美国海军战斗机从航空母舰上坠入红海
Navy: U.S. fighter jet falls off aircraft carrier and into Red Sea
译文简介
据报道，这架价值七千万美元的F/A-18战斗机在被拖出机库时，哈里·S·杜鲁门号航空母舰的船员失去了对其控制。
正文翻译
April 29, 2025
2025年4月29日
The $70 million F/A-18 fighter jet was reportedly being towed out of the hangar bay when the of the USS Harry S. Truman crew lost control.
据报道，这架价值七千万美元的F/A-18战斗机在被拖出机库时，哈里·S·杜鲁门号航空母舰的船员失去了对其控制。
据报道，这架价值七千万美元的F/A-18战斗机在被拖出机库时，哈里·S·杜鲁门号航空母舰的船员失去了对其控制。
评论翻译
很赞 ( 8 )
收藏
“Was it because of enemy fire?”
Soldier :” Oh uh yeaaa… enemy fire yea.”
“是因为敌人的炮火吗？”
士兵：“哦，呃，嗯，敌人的炮火，对，就是敌人的炮火。”
lol
哈哈
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
sure blame the houtis lol
当然了，怪胡塞武装呗，lol。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
it was very peculiar that this kind of "accident" only happens in hot water under enemy fire, never in peaceful time
maybe, juuuust maybe, somebody is lying.
Like many NATO officer suddenly died while hiking or skiing or because of helicopter accident, all that never happened before 2022 war.
这确实很奇怪，这种“事故”似乎只在敌方炮火下的混乱中发生，从未在和平时期出现。或许，仅仅是或许，有人在撒谎。就像许多北约官员突然在徒步旅行、滑雪或者直升机事故中丧生，这些情况在2022年战争之前从未发生过。
Yea, yea…that’s the ticket!
是的，是的…这正是我要的！
Less embarrassing than admit it was shot down over Yemen.
比承认是在也门被击落还要尴尬。
Most Americans have no money, there goes 70 million of your tax dollars lol
大多数美国人都没钱，就这样七千万美元的税款没了，lol。
@jamesdennis2815 MAGA
@jamesdennis2815 让美国再次伟大
Nationwide blackout in Spain and Portugal yesterday, and the official explanation... "rare atmospheric phenomenon."
西班牙和葡萄牙昨天全国大停电，官方解释是“罕见的气象现象”。
@MuhammadRidwan-pe7ny - If they're lying, it'll be so they claim on the insurance policy. Can't if cause is stupidity.
如果他们在撒谎那就是为了申请保险赔偿，但如果原因是愚蠢的话就没办法了。
All are like my grandmother age plane, are there capable of going War?
全都是和我奶奶年纪一样的飞机，这些飞机还能上战场吗？
@MuhammadRidwan-pe7ny It really is sad how the Muslim World seems to fall for conspiracy theories so easily.
穆斯林世界似乎如此容易相信阴谋论，确实让人感到悲哀。
First off it is sailor silly not soldier! And you would not last an hour working on that flight deck at night during war ops!
首先，这是“水手”，不是“士兵”！而且，在战争行动期间，你在深夜的飞行甲板上干活恐怕连一个小时都撑不住！
Sailor, that was the Navy
水手，那就是海军。
"Hey Maverick, did you remember to set the hand brake?"
"Uuuuuuh, I think so... why?"
“嘿，Maverick，你记得拉手刹了吗？”
“呃......我想记得吧，怎么了？”
@xiaoka just like Iraqi WMD you mean ??????????
@xiaoka 你是指伊拉克的大规模杀伤性武器对吧？？？？？？？？
@xiaoka do you know about 2003 Iraq INVASION by US, ooh youngster ?
@xiaoka 你知道2003年美国对伊拉克的入侵吗，年轻人欧？
@MuhammadRidwan-pe7ny that was a dumb choice made by the president and government. You do remember the invasion of Kuwait?
@MuhammadRidwan-pe7ny 那是总统和政府做出的愚蠢决定，你还记得入侵科威特的事情吗？
@BojackHorseman0098 1991 yes USA is justified to smote Iraq
but 2003 Iraq OSTENSIBLY had nukes so the BENEVOLENT USA did what it does best since 230 years.
Now search Iraq nuke lie, sweet summer child
@BojackHorseman0098 1991年美国对伊拉克进行打击是有理由的，但到了2003年，以伊拉克所谓拥有核武器的借口成为幌子，被自诩为仁慈的美国继续延续其两百三十年以来的传统。现在去搜索“伊拉克核武谎言”吧，天真的孩子。
The Hourhis are not capable of shooting down an F/A-18
“胡塞武装没能力击落F/A-18战机。”
@DR_1_1 the cope is hard among the global north
@DR_1_1 全球北方的应对确实很困难。
cant imagine war with china
无法想象与中国开战。
@BojackHorseman0098 woah you are YOUNG.
Bush Jr. was blabbering that Saddam had nukes back in 2003.
now everybody think that Nukes are no bigge in Iraq ???
哇哦，你还很年轻啊。布什总统在2003年时还在胡扯说萨达姆拥有核武器，现在大家都觉得核武器在伊拉克不是什么大事了吗？
The Houthis have shot down 15+ MQ-9 Reaper drones. At least six this month. They have air defenses quite capable of shooting down an F-18. These aren't 1970s F-18s. They're new and have fairly powerful electronic warfare capabilities.
胡塞武装已经击落了超过15架MQ-9“死神”无人机，仅本月就有至少6架被击落，他们的防空系统足够强大，可以击落F-18战斗机，而且这些F-18战斗机并不是上世纪70年代的型号，而是新型并具备相当强大的电子战能力的机型。
Gulf of Tonkin?
北部湾事件？
@shawnhaqqani3227 And what do you think protecting trade routes helps with?
@shawnhaqqani3227 那你认为保护贸易路线能起到什么作用呢？
The Yemeni Houthi army who destroyed F18 aircraft during the big Houthi attacks on the USA Navy in the red sea
也门胡塞军队在红海的大规模进攻中摧毁了F18战机，同时袭击了美国海军。
"Every war begins with a false flag operation" - Jesse Ventura
“每场战争的开端通常都是一场虚假的旗帜行动”——杰西·温图拉
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
It is very embarrassing that the aircraft carrier and F-18E were hit by Houthi missiles.
航母和F-18E战机竟然被胡塞武装的导弹击中，这实在是太丢脸了。
Oops....there goes $70 million.
哎呀……7千万美元就这么没了。
HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa!!!!!!!!!! So many questions there.......
哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈，问题真是多得不得了啊！
They can make the same one in china for 3 millions.
他们在中国可以用三百万制造出同样的东西。
Of taxpayer money.
纳税人的钱。
probably can get 10 mil back if you list it on craiglist, just make sure label it: slight water damage
如果你在克雷格列表上挂出来，可能可以拿回1000万，只要确保标注：轻微水损。
Well, it's creating jobs......
嗯，这确实能够创造就业机会。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@seanhoward8025 the carrier had an incoming missile/drone strike. They were forced into making evasive maneuvers while the plane was being parked by the tug.
@seanhoward8025 那艘航空母舰遇到了一枚来袭的导弹或无人机的袭击，在飞机正被牵引车停放时，迫使其不得不采取紧急回避动作调整航向。
@austinlmbt24 this is true I witnessed it
@austinlmbt24 这是真的，我亲眼目睹了。
that jet identifies as a submarine, thats what actually happened
那架飞机自我认同是一艘潜艇，这就是事情的真相。
（笑哭）（笑哭）（笑哭）
Bro i swear if i hear one more “I identify as” joke im gonna crash out
老兄，我发誓，要是再听到一个“我认同自己是...”的笑话，我要崩溃了。
Huh. This new breed of woke jets!
嗯，这是一种新型的觉醒的战斗机！
Yall really came up with one “joke” in 2016 and just never let go lM
你们从2016年想出了一个“笑话”，然后就一直抓着不放，笑死了。
@theblacksquirrel. Nah..they realized a Black pilot was the last one to fly it. Had to be trashed. You know, DEI and all....
他们意识到上一位驾驶这架飞机的是一位黑人飞行员，所以必须出事的，你知道的，DEI那些事。
Like that olde and tired joke about more planes being at the bottom of the sea than there are submarines in the sky…
就像那个老掉牙的笑话，说海底的飞机比天空中的潜艇还多一样…
@youwontlikemysteeze2945 hegseth got rid of dei hires months ago.
THEN this happened. looks like dei hires are more competent.
@youwontlikemysteeze2945 赫格塞斯几个月前就解雇了DEI员工。
结果现在发生了这种事情，看起来DEI的员工更有能力一些。
Nah... it was just trying to do its best impersonation of the US economy
算了吧，影片只是尽力模仿一下美国经济的表现罢了
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
The jet identifies as a 'transmarine'!
这架飞机自称为“变潜艇的”！
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Trans
变性的
Dude, you made me laugh like crazy in the office
兄弟，你在办公室让我笑疯了
There are more aircraft in the ocean than submarines in the sky!
海洋中的飞机比天空中的潜艇还要多！
Don`t tell doge or they will start to sort out planes by their pronouns and DEI hires ^^.
不要告诉狗狗币的社区，否则他们可能会开始根据飞机的代词和多元化与包容性招聘来进行分类。
Hi former plane captain here, spent alooooot of time in line shack. And spent almost half of my service on the flight deck of an aircraft carrier.
1st this has to have happened outside of flight operations*down time*
2nd unfortunately the crew who was in charge of moving the aircraft were not following normal procedures.
嗨，这里的前机长，在排队小屋里度过了大部分时间。我几乎有一半的服役时间是在航空母舰的飞行甲板上度过的。
第一，这必须发生在飞行运营*停机时间* 之外
第二，不幸的是，负责移动飞机的机组人员没有遵循正常程序。
在牵引飞机时，驾驶舱里有一个人控制刹车，就是这样，你有你的司机，然后你有你的机翼助行器和尾翼助行器......还有轮楔家伙和几个拿着一堆系紧链的家伙......您需要 7 人以上才能移动一架飞机。
显然，这些人没有遵守规定操作，而是抄了近路。
哦，另外，当军舰正在进行机动以避开敌人时，是绝对不会去移动飞机的。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Question, even if it didn't happen in downtime, would there have been enough early warning to essentially ground everything and make the maneuver?
问题是，即使这不是在停机期间发生的，是否会有足够的早期预警来全面停下所有行动并完成这一动作？
Thanks for a sensible explanation.
感谢你提供了一个通俗易懂的解释。
Hi there. It's nice that you are a 'former plane captain' and 'spent alooooot of time in line shack' and 'spent almost half of your service on the flight deck of an aircraft carrier', but unless you have inside information or you were on that aircraft carrier and saw it happen all that supposed experience of yours means nothing.
你好，虽然你是“前飞机指挥官”，并且“花了非常非常多的时间在飞机维修棚”，还“在航空母舰的飞行甲板上度过了差不多一半的服役时间”，但除非你掌握内部信息或者你亲眼在那艘航母上看到了事情的发生，否则你所谓的这些经验根本毫无意义。
@myselfandeye3884 ...I wouldn't call them procedures for nothing...meaning that regardless of me or anyone else or rain or shine it's the same.
And yes you can when you have enough time at sea, but especially working in an environment like the flight deck.
Also I wasn't just somebody, I was the lead petty officer for the line shack and ran the radio on the flight deck for my squadron so yes I definitely know enough.
@myselfandeye3884 我不会无缘无故称其为“程序”……意思是无论是我还是其他人，无论是晴天还是雨天，这些都一成不变。
是的，只要你在海上有足够的时间，尤其是在像飞行甲板这样的环境中工作，一切都可以办到。
此外，我可不只是某个普通人，我是负责线组的首席军士长，还在飞行甲板上为我的中队运行无线电，因此我确实非常了解相关情况。
But they won't show the video of the actual incident. i wonder why
但他们就是不放实际事件的视频，我想知道这是为什么
@myselfandeye3884 yes we can for say that, it is supposed to be the same procedure EVERY time, if something like this happened, procedures definitely weren’t followed
@myselfandeye3884 是的，我们可以这么说，本来每次都应该遵循相同的流程，如果发生了这样的事情，那肯定是没有遵守规定的流程。
@ Yes you did call them procedures but again were you there or do you have inside information? If not, then you're making assumptions and you're presenting them as facts. As a matter of fact we don't know you. You're an unknown on the internet who claims to be a lead petty officer.
是的，你确实称它们为程序，但你当时在场或者有内部消息吗？如果没有，那你就是在做假设并将其当作事实来呈现。事实上我们不了解你，你只是一个在网络上自称为高级士官的不知名人士。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
How do you know they weren't following procedures? The report doesn't state that they didn't have the seven crew you mentioned. It reports that there were at least one in the cockpit and one in the tow, the two who were most in danger of going overboard when the plane went over, but that doesn't mean they didn't have the rest of the crew as well.
你怎么知道他们没有遵循规定？报告并没有说明他们没有你提到的那七名机组人员。报告提到，驾驶舱内至少有一人，拖车位置也有一人，这两人是当飞机倾覆时最有可能掉入水中的，但这并不意味着其余的机组人员不存在。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@GeorgeFhore my guess it's because they are actively deployed is probably the reason why they haven't released any video. Typically when the ships are in the red sea or Persian Gulf we do these boxes in the water. And the box constantly changes so that way enemy can't exactly predict our ships movements or positions. Also here is some bonus info, a aircraft carrier is never alone the Carrier Strike group is always around it in some way shape or form so warships and submarines and destroyers and many other ships make up this safety net.
我猜可能是因为他们正在执行任务所以没发布任何视频，通常当舰船在红海或波斯湾行动时，我们会设定一些区域，这些区域会持续变化以防止敌方准确预测我们的舰船行动或位置。另外，提供一些额外信息，一艘航空母舰绝不会单独行动，它总是有航母打击群以某种形式保护它，驱逐舰、潜艇以及许多其他战舰都会形成这个安全网络。
@runningwithhammers619
@Sinistar123 ...because with a full moving crew this wouldn't have happened... How do I know this, cause part of the training tells you why you can't move a plane with less...
Moving a plane requires more than 7 people because an aircraft carrier isn't some big wide open highway... It has many other jets on it it has ordinance stationed along with a ton of other gear ...something a two man moving crew wouldn't be able to do 100% safely.
@Sinistar123 原因是，如果有完整的搬运小组，这种情况就不会发生，我之所以知道，是因为训练的一部分会告诉你为什么不能用更少的人来移动飞机。移动一架飞机需要至少7个人，因为航空母舰并不是那种宽阔的大马路，它上面不仅有许多其他的战斗机，还有各种弹药和大量其它装备，这是两人小组无法100%安全完成的任务。
I can only imagine my boss’s face if I made a $70 million mistake
我只能想象如果我犯了一个七千万美元的错误，我老板的脸会是什么样子。
Wages deduction for a thousand years!.
扣工资一千年！
He would still be your 'boss'???
他还会是你的“老板”吗？
you lucky if civilcase did not come after
如果之后没有民事诉讼找上门，你算是幸运的。
Court Marshall!
军事法庭！
YOUR FIRED!!
你被开除了！！
If you worked for the government it wouldn’t be a big deal
如果你是为政府工作的话，这就不算什么大事。
If you are a government official, you’d be promoted, if you are the CEO of a private company, you’ll get the golden parachute, if you are a just an employee you’ll find your ass on the sidewalk for losing 7 dollars. Nobody is more equal than another.
如果你是政府官员，你会被提拔；如果你是私人公司的CEO，你会得到丰厚的离职补偿；如果你只是普通员工，为丢了7美元会被扫地出门。没有人真的比别人更平等。
Don't worry uncle Sam is loaded
别担心，山姆大叔很有钱。
Someone forgot the parking brake?
是不是有人忘了拉手刹？
The carrier had an incoming strike from the Houthis and was forced into making evasive maneuvers quickly. Planes don’t just fall off
胡塞组织发动袭击，航母被迫迅速采取闪避动作，飞机不可能无故掉落。
@lancewood1410
@austinlmbt24 Oh really??? hahahahahaha
@austinlmbt24 哦，真的吗？？？哈哈哈哈哈哈
Aircraft carriers don't make "evasive maneuvers such as what you're suggesting. You made that up
航空母舰不会像你所说的那样进行“规避动作”，这是你凭空捏造的。
@blackmcbain3145
They have video of them doing Sea Trials.
Full speed, rudder hard over.
Lean like crazy!
@blackmcbain3145
他们有一段他们进行海上试航的视频，全速前进，猛烈转舵，船体倾斜得非常厉害！
Just think about it, all the taxes you paid for your entire life would probably only pay for an armrest on an F-15 fighter jet.
想想看，你一辈子交的所有税款，可能也就够买一架F-15战斗机上的一个扶手而已。
For real.
确实如此哈哈。
More waste and abuse
更多浪费和滥用
america wasting tax payer money for nothing, shame
美国在浪费纳税人的钱却没有任何成效，真是可耻。
Um actually it’s an f18
呃，其实这是F18
The canopy has gold in it and back in 2005 when I was in the navy it was 400k for a canopy and that was the single seater or the e the f was more I'm sure
这顶舱盖里有金属材料，我记得在2005年我还在海军时，一个舱盖就要40万美元，那是单座舱盖，而E型号和F型号的价格肯定更高。
@thesmokedog121 Waste? ….. as you sleep safe and sound tonight while the folks on these aircraft carriers are busting their asses 24/7 so you can have the freedom to type
浪费？……今天晚上当你睡得安稳舒适时，这些航空母舰上的人却在不分昼夜拼尽全力，只为了让你能拥有自由在这里敲打键盘发表这种内容。
People have a very poor grip on taxes. $70m as a % of annual spending is 0.00159%
人们对税收的理解非常浅薄，7000万美元占年支出的比例仅为0.00159%。
@alanaldpal950 genuine question, what freedom of ours is all the way over there at the red sea? 7,000 miles away half way a cross the world lol? It's our trade route sure. But not our freedom.
Freedom for lower prices i guess lol, meanwhile the cost of that is 800 billion...
@alanaldpal950 真心想问，我们的哪项自由竟然远在红海那边，距离我们7,000英里之外，环绕地球另一端 lol？这确实是我们的贸易路线没错，但并不是我们的自由。
我猜是为了更低价格的自由吧，哈哈，不过同时这可要付出8千亿美元的代价啊...
Even if recovered, salt water destroys all the electrical, electronic parts, the engines. 70 millions gone like this, yet the US has no money for fast rail, public transportation, universal health care.
即便找回来了，盐水也会损坏所有电气和电子部件以及发动机，七千万美元就这样打了水漂，然而美国却没钱用于建设高铁、公共交通和全民医疗保障。
That's not why they'd recover it. The jet is a total loss for sure, but if that jet was currently "up" or in full flight status there is sensitive things on it that can still be reversed engineered even after the jet has succumb to the depths. Several years before the complete degradation of the sensitive components.
那并不是他们会打捞它的原因，这架战机肯定已经彻底报废，但如果这架战机当时处于“正常运行”或完全飞行状态，那么即使战机已沉入深处，其上的一些敏感部件仍然可以被逆向工程，而这些敏感组件在完全降解之前还能维持好几年。
They would recover it so nobody else can get it and study it. They’re worried more about that than the money
他们会收回它以防其他人得到并研究，他们对此的担忧超过了对金钱的关注。
@stefpix it's not new & F18's are that much from the factory LM. Importance is no one was hurt
@stefpix 这并不是什么新鲜事，F18的原厂价就是这么高，重要的是没有人受伤。
Yeah it's gone, not worth the cost of recovery.
是的，它已经没了，修复的费用不值得。
You think $70m would pay for universal healthcare? Buddy the cost of that plane is less than $0.25 per person in the USA.
你觉得七千万美元能覆盖全民医保吗？朋友，那架飞机的成本折算到美国每个人身上还不到0.25美元呢
@Withnail1969 oh no they will recover it.
There’s no chance they leave it there to let the Chinese or someone get ahold of it.
@Withnail1969 哦，不，他们肯定会把它回收，没有任何可能会让它留在那里被中国人或其他人得到。
Oh like the 120 billion dollar high speed rail in CA? Sure bud
哦，就像加州耗资1200亿美元的高铁一样？当然啦，哥们儿
One slip-up worth more than some countries’ entire defense budgets.
一次失误的代价竟然比一些国家的全部国防预算还要高。
What are they afraid of
他们在害怕什么
Maybe the crew colluded to get rid of it, maybe it was a lemon of a jet.
也许机组人员串通一气想要摆脱它，也许这架飞机本身就是个问题机型。
@ You’re onto something big, I can feel it
你一定在干一件大事，我感觉到了（笑哭）！
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Wrong geography for them.
对他们来说地理位置不对。
@AirportNow the carrier was forced into making evasive maneuvers because they had an incoming strike from the Houthis all while the plane is trying to maneuver via tow assist. That threw the plane right out of the hanger
@AirportNow 承运方被迫采取紧急避让措施，因为胡塞武装发起了袭击，而此时飞机正试图通过牵引辅助进行机动，这直接导致飞机被甩出了机库。
So the taxpayers are on the hook for Izzy yet again... every action in the gulf is because Izzy wants land
所以纳税人又得为伊兹（谐音以色列）买单了，所有在海湾发生的行动都是因为伊兹想要土地。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Don't worry, the tariff revenue will more than offset this cost
别担心，关税收入将轻松抵消这部分成本。
What ever country with less than a 70 mil budget has no military, like half a gram of weed means you ain’t got no weed
任何一个预算不到7000万美元的国家就像没有军队一样，比喻就像只有半克大麻就等于没有大麻。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Yemeni doesn't fire a single shot, yet US Navy lost 1 fighter jet
也门人连一枪都没开，美国海军却损失了一架战斗机
American navy is one BIG LAUGHABLE JOKE!!
美国海军简直是一个大笑话！
@ardiantosmada8028
@arunal3695 How's houthi doing??
@arunal3695 胡塞武装最近情况如何？
@arunal3695 the American navy is not only the world's largest navy, but also the 2nd largest air force. (China's air force is smaller than the US Navy's). With the amount of operations they do, the amount of accidents are stupendously low. Also the only navy in the world that can operate in ANY part of the world. Not even Russia or China can do that
@arunal3695 美国海军不仅是世界上规模最大的海军，同时也是世界上第二大的空军（中国的空军规模甚至小于美国海军）。鉴于他们执行的任务数量，事故率却低得惊人。另外，美国海军也是全球唯一一支能够在世界任何地方执行任务的海军，俄罗斯和中国都无法做到这一点。
Wrong, the f-18 committed suicide
错了，是F-18自己作死了
@abderrahimkessira5352 It identified as artificial reef.
@abderrahimkessira5352 它自我认定为人工礁。
@inshoreassassin
@inshoreassassin （笑哭）
@inshoreassassin lmfao best thing i’ve seen today
@inshoreassassin 哈哈，今天看过的最好笑的东西。
Was the cockpit named after Prince Andrew?
驾驶舱是以安德鲁王子命名的吗？
@thekenthouse6428 No, Kate and Wiliam
@thekenthouse6428 不对，是凯特和威廉
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
f18 scared and jumped into water and become submarine
F18战斗机害怕了，直接跳进水里变成了潜水艇哈哈。
The US Secretary of State was asked, how many MQ9 plane brought down by Yemen? He said you mean before the question or after the question
美国国务卿被问到有多少MQ9飞机被也门击落，他回答说你是指问问题之前还是之后 （笑哭）
MQ9s are drones. Not planes
MQ-9是无人机，不是飞机。
They're doing offensive missions not defensive
他们执行的是进攻任务，而不是防御任务
Yeah, I find the fact that all we are doing over there is protecting Isnotreal interests highly offensive to US taxpayers.
是的，我觉得我们在那里所做的一切都是在保护以色列的利益，这对美国纳税人来说是极其令人反感的。
Some future civilization is gonna find that.
未来的某个文明会发现它。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
They will spend everything necessary to recover it. More money
他们会不惜一切代价来修复它，需要投入更多资金。
More planes on bottom of the ocean than ships.
海底的飞机数量比船还多。
@easyenetwork2023 Strange, but true ?
@easyenetwork2023 奇怪，但却是事实？
Yeah, China does have some pretty futuristic tech.
是的，中国确实拥有一些相当先进和未来感的技术。
@tstorm3706 it’s a active war zone dummy
@tstorm3706 这是一个活跃的战争区域，笨蛋
they already recovered it most likely
他们很可能已经找回来了。
The military could have just reported the jet has been re-assigned to aquatic habitat sanctuary support status, and moved on.
军方本可以直接宣布这架战机已被重新指定为水域生境保护区支援任务状态，并继续推进下一步行动。
@zonian1966 new coral reef
@zonian1966 新的珊瑚礁
It's a miracle the media even knows about this. You'd think this is one of the things they wouldn't want you to find out.
媒体竟然知道这件事，简直是个奇迹，你会以为这本该是他们不想让你知道的事情。
We have the best undersea jets on the planet... and they're invisible as well.
我们拥有地球上最先进的水下喷气装置，而且它们还拥有隐形功能。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
（笑哭）（笑哭）
"US navy, Providing homes for fish one jet at a time. Sign up now."
“美国海军，为鱼类提供栖息地，一次一架战机。现在就加入吧。”
Serves them right, blaming everyone but themselves for their own mistake, a $70 million dollar mistake.
活该，他们犯了价值7000万美元的错误，却只会怪别人不自我反省。
Unless somebody's recording it on their phone, then no. There's no cameras in the hangar bay.
除非有人用手机录下来，不然没有其他方法，因为机库里没有安装摄像头。
@blaydCA
@Joe-dy7bb
If it was IN the bay, it would have hit the a bulkhead.
I'm assuming the elevator has stanchions at the edge, which should have hopefully stopped it.
如果是在海湾内的话，它应该会撞到挡墙。我猜测升降设备的边缘会有支柱，希望它能够阻止事故发生。
Don't they all have external elevators now? Maybe the plan was in reverse by mistake?
他们现在不都已经使用外部电梯了吗？或许当初的设计弄反了吧？
@MH_6160 the carrier had an incoming missile/drone strike from the Houthis and was forced into making evasive maneuvers. That threw the plane right out of the hanger
@MH_6160 航母遭到胡塞武装的导弹/无人机袭击，被迫进行紧急规避动作，结果导致飞机直接从机库里滑了出去。
Yemen shot it down
也门击落了它。
@newbeginning1510 My men wouldn’t do that!
@newbeginning1510 我的兄弟们才不会那样做！
@Joe-dy7bb
They don't have CCTV?
他们没有安装监控摄像头吗？
You know there has to be video of this.
你知道肯定会有视频存在的。
ABSOLUTELY!
30 years from now the History Channel will show it.
绝对的！30年后，历史频道会播出它。