佛罗里达州如何悄然成为太阳能强国？

@Wheninflight
For a state like Florida, it could only help it even more by reducing the urban heat island effect if done correctly. I wish they along with CA would rewrite the tax code to give more credits/wright offs to put them over parking lots and buildings instead of cutting down trees and taking up lots of forested areas.
 
对于像佛罗里达这样的州，如果正确实施，减少城市热岛效应会带来更多好处。我希望他们和加利福尼亚州一起重新编写税法，给予更多的税收优惠和扣除，鼓励在停车场和建筑物上安装太阳能板，而不是砍伐树木、占用大量森林面积。
 
@lynnrumsey3296
Wouldn’t it be great if all suitable parking lots in Florida had solar panels built over them?  Shopping malls, Walmarts, grocery stores, etc.  In Pensacola I’ve seen this done at a community center and a few small ones other places. It would be great shade to protect vehicles and people from the radiating heat caused by pavement.
 
如果佛罗里达州的所有合适停车场都安装太阳能板，那该多好啊？购物中心、沃尔玛、超市等地方。在彭萨科拉，我看到社区中心和一些小地方已经做了这项工作。这样不仅可以为车辆和人们提供阴凉，保护他们免受地面反射的热量。
 
@The38alt
Instead of building solar on parking lots, roofs and much needed areas for heat cover, they cleared whole forest to place them in middle of nowhere.
Imagine the less heat everywhere if solar covered parking lots instead of destroying wildlife.
 
与其在停车场、屋顶和需要遮热的地方建设太阳能板，他们却在荒无人烟的地方清理整片森林来安装它们。想象一下，如果太阳能板覆盖停车场，而不是破坏野生动物栖息地，周围的热量会减少多少。
 
@sidali2590
Kudos to this project we need less dependence on fossil fuels
 
为这个项目点赞，我们需要减少对化石燃料的依赖。
 
@KenDotCom
Florida voted republican  and  against solar panel subsidies and for more oil pollution. 2nd most sunshine and they don't have any state level subsidies for solar
 
佛罗里达州投票支持共和党，反对太阳能面板补贴，支持更多的石油污染。阳光最多的第二大州，却没有任何州级的太阳能补贴。
 
@simonpannett8810
Just need Oil & Gas to lose its subsidies to encourage more renewables at the same time saving Government Money!!
 
只需要取消石油和天然气的补贴，就能同时鼓励更多可再生能源的发展，并节省政府开支！
 
@sbl17jackson37
Babcock Ranch said they don't like rooftop solar because of the aesthetics. I think solar on the rooftops of homes and buildings is better because less land is required then taking huge areas of Florida for solar farms.
 
巴布考克牧场说他们不喜欢屋顶太阳能板，因为美学问题。我认为屋顶上的太阳能板更好，因为相比在佛罗里达州占用大片土地建设太阳能农场，屋顶太阳能需要的土地更少。
 
@jorgenfrohlich6954
In Denmark we have 60% renewable clean energy mostly from Wind
 
在丹麦，我们有60%的可再生清洁能源，主要来自风能。
 
@fassphoto
What a beautiful concept.
I hope this concept will spread throughout the nation.
 
真是一个美丽的概念。
希望这个概念能在全国推广。
 
@DawlessHouseMusic
And no one is addressing what happens if they use up all the sun?
 
没人提到如果他们用光了所有的太阳能会发生什么？
@urbanstrencan
This is just awesome to see, such a Big and successful solar projects
 
看到这种规模大且成功的太阳能项目真是太棒了。
 
@shawnstangeland3011
Happy as hell i built my own solar system.  So nice not depending on anyone fir energy
 
我真高兴自己建了一个太阳能系统。 不再依赖任何人提供能源真是太好了。
 
@degnarius
Yes, Florida utilities have been pushing solar friendly development policies for themselves while actively fighting against residential solar for homeowners. They’re all for protecting their monopoly.
 
是的，佛罗里达的公用事业公司一直在推动有利于太阳能发展的政策，但同时积极反对住宅太阳能系统的普及。它们全力保护自己的垄断地位。
 
@Ind-b9b
Florida surprises me once in a while. Some of the surprises include things like EVs and solar ownerships. Maybe all of the brains were not washed.
 
佛罗里达有时会让我感到惊讶。有些惊讶包括电动车和太阳能拥有权。也许并不是所有的脑袋都被洗脑了。
 
@samirshah5411
I am actually due for a new roof and I live near Fort Lauderdale. I was hoping to get a Tesla solar roof, which would solve both issues of a new roof and wanting solar panels however, with the new bill erasing the tax credit this is now financially not possible. On top of that a lot of homeowners insurance companies don’t want to insure solar roofs or panels, which makes adopting solar much more difficult. Especially in a state like Florida, where a lot of homeowner insurance companies are exiting due to all the storms this only acts as a deterrent.
 
我实际上需要更换屋顶，我住在劳德代尔堡附近。我原本希望安装特斯拉太阳能屋顶，这样既能解决换新屋顶的问题，又能安装太阳能面板。然而，随着新法案取消了税收优惠，这在财务上变得不可能。更糟的是，许多房主保险公司不愿意为太阳能屋顶或面板投保，这使得采用太阳能变得更加困难。尤其是在像佛罗里达这样的州，许多房主保险公司因频繁的风暴而退出，这只会起到阻碍作用。
 
@nighle160
Power companies make it harder for homeowners to install solar on their roofs, so they still have to depend on power companies.
 
电力公司让房主更难在屋顶上安装太阳能板，因此他们仍然需要依赖电力公司。
 
@felixvelo
Use the space you place the solar panels more effectively. C'mon guys!
 
更有效地利用安装太阳能板的空间。来吧，大家！
 
@kenvalenti5414
We must reward the fossil fuel industry for such large donations to the GOP.
Clean air and water is over-rated.

我们必须奖励化石燃料行业，因为它们为共和党做出了如此大的捐款。
清洁空气和水被高估了。
 
@jjamespacbell
King Don cut solar tax incentives but kept fossil fuel incentives. What a troglodyte.
 
国王唐削减了太阳能税收激励，却保留了化石燃料激励。真是个原始人。
 
@gweejiahan9336
What America really needs to look at is Agrivoltaics where the Solar power generation and agriculture is done concurrently on the same land. it has shown to improve both the efficiency of the solar power generation and also the yield of certain crops grown on the land. Also the farmers earn from the solar power generation on top of the crop yield. and the shade from the panels effectively changes the conditions of the humidity, sunlight that can be designed to benefit higher value crops.
 
美国真正需要关注的是农业光伏，即在同一块土地上同时进行太阳能发电和农业生产。这已被证明可以提高太阳能发电的效率，同时增加某些作物的产量。此外，农民可以从太阳能发电中获得收入，除此之外，还能从作物产量中获益。面板的阴影有效地改变了湿度和阳光的条件，可以设计成有利于高价值作物的生长。
 
@atanacioluna292
Why don't they put the panels up higher so the land can be used for agriculture or nature?
 
为什么不把太阳能板安装得更高，这样土地就可以用于农业或自然保护了？
 
@risamaeve
We wanted to get solar this year but our roof is the exact awkward age where it doesn't make sense to get a new roof yet but it also doesn't make sense to put panels that will last 20 years on a roof that has less than 10 years left in it.
 
我们今年本来想安装太阳能的，但我们的屋顶正好处于那个尴尬的年纪，既不适合换新屋顶，又不适合在一个剩余寿命不到10年的屋顶上安装可以持续20年的太阳能板。
 
@Mike-hu3pp
150MW is amazing. That's over 200,000 HP in American numbers
 
150兆瓦真惊人，相当于超过200,000马力（美国标准）。
 
@imacuser101
We should try to really promote rooftop solar, especially if the utility scale is not able to power data centers. If we're only reliant on utility scale, we'll see prices surge due to AI companies being able to pay prices that consumers cannot. So we really should promote rooftop solar as an alternative, not because of climate policy, but just as a way to produce watts and power.
 
我们应该真正推广屋顶太阳能，特别是如果公用事业规模的太阳能无法为数据中心提供电力的话。如果我们只依赖公用事业规模的太阳能，价格将会因为AI公司能够支付普通消费者负担不起的价格而飙升。因此，我们真的应该推广屋顶太阳能作为一种替代方案，不仅仅是因为气候政策，而是作为一种生产电力的方式。
 
@TQQQ333
But picking the right sites are very important for the board installations skills sets double checking.
 
但选择合适的地点对于板安装的技能组合和再次检查非常重要。
 
@thenerdnetwork
3% of Floridians supported this bill to allow revision of net metering. 3%. Yet the Florida House and Senate overwhelmingly passed this bill. This bill was lobbied for and backed by power generation companies. These companies literally stuffed the pockets of those voting in favor of the bill. Regardless if it was going to absolutely 100% without a doubt no question about it going to negatively impact the citizens of Florida. They voted against the interest of the citizens they are supposed to "represent" because the power generation companies paid them to vote in favor of these multi-billion dollar corporations. Any Florida citizen should be looking to see if any representative in their districts voted in favor of this bill, and vote these people out of office either in primaries or general elections. It really is just that simple. You voted FOR them and they voted AGAINST you.
 
只有3%的佛罗里达人支持这项允许修订净计量的法案。仅仅3%。然而，佛罗里达州的众议院和参议院却压倒性地通过了这项法案。这项法案是由发电公司游说并支持的。这些公司实际上塞满了支持该法案投票的人的口袋。无论这项法案是否会毫无疑问地对佛罗里达公民产生极大负面影响，投票者还是支持了发电公司的利益。任何佛罗里达公民都应该查看他们所在选区的代表是否支持了这项法案，并在初选或大选中将这些人投票下台。事情真的很简单，你支持了他们，而他们却背叛了你。
 
 
@xeridea
70% of the cost of rooftop solar is installers overcharging, and pointless permitting. Then they sign homeowners up for horrendous terms on a loan, so the final cost ends up being 5x the actual equipment cost. Just do it yourself and save a massive amount of cash, and have a very quick payback. I am fine with getting rid of the tax credit because it was just abused by investors lending, and solar companies.
Panels are extremely cheap these days, some just make fences out of them because that is a similar cost as building a fence.
 
屋顶太阳能成本的70%是由于安装工人过度收费和不必要的许可手续。然后，他们让房主签订非常糟糕的贷款条款，最终成本变成了实际设备费用的5倍。只需自己动手做，就能节省大量现金，而且回报期非常短。我对于取消税收优惠并不介意，因为它被投资者和太阳能公司滥用。如今，面板非常便宜，有些人甚至用它们建篱笆，因为那样的成本和建篱笆差不多。
 
@TQQQ333
Same as the water pipes workers and skilled teams they all got out of expectations protections and income levels.
 
和水管工以及其他技术团队一样，他们都没有得到预期的保护和收入水平。
 
@irwinsaltzman979
Solar now less expensive than natural gas for generating electricity. If the US continues building fossil fuel plants, ignoring a less expensive technology  manufacturing cost go up in the US.
 
太阳能现在比天然气发电便宜。如果美国继续建设化石燃料电厂，而忽视更便宜的技术，制造成本将在美国上升。
 
@jfkastner
We need every kW we can get for Computers/AI, EVs, HVAC, ... the more the better. Don't always need Batteries - If you run your A/C with it's mostly during the Daytime!
 
我们需要尽可能多的千瓦来支持计算机/人工智能、电动汽车、空调系统……越多越好。并不总是需要电池——如果你在白天使用空调，大部分时间都能使用！
 
@llN3M3515ll
Holy smokes CNBC loves Babcock ranch, the keep publishing on hurricane resiliency now it's solar.
 
天啊，CNBC太喜欢巴布考克牧场了，他们一直在发布关于飓风韧性，现在是关于太阳能的。
 
@RollinHomies
of course the orange man kills the incentives. So, now, where do those credits go?
 
当然，那位橙色大人物取消了激励措施。那么，那些税收抵免现在去哪儿了？
 
@imacuser1
The best thing, like always, is not to just build a product and hope that the government subsidizes it, but just build the best product. The cheapest product. And solar provides that. Solar is cheap, and it's the fastest way you can go from zero to actually powering communities and getting legit power to consumers. Climate policy has nothing to do with this. If you build the best product, it'll work every time.
 
像往常一样，最好的做法不是仅仅制造一个产品并希望政府补贴，而是制造最好的产品。最便宜的产品。太阳能提供了这一点。太阳能便宜，而且是从零到真正为社区供电、为消费者提供合法电力的最快方式。气候政策与此无关。如果你制造最好的产品，它每次都会成功。
 
@antronx7
Solar with subsidies is on par with existing natural gas at $35/MWh. When you have to add batteries the cost of solar energy increases. So no, more solar beyond what the grid can absorb without batteries will not make energy cheaper.
 
有补贴的太阳能和现有的天然气发电相当，价格为35美元/兆瓦时。当你必须加上电池时，太阳能的成本就会上升。所以，不，超过电网能吸收的太阳能（不加电池）不会让能源变得更便宜。
 
@TrevorBrass
Solar PV is now the default, not the niche form of new energy.  One day most of our power will be from solar PV.  Perhaps nuclear fission has a place for areas with less direct sun and as a backup baseload source of power.
 
太阳能光伏现在是主流，而不是新型能源中的小众形式。未来我们大部分的电力将来自太阳能光伏。也许核裂变在阳光不充足的地区有一席之地，作为备用基荷电源。
 
@enthused7591
Makes zero sense to have 10 square miles of cut down forest to put solar panels for every neighborhood, when a couple thousand dollars in solar panels can just be placed either on the roof of your house or shed, or in your side yard and generate all the power you'd ever need right on site. The smartest way is always to put them on the roof of something like a building or carport so that not only can you still use the space below them, but they provide shade from the 100-degree heat as well. The future of energy is absolutely solar panels on site at people's homes, there's literally no other way to do it. We have existing structures to mount them on so that they take up zero additional effective space.
 
把10平方英里的砍伐森林用来安装太阳能板为每个社区提供电力根本没有意义，几千美元的太阳能板可以直接放在你家或小屋的屋顶，或者放在侧院，现场就能产生你需要的全部电力。最聪明的做法总是把它们安装在像建筑物或车棚的屋顶上，这样不仅可以继续使用下面的空间，还能提供100度高温下的遮荫。能源的未来绝对是安装在家庭现场的太阳能板，别无他法。我们有现有的结构可以安装它们，这样就不会占用额外的有效空间。
 
@llN3M3515ll
F* FPL and raising their hookup charge from 25 to 30 a month.  I am kicking around just going off grid, rather have batteries then pay  these guys 30 a month
 
去你妈的FPL，把他们的接入费从25美元涨到30美元。我在考虑直接离网，宁愿买电池，也不愿每月给这些家伙交30美元。
 
@keeblers2003
What about the insurance companies that dropped customers for putting solar panels on their roof?
 
那些因为在屋顶安装太阳能板而取消客户的保险公司怎么办？
 
@jcampbell7619
Would be good to define what a “Microgrid” is and  specify what (and how much) the costs actually are.
 
最好定义一下什么是“微电网”，并明确它的实际成本是多少。
 
@LilInsomniaa
solar is a scam, bought $50k of solar panels for my 2600sqft home, I only get $30-40 off my $400 energy bill each month, its a scam.
 
太阳能是个骗局，我为我的2600平方英尺的家买了5万美元的太阳能板，每个月电费只便宜30到40美元，我的电费是400美元，简直是个骗局。
 
@Denny19800
We have the best sales people that’s why ans we are truly free here no state taxes
 
我们有最好的销售人员，正因为如此，我们在这里真的很自由，没有州税。
 
@JonathanAdamsPhoto
Solar is about to take off even more as server farms and export of liquid gas over seas we will see a spike in the cost of electricity
 
随着服务器农场和液化天然气的出口，太阳能将会更加发展，我们将看到电力成本的激增。
 
@ommanipadmehung3014
Clean energy is far cheaper and will help America become energy independent
 
清洁能源便宜得多，将有助于美国实现能源独立。
 
@Dmsfhg
If green energy is cheaper like the video claimed, why do they need subsidies?
 
如果像视频中说的那样，绿色能源更便宜，那为什么还需要补贴？
 
@mooret025
Why isn't Alabama on this list? Why is it okay for utilities to continue to break ground on new solar projects, but the environment for residential solar is prohibitive?
 
为什么阿拉巴马州不在这个名单上？为什么公用事业公司可以继续开展新的太阳能项目，而住宅太阳能的环境却如此严苛？
 
@n21010
It’s wonderful to see years of industry building by California start maturing, become more economically viable, and job creating nationwide
 
看到加利福尼亚多年来的行业建设开始成熟，变得更具经济可行性，并在全国范围内创造就业机会，真是太好了。
 
@sbl17jackson37
All homes, buildings, canals, roadways, and parking lots should have solar power.
 
所有的房屋、建筑物、运河、道路和停车场都应该安装太阳能。
 
@InLineDiesel6
Solar should not need taxpayer subsidies to be viable. I may have missed it, but I did not hear the household cost for power. Is it lower than, equal to, or more than being on the grid?
 
太阳能不应该需要纳税人补贴才能生存。我可能错过了，但我没有听到家庭电力成本是多少。它是低于、等于还是高于接入电网的成本？
 
@johnl5316
Where will we dump the TOxiC panels after 15 yrs. How often will STORMS destroy them?
 
15年后我们该如何处理这些有毒的太阳能板？暴风雨会多频繁地摧毁它们？
 
@TimLucasdesign
I'm really surprised the republican leadership allow solar in Florida.
 
我真的很惊讶佛罗里达州的共和党领导允许太阳能存在。
 
@charlesjack6571
Sadly, as long as Trump an retrobates like him are voted into policy marking positions, efforts toward  sustainable energy programs will lag. Voters must be better educated because as Trump was quoted saying, "I love the poorly educated."
 
可悲的是，只要像特朗普这样的人和类似的落后分子被选入政策决策岗位，推动可持续能源项目的努力将会滞后。选民们必须接受更好的教育，因为正如特朗普所说的，“我喜欢那些受教育程度低的人。”
 
@TheParot161
I’m heating my home with a small backyard incinerator like folks had in the 1950s. Great way to get rid of my garbage and plastic. No scrubber on the stack. Make America great again
 
我用一个像1950年代人们使用的小型后院焚烧炉来取暖。它是处理垃圾和塑料的好方法。烟囱上没有净化器。让美国再次伟大。
 
@kevinmanan1304
Ah so now that they got a monopoly on this energy market they want the incentives and subsidies to be removed.
 
啊，所以现在他们在这个能源市场上垄断了，他们想要去掉激励和补贴。
 
@mrright1068
Taking all those acres out of agriculture production is disgusting. Healthy food is already more expensive than it should be, but to take that much land out of production exacerbates the problem. Not to mention that the federal gov gives subsidies to make this switch. It is not benefit the homeowners only the utilities.  Its a lose lose for the citizens.
 
把那些土地从农业生产中拿出来真令人恶心。健康食品已经比应有的价格贵，但把这么多土地从生产中拿走只会加剧问题。更不用说联邦政府还给这些转型提供补贴了。这对房主没有好处，只有对公用事业公司有利。这对市民来说是双输局面。
 
@LordKingTrump
solar takes too much space
 
太阳能占用太多空间。
 
@MeatWig00
We should build most living quarters, underground. Make that the norm. Wouldn’t that leave so much more space for clean energy infrastructure. This solar stuff takes up too much acreage. It’s a land grab.
 
我们应该把大部分住宅建在地下。让它成为常态。那样不就能腾出更多空间来建设清洁能源基础设施吗？这种太阳能东西占用了太多土地。这是土地争夺。