尽管当前存在技术和经验差距,但中国海军力量的持续增长是否最终能使其超越俄罗斯?
Could China's growing naval power eventually give it an edge over Russia, despite their current technological and experience gaps?
译文简介
网友:中国海军在规模、技术水平和经验上实际上已经领先俄罗斯海军十年以上。
如今中国竞争的对象是美国,在西太平洋与美国角力,而不只是停留在东亚区域。
正文翻译
中国海军在规模、技术水平和经验上实际上已经领先俄罗斯海军十年以上。
如今中国竞争的对象是美国,在西太平洋与美国角力,而不只是停留在东亚区域。
如今中国竞争的对象是美国,在西太平洋与美国角力,而不只是停留在东亚区域。
评论翻译
很赞 ( 17 )
收藏
I’d say that China has already surpassed Russia in terms of naval power, and particularly if you consider the Russian Pacific fleet in isolation (which is the only thing that makes sense, as China isn’t going to operate in the Atlantic).
我认为在海军实力上中国已经超越俄罗斯,尤其是如果单看俄罗斯的太平洋舰队(这是唯一有意义的比较,因为中国不可能在大西洋行动)。
##bas64img##
China's dual-carrier battle group
中国的双航母战斗群
CATOBAR-class carrier“Fujian”CV18
弹射-拦阻(CATOBAR)型航母“福建”号(CV-18)
However, the Chinese navy is also learning. For example, it has mastered the operation of aircraft carriers, possessing two STOBAR-class carriers and planning to commission the first CATOBAR-class carrier equipped with electromagnetic catapults, second only to the United States. Meanwhile, the Russian Navy has just abandoned its sole STOBAR carrier.
不过,中国海军也在学习。例如,中国已掌握航母的运行,拥有两艘短距起飞/阻拦着舰(STOBAR)型航母,并计划服役首艘配备电磁弹射的CATOBAR(弹射起飞拦阻降落)型航母,仅次于美国。同时,俄罗斯海军刚刚放弃了其唯一的一艘STOBAR航母。
The aircraft carrier Admiral Kuznetsov under repair
正在维修中的航母"库兹涅佐夫海军上将"号
Phantom Chuck
China’s surface navy already have a daunting and almost insurmountable edge over the Russian surface navy.
“幻影查克”:中国水面舰队在很多方面已经对俄罗斯水面舰队形成了可怕且几乎无法逾越的优势。
90% of principles combatants in the Chinese surface navy by tonnage are up to date by contemporary standards, all of them seems to be operational and generally sustain a relatively high level of operational activity. The Chinese produce on average around 10 new major blue water combatants a year, about the same number as Russia has produced in the last 25 years put together. Every single one of these new Chinese combatants are larger, more modern and more capable than any surface combat Russia has managed to build in the last 25 years.
按吨位计算,中国水面主力舰中约90%符合当代标准,且看起来都能投入使用并维持相对较高的出航活动水平。中国平均每年大约建造10艘新的远洋主力作战舰艇,这相当于俄罗斯过去25年总产出的数量。每一艘中国的新型作战舰艇都比俄罗斯在过去25年里建造的任何水面战舰更大、更现代、能力更强。
only about 20% of the principles combatants combatants in the Russian surface navy can be regarded as up to date. the rest consist of little modernized relics of the Soviet era. It is not clear how many of the rest are truly operational, and most of the Russian surface navy combatants seldomly go to sea.
而在俄罗斯水面舰队中,只有约20%的主力舰可被视为现代化舰艇,其余大多是经过少量现代化改装的苏联遗产。目前尚不清楚其中多少舰艇真正处于可操作状态,而且大多数俄罗斯水面战舰很少出海。
and the Chinese navy has more than twice the total tonnage of surface warships.
并且中国海军的水面战舰总吨位是俄罗斯的两倍多。
but in submarines, the Russians still enjoy some edge over the Chinese, particularly in nuclear powered submarines, where the Chinese seriously lagged Russia until recently. The Chinese are only beginning to produce submarines that come close to rivaling contemporary Russian nuclear submarines. The Russians already have a number of fully modern new nuclear powered submarines in the water. The Chinese as far as is known having completed a single one of their latest nuclear powered submarine designs yet.
但在潜艇方面,俄罗斯仍然对中国有一定优势,尤其是在核动力潜艇上,中国直到最近都严重落后于俄罗斯。中国才刚开始生产能接近竞争当代俄罗斯核潜艇性能的型号。俄罗斯已经拥有若干完全现代化的新型核潜艇服役在水面上;据已知信息,中国到目前为止仅完成了其最新核潜艇设计中的一款。
Xb Liu
The military strength of the Chinese Navy is already the best in the world. I don't understand why you are comparing it with Russia. Even if the US Navy comes, they will only be sunk.
我认为中国海军的军事实力已经是世界第一。我不明白为什么要拿它跟俄罗斯比。即便是美国海军来了,也只会被击沉。
The current naval combat mode has completely changed. During the ordinary World War II, battleships were no longer used because aircraft had a much greater attack range. Aircraft carriers replaced battleships. Now, the deterrent power of aircraft carriers has also weakened. This is because the 055 destroyers with a much greater attack range have emerged.
当前的海上作战模式已经完全改变。二战期间,战列舰逐渐被淘汰,因为航空器拥有更远的打击范围,航母取而代之。现在,航母的威慑力也被削弱了,因为出现了具备更远射程的055型驱逐舰。
A Type 055 destroyer can effectively suppress an entire US aircraft carrier group and withdraw from the battlefield. Because it is fully electronically suppressed throughout the process, the US aircraft carriers are even unable to conduct radio communication with other vessels. Moreover, the carrier-based aircraft of the US cannot launch attacks like the Type 055 destroyer either. The Type 055 has 112 vertical launch units, and it can destroy aircraft and the entire carrier battle group in an instant. These missiles have an attack range of up to several thousand kilometers and a terminal attack speed exceeding 10 Mach. Even the US military does not have such a fantastical hypersonic missile.
055型驱逐舰可以有效压制整个美国航母战斗群并撤离战场。因为在整个过程中它实现了全面电子抑制,使得美军航母甚至无法与其他舰艇进行无线电通信。此外,美国航母上的舰载机也无法像055那样发起类似的远程打击。055拥有112个纵向发射单元,能够瞬间摧毁飞机及整个航母战斗群。这些导弹的射程可达数千公里,末端突防速度超过10马赫。即便是美军也没有如此“奇幻”的高超音速导弹。
If you don't believe it, you can check the number of fleet captains or commanders in the US Pacific Fleet who have had their positions revoked in recent years. This is because they have been brought into disrepute by China's Type 055 destroyers.
如果你不信,可以查一查近年来美国太平洋舰队被撤职的舰队长或司令人数。这是因为他们在中国055型驱逐舰面前声誉受损。