Rodney Jones
Should Donald Trump annex Canada?
唐纳德-特朗普应该吞并加拿大吗?
 
HMMm, that’s a tough one. The word annex is ambiguous… if you mean in the military sense, I’d suggest that this would be a very bad move. For a start, the USA would become a pariah nation like Saddam Hussein’s Iraq when they invaded Kuwait. Secondly… they’d get their arse kicked. Canada would get instant aid from the UK and the Commonwealth countries, and I imagine they’d invoke some NATO clause about protecting the sovereignty of member nations. Not only pariahs, but the USA would quickly find themselves facing 3 or more nuclear nations.
嗯,这个问题很难回答。吞并这个词有歧义......如果您指的是军事意义上的吞并,我认为这将是一个非常糟糕的举动。首先,美国将成为一个被唾弃的国家,就像萨达姆·侯赛因入侵科威特时期的伊拉克一样。其次......他们会被打得屁滚尿流。加拿大会立即得到英国和英联邦国家的援助,我觉得他们会援引北约关于保护成员国主权的条款。美国不仅会成为过街老鼠,它还会很快发现自己面临三国或更多核武国家的威胁。
 
A better choice might be to go after the ‘hearts and minds’ of Canadian citizens. Again, not an easy task because they have proper schooling in Canada, and would be most unlikely to fall for the sort of lying shit that comes out of Fox News.
更好的选择可能是争取加拿大公民的 “民心”。同样,这也不是一件容易的事,因为这些公民在加拿大接受过正规教育,不太可能听信福克斯新闻的谎言。
 
And you’d also need a way to induce them to pay double for their healthcare costs, and risk bankruptcy whenever a family member gets a chronic illness, and the insurance companies cancel their cover.
您还需要想办法让加拿大人愿意支付双倍的医疗费用,并在家庭成员患慢性病、保险公司取消保险时冒破产的风险。
 
They do have guns in Canada but they also have controls on their use, so the proliferation of automatic weapons, and the sort of deregulation advocated by the NRA probably wouldn’t be too popular with most Canadians.
加拿大确实有枪支,但他们也对枪支的使用进行管制,因此自动武器的扩散以及全国枪支协会所倡导的放松管制的做法可能不会受到大多数加拿大人的欢迎。
 
You’d also need to fix things like homicide rates, education, pollution, food nutrition, incarceration rates, obesity, and infant mortality.
您还需要解决高杀人率、教育、污染、食品营养、监禁率、肥胖症和婴儿死亡率等问题。
 
Oh, and might I suggest replacing your president with someone who’s not a felon, or a rapist, or an insurrectionist, or a career con-man?
哦,还有,我建议你们换掉你们的总统,选一个不是罪犯、强奸犯、叛乱分子,或者职业骗子的人。