中美军力对比2025

-------------译者：徐黎炤--- 审核者：龙腾翻译总管------------

@satviksingh7242
make one for india and pakistan it will go viral because of the tensions right now XD

做一个印度和巴基斯坦的对比视频吧，现在局势这么紧张，肯定会火的，哈哈 兄弟

@TurdFerguson-j7z
Military size isn’t nearly as important as military tech in a modern war

在现代战争中，军队规模远没有军事技术重要。

@kevinsteele100
"A strange game. The only winning move is not to play. How about a nice game of chess? " Joshua

“真是奇怪的游戏。唯一的制胜之道是不去玩。来下一盘棋怎么样？”——Joshua

@Sole650
I’m so glad I skipped to the end only to find out the speaker said “who do you think will win this war”

真庆幸我直接跳到最后，结果发现演讲者只是说了句“你觉得谁会赢这场战争？”

@Dreamstackr
Training with Russia is no longer flex. Three years into the "Special Military Operation" and Russian soldiers are getting slaughtered for minimal gains while theirs a general lack of discipline and military strategy in their ranks

和俄罗斯一起训练现在已经不算炫耀了。“特别军事行动”进行了三年，俄军为了微小的战果被大量消灭，而他们的军队内部普遍缺乏纪律和军事战略。

-------------译者：徐黎炤--- 审核者：龙腾翻译总管------------

@Superpooper-2020
How do these people even get the numbers for Chinese military equipment ? Oh right, it's all just speculation—no wonder these kinds of videos are pointless

这些人到底是怎么拿到中国军事装备的数据的？哦对了，全都是猜测——难怪这种视频毫无意义。

@dekuuchiha9990
Need a second channel for all the military what ifs

需要一个专门的第二频道来做各种军事“假设”视频。

@dopeentertainment8924
China underestimates the power of my twitterfingers

中国低估了我发推特的威力。

@patrickjamesmurray
China is like the boxer who looks really good on the heavy bag and speed bag, but hasn't been in the ring

中国就像那个在沙袋和速度球上看起来很厉害的拳击手，但从没真正上过擂台。

@Axeiaa
One massive flaw, didn''t compensate for purchasing parity. Everything from materials to labor is cheaper in China which equals out their lower budget.

一个巨大的漏洞：没考虑购买力平价。从材料到劳动力，中国的成本都更低，这弥补了他们预算较少的问题。

-------------译者：bakemorewu--- 审核者：龙腾翻译总管------------

@Kexser12
Bro will not stop Usa vs China

博主制作中美对比视频上瘾了

@JuanaWatchDaWorldBurn
"Dragon tank, ready for battle!" -command and conquer: generals

“龙式坦克，准备战斗！”——《命令与征服：将军》

@Kinkarus02502
Comment section full of bots holy crap

评论区全是机器人，我的天

@sdericmonty
Can you please do the USA vs North Sentinel Island next?

你能不能接下来做个美国与北森蒂纳尔岛（的对比或相关内容）？

@wahyudiachmad6175
Bring back the infographic experiments i miss those
categories.

恢复信息图实验吧，我想念那些类别。

-------------译者：bakemorewu--- 审核者：龙腾翻译总管------------

@ragnarokws2670
I remember back few years people say China have no chance to close gap with America but look what we here now. They are not far behind now

我记得几年前，人们说中国没有机会缩小与美国的差距，但看看我们现在的情况。中国现在已经与美国相差不远了。

@khoruyi
budget is not a matter. compare Chatgpt and deepseek, the cost is different yet works the same.?

预算不是问题。对比一下 ChatGPT 和 DeepSeek，成本不同但效果一样，不是吗？

@ashemsavage6842
Americans own over 400 to 500 million firearms with civilian militias that know how to use them

美国人拥有 4 亿到 5 亿多支枪支，还有知道如何使用这些枪支的民兵组织。

@greeneclipse8088
As a Narnian Centaur once said..."Numbers do not win a battle"

就像纳尼亚半人马曾经说过的：“数量并不能决定一场战斗的胜负。”

@seanyang128
make a video of aliens invading Earth VS the military powerhouses like USA, China, Russia alliance.

制作一个关于外星人入侵地球，与美国、中国、俄罗斯等军事强国联盟对抗的视频。

-------------译者：bakemorewu--- 审核者：龙腾翻译总管------------

@Lysander-vciop
I wish they just make people from each country fight like a 5v5 or 10v10 where people can fight for their country (but without dying just heavily injured) like imagine if they just make an arena for it.

我希望他们能让各国派人进行 5 对 5 或 10 对 10 的战斗，人们可以为自己的国家而战（但不会死亡，只是重伤），想象一下，如果为此专门建一个竞技场。

@ragokueod
Seriously? Can we get back to factual and informative videos rather than hypotheticals for views?

说真的？我们能不能回归到基于事实且有信息价值的视频，别再为了点击量搞些假设性内容了？

@majesticgent
The US's newest advanced EWF platform (that we know about), the EF-18 Growler, attempted to jam the radar of a PLAN Type 055 destroyer Nanchang in December 2023.

美国最新的先进电子战飞机平台（据我们所知），EF - 18 “咆哮者”，在 2023 年 12 月试图干扰中国海军 055 型驱逐舰南昌舰的雷达。

@Nightwing6427
5:00 one thing to take into account when someone talks about us defense budget is that most of this budget goes to maintaining over 800 old bases around the world.

视频五分钟那个地方，当有人谈及美国国防预算时，有一点需要考虑，即大部分预算用于维持全球 800 多个老旧军事基地。

@Chrislw35
China literally just had to cancel a military war games exercise mid game. They couldn''t even protect the lone carrier. It was very bad.

中国军方近日在一次演习中被迫中途取消演练，甚至未能有效保护其单艘航母，情况相当不利。

-------------译者：bakemorewu--- 审核者：龙腾翻译总管------------

@jmj48
You dont have to look far to see a huge gap. The US smallest units are professional soldiers with decades of real fighting experience. End of story.

你不需要看得很远就能看到巨大的差距。美国最小的单位是有数十年实战经验的职业士兵。故事到此结束。

@deannie3088
But you cannot just compare cost spent, its the buying power that matters, know what your military industrial complex have 2000% profit margin

但你不能只比较花费的成本，重要的是购买力，你们的军事工业复合体有2000%的利润率

@davidnice1
The obvious disadvantage would go to the ones who are INVADING. AMERICA is by far the best military in the world, but invading another huge & powerful country and getting a "WIN" is totally different.

明显的劣势会落在侵略者身上。美国到目前为止仍然是世界上最好的军队，但入侵另一个巨大且强大的国家并获得胜利是完全不同的。

@scythe_hydra9680
I no longer think the US can take Russia and China at once it’s becoming Much too close and cost of production in America is just too high

我不再认为美国能同时对抗俄罗斯和中国，这变得越来越接近，美国的生产成本实在太高了。

@KickassRaider
Don''t even need to watch the video to know the answer

甚至不需要观看视频就知道答案。

-------------译者：bakemorewu--- 审核者：龙腾翻译总管------------

@EjayKellner
It''s adorable how y''all consistently lie to make China look better because you know YouTube doesn''t like people telling the truth about China

你们一直撒谎让中国看起来更好真是太可爱了，因为你知道YouTube不喜欢人们说出关于中国的真相。

@AcM.5233
It's also to note that HLC just released a video and every Chinese vessel being manufactured whether it's for military or civilian use is based off of military platform.

还要注意的是，HLC刚刚发布了一个视频，所有正在制造的中国船只，无论是用于军事还是民用，都是基于军用平台的。

@thefiveofour
Was this episode written a year ago? Maybe some should tell them that the new global US alliance is just US + El Salvador.

这一集是一年前写的吗？也许应该有人告诉他们，新的全球美国联盟只是美国+萨尔瓦多。

@VoicesForUSA
I heard a U.S. general say that the AIM-260 is such a game changer to the point that we could lose half our Raptor fleet, and still be just fine.

我听说一位美国将军说AIM-260是一个如此改变游戏规则的武器，以至于我们可能会失去一半的猛禽机队，但仍然会没事。

@stephenaube9556
All depends on how many feminists are pilots in the US

这完全取决于美国有多少女权主义者是飞行员。

-------------译者：bakemorewu--- 审核者：龙腾翻译总管------------

@TheJl272
USA USA!!! BLACK LIVES MATTER!! USA USA USA!!! LONG LIVE GAY PRIDE!!! USA USA!!!

美国！美国！！！黑人的命也是命！！美国！美国！美国！！！同志骄傲万岁！！！美国！美国！！！

@CR7whirl
A war not only millitary attack.

一场战争不仅仅是军事攻击。

@Neellssoonn1
You made it with this one !

你做到了这一点！

@PAUL-em4tj
Rome was once concidered the worlds Policeman.

罗马曾被认为是世界的警察。

@mrmiyagi7388
When two nuclear powers go to war nobody wins

当两个核大国开战时，没有人会赢。

-------------译者：chen1a1--- 审核者：龙腾翻译总管------------

@joshjacobson1674
Make a video that if we had to go to war with another planet that was trying to attack us I wonder what would happen?

博主，啥时候做个视频呗：万一有哪个星球想要攻击我们，我们不得不跟他们开战，你说到时候会发生啥？

@jmarshall3620
To be fair, the US has only won one war and that's because they used atomic technology. They lost Vietnam, Korean, Gulf War, and War on Terror.

恕我直言啊，美国也就赢过那么一场战争，那还是靠着原子弹才赢的。越南战争、朝鲜战争、海湾战争，还有那个反恐战争，不都输了嘛。

@Flamsterette
Thanks for the upload!

感谢分享！

@noahshaw7549
If this war happens, a lot of this wont be used. We'll definitely be introduced to new tech. Scary what both may have.

真要打起来，现在展示的这些（武器）估计好多都用不上。到时候肯定会有咱们闻所未闻的新技术亮相。想想双方可能都藏着什么黑科技，真是吓人。

@Superpooper-2020
This guy made a video called "USA vs the World" and claimed the U.S. would win—absolutely hilarious.

这位老兄之前做了个视频叫《美国 VS 全世界》，居然还说美国能赢——简直笑死人了。

-------------译者：chen1a1--- 审核者：龙腾翻译总管------------

​@IdkanymoreFMLbro
Not to mention, one army has a much higher morale than the other. Example: You will do better at your job if you want to get up to work and actually love your career.

更不用说，其中一支军队的士气可比另一支高多了。举个例子：你要是真心想起床去上班，真心热爱你的事业，那你工作肯定能干得更好。

@TravelAndPhotography1982
You are funny. The US could not win against Vietnam, Irak or Afghanistan but you still think they could beat China ?

你可真逗。美国连越南、伊拉克、阿富汗都打不赢，你还觉得他们能打败中国？

@Serahpin
"Good iron doesn't make nails; good men don't make soldiers" -Chinese Proverb

“好铁不打钉，好男不当兵”——中国谚语

@aburetik4866
China leads the world in 37 out of 44 critical technologies and America only leads in 7, according to the Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI).

根据澳大利亚战略政策研究所（ASPI）的数据，在44项关键技术中，中国有37项领先世界，而美国只领先7项。

@TheDon5812
I can''t explain how upset I am that you made the Marines say "hooah."

我简直没法形容我有多不爽，你们居然让海军陆战队喊“呼啊（hooah）”。

-------------译者：chen1a1--- 审核者：龙腾翻译总管------------

​@VexEdits
"Chinas total population stands at over 1.4Billion, Whereas the U.S. has approx 340 Million" America: Sounds like they need more people to make it even.

“中国总人口超过14亿，而美国大约有3亿4千万。” 美国：“听起来他们那边人手不太够啊，得再多点人才算公平。”

@JFomo
Military size aside, the real question is which side is more likely to not give a F about the rules of war.

抛开军队规模不谈，真正的问题是，哪一边更可能压根儿不把战争规则当回事儿。

@Bigevilsatanas
My money's on China for the win

我赌中国赢。

@haribohajimoto
I don`t know about the numbers and theoretical s, but the current US is more and more isolating itself on the world stage.

那些数据和理论上的东西我不清楚，但现在的美国在世界舞台上是越来越孤立自己了。

@beaumontgile-zm7uw
You need quality and quantity in a peer to peer war. China''s quantity is already there and if u are honest their quality is becoming better.

旗鼓相当的对手之间打仗，质量和数量都得有。中国的数量已经到位了，而且你要是老实说，他们的质量也越来越好了。

-------------译者：chen1a1--- 审核者：龙腾翻译总管------------

@mrblue543
And those are only the weapons they let the people know about. Who knows what both countries have behind closed doors

而且这些还只是他们让老百姓知道的武器。天晓得这两个国家关起门来还藏着些什么宝贝。

@HectorGonzalezlopez-dk6jd
Mexico ayudará a China,Tómelo enserio...
(Spanish: Mexico will help China, take it seriously...)

西班牙语：墨西哥会帮助中国，我说真的……

@johannesmoeti710
The world would have been a peaceful place if we were one nation one currency

如果我们能统一成一个国家，用同一种货币，那世界早就天下太平了。

@cavalryscout3952
Our stuff works, theirs falls apart. They've got more boats but we don't count canoes.

咱们的东西好用，他们的玩意儿一碰就散架。他们船是多，但咱们可没把独木舟也算进去。

@TunaTraveler
Predicting the what will happen of a possible US-China military war in 2025 is complex and involves numerous factors.

预测2025年可能发生的中美军事冲突会是个什么结果，这事儿太复杂了，牵扯的因素也太多了。

-------------译者：chen1a1--- 审核者：龙腾翻译总管------------

@wllmshrwn
The video was great until he started talking about alliances. I almost through my phone. We used to have alliances until tariff man!

这视频本来挺棒的，直到他开始扯什么联盟。我差点没把手机给扔了。咱们以前是有盟友的，直到那个“关税侠”上台！

@mof4104
In all out war between superpowers, everybody loses

超级大国之间要是全面开战，那就是个两败俱伤的结局，谁也别想捞着好。

@TheAllSeeingEye2468
Just wait till they start doing mandatory recruiting in America again

等着瞧吧，等美国再次开始强制征兵的时候就有好戏看了。

@himanshujod7645
1:30 this fits so true right now as USA is even mediating between india and pakistan on kashmir issue.

1分30秒那里说的可太对了，眼下美国甚至在克什米尔问题上给印度和巴基斯坦当和事佬呢。

@xuimod
Neither country would win. Like the Korean war, It would be a stalemate.

哪个国家都赢不了。就像朝鲜战争一样，最后肯定是僵持不下。

-------------译者：chen1a1--- 审核者：龙腾翻译总管------------

@dmoney_pimpslap
The Marine''s don''t say "Hooah." That''s an Army thing. Shame on you guys at 00:23:24 for getting that wrong.

海军陆战队不说“呼啊（Hooah）”。那是陆军的口号。你们在00:23:24那里搞错了，太不应该了。

@Wagnerianz
Fallout IRL?

现实版《辐射》上演？

@tomatoketchup-n5i
“Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the mouth.” - Mike Tyson

“每个人都有自己的计划，直到脸上挨了一拳。”——迈克·泰森

@daviddriver9168
Q: Remember when the US military defeated the Taliban? A: Yeah, neither do I.

问：还记得美军是啥时候打败塔利班的吗？ 答：嗯，我也不记得了。

@techntyre
this shows the general trend over the past years! US being military oriented and seeing the naval capacity trying to take over the world.

这显示了过去几年的大趋势！美国以军事为导向，眼瞅着其海军力量试图掌控全世界。

-------------译者：chen1a1--- 审核者：龙腾翻译总管------------

@saewonyi
The C military is the very face of a paper tiger. C lacks far behind the U.S. in every obxtive measure.

C军队就是个彻头彻尾的纸老虎。在每一项客观指标上，C都远远落后于美国。

@TogtherWeThrive
card-red-penaltyChiXa couldn't even take L.A.

中国连洛杉矶都拿不下。

@tomk887
The answer before i even watch the video is that no body wins if these 2 went to war.

我连视频都不用看就知道答案了：要是这两个国家开战，谁也赢不了。

@mast8-f7j
USA wins with NATO. Without NATO it might be a draw

美国有北约帮忙就能赢。要是没北约，估计是个平手。

@vlanson6529
Ultimately I''d say who wins majorly depends on what the conditions of winning are.

归根结底，我觉得谁能赢主要还是看“赢”的条件是什么。

-------------译者：chen1a1--- 审核者：龙腾翻译总管------------

@BShub-1
Do one for india and pakistan , conventional and nuclear

也做一期印度对巴基斯坦的吧，常规战和核战都讲讲。

@shaunrussell9694
How can this even be a question America may spend but they can’t win wars. Yemen - loss Afghanistan - loss Iran/Iraq - stalemate Korea - stalemate Vietnam - loss

这怎么还能算个问题？美国是能烧钱，但他们打不赢战争啊。也门——输了，阿富汗——输了，伊朗/伊拉克——僵局，朝鲜——僵局，越南——输了。

@chasehedges6775
Neither.

谁也赢不了。/ 两边都不行。

@scottmoore6131
At least America has a fully volunteer army!

起码美国是完全的志愿兵役制！

@kangtheconqueror-w6w
China

中国。

-------------译者：chen1a1--- 审核者：龙腾翻译总管------------

@Sir_Joshua_Zanetta
I used to really admire your channel. but now it seems your politically motivated instead of factually motivated. Do better. stay out of politics and stick with truth.

我以前真的很欣赏你的频道，但现在感觉你好像是出于政治动机而不是事实动机在做内容。用点心吧，离政治远点，坚持说真话。

@markleaman8313
China!

中国！

@pigmoonk2545
11:16 this is untrue. The weapons the J20 has outranges the US. Engines are not a problem already for years. Come on. Go research before posting falsehoods.

11分16秒那里说的不对。歼20的武器射程比美国的远。发动机问题好几年前就解决了。拜托，先去好好研究研究再来发这些假东西。

@neutral6941
America

美国

@clifftolbert4122
You should do a video of what America left behind in Afghanistan and what happened to the military equipment after

你应该做个视频讲讲美国在阿富汗留下了些什么，那些军事装备后来都怎么样了。

-------------译者：chen1a1--- 审核者：龙腾翻译总管------------

@luting3
Honestly speaking, F22 & F35 are both not battle tested as well unless you consider bomb terrorist organization.

老实说，F22和F35都没怎么经过实战检验，除非你把轰炸恐怖组织也算上的话。

@jeff_lee69
i think it was MIT that researched this. if i remember correctly usa could completely disable China with 5 stealth bombers, 5 stealth fighters and 10 f-35s.

我记得好像是麻省理工学院研究过这个。如果我没记错的话，美国用5架隐形轰炸机、5架隐形战斗机和10架F-35就能把中国彻底干趴下。

@Alamandorious
I suggest you go watch videos on China's infrastructure. If it's any indicator of their building capacity, their ships, aircraft, tanks, artillery, and infantry weapons are shoddy.

我建议你去看看关于中国基础设施的视频。如果那能反映他们的建造能力的话，那他们的军舰、飞机、坦克、大炮和步兵武器肯定都是DF渣工程。

@Asianwick4401
I swear everyday its a China v us video. (Not that im complaining)

我发誓，天天都是中美对抗的视频。（我倒不是抱怨哈）

@wllmshrwn
Who ever can manufacture more missiles will win

谁能造出更多的导弹，谁就能赢。

-------------译者：chen1a1--- 审核者：龙腾翻译总管------------

@rhyswick
Kinda doubt many past allies of the usa would flock to help them currently ? They want to isolate themselves with tariffs.

有点怀疑啊，美国以前那些盟友现在还有多少会跑去帮他们？他们自己都想通过关税把自己孤立起来。

@dhrubo9140
India vs Pakistan

印度对巴基斯坦

@tforaodg
I can confirm that nobody can defeat America when it comes to military power.

我可以打包票，论军事实力，没人能打败美国。

@stillman28
The longer the conflict is held off the greater chance China has, but barely. Time isn't on this side of either.

冲突拖得越久，中国的机会就越大，但也只是勉强有点机会。时间对双方来说都不是朋友。

@James-e1h8l
If numbers didn’t win wars every history book has proven otherwise. Numbers in wars of attrition are everything.

要是数量不能赢得战争，那每一本历史书都证明错了。在消耗战里，数量就是一切。

-------------译者：chen1a1--- 审核者：龙腾翻译总管------------

@fightfish3265
China no longer has 1.4 billion people.

中国早就没有14亿人了。

@collegemathematics6698
China's military technology is now not that far behind that of the United States.

中国现在的军事技术跟美国的差距已经没那么大了。

@Chad-z7c
America would be increasingly fighting alone without allies

美国会越来越发现自己是孤军奋战，没盟友帮忙了。

@cee3916
8:41 I thought infographics would be better than misspelling four as for

8分41秒那里，我原以为信息图表频道水平能高点儿呢，居然把“four”（四）拼成了“for”。

@rmcgraw7943
The US doesnt use tofu as a buiding material, nor does it use water for rocket fuel.

美国可不用豆腐渣当建筑材料，也不用水当火箭燃料。

-------------译者：chen1a1--- 审核者：龙腾翻译总管------------

@IHORSHCHERBAN
Very important close all gaps

堵上所有缺口，这至关重要。

@guillermopacheco903
The PLA it's just a target rich environment.A marine's dream

PLA嘛，不过是个遍地靶子的好地方。简直是海军陆战队员的美梦！

@quarantinezone2844
Don't need to watch, already saw a video of USA versus the World so we got this dub and it's not even close as always.

都不用看，我早就看过一个美国单挑全世界的视频了，所以（这场对决）咱们赢定了，而且跟往常一样，（实力）根本不在一个档次。

@ShonenEditzYt
We all know China would lose...

咱们都知道中国会输的啦……

@mcknight3483
I wonder what did russians learn during the cooperative exercise with the PLA since they recently having issues with working together themselves within their military branch.

我挺好奇俄罗斯人在跟解放军搞联合演习的时候都学到了啥，毕竟他们最近自己军队内部各兵种协同作战都出了问题。

-------------译者：chen1a1--- 审核者：龙腾翻译总管------------

@excusemebut
You have to take into account the fact that Chinese numbers are what they spent in their own money. It does not take into account that 1USD buys A LOT more of things and pays a lot more in China.

你得考虑到一个事实，就是中国的那些数字是他们用本国货币计算的花销。这没有把一美元在中国能买到多得多的东西、支付多得多的薪酬这一点算进去。

@kurtzhang8076
If US dares to fight against China, that would be the end of US military dominance. That is why US is so hesitant.

美国要是敢跟中国开战，那就是美国军事霸权的终结。所以美国才这么犹豫不决。

@The-Inner-AscentB
Great video pleaseeeeeeeee bringggg the ALIEN SHOW back !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

视频太棒了，求求求求求求快把外星人系列节目做回来吧！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！

@mike9347
Maybe the *** should have been nice to Taiwan in the first place. They wouldn't be in this mess now.

或许***一开始就该对台湾好点儿，他们现在就不会陷入这种困境了。(***政党或名字 上下同)

@hottube135
This video is pointless factual information this is click bait

这视频就是些没啥意义的所谓事实信息堆砌，纯属标题党骗点击的。

-------------译者：chen1a1--- 审核者：龙腾翻译总管------------

@MarcusisMetheonlyrealMarcus
23:20 FYI army says "hooah", usmc says "oorah"

23分20秒那块儿，温馨提示一下哈：美国陆军喊的是“呼啊（hooah）”，海军陆战队喊的才是“乌拉（oorah）”。

@hkiswatch
this kind of video stirs up hatred and instill fear on people that is absolutely sinister.

这种视频煽动仇恨，给人们灌输恐惧，用心实在太险恶了。

@mauricebrosseau9181
Nobody wins. Everyone loses.

（战争里）没有赢家，大家都是输家。

@Bl00dCrown
Infographics yet again showing why they''re so irrelevant now to the average viewer looking for unbiased and honest information. Lol. Ripppp your channel bro.

信息图表频道又一次证明了，为啥对于想看中立客观信息的普通观众来说，你们现在这么不着调。笑死。哥们儿，你这频道算是凉透了。

-------------译者：chen1a1--- 审核者：龙腾翻译总管------------

@alexfry9114
I think the US handily outclasses China in combat experience. Althe US might be a younger country, but we''ve also been at war more than China has.

我觉得在实战经验这块儿，美国能把中国甩开好几条街。虽说美国是个年轻国家，但咱们打过的仗可比中国多多了。

@Meatball1407
The US is also developing a brand new nuclear ICBM, Sentinel.

美国还在研发一款全新的核洲际弹道导弹，“哨兵”导弹。

@SeniorScout
American Military is too Advanced to ever fail

美军太先进了，绝不可能失败。

@dionthomas5418
Great job with the video about the

关于（某个主题）的视频做得真棒！