中国空间站与国际空间站的差异为何如此巨大？

Why is there such a big difference The ISS is crowded, but the CSS is like an Apple store

2024-11-04 苏维埃！ 14997 52 65 收藏纠错&举报

译文简介

该视频从空间站的设计（多国协作的差异与独立制作的统一标准）与布局等方面介绍了中国空间站与国际空间站的视觉差异（整洁 VS 杂乱）。

正文翻译

该视频讨论了国际空间站（ISS）与中国空间站（CSS，即天宫空间站）之间的显著差异，尤其是从内部设计和环境舒适度的角度来看。
1. **外观和设计**：
- 天宫空间站的设计被描述为像苹果专卖店一样简洁、现代，拥有宽敞的宇航员休息舱、独立的生活空间、简约的白色内饰设计等。这种设计不仅考虑到了功能性的需求，还努力让宇航员感到尽可能舒适。
- 相比之下，国际空间站则显得陈旧和拥挤，内部布满了各种电线、电脑和其他设备，给人的感觉比较杂乱。
2. **生活条件**：
- 在天宫空间站，每位宇航员都有自己的私人睡眠舱，可以平躺睡觉，还可以存放个人物品，这大大提高了宇航员的隐私和舒适度。·
- 国际空间站的睡眠区相对较小，有时宇航员不得不挤在一起睡觉，空间十分有限，导致生活条件较为拥挤。
3. **国际合作与设计标准**：
- 国际空间站是一个多国合作的项目，因此在设计和建设过程中，不同国家的需求和标准难以统一，这也是导致其内部风格多样、看起来较为杂乱的原因之一。
- 天宫空间站由中国独立设计和建造，不需要考虑其他国家的审美标准，因此设施的标准化程度非常高，给人一种和谐统一的感觉。
4. **建造时间和老化情况**：
- 国际空间站始建于上世纪末，已经运行了很长时间，设备老化，环境也显得老旧。虽然最初设计寿命为30年，但目前仍在继续使用。
- 天宫空间站则是在近年来才开始建设的，比国际空间站年轻大约十年，因此设备更新，环境也更为现代化。
5. **未来展望**：
- 视频最后提到，已经有27个国家正式申请进入天宫空间站进行太空研究，中国已同意了其中16个国家的合作申请。这表明天宫空间站将在未来的太空探索中发挥重要作用，人类的太空产业也将迎来新的时代。
总的来说，视频通过对比两个空间站的设计、生活条件、国际合作方式等方面，展示了天宫空间站在舒适度和现代化方面的优势，同时也指出了国际空间站由于其长期运行和多国合作背景所面临的一些挑战。
——以上总结由“通义千问”根据英语字幕总结，有修改，但完全符合视频内容。

评论翻译

@guangxidavidliu Let's blame the Chinese. Without CSS, the ISS looked just fine in people's eyes.

我们来指责中国人就行了，他们要是不再建一个空间站，就不会使国际空间站相形见绌了。

--- @masterkoi29 China's space station can be upgraded. They can add more space labs as it was planned during the designing stage of China's space station.

中国空间站是可以升级改造的，他们能按照他们的发展规划一步步改造空间站增加更多舱段和实验设施。

--- @rudyalfonsus686 this is like watching the difference of Chinese metro station and american metro station

区别就类似于中国地铁和美国地铁一样。

--- @mancn4465 XD Fun fact, the US kicked china out from the ISS project, so china built CSS

兄弟们，有意思的是——中国自建空间站是因为国际空间站不带他们玩。

---
@Drunk3nBogdan You missed the most important one. If ISS it`s build by cooperation and knowledge of 27 countries , the CSS was build by the Chinese people who was ,sanctioned and banned , to have access ,to know how and technology ,by the 27 countries. That`s make the CSS more impressive.

你忽视了很重要的一点——国际空间站由27个国家协力建造，这意味着中国被27个国家在技术与知识等层面进行限制，但中国人还是独立建造了他们自己的空间站。这才是中国空间站令人震撼的根本。

---
@UsmanSiddiq1 The CSS is designed to be as modular as possible and can be effectively upgraded, while same is not true for ISS and NASA has to make do with what they have and hence. It has outside plumbing and wires, with piles of old equipment stored in it.

中国空间站的设计层面就很注重模块化与可扩展性，国际空间站则不行，必须在现有设施设备的基础上缝缝补补，所以里面到处都是杂乱无章的管线和过时的旧设备。

---
@1313hyme
Someone in ISS: shit, i tripped a wire
Somebody in ISS: did you trip on this one too? Where's the other end to this connection?
Someone: don't worry, I'll take up the one i just tripped on. As for the other one, it's like that for over a week and we're still good. Somebody: okay! We'll find the other end sooner or later.

国际空间站某人：糟了，我绊到了一根线。
站内另一个人：你也绊到这根了吗？另外一头儿在哪儿？
某人：小问题，我会处理好这一根的。都一个星期了也没出事，不用管另一头了。
另一个人：好吧！反正迟早能找到的。

--- @lagrangewei most of the video explaination are just minor nitpick. there are 2 main reason of the CSS looking clean. first is cable management and standardization, power and datalix for each rack were preplanned and build into the housing, with power and datalix being standardized commercially in the last decade, it easy to implement wifi, ethernet, USB, liquid cooling and power. the rack size is also standardized that you can pull an experimental rack from ESA's ISS lab and stick it in CSS and it would fit. the 2nd is ISS is design to be carry by proton and shuttle which force the station to be design to fit within those confine spaces. in contrast the long march 5 use a wide fairing, allowing them to attach alot of the machinery to the outside of the station instead of mounting them internally, this remove alot of bump in the interior space.

视频的大多数点都说的太浅了。中国空间站看起来更干净整洁主要原因有二：一是其设计注重标准化，每一个设备的电源线和数据线等都有专门的通道，电源和数据链在过去十年中已实现商业标准化，可以轻松实现 wifi、宽带、USB、液冷和电源等统一标准管理。正因标准化，所以不管是谁从欧空局或者中国的实验室里拿来的设备都可以完美安装。
二是国际空间站的组件由火箭和航天飞机发货，所以空间站的组件尺寸必须考虑运载工具的限制，而发射中国空间站的长征5好运载火箭使用了宽体整流罩，这就能让更多的设备安装在空间站外面，而不用塞在里面占地方。

--- @t16205 ITs called progress. Iss is old. CSS is modern. As easy as that

这就叫进步，国际空间站以及老了，而中国空间站是新的。就这么简单。

---
@lordlee6473
ISS will turn into Kensington Avenue soon

国际空间站很快就会变成肯辛顿大道了。
（注：看得出是一个笑话，但看不懂，问了AI，它解释说肯辛顿大道是繁华的商业街，这句话是在嘲讽国际空间站说它会像愈发繁华的商业街一样更乱。）

--- @zkzhang9802 Because China submitted applications many, many times, hoping to join the International Space Station, but was rejected every time, and then......................... There is a new space station

中国多次申请加入国际空间站，又频频被拒绝，然后他们就自己做了一个。

--- @zkzhang9802 For human space exploration, no discrimination, human beings respect each other

在对太空的探索中人类应该合作尊重，而不是歧视打压。

--- @xiaowen6876 Considering the age and technical development level of ISS, I think ISS has every reason to be proud. The problem now is that ISS has lost its ambition and foundation for further development, so it has stagnated. You can't ask ISS to compare with CSS, especially ISS refuses China's participation and provides economic and technical support.

考虑到国际空间站的岁数和科技水准，我认为ISS（国际空间站以下都打ISS）有理由感到自豪，问题是ISS失去了发展潜能所以停滞不前。不应该拿它和CSS（中国空间站以下都这么打）比，尤其是ISS还拒绝了中国加入和资金支持。

--- @Mlo76 Without counting the testing phase. China only took 2 yrs. to completely build their space station. While the ISS took over a decade.

不算测试的话，中国完全独立建造CSS只用了两年时间，而ISS用了十几年。

--- @williamwilliam The messiness and highly unsafe conditions in the ISS are recipe for disasters waiting to happen. The only surprise is that the ISS has not yet suffered any major disasters all these years.

ISS内部的杂乱无章的环境是重大的安全隐患，这么多年还没出大的事故倒是令人惊奇。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处

--- @yohanlobo4767 There's a gap of 2.5 decades in the launch of both these space station. I don't think this is a fair comparison at all.

这么对比不公平啊，他们的建造时间差了25年。

--- @ydv1984 Important ( CSS) is modular that means if part of the module old or aging they always replace it with a new module Making the ( CSS ) availablity longer working up there!!!

重点是CSS的模块化设计，如果有个地方坏了你可与很方便快捷地更换或者升级，这样CSS的寿命能更长。

中国 空间站 国际 空间站

很赞 ( 65 )