup,the "we're ok, fuck everybody else" ethos.

没错，就是那种“我们自己过得好就行，别人都去死”的精神。

MittenstheGlove
Likes: 5
We got democrats agreeing with it too.

我们这儿的民主党人也同意这一点。

Mental-Fox-9449
Likes: 17
Which is why we have a gov shutdown right now? Stop with the “both sides are the same”

这就是我们现在政府关门的原因？别再说“两边都一样”这种话了。

ttystikk
Likes: 17
Notice the Democrats are NOT fighting for universal healthcare free or cheap at the point of service. Obamacare was modeled on Romneycare, which was still very much pro health insurance company legislation.
We can do better and we must.

注意，民主党并*没有*在为全民免费或平价的医疗服务而战。奥巴马医改是模仿罗姆尼医改的，而罗姆尼医改本身就是一项非常有利于健康保险公司的法案。
我们可以，也必须做得更好。

Kaizothief
Likes: 10
The amount of gaslighting the Democrats and their weird supporters on this subreddit it insane. Like do they not know any history l outside of what their DNC overlords tell them?
Obamacare was gutted by Biden and Lieberman for the sake of Healthcare companies. Additionally, even when people were advocating for M4A, the last 3 Democratic candidates were all against it and only called for expanded "access", whatever the fuck that means.
We need to do better, but the fact of the matter is that we can't rely on these Democrats anymore for it.

在这个论坛上，民主党和他们那些奇怪的支持者们进行的煤气灯操控（gaslighting）简直是疯了。难道除了民主党全国委员会（DNC）的老爷们告诉他们的之外，他们就不知道任何历史了吗？
为了医疗保健公司的利益，奥巴马医改被拜登和利伯曼阉割了。此外，即便在人们倡导全民医保（M4A）的时候，最近三位民主党候选人也都反对，只呼吁扩大“渠道”，天知道这他妈的是什么意思。
我们需要做得更好，但事实是，我们再也不能指望这些民主党人了。

ttystikk
Likes: -4
And that's why I'm done voting for Democrats; if they won't represent my interests, they certainly don't need my vote. If 50 million other Americans felt the same way, it would be the end of the Democratic Party. Good riddance!

所以我不打算再投票给民主党了；如果他们不能代表我的利益，他们当然也不需要我的选票。如果有五千万美国人也这么想，那民主党就完蛋了。走好不送！

FuckYourUsername84
Likes: 2
Leaving more power to the republicans to gut more healthcare. Smart choice!

把更多权力留给共和党去进一步摧毁医疗体系。真是明智的选择！

ttystikk
Likes: -4
No longer my problem. Why didn't you hold Democrats accountable instead?

那不再是我的问题了。你为什么不去追究民主党的责任呢？

FuckYourUsername84
Likes: 0
Republicans first

先干掉共和党。

ttystikk
Likes: 0
Both sides are completely corrupt. You can deny gravity but it will still hurt if you jump off the roof.

两党都彻底腐败了。你可以否认地心引力，但你从屋顶跳下去还是会受伤。

Money_Cost_2213
likes: 21
Which is important to note for profit healthcare wasn’t really a mainstream thing until 1973. This was a big shift that happened in the 1970s-1980s.
Also as someone who’s had to go to hospital in Asia, It’s crazy that I did not have the same anxiety of healthcare costs that I have in my home country USA. And I have always had heath insurance too.

值得注意的是，营利性医疗直到1973年才真正成为主流。这是在20世纪70到80年代发生的一个巨大转变。
另外，作为一个曾在亚洲住过院的人，我在那里对医疗费用的焦虑感完全不像在我的祖国美国那么强烈，这太疯狂了。而且我一直都有健康保险。

-JackBack-
likes: 15
Boomers happened, that’s what.

婴儿潮一代上台了，就是这么回事。

Money_Cost_2213
likes: 18
100. They robbed from the future generations to enrich themselves. And have held the govt and its policies hostage for their own gain. This is not a one party problem either.

百分之百是。他们窃取了子孙后代的财富来中饱私囊，并为了自己的利益绑架了政府及其政策。而且这也不只是一个党的问题。

BronxBoy56
likes: 3
It was Nixon

是尼克松干的。

M3RV-89
likes: 8
Reagan

里根。

here_for_the_boos
likes: 8
C'mon guys don't fight. It was Nixon AND Reagan. Without Nixon's help Reagan wouldn't have had the ability to destroy as much as he did.

得了吧伙计们，别吵了。是尼克松和里根一起干的。没有尼克松的帮助，里根也不可能造成那么大的破坏。

Lucy_Goosey_11
likes: 9
Because US politics has been taken over by special interest insurance lobbies. The world looks at the US healthcare system in horror and confusion.

因为美国政治已经被特殊利益的保险游说集团接管了。全世界都以一种恐惧和困惑的眼光看待美国的医疗体系。

jlb8
likes: 5
It's mutually beneficial, companies get to make lots of cash and the government gets to make sure everyone is in work for fear of getting sick.

这是互利的，公司能大赚一笔，而政府则能确保每个人都因为害怕生病而不敢失业。

Splenda
likes: 15
Insurance companies. Hospital companies. Pharma companies. Medical schools. High-priced specialist physicians. The American Medical Association. They're all in on the big scam.
Which is why countries like France nationalize the fuckers, then have even better medical care and better health metrics at half the price we pay.

保险公司、医院集团、制药公司、医学院、高价专科医生、美国医学会。他们全都参与了这个大骗局。
这就是为什么像法国这样的国家把这些混蛋都收归国有，然后以我们一半的价格，提供了甚至更好的医疗服务和健康指标。

treenewbee_
likes: 2
Do you think the CCP doesn't want high healthcare prices? China's healthcare system relies on overcharging for drugs, while examination fees are relatively low. The reason is that Chinese people have very low incomes (600 million people earn less than $140 per month, and 900 million earn less than $280 per month). If prices were the same as in the US, most people couldn't afford medical care.

你以为中G不想要高昂的医疗价格吗？中国的医疗体系依赖于药品的高价收费，而检查费用相对较低。原因是中国人收入很低（6亿人月收入低于140美元，9亿人月收入低于280美元）。如果价格和美国一样，大多数人都看不起病。

xydanil
likes: 1
You're going to need to provide a source for this claim. President * has outright stated both publically and in his published books that the goal of the Chinese government is to provide preventative health care and to aim to achieve universal healthcare.

你需要为你的这个说法提供来源。中国已经在公开场合和他出版的书籍中明确表示，中国政府的目标是提供预防性医疗保健，并致力于实现全民医保。

ShastaAteMyPhone
likes: 1
What about the non-profit health insurance companies?

那么那些非营利性的健康保险公司呢？

stroker919
likes: 1
Times are tough for them. We already got letters that major networks are being dropped by the carriers here and warned at work to look out for huge premium increases.
Thoughts and prayers.

他们的日子也不好过。我们已经收到信说这里的主要保险网络正在被保险公司放弃，工作时也接到警告要注意保费大幅上涨。
为他们默哀祈祷吧。

jjcly
likes: 1
Yeah. It’s called Corpocracy.

是的。这叫“公司治国”。

MrThingMan
likes: 1
What a simple answer.

多么简单的答案。

leftofmarx
likes: 0
The difference between bourgeois capitalism and capitalist development with the goal of building advanced socialism under the guidance of a communist party is staggering. The state can be wielded to be wildly successful at anything it does, but in the United States the state serves mostly as an organizing committee for the affairs of the capitalist class and their common class interests. Our government is a means for the capitalists class, and the bourgeois capitalist system is inseparable from the bourgeois state. "Public-private" never means anything other than bourgeois profit interests using the state to facilitate those profit interests.

资产阶级资本主义与在gcd领导下以建设先进社会主义为目标的资本主义发展之间有着天壤之别。国家可以被用来在任何事情上取得巨大成功，但在美国，国家主要充当资本家阶级及其共同阶级利益的事务组织委员会。我们的政府是资本家阶级的工具，资产阶级资本主义制度与资产阶级国家是密不可分的。“公私合营”除了意味着资产阶级的利润利益利用国家来促成这些利益之外，别无他意。

Treadmiler
likes: 1
Billionaires exist in both countries and almost in the same numbers - billionaires in both countries are in lock step with the government

两国都有亿万富翁，而且数量几乎相同——两国的亿万富翁都与政府步调一致。

leftofmarx
likes: 1
Ah yes the United States executes and imprisons billionaires for corruption just like China. Oh wait... nope
In the same numbers when one country is 5 times larger also, and the number of billionaires in China has decreased nearly 40% in the last couple of years
Using the capitalist mode of development under the guidance of a vanguard party to develop toward advanced socialism is the most basic principle of Marxism-Leninism-Maoism. The existence of markets and billionaires is expected, but the state doesn't serve the class interests of the capitalist class like in bourgeois capitalism, the capitalists instead serve the interests of the state. Or they are punished. It is why the bourgeois form of capitalism in the United States if faltering while China is thriving.

啊是的，美国也像中国一样，因为腐败就处决和监禁亿万富翁。哦等等……并没有。
在一个国家比另一个大5倍的情况下，数量还相同，而且过去几年中国亿万富翁的数量减少了近40%。
在先锋队的指导下，利用资本主义的发展模式走向先进社会主义，是马克思列宁毛主义最基本的原则。市场和亿万富翁的存在是预料之中的，但国家不像在资产阶级资本主义中那样为资本家阶级的利益服务，相反，是资本家为国家的利益服务。否则他们就会受到惩罚。这就是为什么美国的资产阶级资本主义形式步履维艰，而中国却蓬勃发展。

clem_fandango_london
likes: 0
Luigi is my King.

路易吉是我的王。

bulla564
likes: 210
Corporate Pirates and warmongering organized cartels control the US, especially healthcare.

企业海盗和好战的犯罪集团控制着美国，尤其是医疗保健领域。

LurkerFromTheVoid
likes: 45
Yep. MRI is old technology, nowadays, it should cost 70 USD to take one now:
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) was invented in the 1970s.
1971: Paul Lauterbur and Peter Mansfield independently published research on the use of magnetic resonance to create images.
1972: Raymond Damadian patented the first MRI scanner.
1973: Lauterbur created the first magnetic resonance image of a mouse.
1974: Mansfield published a paper on how to create three-dimensional images using MRI.
1977: Damadian and his team performed the first full-body MRI scan on a human.
The first commercial MRI machine was installed in 1983.

没错。核磁共振（MRI）是老技术了，如今做一次应该只要70美元：
磁共振成像（MRI）发明于20世纪70年代。
1971年：保罗·劳特伯和彼得·曼斯菲尔德独立发表了利用磁共振生成图像的研究。
1972年：雷蒙德·达马迪安为第一台MRI扫描仪申请了专利。
1973年：劳特伯创造了第一张老鼠的磁共振图像。
1974年：曼斯菲尔德发表了一篇关于如何使用MRI创建三维图像的论文。
1977年：达马迪安和他的团队对人类进行了首次全身MRI扫描。
第一台商用MRI机器于1983年安装。

putdownthekitten
likes: 24
Honestly, as an American, I think it would be cheaper AND easier just to fly out of the country for an MRI.

老实说，作为一个美国人，我觉得飞到国外做一次核磁共振检查，可能既便宜又省事。

noonenotevenhere
likes: 10
id agree with you if flying and customs weren’t... exceptional risks at the moment.

如果眼下飞行和过海关不是……特别有风险的话，我会同意你的。

SEQLAR
likes: 13
Let me give you my most recent example. Last year I paid for a full body MRI on my own and spent $2500.00
This year I needed an MRI on my lower leg. Simple no contrast type of MRI. I get a doctor’s referral and get such MRI through insurance. The radiology place charged my insurance company $3800.00 resulting in a $900.00 cost to me(deductible+coinsurance).
Meanwhile, if you do a search for radiology places to get this same MRI done privately an average cost comes out to $600-800.
What kind of Ponzi scheme is this? How can such an MRI cost $4000 via insurance coverage meanwhile privately one can get it for almost 1/10 of the cost??
wtf is going on with the price gouging??

我给你举个最近的例子。去年我自费做了一次全身核磁共振，花了2500美元。
今年我的小腿需要做核磁共振，就是那种最简单的不打造影剂的。我拿到了医生的转诊单，通过保险做了检查。结果放射科向我的保险公司收了3800美元，导致我自付了900美元（免赔额+共同保险）。
与此同时，如果你自己去搜一下做同样检查的放射科，自费的平均价格大概在600到800美元。
这是什么庞氏骗局？怎么同一个检查，走保险要花4000美元，而自费却能用几乎十分之一的价格搞定？？
这价格欺诈到底是怎么回事？？

LurkerFromTheVoid
likes: 4
Ridiculously Terrible.
We are literally paying somebody's Yatch in the Caribbean. And it's gonna get even worse thanks to this crazy current administration.

简直太离谱了。
我们这简直是在给某人在加勒比海的游艇买单。而且多亏了这届疯狂的政府，情况只会变得更糟。

Meet-me-behind-bins
likes: 3
It’s mad. I can get a free MRI with the NHS in the UK in 6 months. Or I can pay £200 and get one in a week and take the results to my NHS doctor.

这太疯狂了。在英国，我可以通过国民医疗服务体系（NHS）在6个月内免费做一次核磁共振。或者我也可以花200英镑，一周内做完，然后把结果拿给我的NHS医生看。

nerdswag0
likes: 1
That's like saying cars are old technology. The technology of current MRI scanners is miles ahead of where it was even 20 years ago, let alone 50.

这就像说汽车是老技术一样。现在的核磁共振扫描仪技术比20年前，更不用说50年前，已经领先了不知多少。

LurkerFromTheVoid
likes: 1
Well... If I need to rent a Car, once a year for 15 minutes . It should not cost me 2000 USD - 3500 USD to use it, even if it's state of the art. Just my humble opinion. But I understand your point.

嗯……如果我需要租一辆车，一年一次，用15分钟。那它不应该花掉我2000到3500美元，即使它是最先进的。这只是我的拙见。但我明白你的意思。

nerdswag0
likes: 2
An elective MRI with no insurance is usually in the 700-1100 range. At least at the hospital I have experience with. This is not a defense of the cost of medical care. Just providing context.

如果没有保险，一次选择性的核磁共振通常在700到1100美元之间。至少在我有经验的医院是这样。我不是在为医疗费用辩护，只是提供一些背景信息。

SpeakCodeToMe
likes: 28
"By and For the people" went out the door a long time ago, but citizens united was the death blow.

“民有、民享”的理念早就被抛弃了，而“联合公民案”则是最后一击。

vacccine
likes: 11
Citizens united killed democracy

“联合公民案”扼杀了民主。

Splenda
likes: 5
Democracy is being killed by an obsolete constitution that allows right-wing rural states to pack the Supreme Court with corrupt political hacks.

民主正在被一部过时的宪法扼杀，这部宪法允许右翼的农业州用腐败的政客填满最高法院。

SiteTall
likes: 80
Because the money earned by the workers was "trickled UP" to those who exploit them instead of setting up a functional healthcare

因为工人们赚的钱没有被用来建立一个功能齐全的医疗体系，而是“向上涓滴”到了那些剥削他们的人手里。

scipio211
likes: 76
Id laugh my arse off if americans started heading to China for medical holidays

要是美国人开始跑到中国去医疗度假，我真要笑死了。

karmaceuticaI
likes: 37
I mean, medical tourism is booming these days.
Especially for Americans. Thailand, and India see thousands a year for it

我的意思是，医疗旅游现在正蓬勃发展。
特别是对美国人来说。泰国和印度每年都因此接待成千上万的游客。

Sparkykc124
likes: 13
I need a couple crowns and will be going to Mexico to do it. Even with dental insurance, it will be cheaper to buy flights and lodging, with the added bonus of sitting on the beach and having pain treated with something stronger than Tylenol.

我需要做几个牙冠，准备去墨西哥做。即使有牙科保险，买机票和住宿也更便宜，额外的好处是还能坐在沙滩上，用比泰诺更强的药来止痛。

broohaha
likes: 11
Turkey, as well.

还有土耳其。

SuckerForFrenchBread
likes: 5
Been around for ages. First were elective surgeries such as hair transplants in turkey or other plastics in Korea.
Now it's other procedure too, like dental in Mexico (I'm guessing cause it's nearby too).
They can do medical tourism in rich countries too, the medical stuff doesn't cost that much more, but it's the rest of the cost of living (ie food, lodgings and flight) stuff that bumps up the price.

这事儿早就有了。最早是选择性手术，比如去土耳其植发或者去韩国做其他整形。
现在也有别的项目了，比如去墨西哥看牙（我猜是因为离得近）。
其实富裕国家也能搞医疗旅游，医疗费用本身没贵多少，但其他生活成本（比如食物、住宿和机票）把总价抬高了。

uglyheadink
likes: 2
My grandparents go to Canada like once every couple months to get their medications

我的祖父母差不多每隔几个月就去一次加拿大拿药。

CoolKidRawHuh10
likes: 1
India? Really? Thought Indians were getting a bad rap Globally

印度？真的吗？我以为印度人在全球名声不怎么样。

Wewu69
likes: 9
It is already happening, I had a friend travel to China for knee cartilage transplants a decade ago. It cost him only a couple of thousand for the procedure.

这事儿已经在发生了，十年前我有个朋友就去中国做了膝盖软骨移植手术。整个手术只花了他几千块。

ShyLeoGing
likes: 3
Europe is the same way, most countries, you can walk in and they'll take care of you! But China, from all the YouTube videos seems like a pretty cool place as long as you have your identification and don't act a fool!

欧洲也一样，大多数国家，你直接走进去他们就会管你！不过从YouTube上的视频来看，中国似乎是个挺酷的地方，只要你带上身份证，别犯傻就行！

Hertje73
likes: 48
because in America everything needs to make an insane profit

因为在美国，任何事情都需要创造疯狂的利润。

cakeman666
likes: 2
And then it needs to make even more next year!

然后明年还得赚更多！

Terrible_Tutor
likes: 1
Why sell anything if you can’t make at LEAST 80% margins!

如果连80%的利润都赚不到，那还卖个什么劲儿！

LD_Minich
likes: 14
It's not dysfunctional. It functions exactly as it's intended to. It maximizes profits for the private equity shareholders at the expense of the health and livelihood of people who have to rely upon them to continue to live.

它并非功能失调。它的运作方式完全符合其设计初衷。它以牺牲那些必须依赖它才能活下去的人们的健康和生计为代价，为私募股权股东实现了利润最大化。

Odium-Squared
likes: 3
Old people aren’t productive so it’s in the best interest of the company not to keep them alive. /s

老年人没有生产力，所以不让他们活着才最符合公司的利益。/s

oh_woo_fee
likes: 29
Hey that’s how America generates its GDP /s

嘿，美国就是这么创造GDP的 /s

soloChristoGlorium
likes: 21
That's actually true, unfortunately.
Healthcare and pharmaceuticals is a MAJOR industry.

不幸的是，这确实是真的。
医疗保健和制药是一个主要产业。

Mike9797
likes: 1
Ya no joke, anecdotally I used to watch a lot of reality tv(Survivor and the like) and you’d see a lot of the contestants jobs being listed as pharmaceutical sales. Must be pretty lucrative.

是啊，不开玩笑，据说我以前看很多真人秀（比如《幸存者》），看到很多参赛者的职业都写着药品销售。肯定很赚钱。

thot-abyss
likes: 2
Oil spills also increase GDP.

石油泄漏也能增加GDP。

Anning312
likes: 1
It’s AI this year, we would have 0.1% GDP growth if AI is taken off of the equation

今年是人工智能，如果把人工智能从公式里去掉，我们的GDP增长率就只有0.1%了。

rafe_nielsen
likes: 49
$70 in China vs $3000 in the US. This is what you voted for, folks. Don't cry in your beer. Your choice, your results.

中国70美元，美国3000美元。伙计们，这就是你们投票选出来的。别对着啤酒哭了。自己的选择，自己承担后果。

rafe_nielsen
likes: 10
It'll be 50-100 years before this goddamned country, if it even survives Trump, will be rid of his pernicious influences.

这个该死的国家，就算能在特朗普手下幸存下来，也需要50到100年才能摆脱他的恶劣影响。

Valuable-Reading-154
Likes: 12
It is annoying how people hop on their stupid shit where they just assume everyone that lives in the country is monolithic. Plenty of people want the right things and vote for the people that at least pretend to also want them and then get fucked over because there are unfortunately just as many brain dead idiots and cheating filth constantly at war with them trying to destroy the country because they're too stupid or greedy to know any better. I honestly think a lot of people just want to talk down to anyone so they get on the internet and make comments like the one you replied to

有些人一上来就发表愚蠢的言论，想当然地认为一个国家的所有人都思想统一，这真的很烦人。有很多人想要做出正确的选择，并投票给那些至少表面上看起来志同道合的人，结果却被坑了。因为不幸的是，这个国家同样也存在着大量脑死亡般的白痴和卑鄙小人，他们不断地与前者作对，试图摧毁这个国家，因为他们除了愚蠢和贪婪之外一无所知。老实说，我觉得很多人就是想贬低别人，所以他们才上网发表像你回复的那种评论。

rafe_nielsen
Likes: 3
The American people who didn't vote for the Orange Shit Stain are too apathetic to rise up. I'm watching them just roll over and die right now. Their food has been cut off, their healthcare has been made unaffordable, they're losing their jobs, they're getting thrown out of their apartments and onto the streets and you hear NOT even a peep from the public at large. France rioted and burned buildings just because the government tried to raise the retirement age from 62 to 64. Can you imagine what the French would do if they were facing the same cuts Americans are facing now? But Americans just sigh and shrug and say, "What can we do" as millions of us rummage the local restaurant dumpster for supper.

那些没有投票给“橙色粪球”（指特朗普）的美国人实在是太冷漠了，根本不会站起来反抗。我正眼睁睁地看着他们坐以待毙。他们的食物供应被削减，医疗费用高到无法承受，他们正在失业，被赶出公寓流落街头，但你却听不到大众发出一丁点声音。法国仅仅因为政府想把退休年龄从62岁提高到64岁，就引发了骚乱和纵火。你能想象如果法国人面临美国人现在所遭遇的处境，他们会怎么做吗？但美国人只是唉声叹气、耸耸肩说：“我们能怎么办呢？”而与此同时，我们中成千上万的人正在餐厅的垃圾箱里翻找晚餐。

Valuable-Reading-154
Likes: 2
See this is what I'm talking about I got three sentences in and you were saying stuff that is absolutely fucking stupid. The implication that everyone that doesn't support Trump cannot afford healthcare, stay employed, afford food, maintain a place to live etc is fucking hilariously stupid. Is that happening to some people? Sure although perhaps not all at once. Does that include everyone that votes democrat or doesn't like Trump? Fuck off lMao where do you people come from
Believe it or not the reason most people aren't in the streets rioting, burning it all to the ground and potentially killing people is because the truth is most of us are still completely fine and living more or less exactly how we always have. The dramatic bullshit people come up with thinking everyone is just suffering and starving to death while doing nothing is mind boggling that's obviously not true. Also its not just people who don't support Trump in the first place. A lot of the places that voted heavily in his favor *are* the poor people that need help

看，这正是我要说的。我才看了三句话，你就在讲一些绝对他妈的蠢话。你暗示所有不支持特朗普的人都看不起病、找不到工作、吃不上饭、住不起房等等，这简直是愚蠢到家了。这种情况发生在一些人身上了吗？当然，但可能不是同时发生在所有人身上。这包括所有投票给民主党或者不喜欢特朗普的人吗？滚吧，笑死我了，你们这些人都是从哪儿冒出来的？
信不信由你，大多数人之所以没有上街骚乱、烧毁一切甚至杀人，是因为事实是我们大多数人仍然过得很好，生活方式和以往没什么两样。有些人编造出那些戏剧性的鬼话，以为每个人都在受苦受难、濒临饿死却无动于衷，这种想法简直令人难以置信，显然不是真的。而且，需要帮助的也不仅仅是一开始就不支持特朗普的人。很多大力投票支持他的地方，恰恰就是那些需要帮助的穷人。

rafe_nielsen
Likes: 2
Eh! You think most people in this f\\\\*cking shithole are doing great. I read that most are not. So you live in the good times you're obviously enjoying while the rest of us suffer Trump's insanity.

哈！你觉得这个鬼地方的大多数人都过得很好。但我读到的消息是大多数人并非如此。所以你就活在你显然很享受的美好时光里吧，而我们其他人则在忍受特朗普的疯狂。

Anning312
Likes: -1
Who should we have voted for?

那我们应该投票给谁？

BrandedBro
Likes: 2
For starters, not the convicted felon and sexual abuser/rapist, who incited a deadly insurrection? Maybe?

首先，不该投给那个煽动了致命叛乱、被定了罪的重罪犯和性侵犯/强奸犯？也许吧？

Anning312
Likes: 1
I asked you who we should have voted for

我问的是我们应该投票给谁。

Str8OuttaLumbridge
Likes: 2
Bernard

伯纳德（指桑德斯）。

MasterJcMoss
Likes: 5
America's worst enemy will never be Russia or China. It will be itself.

美国最大的敌人永远不会是俄罗斯或中国，而是它自己。

dakotanorth8
Likes: 5
I got my MRI in TJ (with blood and stool) and same day results.
190 USD

我在蒂华纳做了核磁共振（还包括血检和粪检），当天就拿到了结果。
花了190美元。

callmekizzle
Likes: 12
Healthcare in the us is for profit. In China it’s not for profit. Simple.

美国的医疗保健是逐利的。在中国的不是。就这么简单。

ShakesbeerMe
Likes: 3
Because criminal rapist pedophiles are running our country.

因为我们国家正由一群罪犯、强奸犯和恋童癖管理着。

Siceless
Likes: 7
Because in places like China basic healthcare is a right and in the United States of America it's a commodity.
It's expensive because it's an investment. In my state of Utah the healthcare company Intermountain Healthcare is the largest employer. Owning hospitals is a way to collect guaranteed rent rather than a way to help people. Every hospital bed, syringe, swab, bandage and pill has a margin of profitability that every human life does not.
In the US we put profits over people. The wealthier the individual gets the more blind they become to that fact.

因为在中国这样的地方，基本医疗保健是一项权利，而在美国，它是一种商品。
它之所以昂贵，是因为它是一项投资。在我所在的犹他州，山间医疗保健公司是最大的雇主。拥有医院与其说是为了帮助人们，不如说是为了收取稳定的租金。每一张病床、每一支注射器、棉签、绷带和药片都有利润空间，而人的生命却没有。
在美国，我们把利润置于人的生命之上。个人越富有，就越对这一事实视而不见。