一辆特斯拉汽车在特朗普酒店外爆炸，马斯克发声：与车辆本身无关！
Tesla Cybertruck explodes outside Trump hotel in Las Vegas
译文简介
特斯拉Cybertruck在拉斯维加斯爆炸，马斯克发声：与车辆本身无关！
正文翻译
At 8:40 am on January 1, 2025, a Tesla electric pickup truck exploded in front of the Trump Hotel in Las Vegas, Nevada, killing one person in the car and injuring seven people near the vehicle. The accident caused widespread concern. Witnesses said the explosion occurred when the back of the vehicle first produced a strong flash and sparks, followed by a violent explosion. The location of the accident, near the Trump Hotel in New York City, coincided with New Year's celebrations, and nearby fireworks may have further exacerbated the effect of the explosion.
美国时间2025年1月1日8时40分，一辆特斯拉电动皮卡在位于美国内华达州拉斯维加斯的特朗普酒店门前发生爆炸，造成车内1人死亡，车辆附近7人受轻伤。 事故引起了广泛关注。目击者表示，爆炸发生时，车辆的后部先是产生了强烈的闪光和火花，随后发生了剧烈的爆炸。事故地点位于纽约市，靠近特朗普大酒店，事发时恰逢新年庆祝活动，附近的烟花爆竹可能进一步加剧了爆炸的效果。
美国时间2025年1月1日8时40分，一辆特斯拉电动皮卡在位于美国内华达州拉斯维加斯的特朗普酒店门前发生爆炸，造成车内1人死亡，车辆附近7人受轻伤。 事故引起了广泛关注。目击者表示，爆炸发生时，车辆的后部先是产生了强烈的闪光和火花，随后发生了剧烈的爆炸。事故地点位于纽约市，靠近特朗普大酒店，事发时恰逢新年庆祝活动，附近的烟花爆竹可能进一步加剧了爆炸的效果。
Tesla founder Elon Musk later responded to the incident via social media, saying that the explosion had nothing to do with the Tesla vehicle itself. He pointed out that after a preliminary investigation, the explosion was caused by the owner of the car may have stored flammable items in the car, especially fireworks, resulting in an accident. In addition, Musk stressed that Tesla's battery system has been proven safe after several years of testing, and similar incidents are very rare.
特斯拉创始人埃隆·马斯克随后通过社交媒体回应此事，表示爆炸与特斯拉电动车本身无关。他指出，经过初步调查，爆炸是由于车主可能在车内存放了易燃物品，尤其是烟花，导致发生了意外。此外，马斯克强调，特斯拉的电池系统在经历过数年的测试后被证明是安全的，类似事件非常罕见。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Police are also involved in the investigation, the initial cause of the explosion may be other fuel in the car or human factors, rather than battery problems. However, Tesla's battery system has also been the focus of public discussion several times due to its fire risk. Despite this, Musk insisted that the battery itself did not cause the accident, and the investigation into the accident is still ongoing.
警方也介入调查，初步认为爆炸的起因可能是车内的其他可燃物或人为因素，而不是电池问题。然而，特斯拉的电池系统也因其火灾风险曾多次成为公众讨论的焦点。尽管如此，马斯克坚称电池本身并未导致此次事故，事故调查仍在进行中。
警方也介入调查，初步认为爆炸的起因可能是车内的其他可燃物或人为因素，而不是电池问题。然而，特斯拉的电池系统也因其火灾风险曾多次成为公众讨论的焦点。尽管如此，马斯克坚称电池本身并未导致此次事故，事故调查仍在进行中。
The incident has sparked widespread debate about the safety of electric vehicles, vehicle regulations and emergency response in the event of an accident.
这起事件引发了对于电动汽车安全性、车辆使用规范以及意外情况下应急响应的广泛讨论。
这起事件引发了对于电动汽车安全性、车辆使用规范以及意外情况下应急响应的广泛讨论。
评论翻译
很赞 ( 5 )
收藏
Placement and timing not a coincidence.
位置和时机不是巧合。
what timing?
什么时机？
@Baldor. timing regarding coming into the new presidency. looks like a message.
@Baldor. 关于进入新总统职位的时机，看起来像是一个讯息。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Also first day of new year too@Baldor.
也是新年的第一天，@Baldor.
It’s a pickup full of fireworks on new years. It’s not a coincidence, but it sure ain’t a conspiracy.
这是新年时满载烟花的皮卡车。这不是巧合，但肯定不是阴谋。
Cybertruck, the Trump hotel – there’s lots of questions. Sure it's a message.
赛博皮卡，特朗普酒店——有很多问题。肯定是一个讯息。
agreed …..it’s going to be a bumpy ride folks
同意……接下来会有一段不平稳的旅程，大家小心。
NOT the first time a Cyberturd has burst into flames. It happens quite frequently considering only 12k have been delivered (and recalled).
这不是赛博垃圾车第一次着火。考虑到仅交付了12,000辆（并且有被召回的情况），这种事发生得相当频繁。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
It is exactly a coincidence. A coincidence doesn't mean it's random. A coincidence is just two things or more happening at the same time or place or whatever you want. It is exactly the case here.
这正是巧合。巧合并不意味着随机。巧合只是指两件或更多事物在同一时间或地点发生，或者按你想的任何方式发生。这正是这里的情况。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Muy simbólico un auto fabricado por Elon frente al hotel de Donald
一辆由埃隆制造的汽车停在特朗普的酒店前，非常有象征意义。
step one: bursting flames. step two: multiple fireworks mortars explode. pal.
步骤一：爆炸的火焰。步骤二：多个烟花炮筒爆炸。伙计。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Not really. I would typical imagine Cybertruck owner would pick Trump hotel to stay at. Considering how obnoxious people are who drive this garbage it's no surprise it's parked at the entrance.
其实不是。我通常会想象赛博皮卡的车主会选择住在特朗普酒店。考虑到那些开这垃圾车的人有多么令人讨厌，它停在入口处也不足为奇。
Cybertruck, trump tower= Donald trump and Elon musk. Someone is sending a warning message to them.
赛博皮卡，特朗普大厦= 唐纳德·特朗普和埃隆·马斯克。有人在向他们发出警告信息。
Yes, but we don’t know who the message is from. There’s no reason for the driver to remain in the vehicle to send that message. I’m guessing it is a synchronicity from a cosmic source.
是的，但我们不知道这个讯息是谁发出的。司机没有理由留在车内发出这个讯息。我猜这是一种来自宇宙源的同步性。
Co-inkydink
巧合
Terrorism. They are in that area.
恐怖主义。他们在那个地区。
it's domestic terrorism ...
这是国内恐怖主义...
What can we learn from this situation huus??
我们能从这个情况中学到什么，伙计？
@brennandefreitas3034 Don't buy a Tesla?
@brennandefreitas3034 不买特斯拉？
Yeah, the only way it could be more obvious would be if there were a Harris Waltz 2024 bumper sticker on the license plate but I hear it was a rental.
是的，唯一能让它更加明显的方式就是车牌上贴上哈里斯·沃尔茨2024的车贴，但我听说那是辆租赁车。
I own a small business. I have an 8 camera high definition security system with sound and night vision that I bought over 10 years ago for around $500.00. Every time something like this happens the video footage looks like the camera and system is from 1964.
I’ve even seen bank robbery videos that are so horrible that you can’t even tell if the suspect is male or female.
我拥有一家小型企业。我有一个8摄像头的高清安防系统，带有声音和夜视，十多年前花了大约500美元购买。每次发生类似事件时，视频画面看起来就像是1964年的摄像头和系统。
我甚至看过一些银行抢劫视频，糟糕到无法判断嫌疑人是男性还是女性。
Yes I agree. I have full colour in the middle of the night. People just put up cameras to put up cameras and have no idea on what can be installed.
是的，我同意。我在深夜也能看到全彩。人们只是为了安装摄像头而安装摄像头，根本不知道可以安装什么。
in today's america the robber ain't sure either
在今天的美国，抢劫犯也不确定。
I agree with what you’re saying, wholeheartedly. But sometimes it’s the upload that distorts the footage.
I’m willing to guess that the original footage is high definition, they’re just showing us the uploaded footage.
我完全同意你的说法。但有时是上传过程扭曲了画面。
我猜原始视频是高清的，他们只是给我们展示了上传的视频。
They must have extracted the video from a social network and not the original source.
他们一定是从社交网络提取的视频，而不是原始来源。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
You think Trump wants to upgrade the security system that was high end when it was installed 3 decades ago?
你认为特朗普想要升级三十年前安装的那套高端安防系统吗？
Good point. This almost looks like a Hollywood production.
好观点。这几乎看起来像是好莱坞的制作。
there’s a lot of factors that might be at play.
1) they might have an HD camera that is covering the entire street, but the incident takes place in a very small portion of the frx (i.e. maybe they’re zoomed in on only a few thousand pixels instead of the 2 million 1080p pixels) The cameras are usually trying to cover a large area (e.g. bank, maybe there’s a camera covering the entire lobby or row of tellers, not 1 camera per teller)
2) maybe incident occurs at night, which a lot of cameras have trouble with.
3) they might have zoomed in & cropped to avoid showing gore. if someone is injured by the incident, or the driver’s flaming skull comes bouncing down the street 5 seconds after the explosion, that’s not going to make it on the news.
3) there might be several other cameras with better pictures where the footage hasn’t been recovered yet. (maybe.)
4) law enforcement might have better footage they have not released (e.g. police car dashcam?) because reasons.
这可能涉及许多因素。
1）他们可能有一个覆盖整个街道的高清摄像头，但事件发生在画面中的一小部分（也就是说，也许他们只对几千像素进行了缩放，而不是1080p的200万像素）。摄像头通常试图覆盖大面积区域（例如银行，也许有个摄像头覆盖整个大厅或一排出纳员，而不是每个出纳员一个摄像头）。
2）也许事件发生在晚上，很多摄像头在夜间表现不佳。
3）他们可能进行了缩放和裁剪，以避免显示血腥场面。如果有人在事件中受伤，或者司机的燃烧头颅在爆炸后5秒钟滚下街道，那可不会被放到新闻里。
3）可能有其他几台摄像头拍摄了更清晰的画面，但视频还没有恢复。（也许。）
4）执法部门可能有更好的画面，他们还没有发布（例如警车行车记录仪？），因为种种原因。
6) might be cropped to avoid showing recognizable landmarks or street signs to deter curious rubber-neckers.
7) news orgs might be offered better footage but could not secure rights because rights holder wants a million dollars.
8) Maybe the camera is from 1964. there was recently an incident in a Large American City that spends over $1 billion on public security. i saw a picture of police climbing a street lamp to, i kid you not, retrieve the film canister from the surveillance camera covering that street. i was like “how tf is anybody using film for surveillance in the 21st Century, how does that even work? doesn’t it run out of film?” and i went down this rabbit hole and it turns out yeah it is a thing and yeah it has not been upgraded in the decades this city has spent billions of dollars per year and it would not surprise me if it was actually installed in 1964.
on the bright side, the film probably has better resolution than HD digital. lol
5）可能有另一台摄像头拍摄的超清晰画面，但不包括感兴趣的区域（例如，只是爆炸产生的黄色光闪反射在某物上的画面）。
6）可能裁剪了画面，以避免显示可识别的地标或街道标志，以防止好奇的旁观者。
7）新闻机构可能收到了更好的画面，但由于版权方要求一百万美元，他们未能获得版权。
8）也许那摄像头真的是1964年安装的。最近在一个大美国城市发生了一起事件，这个城市每年花费超过10亿美元在公共安全上。我看到一张警察爬上路灯的照片，取回监控摄像头中的胶片罐，真的是胶片。我当时想，“在21世纪，怎么还用胶片做监控？这怎么运作的？不会用完胶片吗？”我陷入了这个思考，结果发现它确实存在，而且这座城市每年花费数十亿美元，几十年来它并没有升级，可能它真的是在1964年安装的。
好消息是，胶片的分辨率可能比高清数字还要好。哈哈
@yesthatkarim9601 now that’s what I call a breakdown. Great points (I think lol clearly you know a lot more about this stuff than I ever will)
@yesthatkarim9601 这才是我称之为分析的内容。很棒的观点（我想，哈哈，显然你比我了解这些事情多得多）
Yeah like Trump will have anything of quality.
是的，就像特朗普会拥有任何优质的东西一样。
I wish these news reporters would just shut up and play the video
我希望这些新闻记者能闭嘴，直接播放视频。
Videos need context. Otherwise the wrong conclusions are easy to draw.
视频需要背景，否则很容易得出错误的结论。
Then everyone would be like. What happened? Why isn't someone narrating this.
然后大家就会问。发生了什么？为什么没有人解说？
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
What would be nice is if reporters would just state the facts. All major media are like this. Opinions are more important than facts.
最好的情况是记者们只陈述事实。所有主要媒体都是这样的，观点比事实更重要。
另外，我会检查，但其他新闻来源说是1人死亡，几人受伤，而不是10人或35人。
I want an official tag for videos on YouTube that are original footage with no commentary. It’s so hard just to find the original footage of things. I hate it. Everything has to be filtered by some news conglomerate. Just let me see it with my own eyes.
我希望YouTube上的视频能有一个官方标签，标明这是原始视频，没有解说。找到事物的原始画面真的很难，我讨厌这样。所有的东西都必须经过某个新闻集团的筛选。只想让我自己看。
They’re NOT “reporters” they’re scxt readers!
他们不是“记者”，他们是念稿子的人！
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Gonna be a crazy year in America
将会是疯狂的一年，美国。
Gonna be??? It already is
将会？？？已经是了。
*Just another year in America.
又是普通的一年，美国。
You're not wrong
你说得没错。
Four more years of chaos is right around the corner.
还有四年的混乱即将到来。
Seeds planted the last 4 years
过去四年埋下的种子。
Well if we remember what it was like his first term then yeah
嗯，如果我们记得他第一任期是什么样子的话，那确实是。
Worse than the last 4?
比过去四年更糟糕？
They're doing this because of how weak the oval office right now. We'll see if it continues once Trump takes the reigns.
他们这么做是因为现在的椭圆办公室太弱了。等特朗普掌权后看看会不会继续。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Deagel report estimates a 100mil less citizens this year
军事网站“迪葛尔”（美国著名的武器研发咨询公司，主要提供军事信息服务）的报告预测今年将减少1亿公民。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Electric car batteries catch fire and/or explode, this was an axplosion. There is no indication that it was anything other than another faulty Tesla battery!
电动汽车电池起火和/或爆炸，这是一次爆炸。没有任何迹象表明这不是另一个故障的特斯拉电池！
hell is gonna break loose this yr just the beginning
今年地狱将崩塌，这只是开始。
Not really. People just do stupid things around New Years
并不是真的。人们只是喜欢在新年前后做一些愚蠢的事情。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Someone does not like that Elon Musk and Trump are working together.
有人不喜欢马斯克和特朗普合作。
Yeah, and that someone is Trump. He’s already sick of Musk and talks about it every chance he gets.
是的，那个人就是特朗普。他已经厌倦了马斯克，并且抓住每个机会谈论这件事。
@nw42 Yeah and he'll be even more pist now that one of Elon’s stupid trucks just nearly burnt his hotel down lol.
是的，他可能更气愤，因为马斯克的一辆愚蠢的卡车差点烧毁了他的酒店，哈哈。
LOL more like Phony Stark’s inventions are catastrophic failures.
笑死了，更像是伪钢铁侠的发明是一场灾难性的失败。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
A lot of people don't. But this ain't helping.
很多人都不喜欢，但这没什么帮助。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Everyone…
所有人……
Lol, got nothin "NADA" to do with Musk.
哈哈，与马斯克无关。
First New Orleans now Vegas… what a wild start to 2025.
从新奥尔良到拉斯维加斯……2025年真是个疯狂的开局。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Any bets on the next attack?...
要下注下一次袭击吗？
Funny... Putin's presidency started the same way.
有趣的是……普京的总统任期也是这样开始的。
I've heard there have been more incidents on the NY subway as well.
我听说纽约地铁上也发生了更多事件。
That was a bomb. There is no reason the vehicle should have that much explosive potential without something added to it.
那是炸弹。车辆不应该有如此大的爆炸威力，除非有东西被加进去。
More like a blessing.
更像是个祝福。
Gigantic battery, maybe faulty. The explosion starts from under the car too I think.
巨大的电池，我认为也许是有故障。爆炸也从车底开始。
You can look up NCM battery explosion. It's very powerful. Cybertruck has a supersize battery with a ton of special glue.
你可以查一下NCM电池爆炸，非常强力。Cybertruck有一个超大电池，里面用了大量特殊胶水。
It's a Tesla, they have a tendency to explode at random. This one had fireworks on New Year's Eve, it seems unfortunate.
这是特斯拉，它们有随时爆炸的倾向。这辆车在新年前夜发生了烟花爆炸，似乎很不幸。
It's literally just fireworks exploding. You can see the stars in other videos. You can hear the whistles and booms.
这实际上只是烟花爆炸。你可以在其他视频中看到星星，听到口哨声和爆炸声。
Do trucks have trunks?
赛博皮卡有后备厢吗？
@wadestanton
赛博皮卡有一个卷顶的货箱盖，可以打开或关闭。它在卡车锁定时会自动锁定（无论是打开还是关闭）。
它也可以通过应用程序开关（现在我开始想这在租赁的汽车中是怎么工作的……）。
有趣的是，文档中有一条警告：切勿将易燃溶剂、化学品或液体装入货箱或底部隔间。这样做可能会导致泄漏，或使气体积聚，造成损害、严重伤害甚至死亡。
Tesla cyber trucks do have trunks. They’ve showed it on the news.
特斯拉赛博皮卡确实有后备厢。新闻里有展示过。
Same place for the high cap battery and that's not a battery explosion.
电池的高容量位置在那里，但那不是电池爆炸。
Dude! It looks like they used a lot of fireworks to ensure that car exploded. That was intentional.
兄弟！看起来他们用了很多烟花确保那辆车爆炸。这是故意的。
They blow up like that when they blow up. Gasoline is way safer that's why electric cars were abandoned before. Tesla has the highest death rate of any car brand.
它们爆炸就是这样爆炸的。汽油车更安全，这也是为什么电动汽车曾被放弃。特斯拉的死亡率是所有汽车品牌中最高的。
@user-ur3gr2qs6i
Yes, these trucks blow up, but not like that. I’ve seen it, these trucks do not catch flame this fast.
是的，这些皮卡会爆炸，但不是那样。我见过，皮卡不会这么快着火。
It was 100% intentional, how is this being debated? bro put fireworks in his car and blew himself up, it’s been confirmed, use the internet.
这绝对是故意的，怎么还在争论这个？这哥们把烟花放进车里把自己炸了，已经证实了，去用用互联网。
@Toader21
Well if the internet says it, it must be true.
如果是互联网说的，那一定就是真的。
@twelfthdoctor4402
Sure man, go read the stars and get your answers from that if that's what you're looking for I understand what you're attempting to argue, but it’s not “the internet” telling me answers, it’s the MULTIPLE investigations from MULTIPLE authorities and sources telling me the answer. The internet is the MEDIUM to get the information. Can’t really believe I just had to explain that, but at the same time, based on what you said, it does kinda make sense that you needed this explanation.
好吧，兄弟，如果你想从星星那里得到答案，那就去看吧，我理解你试图争论的点，但并不是“互联网”给我答案，而是多个机构和来源的多次调查给我答案。互联网只是获取信息的媒介。真不敢相信我还需要解释这个，但同时，基于你说的，似乎你确实需要这个解释。
This is just how Lithium-Ion batteries explode. The white smoke, too.
这就是锂电池爆炸的方式，白烟也是如此。
It came from the batteries on the bottom. And it's New Year's. A lot of people have fireworks.
它来自底部的电池。而且是新年，很多人有烟花。
@hanna-liminal
That is not how lithium-ion batteries explode. When EV car batteries "explode," it’s more like they rapidly catch fire. This huge sudden explosive force is not typical of a li-ion battery fire.
这不是锂电池爆炸的方式。电动汽车电池“爆炸”时，更像是它们迅速着火。这种突如其来的巨大爆炸力并不典型于锂电池火灾。
The electric battery is made full of tiny batteries, if only one of them overheats or is damaged, the whole bunch will collapse.
电动电池由许多小电池组成，如果其中一个过热或损坏，整个电池组都会崩溃。
@alanqueiroz9957
To be fair, that's what battery management systems are for, but the Cybertruck has been having near constant safety recalls since leaving the factory.
公平地说，电池管理系统就是为此而设计的，但赛博皮卡自从离开工厂以来几乎一直在进行安全召回。
Obviously.
显然。
That's what happens when lithium, from the big lithium batteries in electric vehicles, gets in contact with air/oxygen.
这就是当电动汽车中的大锂电池与空气/氧气接触时发生的事情。
Maybe he was transporting some fireworks that somehow were ignited? Seems the driver was in it, maybe he was smoking?
也许他运送了一些烟花，不知道怎么着火了？看起来司机也在车里，也许他在抽烟？
The secondary "firework" like things were definitely battery, but that initial one was a bomb.
第二次类似“烟花”的爆炸绝对是电池，但最初的那个爆炸是炸弹。
That’s what a large lithium battery looks like when it explodes.
那就是大型锂电池爆炸时的样子。
@user-ur3gr2qs6i
That's cause it was made by Elon, not fundamentally because of electric cars.
那是因为它是由马斯克制造的，而不是电动汽车本身的问题。
Everyone has been saying fireworks because it looked like fireworks at first. Guess what? It was fireworks! Bravo geniuses.
每个人都在说是烟花，因为一开始看起来像是烟花。猜猜怎么着？它就是烟花！天才们，干得好！
People really over analyze everything nowadays.
现在的人真是把一切都过度分析了。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Man, they need to recall all Teslas.
兄弟，他们需要召回所有特斯拉。
"America is at war with itself"
“美国正在与自己作战”
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
We're the idiot country that voted for another 4 years of Trump
我们是那个傻乎乎的国家，选出了特朗普连任四年。
@tonyrodriguez_
So you are expressing support for terror groups then.
那你就是在支持恐怖组织了吗？
It's good vs evil！
这是善与恶的较量！
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@tonyrodriguez_
In the end, most of those that voted for Trump wanted to get the prices down. As stupid as I think it is to vote Trump in again, that's what I'm trying to see. Otherwise, I just see this craziness in America I can't stand.
最后，大多数支持特朗普的人是想要降低物价。虽然我认为再次选特朗普很愚蠢，但我能理解他们的想法。否则，我只能看到美国一直处于疯狂中，这真的受不了。
@babu357
Trump didn’t have a single war, barely any tax problems, great foreign policy, also no Americans were harmed in the Middle East for most of his time in office.
特朗普没有打过一场战争，几乎没有税务问题，外交政策也很出色，在他任期的大部分时间里没有美国人在中东受到伤害。
@TMRN0ICE
Over a million Americans died due to his incompetence.
由于他的无能，超过一百万美国人死亡。
Voted for Trump and got Elon instead.
选了特朗普，结果却得到了马斯克。
@vladthe3rd414
Elon found the weak lix and exploited it.
马斯克找到了弱点并加以利用。
Because he took office after Obama fixed the housing crisis. Obama left him with a good economy.
因为他是在奥巴马解决了住房危机后上任的，奥巴马留下了一个良好的经济。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
@jacquelineglitter4328
Ahem, a lot of businesses going bankrupt? The hoods got more out of control, btw, and I know this because my family lived in those areas during those times, also Russia was on a roll trying to take over countries.
咳咳，很多企业破产了？顺便说一下，贫民区越来越失控，我知道这一点，因为我的家人曾在那些时期住在那里，而且俄罗斯在积极吞并其他国家。
#BUILD UP OF HYDROGEN GAS <---- Li-ion Batteries absolutely DO explode, it's already happened several times, since most have no knowledge of these events (and try to hide themselves from the information, the news reports, and the associated videos that have previously showed this) they naturally think this doesn't happen.
#氢气积聚<---- 锂电池绝对会爆炸，这种情况已经发生过好几次了，由于大多数人对这些事件不了解（并试图回避信息、新闻报道以及之前显示过的相关视频），他们自然会认为这不可能发生。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
I thought that too, I was like; I'm pretty sure lithium just burns. I looked up videos and I was wrong, they can explode. Good examples are e-cig battery failures. Those things are basically flashbangs. Now imagine one the size of a car? I think it could be the guy had something else in his car, maybe fireworks and something went wrong. It IS New Year, which would make sense why he had fireworks in the first place. Maybe it wasn't intentional?
我也这么想，我想，锂电池最多不就是燃烧吗？我查了一下视频，结果我错了，它们也能爆炸。很好的例子就是电子烟电池的故障，那些东西基本上是闪光弹。现在想象一下如果是车那么大？我觉得可能车里还有其他东西，可能是烟花，出了问题。毕竟是新年，也能解释为什么他一开始会有烟花。也许这不是故意的？
One just blew up in Port Miami. They very much do explode sometimes.
刚刚有一个在迈阿密港爆炸了。它们确实有时候会爆炸。