特朗普宣布“最致命”的F-47战斗机

 
@Jamux69
They say when someone keeps repeating themselves it means it's the truth.
 
他们说，当一个人不断重复自己时，这意味着这是真相。
 
@ChelseyKenesky
How many do you think the US needs? and can afford to make? Cause NO other country will be buying them!
 
你认为美国需要多少架？并且能够负担得起？因为没有其他国家会购买它们！
 
@svenhvr
They won't be exported, it's the replacement for the superior F-22
 
它们不会被出口，因为它是优越的F-22的替代品。
 
@Wafflecombo54
We can’t even get the F35s to fly right
 
我们甚至无法让F35正确飞行。
 
@hessherman717
What experience does Boeing have in making next-generation stealth fighters?
 
波音在制造下一代隐身战斗机方面有什么经验？
 
@daltonengland7134
Considering they made the super hornets the P8 and the F15 EX I think they’ve got quite a bit of experience. What experience do you have?
 
考虑到他们制造了超级大黄蜂、P8和F15 EX，我认为他们有很多经验。你有什么经验？
 
@memohurtado3007
We just want free healthcare
 
我们只想要免费的医疗。
 
@anonanon119
Note: most Americans are fine with healthcare
 
注意：大多数美国人对医疗保健感到满意。
 
@HamishSoutar-h2d
That meas more taxes... I say try make more money so u don't worry about 6k a year in heathcare...
 
这意味着更多的税收……我的意思是试着赚更多的钱，这样你就不用担心每年6000美元的医疗费用了……
 
@legitbeans9078
You can either have free health care for every american. OR you can throw trillion after trillion after trillion of dollars of tax money into the black hole of developing unnecessary wasteful military projects. You can't have both
 
你可以为每个美国人提供免费的医疗，或者你可以将数万亿美元的税款投入到开发不必要浪费的军事项目的黑洞中。你不能两者兼得。
 
@Genebaket
People who have been following to these airplanes for the last few years know that there’s something quite out of this world being developed. What is very surprising is when he says it’s been flying for the last five years.
What I’ve heard, and this is just secondhand that this aircraft has flown over every continent and country in the world and has never been detected
 
过去几年一直关注这些飞机的人知道，有一些非常超乎寻常的东西正在开发中。非常令人惊讶的是当他说它已经飞行了五年时。
我听说，这只是二手消息，这架飞机已经飞越了世界上的每一个大陆和国家，并且从未被检测到。
 
@TheRudymentary
Isn't Boeing years behind schedule and over budget on the new air force one?
 
波音在新空军一号项目上不是已经拖延多年并超预算了吗？
 
@Cram_pie
They suck in the commercial sector but they make the most efficient and lethal fighter jets to date.
 
他们在商用领域表现糟糕，但他们制造了迄今为止最高效、最致命的战斗机。
 
@GuitarGunner
Boeing also has more years of stealth aircraft research and experience (starting in the early 1960's) than any of the other big 3. That being said, Northrop is still working on the Navy's 6th gen fighter and it's highly likely that all 3 contractors will have parts in the F-47.
 
波音在隐身飞机研究和经验方面（从1960年代开始）比其他三大公司都要多。话虽如此，诺斯罗普仍在为海军开发第六代战斗机，很可能这三家承包商都会参与F-47的部件制造。
 
@Jamux69
B-52 Stratofortress, C-17 Globemaster III, AH-64 Apache, B-17 Flying Fortress, B-29 Superfortress, CH-47 Chinook, F-15 Stike Eagle E/SE/EX, F/A-18E/F Super Hornets, B-1B Lancer, Kc-46a Pegasus Tanker and Air Force One would all like to have a word with you about reliability and effectiveness.
 
B-52同温层堡垒、C-17环球霸王III、AH-64阿帕奇、B-17飞行堡垒、B-29超级堡垒、CH-47支奴干、F-15攻击鹰E/SE/EX、F/A-18E/F超级大黄蜂、B-1B枪骑兵、Kc-46a飞马加油机和空军一号都想和你谈谈可靠性和有效性。
 
@generictag1050
Boeing’s defense section is actually good though, they make f15, f18, maintain all the AWACS, c17, and a lot more
 
波音的国防部门其实很不错，他们制造F15、F18，维护所有预警机、C17等等。
 
@blueport4
The cost per plane will exceed the GNP of most countries.
 
每架飞机的成本将超过大多数国家的国民生产总值。
 
@Roadrunner4life.
@blueport4 Yeah so teacher me is gonna come out here. The NGAD or this model of NGAD (next generation air dominance) is specifically made to be surrounded by cheaper drones. The way it'll fly is just on its own and having a team of drones around it. We can make 5-10 and have the whole country covered for a couple decades. It's cheaper than you think because they don't explain it super well.
 
@blueport4 是的，让我来解释一下。NGAD（下一代空中优势战机）或这种NGAD模型是专门设计为被更便宜的无人机包围的。它的飞行方式是独立的，并有一组无人机围绕它。我们可以制造5-10架，覆盖整个国家几十年。它比你想象的要便宜，因为他们没有很好地解释这一点。
 
@Gballpikker
So advanced, the president doesn't even have a model of it on his desk, and its been flying for 5 years.
 
如此先进，以至于总统的桌子上甚至没有它的模型，而它已经飞行了5年。
 
@robb3670
I won’t be surprised if it takes 15 years to bring it in service and cost way more than the F-35.
 
如果它需要15年才能投入使用并且成本远高于F-35，我不会感到惊讶。
 
@texaswunderkind
And its capabilities exceed that of the pilots who become disoriented, pass out and crash when flying it. All new fighters should be remotely piloted.
 
它的能力超过了飞行员的能力，飞行员在飞行时会迷失方向、昏倒并坠毁。所有新战斗机都应该是远程操控的。
 
@Heidi332K
Allegedly around $300 million per aircraft. No wonder they are defunding all the government departments. They need all that extra cash for this program.
 
据称每架飞机约为3亿美元，难怪他们削减了所有政府部门的资金，他们需要所有这些额外的现金来支持这个项目。
 
@masterbaiter0fthebait572
@Heidi332K That is 50 less than the f-22. 195 f-22s have been built and if we want to match that with the f-47 then it would take around 60 billion dollars. Keep in mind that this is a one time cost so comparing it to the defunding of gov departments is not intellectually honest.
 
@Heidi332K 这比F-22少了50亿。我们已经制造了195架F-22，如果我们想用F-47匹配，那将需要大约600亿美元。请记住，这是一次性成本，因此将其与政府部门的资金削减进行比较在智力上是不诚实的。
 
@antrodeldungeonmaster
Worst presentation ever. Zero preparation. The only thing that was really flying were random numbers.
 
这是有史以来最糟糕的演示，零准备，唯一真正飞的是随机的数字。
 
@frankhalsey-y4c
They scraped the f-46 because it was old tech that couldn't function autonomously, spewed toxic smoke and wondered off course regularly.
 
他们放弃了F-46，因为它是旧技术，无法自主运行，经常喷出有毒烟雾并偏离航线。
 
@artimeis
China says Thank you. Now, make sure the door doesn't fall off.
 
中国说谢谢。现在，请确保门不会掉下来。
 
@kurtwagner350
That would unironically be good though, if you could guarantee no security leaks. Makes the US a ton of money, also the US doesn’t sell its top of the line fighters abroad until they’re outdated.
 
不讽刺地说这将是好事，如果你能保证没有安全漏洞的话。这会让美国赚很多钱，而且美国不会在国外销售其顶级战斗机，直到它们过时。
 
@AirJoe
I love how Trump acts like he knows what this is
 
我喜欢特朗普表现得好像他知道这是什么。
 
@texaswunderkind
His dentures nearly went flying when he said "sixth generation." They should have called it the bigly generation, because it demands less of his upper teeth.
 
当他说“第六代”时，他的假牙几乎飞了出来。他们应该称之为“大代”，因为这对他的上牙要求较少。
 
@Kayluv101
He’s reading what some other dummie wrote ���� he should’ve had pete announce it he knows his stuff
 
他在读其他傻瓜写的东西，他应该让皮特宣布，因为皮特知道自己在说什么。
 
@Roadrunner4life.
I like Trump as a president but yeah he probably doesn't know anything about a fighter or AE in general.
 
我喜欢特朗普作为总统，但是的，他可能对战斗机或航空工程一无所知。
 
@djabroni_brochacho4644
I could never be president, people expect you to be an expert on law, policy, science, and speaking and you can't make a simple gaff once a month or you're cooked. Unless of course you're Biden and they'll try to edit your constant gibberish
 
我永远不可能成为总统，因为人们会期望你成为法律、政策、科学和演讲方面的专家，你不能每个月犯一次简单的错误，否则你就完了。当然，除非你是拜登，他们会试图编辑你不断的胡言乱语。
 
@LiveFastRaceHard
Everyone forgets about the P-47 in ww2. A pinnacle in fighter design in WWII.
 
每个人都忘记了二战中的P-47，它是二战战斗机设计的巅峰。
 
@donnwzad7980
WE R WINNING SO GREATLY WITH YOU MR PRESIDENT TRUMP �������� WE CANN’T TAKE SO MUCH WINING MR PRESIDENT !!! AMERICA SALUTE YOU MR PRESIDENT ��������
 
特朗普总统，我们和你一起赢得了如此伟大的胜利，我们无法承受如此多的胜利，总统先生！！！美国向您致敬，总统先生。
 
@Navak_
6th gen fighters have autonomous drone wingmen. Those could be faster and more maneuverable than any previous generation fighter since they are unmanned. Certainly the manned craft will not be.
 
第六代战斗机有自主的无人机僚机，这些无人机可能比任何前一代战斗机更快、机动性更强，因为它们是无人驾驶的。当然，有人驾驶的飞机不会如此。
 
@radustana
As far as im aware the NGAD(the program from which the F-47 came from) wasn't even meant to be that maneuverable and instead to use extreme range missiles like the AIM-260 JATM and/or the AIM-174B stored either in its own internal weapon bays or in the weapon bays of its CCAs(Collaborative Combat Aircraft,basically drones) like the YFQ-42 and/or the YFQ-44 as dogfighting had become a much smaller priority for the aircraft as maneuverability was deemed unnecessary and instead it focused on stealth and integrated weapon systems
 
据我所知，NGAD（F-47的来源项目）甚至不是为了机动性，而是为了使用像AIM-260 JATM和/或AIM-174B这样的超远程导弹，这些导弹存储在其自身的内部武器舱或其CCA（协作战斗飞机，基本上是无人机）的武器舱中，如YFQ-42和/或YFQ-44，因为狗斗对飞机来说已经变得不那么重要了，机动性被认为是不必要的，而需要专注于隐身和集成武器系统。
 
@Navak_
@radustana Even if maneuverability is not a priority, the fact that they are unmanned means they can easily exceed the 9G limit that a human pilot could take. So they are more maneuverable simply by virtue of being unmanned.
 
@radustana 即使机动性不是优先考虑的因素，它们无人驾驶的事实意味着它们可以轻松超过人类飞行员能承受的9G极限。因此，它们仅仅因为无人驾驶而更具机动性。
 
@RK-TazindustrialSales
Terrible Terrible choice to pick Boeing! They have so many issues on commercial planes let alone fighter jets.
 
选择波音是一个糟糕的选择！他们在商用飞机上有这么多问题，更不用说战斗机了。
 
@Jamux69
B-52 Stratofortress, C-17 Globemaster III, AH-64 Apache, B-17 Flying Fortress, B-29 Superfortress, CH-47 Chinook, F-15 Stike Eagle E/SE/EX, F/A-18E/F Super Hornets, B-1B Lancer, Kc-46a Pegasus Tanker and Air Force One would all like to have a word with you about reliability and effectiveness.
 
B-52同温层堡垒、C-17环球霸王III、AH-64阿帕奇、B-17飞行堡垒、B-29超级堡垒、CH-47支奴干、F-15攻击鹰E/SE/EX、F/A-18E/F超级大黄蜂、B-1B枪骑兵、Kc-46a飞马加油机和空军一号都想和你谈谈可靠性和有效性。
 
@AviationGod222_YT
I don’t think you know how good Boeing is at making stealth bombers, and fighter jets, for example the b-52, the b-52 is the most used heavy bomber, since Vietnam. F-15, one o f the best 4th gen fighters, f-18, the most successful fighter jet in the U.S. military, and possibly the world! While Lockheed has made the f-35, f-22, Boeing has more experience and is underestimated, while they are struggling in the commercial field, in the military field they pretty much dominate.
 
我认为你不知道波音在制造隐身轰炸机和战斗机方面有多好，例如B-52，B-52是自越南战争以来使用最多的重型轰炸机。F-15，最好的第四代战斗机之一。F-18，美国军队中最成功的战斗机，也可能是世界上最成功的战斗机！虽然洛克希德制造了F-35、F-22，但波音有更多的经验并被低估了，尽管他们在商用领域挣扎，但在军事领域他们几乎占据了主导地位。
 
@maykevin5
F47 "the generals picked the title" , as if you the 47th president had anything to do with the naming. O and why don't you tell us about all the top secret capabilities it has in this speech.
 
F47-“将军们选择了这个型号”，好像你们第47任总统与这个命名有什么关系一样。哦，你为什么不在演讲中告诉我们它所有的绝密性能呢？
 
@jamesjross
He is a child. And the people around him are acting like they are placating a child. Its so flippin' stupid. 2:10 - what is is talking about. Speed 2? He's so silly.
 
他是个孩子，他周围的人表现得像在安抚一个孩子一样。这太愚蠢了。2:10 - 他在说什么。速度2？他太傻了。
 
@VndNvwYvvSvv
@jamesjross You're so hateful and spiteful, so contentious, that it's probably a waste of time to explain to you that anyone know knows a modicum about any of this knows that'll mean supercruise.
 
@jamesjross 你如此充满仇恨和恶意，如此好斗，可能向你解释这意味着超音速巡航的任何对这方面稍有了解的人都知道是浪费时间。
 
@alanmorris7669
This is Trump's way of telling us that we're fried. He's about to get us into a lot of trouble. You get what you vote for. By the way, F-47 stands for FELON-47... you can't spell FELON without ELON
 
这是特朗普告诉我们我们完蛋了的方式，他即将让我们陷入很多麻烦，你得到了你投票的结果。顺便说一下，F-47代表FELON-47……你不能在没有ELON（马斯克）的情况下拼写FELON。
 
@thisguyshorty3554
Now we know where our spending cuts went to. And I am sure Musk will have his hand in the cookie jar
 
现在我们知道我们的削减开支去了哪里，而且我确信马斯克会插手其中。
 
@mward5296
That will be a disaster with Boeing! How to destroy two good companies MD and Boeing by merger...
I'll wager Lockheed won the technical submission but politics got in the way so award moved to Boeing. They need orders as Airbus is kicking their ass in commercial sector
 
这对波音来说将是一场灾难！如何通过合并摧毁麦道和波音这两家好公司……
我敢打赌洛克希德赢得了技术提交，但政治干预了，所以奖项转移到了波音。他们需要订单，因为空客在商用领域击败了他们。
 
@whatever3245
Nope they did not, its the same conspiracy with Abrams, no whoever won the contract won the contract. We are not playing games, in the least case they merged designs, but its produced by boeing
 
不，他们没有，这与艾布拉姆斯的情况相同，无论谁赢得了合同，谁就赢得了合同。我们不是在玩游戏，至少他们合并了设计，但它最终由波音生产。
 
@barnesguides
Why do you think this program was scrubbed? Drone mothership with an untenable budget. Great job, maga. How many canceled school lunches could this pay for?
 
你为什么认为这个项目被取消了？无人机母舰的预算不可持续。干得好，MAGA。这可以支付多少被取消的学校午餐？
 
@planesportraitaviationmedi6873
Did anyone even brief him on China's new 6th Gen platforms they leaked a month ago?? and its not a LEVEL. omg....
 
有人向他简要介绍了中国一个月前泄露的新的第六代平台吗？？而且这不是一个级别。天哪……
 
@unforgivingreach
What 6th Gen fighter? You don't know anything about that plane. The fact that it has 3 engines and no tail doesn't make it 6th get at all.
 
什么第六代战斗机？你对那架飞机一无所知。它有3个发动机并且没有尾翼，这并不能使它成为第六代战斗机。
 
@planesportraitaviationmedi6873
@unforgivingreach it was not just one plane, in fact there were 2 designs. and most reports point towards China's 6th gen capabilities. Same could be said about this Boeing Prototype, which is only a mock up so far....
 
@unforgivingreach 中国不仅仅只有一架飞机，它实际上有两款设计。大多数报告都指出中国的战机拥有第六代能力。同样的情况也适用于这个波音原型机，虽然它目前只是一个模型……
 
@robmccormick3197
According to you �� s,maybe we should just buy our jets from China. Or maybe just wait until we don’t have anything to compete.
 
根据你们的说法，也许我们应该直接从中国购买喷气式飞机。或者也许可以等到我们没有任何竞争力。
 
@Ricky-j5k
Next, Trump signed limited edition gold F47 scale models for your desktop. And you can bet MAGA will be all over it too
 
接下来，特朗普将签署限量版金色F47桌面模型，你可以打赌MAGA也会对此疯狂追捧。
 
@gww8026
As soon as the US becomes East Russia, Putin will give the US whatever planes he sees fit.
No one has ever seen anything so magnificent. No one.
By the way, the Gulf of Mexico will then be called the Gulf of East Russia. A beautiful name. No one has ever seen a more beautiful name for a gulf.
 
一旦美国成为东俄罗斯，普京将给美国任何他认为合适的飞机。
没有人见过如此宏伟的东西，没有人。
顺便说一下，墨西哥湾将被称为东俄罗斯湾，这是一个美丽的名字，没有人见过比这更美丽的海湾名字。
 
@morganfoxen6663
As the world is shifting to drones
 
随着世界转向无人机...
 
@texaswunderkind
We shouldn't have another fighter designed with a human cockpit. That mentality has been obsolete for years.
 
我们不应该再设计有人驾驶的战斗机，这种心态已经过时多年了。
 
@kurtwagner350
The drones you’re thinking of are more useful In the realm of army or marine operations. Not defending our skies or ensuring air superiority.
 
你想到的无人机在陆军或海军行动而不是在保卫我们的天空或确保空中优势中更有用。
 
@guymontag2948
This should be great for getting hesitant countries to fulfill contracts for the apparently obsolete F-35.
 
这对于让犹豫不决的国家履行显然已经过时的F-35合同应该很棒。
 
@JohnDoe-pk2hs
Considering most of our allies do not currently trust us, much more likely to order Sweden's Gripin.
 
考虑到我们的大多数盟友目前不信任我们，他们更有可能订购瑞典的鹰狮。
 
@shadowridersiii3080
@JohnDoe-pk2hs Which means that Canada and Sweden with both have trustworthy planes in the sky like their better hockey teams that the US on the ice!
 
@JohnDoe-pk2hs 这意味着加拿大和瑞典在天空中都拥有值得信赖的飞机，就像他们在冰上有比美国更好的冰球队一样！
 
@joakimjonsson1640
The US wont be able to export many of these, Europe has already restarted their military industry and will never look back. This means that the bill for developing this new system will be paid by the American people. Maybe Russia and India can buy
 
美国将无法出口很多这样的飞机，因为欧洲已经重新启动了他们的军事工业，并且永远不会回头。这意味着开发这个新系统的账单将由美国人民支付。也许俄罗斯和印度可以购买。
 
@RyanVendetti-n6n
They don’t plan on selling this they don’t sell the f 22 or b21 or other military tech. People should just be quiet if they don’t know anything your blind hatred is obvious
 
他们不打算出售这个，他们也不出售F-22或B21或其他军事技术。如果人们什么都不知道，他们应该保持安静，你的盲目仇恨是显而易见的。
 
@uwezo86
So we cut department of education to pay for this weapon?
 
所以我们削减教育部门的资金来支付这种武器？
 
@johntaylor8835
We’ve been doing this for a long time. It is sad. Imagine if we could use the money to solve problems. Unfortunately your comparison is poor as the department of education has been a failure.
 
我们已经这样做很长时间了，这很可悲。想象一下，如果我们能用这些钱来解决问题会怎样？不幸的是你的比较很不合适，因为教育部一直是个失败者。
 
@tetsatou2815
No, because that implies that the Department of Education was ever being given enough of a budget to actually make it worth stealing from to pay for other projects. That's the excuse, not the reason.
 
不，因为这意味着教育部曾经被给予了足够的预算，以至于值得从中窃取以支付其他项目。这是借口而不是原因。
 
@daverushambuza3827
There’s usually a “Fly Off” with different competitors, with their competitively developed prototype designs.
 
通常会有不同竞争对手的“飞行竞赛”，他们会竞争性地开发原型设计。
 
@jeffaris2012
Why does president Trump keeps repeating himself on what he is reading?
It looks like a fault ain't it?
 
为什么特朗普总统在阅读时不断重复自己的话？
这看起来像是一个故障，不是吗？
 
@janbrown9195
Try working the hours that man works, oh I forgot most have lost the art of truly working long hours. He’s amazing ��let alone at the age he is ❤️
 
你可以试着按照那个人的工作的时间工作，哦，我忘记了大多数人已经失去了真正长时间工作的艺术。他太棒了，更不用说在他这个年纪。