Brian Stark
King George III is NOT portrayed in American history as a tyrant? What planet is this version of America on? The Declaration of Independence in America in which I’m presently residing is one long screed against the usurpations of George III. George III, and ONLY King George, is the Snidely Whiplash villain of the peace. When I was in school that was the narrative, because that is what one of two documents that created America said — explicitly

乔治三世国王在美国没有被描述为暴君?这个版本的美国在哪个星球上?反正我现在所在的美国《独立宣言》是一篇反对乔治三世篡夺行为的长篇大论。乔治三世,并且只有乔治三世是批判和平的尖刻恶棍。在我上学时就是这种叙事,因为这就是两个创造了美国的文件中其中一个说的-明白无误。

Now it may be true that George was made the personification of America's grievances against Britain, which more accurately should have been aimed at the House of Lords But that is merely a tactic of messaging. But in the American psyche, George is the fount of all that we rebelled against

现在来说可能乔治确实被作为美国对英国不满的化身,更准确的说是针对上议院,但这只是一种传达信息的策略。但是就美国精神而言,乔治就是我们所反抗的一切的根源。

And is someone trying to say that this has all been debunked in the American mind by the musical, “Hamilton”? If thats the case, has the fact that all the signers of the Declaration and all the key players in the American Revolution were white Europeans been debunked as well. What about the fact that African Americas at the time were either slaves or second class citizens (if that) Has that been “debunked” as well by “Hamilton”?

这时是不是有人想说这点已经被音乐剧“汉密尔顿”从美国人的心中揭穿了?如果真是这样,美国独立宣言的所有签署者和美国革命的所有关键参与者都是欧洲白人也被揭穿了。那么当时的非洲裔美洲人要么是奴隶,要么是二等公民(如果是的话),这也被“汉密尔顿”“揭穿”了吗?