美国宇航局什么时候再次登月?
When will NASA go to the moon again?
译文简介
网友：美国国家航空航天局(NASA) 很快会再次登月吗？他们计划在2024年再次登上月球。考虑到太空项目的复杂性，通常会预期一些延迟。但特朗普显然希望能见证某些重要的“太空事件”（当他得知即使连任，NASA也无法在他的任期内到达火星时，他感到非常失望）。如果他连任，或许至少能在2024年与首位登上月球的女性对话……
正文翻译
When will NASA go to the moon again?
美国宇航局什么时候再次登月?
评论翻译
很赞 ( 8 )
收藏
Will NASA be on the moon again soon?
They actually plan to go in 2024. The way things work in the space business, one would normally expect delays.
But Trump apparently wants to oversee some important “space event” (he was saddened to hear that there was no way NASA could get to Mars during his presidency, even assuming his reelection). If he is reelected, he may at least get to talk to the first woman on the moon in 2024.
Incidentally, being President during the 1969 landings didn’t ultimately do that much for Nixon’s legacy.
美国国家航空航天局(NASA) 很快会再次登月吗？
他们计划在2024年再次登上月球。考虑到太空项目的复杂性，通常会预期一些延迟。
但特朗普显然希望能见证某些重要的“太空事件”（当他得知即使连任，NASA也无法在他的任期内到达火星时，他感到非常失望）。如果他连任，或许至少能在2024年与首位登上月球的女性对话。
顺便提一句，1969年登月时担任总统对尼克松的政治遗产并没有带来多大的影响。
Watergate was 17 June 1972. It took a while to hit the media. Last Apollo was 19 December 1972. Trump would want to do a lot more than just talk to the first woman to go to the moon
水门事件发生在1972年6月17日，但花了一段时间才被媒体曝光。最后一次阿波罗任务是在1972年12月19日。特朗普可能不只是想和第一位登上月球的女性对话。
Yeah cos nixon wound down the project
是的，因为尼克松缩减了这个项目。
Was Nixon the one that was at the centre of the Watergate scandal? I'm assuming that was mild sarcasm when you said didn't do much for his legacy, & I know it happened around 40-50 years ago (Watergate, not the moon landings, I know that was 1969-1972)
尼克松是水门事件的主角吗？你说水门事件对他的遗产影响不大时，是不是在开玩笑？我知道水门事件大概发生在40到50年前（我知道登月是在1969年至1972年之间）。
I saw the moon in Perth today but it disappeared
我今天在珀斯看到月亮，但它消失了。
When will NASA return humans to the Moon?
NASA is in the business of space exploration. NASA has already explored the Moon. Turns out, it was fairly dull.
When there might be something new to explore on the Moon, NASA will go back. But the Moon hasn’t changed much in 4 billion years, so I wouldn’t hold my breath.
NASA 何时会让人类重返月球？
NASA 的任务是进行太空探索，而月球已经被他们探索过了。结果发现，月球相对来说相当乏味。
只有当月球上有新的东西值得探索时，NASA 才会重返月球。但月球在过去的40亿年里几乎没有什么变化，所以我不会对此抱太大期望。
Can NASA go to the moon again?
Could we? Of course. There are two small non-governmental companies in the U.S. that are on the verge of being able to go there as well. They at least have a strong incentive: space tourism. But as far as NASA is concerned, you’d have to come up with a darn good reason for them to go back again, since the space race was long ago won.
NASA 能再次登上月球吗？
我们能去吗？当然可以。美国有两家小型非政府公司也几乎具备了前往月球的能力。至少它们有一个强大的动机：太空旅游。不过，至于 NASA，你需要给他们一个非常充分的理由让他们重返月球，因为太空竞赛早已结束。
Can NASA still go to the moon?
Right now, the vehicles to take us there are being developed… the *knowledge* exists - but, at the moment, the *hardware* doesn’t…. but, hopefully soon - it’ll be ready.
NASA 还能登上月球吗？
目前，载我们去月球的飞行器正在开发中……我们已经掌握了知识，但现在还缺乏硬件……不过，希望不久后就能准备就绪。
Will NASA return to the moon?
I think so. President George W. Bush had instructed NASA to return to the moon as its next mission after the Space Shuttle program. President Obama, although accused by right-wing pundits of shutting down NASA, instead redirected NASA to land astronauts on an asteroid and on Mars.
”NASA is developing the capabilities needed to send humans to an asteroid by 2025 and Mars in the 2030s – goals outlined in the bipartisan NASA Authorization Act of 2010 and in the U.S. National Space Policy, also issued in 2010.”
NASA 会重返月球吗？
我认为会的。乔治·W·布什总统曾指示 NASA 在航天飞机计划结束后将重返月球作为下一项任务。尽管右翼评论员指责奥巴马总统关闭了 NASA，但实际上他重新将 NASA 的目标转向了将宇航员送上小行星和火星。
“NASA 正在开发将人类送往小行星（目标2025年）和火星（目标2030年代）所需的能力——这些目标在2010年通过的《两党 NASA 授权法案》和2010年发布的《美国国家太空政策》中有所规定。”
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
It’s not clear that NASA has any reason to go to the moon now. We know where the moon is, we have samples of its rocks, why would a publicly funded space agency keep sending missions there? It’s far more likely that Elon Musk will send some teslas there and set up a low-gravity driving school…. or more likely… start a mining operation to bring in some income offsetting the costs and effort of flying there.
目前看来，NASA 似乎没有足够的理由再次前往月球。我们已经知道月球的位置，也采集了它的岩石样本，为什么一个由公共资金支持的太空机构还要继续向那里派遣任务呢？更有可能的是，埃隆·马斯克会把一些特斯拉汽车送上月球，并在那里开设一个低重力驾驶学校……或者更可能的是，他会启动一项采矿作业，以产生收入，抵消飞往月球的成本和投入。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Is NASA going back to the Moon?
Yes but only after they've been shamed by another country beating them back there
NASA 会重返月球吗？
会的，但可能要等到其他国家先登月之后，他们才会行动。
Emeritus Professor of Astronomy, Author (ErindalePublishing)
I believe current plans are still for 2024. But funding is iffy, and all sorts of intermediate steps could involve failures of one sort or another, so I wouldn’t count on it.
荣誉天文学教授，作家（Erindale Publishing）
我相信现在的计划仍然是2024年重返月球。但资金不确定，过程中的各种中间步骤可能会出现失败，所以我不太相信会如期实现。
How long before NASA goes to the Moon again?
How long before NASA goes to the Moon again?
At this point, there is no telling. While they’ve been directed by the current administration in the White House to go back and land astronauts on the Moon by 2024, NASA has not received the commensurate increase in budget necessary to even attempt pulling something this ambitious off.
If I were to guess? No sooner than 2030. I suspect that the Chinese or some other country will accomplish this before NASA does. It may even be a private corporation that pulls it off sooner.
NASA 还要多久才能再次登上月球？
目前还无法确定。虽然现任政府已经指示 NASA 在2024年前重返月球并让宇航员登陆，但 NASA 并没有得到足够的预算来完成这个雄心勃勃的计划。
如果要我猜的话，可能不会早于2030年。我怀疑中国或其他国家会在 NASA 之前实现这一目标，甚至可能是一家私人公司更早完成这个任务。
Will NASA be on the moon again soon?
Well, this is more of a political question than a scientific one. It totally depends on the current U.S. president and the next one.
If the question is can NASA go to the moon soon. Then the answer is definitely yes.
However this question cannot really be answered without full understanding of the political situation
NASA 很快会再次登上月球吗？
这其实更多是一个政治问题，而非科学问题。这完全取决于现任和下一任美国总统的决策。
如果问的是 NASA 能否很快重返月球，那么答案肯定是可以的。但要真正回答这个问题，需要充分了解当前的政治局势。
I agree. Just wanted to see if someone comes up with a different angle. Thanks.
我赞同这个观点，只是想看看有没有人能从不同的角度提出看法，谢谢。
Answer: NASA cannot go to the moon or any other celestial body with human beings. NASA does not have the funding and hasn’t had the funding since their last Apollo mission. Go and research NASA funding over the years. Go and research how much of NASA money is spent by percentage to just take car...
回答：NASA 无法让人类登上月球或其他天体。自从最后一次阿波罗任务以来，NASA 一直没有足够的资金。你可以查一下 NASA 多年来的预算情况，看看他们在各个项目上的资金分配。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
When are we going back to the moon?
Humans are going back to the Moon for sure but there is no correct answer to when.
NASA is planning to land on Moon again with a public-private partnership. But I don't think it will be so soon as they have many other projects like Mars landing ahead of all.
Indian space agency ISRO is also working hard to reach Moon. They are going to launch an unmanned mission in few years which is going to be very important for future manned missions.
So at this point of time, no one can say that when we are going to Moon but it's certain that we will.
我们什么时候会重返月球？
人类肯定会重返月球，但具体时间尚无定论。
NASA 计划通过公私合作的方式再次登陆月球。但我认为这不会很快实现，因为他们还有其他优先任务，比如火星登陆。
印度空间研究组织（ISRO）也在努力实现登月目标，他们将在未来几年发射一项无人任务，这对于未来的载人任务至关重要。
因此，目前没人能准确说出我们何时会重返月球，但可以肯定的是，我们一定会回去的。
Will NASA return to the moon?
This cannot be ruled out, but circumstances during the 1960’s, the decade during which the commitment to land men on the moon was made, and then carried out, were very different from today. In 1946, the US national debt was 120% of GDP, but 1947–47 were years during which the federal budget was in surplus, and there were four surpluses during the 1950’s. In those days, the highest marginal tax rate was 91%, the government was adequately funded, and the national income was shared much more evenly and fairly than today. By 1960, the surpluses and economic growth had reduced the debt to 54% of GDP.
NASA 会重返月球吗？
这种情况不容忽视，但1960年代——即承诺并实施登月计划的十年——与现今的环境截然不同。1946年，美国的国家债务占GDP的120%，但在1947至1948年间，联邦预算实现了盈余，且整个1950年代共有四年出现财政盈余。那时，最高的边际税率达到91%，政府资金充裕，国民收入的分配远比今天更加均衡和公正。到了1960年，得益于财政盈余和经济增长，债务比例已降至GDP的54%。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
肯尼迪总统就职时，失业率达到了战后的最高水平。为了激活经济，他推行了全面的减税措施，把最高边际税率降至75%。这一政策使得税收收入和预算支出基本平衡，只产生了微小的赤字。这样的刺激措施促进了经济增长。由于经济增长速度远远超过国家债务的增长（以美元计的债务总额继续上升），债务在国内生产总值(GDP)中的占比持续下降，税收收入的增长速度超过了偿还债务成本的增长。正是这一财政状况使得美国有能力承担阿波罗计划所需的开支。
Today, the USA has seen forty years of mostly decline, where, except for 1993–2001, disastrous policies centred on tax cuts the country couldn’t afford, have shifted the distribution of the national income in favor of the rich, leaving steadily declining living standards for most other people. The national debt is now 128% of GDP and continuing to rise, and the trade deficit is $964 Billion. The cost of servicing the debt is currently $394 Billion, more than 10% of budget outlays.
此外，1970年的截止日期意味着整个研发计划将在两届总统任期内执行，这降低了因资金大幅削减决策而导致项目停滞的风险。
如今，美国经历了四十年的大体下滑期。除了1993年到2001年之外，灾难性的政策——主要是国家无法承担的减税措施——已经改变了国民收入的分配，使之更有利于富人，而大多数其他人的生活水平却在稳步下降。目前，国家债务已达到GDP的128%并且还在持续增长，贸易赤字高达9640亿美元。目前偿还债务的成本为3940亿美元，超过预算支出的10%。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
只要国家债务和累积的贸易赤字的增速持续超过经济增速，每年由经济增长带来的财富中，越来越多的部分将不得不用于偿还这些债务。这将导致作为国民收入的部分不断减少，并在美国人之间极不平等地分配，富人依然占据着过大的份额。
Undoing the damage would take decades and require a long term commitment to sensible policies by both parties, which only the Democrats are currently committed to.
除非美国经济能够重返上世纪60年代的基本面，否则美国宇航局（NASA）获得持续的资金支持来实施再次登月的计划将非常困难。要扭转目前的局势需要数十年的时间，并且这需要两党都持续承诺实施明智的政策，而目前只有民主党展现出了这样的承诺。
Will NASA be on the moon again soon?
Science may well try to present us yet another hoax, but this time every pre-school child will be able to tell it’s a lie, since nowadays even young children understand much about computer technology, so they can tell the difference between what is real and what is computerized. And that especially since children are not yet “hypnotized” the way most adults are, so the children can see what adults can’t, because the former’s minds are not “blocked up” like the minds of the latter.
NASA会很快再次实现登月吗？
科学界可能会再次向我们呈现一个骗局，但这一次，即便是学龄前儿童也能够识破，因为在当今时代，连小孩子都对计算机技术有着不少了解，他们能够区分真实与计算机生成图像的差异。特别是孩子们尚未像大多数成年人那样受到“洗脑”，因此他们能够看到成年人看不见的东西，因为孩子们的思维没有像成年人那样被封闭。
如果给孩子们看一段国际空间站（ISS）的视频，视频中地球的旋转方向是西向东，那么任何一个聪明的孩子都会用他们的理解力让你惊讶，他们会向你解释为什么这段视频是计算机生成的图像。因此，当观看NASA的“太空船”接近并登陆月球的场景时，每个聪明的孩子都能够辨别出这是真实的事件还是好莱坞制作的电影。
但你知道吗，喜欢这样童话故事的人应该尽情享受它们。正是因为这些人，NASA一直在向我们提供如此多的太空图片。
No! there is nothing to go there for ! You have to realise that ‘The Moon Race’ was really ‘The Arms Race’ in disquise ! The rockets that launched Apollo were actually designed to launch Nuclear Bombs to the USSR ,just as the Russian rockets were made to launch bombs to the USA ! Also robotic probes are MUCH cheaper than manned ones and can do more !
不！我们没有必要去那里！你需要明白，“月球竞赛”实际上就是一场伪装的“军备竞赛”！发射阿波罗航天器的火箭实际上是为向苏联投送核弹而设计的，正如俄罗斯的火箭也是为了向美国投送炸弹而制造的！而且，机器人探测器的成本远低于载人航天器，而且能够执行更多任务！
First of all they did actually go to the Moon. There are mountains and mountains of proof to verify that. Secondly why on Earth do you equate not going back with the possibility that they never went there to begin with? That makes absolutely no sense. Let's say you visited some other country for vacation. If you don't go back time and time again to that same country is that evidence that you never went to begin with?
首先，他们确实登陆过月球，这一点有无数证据支持。其次，你为何将不重返月球与他们从未登陆过月球混为一谈？这种说法根本站不住脚。打个比方，如果你曾经去另一个国家度假，难道因为你没有一再去那个国家，就能证明你从未去过那里吗？
人们未能再次登月的原因只有一个，那就是缺乏资金和政治决心。维持NASA的阿波罗计划和航天飞机计划需要巨额资金和巨大努力，他们无法做到两者兼顾。最终，他们选择了发展航天飞机项目。现在，他们正在建造太空发射系统，这个系统将使人类有能力重返月球。
If NASA really went to the moon, how come they have not gone back there?
Simple. Ignore the mad ramblings of conspiracy theorists. It just comes down to MONEY.
The US had won the race to the moon. There was little more to gain from more moon-shots, so why spend large sums of money going back there? Politicians have better things to do with such huge sums. I’m sure lining their pockets isn’t one of them.
如果NASA真的登陆过月球，为何他们至今未再回去？
原因很简单：不要理会那些阴谋论者的胡言乱语，关键问题在于资金。
美国已经赢得了登月竞赛。重复登月无法获得更多收益，何必再投入巨额资金去那方面呢？政治家们有更多重要的事情需要用到这样庞大的资金。我相信他们不会用这些钱来中饱私囊的。
I would like to explain as i had done extensive research on Nasa and other space agencies around the world i felt speechless with the way scientists in the name of science are fooling people across world i will explain in detail to make it clear first starting with moon mission they claim to have gone there but they never did there is a place in us called area 51, sector zone 27 and sector zone 22 thease are the places where with the help of highly advanced simulated technology is used to conduct all the missions moon mission was conducted here on 20july 1969 later on it was said that aliens missions was also conducted by taking African old retired men mars mission is again being carried out in sect 2
经过我对NASA以及全球其他太空机构的深入研究，我对科学家们以科学之名愚弄全世界的方式感到震惊。我将详细解释，以澄清事实，首先从登月任务开始。他们声称已经登陆过月球，但实际上并没有。在美国，有一个被称为51区的神秘地方，其中包括27区和22区。这些区域利用高度先进的模拟技术来执行所有太空任务。据称，1969年7月20日的登月任务就是在这里进行的。之后，还有说法称，利用非洲年长的退休人员进行了外星人相关的任务。火星任务据说目前正在2区进行。