莫卧儿和英国哪个伤印度更多？印度人：莫卧儿，好！不列颠，坏！

Rathi Raj, works at Government
The British did the most damage. While some Islamic raiders caused violence and some stayed back and merged with the culture; the British destroyed the very core of Indian culture from every conceivable angle.
During their 200-odd years of rule, they:—

英国人的伤害最大。一些伊斯兰袭击者引发了暴力，一些后退一步与印度文化融合；英国人从各个角度摧毁了印度文化的核心。
经过他们两百多年的统治，他们：—

1.They disintegrated the thousands years old nation which had survived the Muslim raids and rules.
2.The British were aliens in true sense. They had nothing in common with the subcontinent. They were racially, physically, lingually, culturally, socially and mentally so different. The West and Central Asians were never so different to Indians.

1.他们瓦解了这个在穆斯林袭击和统治下幸存了数千年的国家。
2.英国人是真正意义上的外星人。他们与次大陆的人没有共同之处。他们在种族上、身体上、语言上、文化上、社会上和精神上都是如此的不同。西亚人和中亚人与印度人从来没有如此不同。

3.The British replaced sheer violence with lowest level of treachery and dishonesty that were unheard in the Indian culture.
4.British dismembered the Indian rules, laws, regulations, etc, even those that worked well under the Mughals and other non-Muslim states.

3.英国人用最低级的背叛和不诚实取代了纯粹的暴力，这在印度文化中是从没有过的。
4.英国人瓦解了印度的规则、法律、法规等，即使是那些在莫卧儿和其他非穆斯林国家统治下运作良好的。

5.They imposed their own culture, language, customs & traditions, institutions, etc, that were alien again.
6.They forged, destroyed and distorted facts and histories of the Indian subcontinent (Unfortunately still followed in the independent India & Pakistan).

5.他们强加了自己的文化、语言、风俗习惯、制度等，这些又是外来的。
6.他们伪造、摧毁和歪曲了印度次大陆的事实和历史（不幸的是，独立的印度和巴基斯坦仍然听信这些）。

7.The British looted wealth of all sorts, mined our natural resources and transported back to England for own industries.
8.They destroyed our economy, technologies, productivity, trade and other commercial activities and imposed their own (Bengal''s silk industry for example).

7.英国人掠夺了各种各样的财富，开采了我们的自然资源，并运回英国发展自己的工业。
8.他们摧毁了我们的经济、技术、生产力、贸易和其他商业活动，并强加了他们自己的（例如孟加拉的丝绸工业）。

9.They brought alien religion with them called Christianity and did every thing to propagate the same. They did it what the Portuguese had failed.
10.Destroyed our education and value systems. That''s why Guru (teacher) became the lowest part of our society.

9.他们带来了被称为基督教的外来宗教，并尽一切努力宣扬它。他们做了葡萄牙人失败的事。
10.摧毁了我们的教育和价值体系。这就是为什么上师（老师）成为我们社会的最底层部分。

11.Used our resources to fight wars all over the world, even the two World Wars.
12.Caused artificial famines, the one during early 1940s caused millions of starvation deaths in the eastern India.

11.利用我们的资源在世界各地打仗，甚至是两次世界大战。
12.制造了人为的饥荒，20世纪40年代造成了东印度数百万人饿死。

13.The British used India the same way Aliens wanted to do to planet Earth, in the Hollywood movie “The Independence Day”.
14.They planted their subservient to rule the nation thereby keeping their installed system alive.

13.英国人对印度人的使用和好莱坞电影《独立日》中外星人对地球想做的是相同的。
14.他们安插他们的臣民统治国家，以此使他们建立的系统保持活力。

15.They caused the sense of inferiority among the Indians of all class, we still suffer from it.
The list is longer. The gist is, where the loss of wealth, material and lives can recover, getting back one''s honour, respect, culture and values are really difficult. That''s what the British did.

15.在所有阶级的印度人中造成了自卑情绪，我们现在仍然深受其苦。
清单还能更长。重点是，财富、物质和生命的损失能够恢复，但要恢复一个人的荣誉、尊重、文化和价值观是非常困难的。英国人就是这么做的。

-----------------
Anmol Singh, Really interested in History from the 1000AD onwards.
Are you seriously kidding me?
Okay, I will try to be as unbiased as possible with my response.
The British were no doubt destructive for India’s economy, whereas the Mughals… not as much so.
AND I have evidence to back that up.

你真的不是在开玩笑吗?
好吧，我尽量不带偏见的做出回答。
英国人毫无疑问对印度的经济造成了毁坏，至于莫卧儿，没那么严重。
而且，我有证据支持这一点。

The Mughals did have their wars and people did die and were oppressed due to religion at some points in history, but the question is who was MORE destructive. The mughals actually gave things to India that weren''t meant for their own benefit. The British didn’t do that.
For example, the Mughals gave India many monuments such as the Taj mahal, Jama masjid and Red fort in Delhi just to name a few. These places get thousands of tourists every year and positively contribute towards our economy to this day.

历史上，莫卧儿确实进行了战争，人们因为宗教死亡或被压迫。，但问题是谁的破坏更大。莫卧儿确实给了印度一些东西，而不是为了他们自己的利益。英国人没有这么做。
例如，莫卧儿人给了印度许多历史遗迹，比如泰姬陵、贾马清真寺和德里的红堡。这些地方每年都有成千上万的游客，对我们的经济做出了积极的贡献。

Moreover, the Mughal economy brought 24–26% of the worlds GDP to India. They united us to stand under the same banner as a strong and meaningful nation rather than a divided and weak one.
The British rule on the other hand was solely based on divisions within India. If you have ever heard of the “Divide and Rule” or “Divide and conquer” policy, that didn’t go to vain for the British when they were building their Raj. They exploited cultural and religious differences, the effects of which can be seen to this very day.

此外，莫卧儿时印度占全球GDP的24-26%。他们把我们团结在一起，使我们成为一个强大重要的国家，而不是一个分裂和弱小的国家。
另一方面，英国的统治完全是基于印度内部的分歧。如果你听说过“分而治之”或“分而统之”的政策，那么英国人当时建立的统治没有白费。他们利用了文化和宗教差异，其影响直到今天都可以看到。

Just take the recent India and Pakistan war. Had the British not split up their Raj into 2 in 1947, this conflict wouldn''t be happening today.
We should also take into account that when the British left India, we only made 4% of the worlds GDP as compared to the 24–26% during the Mughal era. As Dr. Shashi Tharur puts it, “The industrialisation of Britain was based on the DE-INDUSTRIALISATION of India.”

想一想最近的印巴战争。如果英国人没有在1947年把他们统治的印度一分为二，这场冲突不会发生。
我们还应该考虑到，当英国人离开印度时，我们的GDP只占世界的4%，而莫卧儿王朝时期是24-26%。正如沙希·塔鲁尔博士所说，“英国的工业化是建立在印度的非工业化基础上的。”

India became from a producer of finished goods to an exporter of raw materials, shipped off to Britain to be manufactured into goods there, and THEN re-shipped back to India to be sold at an absurdly high price.
Some people argue the British gave us rails, but many countries at the time didn’t get conquered and still built their own rails, for example: China. Plus the Rails were actually built to transport goods to the major ports of India for shipment.

印度从一个制成品的生产国变成了原材料的出口国，被运往英国在那里制造商品，然后再被运回印度，以荒谬的高价出售。
有人认为英国人给了我们铁路，但当时许多国家没有被征服，仍然建造了自己的铁路，例如：中国。另外，铁路实际上是用来把货物运到印度的主要港口装运的。

As you can see, the British went to a great extent to de industrialise India and squeeze all the wealth out of it. Now you tell me, who was more destructive?
Both despotism and unequal democracy can be dangerous for a nation, and hence I will conclude that both nations did cause some amount of destruction. But which nation compensated for it? And which one looted us on purpose? You decide.
Thanks for reading.

专制和不平等的民主对国家都很危险，因此我可以得出结论，这两个国家都造成了一些破坏。但是哪个国家做出了一些弥补？哪个国家是故意抢劫？你决定把。
感谢阅读。

-----------------
Siddhant Dhagamwar, worked at iNautix Technologies India Pvt Ltd
The Mughals were far better than the Britishers.
I would like to bring to your notice the psychological difference between the ruling patterns of these two major empires- The Mughals and the British.
When the Mughals invaded the Indian subcontinent in 1526, they were goverend by this one supreme motive- To conquer the territories and govern them.

莫卧儿人比英国人好太多了。
我想提醒你们注意这两个主要帝国——莫卧儿和英国，统治模式之间的心理差异。
当1526年莫卧儿人入侵印度次大陆的时候，他们被一个至高无上的动机驱使—征服这片l领土并统治他们。

Exploitation of the native population was never the main agenda of the Mughal rulers (Or infact any other ruler who invaded India before the Mughals)
Undoubtedly, the Mughals did eye on the immense wealth this country had in its store, but a sizeable portion of the wealth looted by them was inturn invested back in India for the construction of palaces, forts, mosques and many other monuments of Mughal history that we see today.
The Mughals also spent dearly on the welfare of the population by constructing canals, ports and even trade centres and cities.

对当地居民的剥削从来不是莫卧儿统治者的主要议程（事实上，莫卧儿王朝之前入侵印度的任何其他统治者也不例外）
毫无疑问，莫卧儿人确实注意到了这个国家的巨大财富，但他们掠夺的财富中有相当一部分是投资回印度，用于建造宫殿、堡垒、清真寺和我们今天看到的许多莫卧儿历史遗迹。
莫卧儿人也在平民福利上花费甚大，通过修建运河，港口，贸易中心和城市。
原创翻译：龙腾网 http://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处

Kindly remember, the Mughals did not have an empire or a homeland far off in the West where the riches looted from India would be eventually carried and piled up.
The Mughals ruled over India almost continuously from 1526 to 1707. It wouldn''t have been possible for the Mughals to keep such a strong hold of their empire, had they just been tyrannical rulers. People''s uprising and revolts would have been inevitable then.
Now, talking about the infamous British Raj..

请记住，莫卧儿人在遥远的西方没有一个帝国或家园，用以运输和堆放从印度掠夺的财富。
从1526年到1707年，莫卧儿人几乎持续统治印度。如果莫卧儿人只是个暴虐的统治者，他们不可能如此稳固的统治他们的帝国。那时人民的起义和叛乱是不可避免的。
现在，谈一谈著名的英国治下的印度。

When the Britishers entered India, they were only driven by a single force- Profitable trade. These traders of the West did not take much time to realize the potential of the unexplored markets of India and thus began the dark era of British Colonization of India.
Overtime, the Britishers even realized that they can ''trade'' even more easily if they begin ruling over the country.
They left no stone unturned in ensuring The Crown continues to get enough supply of wealth from the newly established colony in India.

当英国人进入印度，他们只受到一种力量的驱使—有利可图的贸易。这些西方商人没有花太多时间就认识到印度未开发市场的潜力，从而开始了英国殖民印度的黑暗时代。
随着时间的推移，英国人甚至意识到，如果他们开始统治这个国家，他们可以更容易地“贸易”。
他们不遗余力地确保王室继续从印度新建立的殖民地获得足够的财富供应。

The dirty politics played by the Britishers can be easily analyzed by this single account-
In the great famine of the Eighteenth century when millions of Indians died of starvation, the annual revenue collected by the Britishers was much greater than that of the preceeding year. To compensate the revenue collection which was badly affected due to the famine (decreased number of tax payers), the Britishers raised the tax duty (Part of agricultural produce paid to the Britishers as tax) from 10% to 50%
When we now analyze both these scenarios, we can definitely conclude that-

英国人玩的肮脏政治可以很容易的通过一笔账来分析。在十八世纪的大饥荒中，数以百万计的印度人死于饥饿，英国人的年收入远远超过前一年。为了补偿因饥荒而受到严重影响的税收（纳税人数减少），英国人将税收（一部分作为税收支付给英国人的农产品）从10%提高到50%
当我们现在分析这两种情况时，我们可以肯定地得出结论-

Mughals:
Main priority- Ruling the territory.
What came along- Enormous wealth to fill the royal treasury.

莫卧儿人：
首要任务—统治领土。
发生了什么—巨量的财富填满了皇室的宝库。

Britishers:
Main Priority - Accumulating wealth.
What came along - Ruling the Colony to ease up the trade obstacles.
The fundamental difference between the ruling patterns of these two empires is a self explanatory account of the question- Who hurt India the most.

英国人：
首要任务—积累财富。
发生了什么—统治殖民地减轻贸易障碍。
这两个帝国的统治模式之间的根本区别是一个不言而喻的问题——谁对印度的伤害最大。
原创翻译：龙腾网 http://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处

-----------------
Bhagwat Shah, I love all things Indian and have 800 plus articles on my website
Muslim invaders vs British (European) invaders
ummm - do you want to be killed by the sword or the bullet? Both are just as deadly and just as effective.

穆斯林入侵者VS英国（欧洲人）入侵者
呃....-你是想死于剑下还是死于子弹呢？
每一个都很致命也很有效率。

Muslim misrule of India lasted over 800 years. They destroyed - *all classical dance systems in Northern and Western India where they ruled the longest. Even now, you find Indian classical dance only on the periphery of muslim rule - ie south, east and far-east. *all classical architecture and styles were destroyed. What remains is a tiny fraction of what we had. Sculptors, masons, architects and all skilled people had to adapt to please the new rulers and old skills were lost over time. *All other classical arts and craft were wantonly destroyed. *Countless educational institutes were destroyed, countless libraries were burned, countless intellectuals were killed or enslaved. Those who managed to escape, were impoverished as their skills were no longer considered relevant by the muslim bigots who considered koran as the only book worth knowing. *Millions were enslaved and sent off to central Asia and beyond. *Millions were forced to convert if they wanted to ‘live’. *Millions more were killed. *Millions of women committed johar and sati to escape life as sexual slaves of invaders. *Muslim misrule ruined our economy and reduced our capacity for scientific investigation and progress for several generations.

穆斯林对印度的暴政持续了800多年。他们摧毁了：
*印度北部和西部的所有古典舞蹈系统，在那里他们统治的时间最长。即使是现在，你也只能在穆斯林统治的外围地区，即南部、东部和远东地区发现印度古典舞。
*所有的古典建筑和风格都被摧毁了。剩下的只是我们拥有的一小部分。雕塑家、泥瓦匠、建筑师和所有有技能的人都必须适应新统治者的要求，旧的技能随着时间的推移而消失
*所有其他的古典艺术和手工艺品都被肆意破坏了。
*无数的教育机构被毁，无数的图书馆被烧毁，无数知识分子被杀害或奴役。那些成功逃脱的人，变得一文不值，因为穆斯林偏执者们认为他们的技能和唯一有价值的书—古兰经，没有关联。
*数以百万计的人被奴役并被送往中亚和其他地区。
*数百万人被迫改变信仰，如果他们想“活下去”。
*数百万人丧生。
*穆斯林的暴政破坏了我们的经济，削弱了我们几代人的科学研究和进步能力。

I could go on - but i wont - its too depressing.
European misrule began with arrival of the Portuguese. Hell bent on conversation and profit, they decimated parts of our western coast. Remnants of their rule survive in Goa where truly old temples are rare and Indian culture and heritage is replaced with European ones.
French and Dutch had minimal impact.

我可以继续列举，但是我不会，这太令人沮丧了。
欧洲人的暴政始于葡萄牙人的到来。他们致力于传教和谋利，摧毁了我们西部海岸的部分地区。他们统治的残余在果阿保存下来，那里真正古老的寺庙非常罕见，印度的文化和遗产被欧洲的东西所取代。
法国人和荷兰人的影响微乎其微。

British were interested only in milking India for every ounce of profit they could get. Between the East India Company and the British Gov (Raj), they sucked India dry. *They kept whatever social, political, economical, judicial infrastructure they needed to run the country with the minimal number or British personnel. *They created better transport network to take Indian raw material to supply British factories. *They expanded education system to create more brown-sahibs to rule us more effectively. *British exported our people to other colonies to replace ‘slaves’ with ‘indentured labourers’. *We were forced to fight their wars in every continent except Antarctica. *Our huge and significant contribution to British survival in WWI and WWII is begrudgingly acknowledged and death of ‘native soldiers’ is largely ignored. *While preaching democracy and peace, they tightened their own grip on India via Viceroys appointed by remote fiat and 550+ ‘native chiefs’ they had contracts with.
So in conclusion, the British and the Muslims rulers were both equally bad for India.

英国人唯一的兴趣就是榨取印度的每一盎司他们可以得到的利润。通过东印度公司和英属印度政府，他们把印度吸干了。
*他们保留了一切必要的社会、政治、经济、司法基础设施，用最少的设施数量或英国人员管理国家。
*他们建立了更好的运输网络，将印度原材料运往英国工厂。
*他们扩大了教育系统，创造了更多的马屁精来更有效地统治我们。
*英国人把我们的人运到其他殖民地，用“契约劳工”代替“奴隶”。
*除了南极洲，我们被迫在每一块大陆上为他们作战。
*我们在一战和二次大战中对英国人的生存做出的巨大而重大的贡献被勉强承认，“土著士兵”的死亡被完全忽视了。
*在宣扬民主与和平的同时，他们通过由遥远的法令任命的总督和550多名与他们有合同的“土著酋长”加强了对印度的控制。
所以，总的来说，英国人和穆斯林对印度做的一样坏。

------------------
Viswamitra, Lawyer, Avid Reader, Spiritual Seeker and Free thinker
The simpliest and best way to answer the question is this:
The Mughals are home Invaders that took over your home. As it was their home as well, you would find that the home itself was treated quite well, as it became their home too, although you were treated like shit most of the time. He also puts up his own decorations and destroys your belongings doing so.
The British are home Invaders that pretended to be your friend, then they steal from you and keep stealing and threaten you that if you fight back they will f***k you up. You try anyway and are beaten badly,( but it feels good trying)

回答这个问题最简单、最好的方式是：
莫卧儿是鸠占鹊巢的入侵者。因为这也是他们的家，你会发现它们对待这个家还是很好的，即使是大部分时间你被当作狗屎对待。他们也挂起了自己的装饰，摧毁了你的。
英国人是装成是你朋友的入侵者，然后从你那里偷东西，一直偷，威胁你，如果你还击，他们会把你干掉。不管怎样，你都试过了，结果被打得很惨，（但尝试的感觉很好）

when they finally do leave you are now utterly poor , and locked in a violent deathmatch with your own brother who has taken a large section of the property and demands one of the nicest rooms.
So who is worse? The invader that trashed your stuff and you, but looked after your house, or the thief that has caused you and the house serious long term problems? (Oh but $you have a nice new microwave now though” they keep telling you. “This should compensate :D”)

当他们最终离开的时候，你现在已经完全贫穷了，并且和你的兄弟陷入了一场激烈的决斗中，他拿走了大部分的财产，要求一间最好的房间。
所以谁更糟糕？那么谁更糟？是把你和你的东西都糟蹋了，却照管着你的房子的入侵者，还是那个给你和房子带来长期严重问题的小偷？（oh，“但是你现在有了一个棒棒的新微波炉”，他们不断告诉你：“这就是补偿 ”哈哈。）