为什么欧洲没有人口严重过剩的国家？
Why are there no severely overpopulated countries in Europe?
译文简介
我们目前看到的所有欧洲国家的人口减少是发生在20世纪的两次灾难性战争和其他政治动荡的结果，这些都对欧洲目前的人口状况产生了负面影响。
正文翻译
Why are there no severely overpopulated countries in Europe?
为什么欧洲没有人口严重过剩的国家？
评论翻译
很赞 ( 2 )
收藏
, studied at Ryerson University
The current depopulation of all European countries that we are witnessing at the moment is the result of two catastrophic wars and other political turbulences that took place in the 20th century and negatively affected the present demographic situation in Europe.
Europe suffered nearly 150 millions casualties in World War I, civil wars, revolutions and Spanish flu. World War II was the worst, with over 50 million deaths. Post-WW2 events such as the Cold War and Nuclear race, requiring intensive industrialization, technological advancement and female labor, impoverished Europe financially and prevented the demographic recovery of Europe. The collapse of the USSR in 1991 was the final verdict for European demography. From that moment on, the native European population began to die out so rapidly and now is facing an anthropological catastrophe.
Avoiding wars and political turbulences with pre-war birth rate, European population should have grown by at least 400% and have at least 2 billion people in 2021. That is, we can say that demographically, due to the wars, Europe lost at least 1.5 billion people.
The current population of Europe is less than 10% of the world's population and is only 0.75 billions with a median age of 42 years. During the last 100 years European population has grown only 20% from 600 millions to 750 millions (including the influx of non-European immigrants in the last 30 years). For comparison, during last 100 years African population have grow 800% from 170 millions to 1.3 billions in 2021 with a median age of 19.7 years. (Population > Africa - Worldometer). The current population of Asia is 4,6 billions with the median age 32.0 years which is 59% of the world population. . (Population of Asia (2021))
, 就读于瑞尔森大学
我们目前看到的所有欧洲国家的人口减少是发生在20世纪的两次灾难性战争和其他政治动荡的结果，这些都对欧洲目前的人口状况产生了负面影响。
欧洲在第一次世界大战、内战、革命和西班牙流感中遭受了近1.5亿的伤亡。第二次世界大战是最严重的，死亡人数超过5000万。二战后的事件，如冷战和核竞赛，需要密集的工业化、技术进步和女性劳动力，使欧洲在经济上陷入贫困，阻碍了欧洲的人口恢复。1991年苏联的解体是对欧洲人口学的最终裁决。从那一刻起，欧洲本土人口开始迅速消亡，现在正面临着一场人类学的灾难。
以战前的出生率并且避免掉战争和政治动荡，欧洲人口应该至少增长400%，在2021年至少有20亿人。也就是说，我们可以说，由于战争，欧洲在人口方面至少损失了15亿人。
目前欧洲的人口还不到世界人口的10%，只有7.5亿，年龄中位数为42岁。在过去的100年里，欧洲人口只增长了20%，从6亿到7.5亿（包括过去30年非欧洲移民的涌入）。相比之下，在过去的100年里，非洲人口从1.7亿增长到2021年的13亿，增长了800%，中位年龄为19.7岁。亚洲目前的人口为46亿，中位年龄为32.0岁，占世界人口的59%。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
In fact, Europe has always been underpopulated because of the very cold climate. 600 years ago, Europe lost 60% of population during the plague epidemic.
In the 16th century, during the Little Ice Age Europeans decided to abandon Europe and migrate to warmer southern continents. In the vast expanses of the new continents, there were no organized states. Europeans were happy to discover the territory, give it the names of America and Australia, settled down there and effectively organized very productive states, and enjoy life there to this day. Leaving cold, frozen Europe and moving to warmer continents is the smartest decision our European ancestors ever made to survive. European Kings and Queens have invested in geographical discoveries in full and won, solving the problem of the Ice Age and another possible extinction of European population.
THE MEDIEVAL ICE AGE
The Little Ice Age (LIA) was a period of cooling that occurred after the Medi Warm Period. It has been defined as a period extending from the 16th to the 19th centuries, but some experts prefer an alternative timespan from about 1300 to about 1850.
During the Age of Exploration between 16th and 19th centuries, several European empires —primarily Spain, Portugal, Britain, and France —began to explore and claim new continents resulting in the establishment of North America, South America, Australia dozens new states all over the World including 20 new states in Africa that had never existed before .
寒冷的气候
事实上，由于气候非常寒冷，欧洲一直都人口不足。600年前，欧洲在瘟疫流行期间损失了60%的人口。
16世纪，在小冰河时期，欧洲人决定放弃欧洲，移居到更温暖的南部大陆。在新大陆的广袤土地上，没有有组织的国家。欧洲人很高兴发现了这块领土，给它起了美洲和澳大利亚的名字，在那里定居下来，有效地组织了非常有生产力的国家，并在那里享受生活至今。离开寒冷、冰冻的欧洲，迁往温暖的大陆，是我们欧洲祖先为了生存而做出的最聪明的决定。欧洲的国王和皇后们在地理发现方面进行了充分的投资，并取得了胜利，解决了冰河时期和欧洲人口再次可能灭绝的问题。
中世纪冰期
小冰期是中世纪温暖期之后发生的一段寒冷期。它被定义为一个从16世纪到19世纪的时期，但有一些专家倾向于将其定位为从1300年左右到1850年左右的时间段。
在16至19世纪的探索时代，几个欧洲帝国--主要是西班牙、葡萄牙、英国和法国--开始探索并冀求获得新的大陆，从而在世界各地建立了北美洲、南美洲和澳大利亚等几十个新的国家，包括在非洲建立了20个以前从未出现过的国家。
When the climate is warm, people need less food and less clothes to survive. That's why, despite financial poverty, during the last 50 years the native South American, African and Asian population increased 2-3 times while native European population has decreased significantly despite official financial well-being and highest economic markers such as GDP. All european high incomes are going for heating. Life in the South is always easier and cheaper than life in the North. The hot sunny weather provides:
more vitamin D, better metabolism,
better health with better fertility,
better mental state, better mood,
all year around the access to naturally grown food is available for everyone everywhere anytime without planting it. Sun also provides energy.
much cheaper life, no expenses for heating, no need for a warm cloth, no warm shoes. In the South all year around I go in flip flops in my shorts and t-shirt. So, it's a significant clothes saving
In warm South American, African and Asian countries where the climate is warm all year around, homelessness is absolutely survivable. While in freezing Europe homelessness is an immediate death sentence and not survivable.
Living on hot continents people don't need so much money.
温暖气候的好处
当气候温暖时，人们只需更少的食物和衣服来生存。这就是为什么在过去的50年里，尽管财政贫困，南美、非洲和亚洲的本土人口仍然增加了2-3倍，而欧洲尽管官方财政状况良好，GDP等经济指标最高，本土人口却大幅减少。所有欧洲人的高收入都用于供暖。南方的生活总是比北方的生活更容易、更便宜。总是能提供炎热晴朗的天气。
1. 更多的维生素D，更好的新陈代谢。
2. 更好的健康和更好的生育能力。
3. 更好的精神状态，更好的心情。
4. 一年四季，每个人都可以随时随地获得自然生长的食物，无需种植。阳光也提供能源。
5. 生活更便宜，没有取暖的费用，不需要保暖衣服，不需要保暖鞋。在南方一年四季，我都是穿着短裤和T恤，穿着人字拖。所以，在衣料上也有着显著的节省。
在气候全年温暖的南美、非洲和亚洲国家，无家可归者是绝对可以生存的。而在冰天雪地的欧洲，无家可归是一种直接的死亡判决，无法生存。
生活在炎热的大陆上，人们不需要那么多钱。
Europe's population growth is comparatively low, and its median age comparatively high, in relation to the world's other continents, especially compared to Asia, Africa and Latin America. Most of Europe is in a mode of sub-replacement fertility, which means that each new(will be -born) generation is becoming less populous than the older.
Europeans are an absolute worldwide minority therefore should apply to get a minority status and enjoy the benefits.
HEALTH FACTOR
“Here in Denmark, there is an epidemic of infertility, more than 20% of Danish men do not father children.” told Niels E. Skakkebæk, an 82-year-old Danish spermotologist endocrinologist, the founder of Growth and Reproduction Department in Ringshospitalet. “Male fertility and male reproductive health are in full-blown crisis.” - Skakkebæk told.
In his book The Strange Death of Europe, British journalist Douglas Murray makes the point that many Europeans that want children are not having children, and that the government have made absolutely no attempt to find out the reasons that people are not having kids. Is it something to do with infertility? 40% of German women don't have children. 25% of German women at the age 50 are childless, they didn't produce any biological children. While older men still have a theoretical chance to father kids, for older women it is too late. A recent study by Institute National d’Etudes Demographique shows that 25% of european women born in the 1970s are likely to remain childless. Why, Murray asked, are the elites so eager to solve plummeting birthrates in the Western Europe only by importing foreign populations instead of helping to increase a birth rates of native European population?
欧洲人是少数
与世界其他大陆相比，特别是与亚洲、非洲和拉丁美洲相比，欧洲的人口增长相对较低，其中位年龄相对较高。欧洲大部分地区处于亚替代生育率模式，这意味着每一代新的（即将出生的）人口都比老一代人少。
欧洲人是世界上绝对的少数群体，因此应该申请获得少数群体的地位，并享受其中的好处。
健康因素
"82岁的丹麦精子学内分泌学家尼尔斯-E-斯卡克贝克告诉记者："在丹麦，不孕不育是一种流行，超过20%的丹麦男子没有孩子。"男性生育能力和男性生殖健康正处于全面的危机之中。- 斯卡克贝克说。
英国记者道格拉斯-默里在他的《欧洲的奇怪死亡》一书中指出，许多想要孩子的欧洲人都没有生孩子，而政府完全没有试图找出人们不生孩子的原因。是不是与不孕不育有关？40%的德国妇女不生孩子。25%的德国妇女在50岁时没有孩子，她们没有生产任何亲生孩子。虽然老年男性在理论上仍有机会成为孩子的父亲，但对于老年女性来说，这已经太晚了。国家人口研究所最近的一项研究表明，在1970年代出生的欧洲妇女中，有25%可能会一直没有孩子。默里问道，为什么精英们如此急切地想通过引进外国人口而不是帮助提高欧洲本地人口的出生率来解决西欧急剧下降的出生率？
Strange things have happened over the few decades: white men become increasingly infertile, so much so that within a generation they may lose the ability to reproduce entirely. According to researchers after WW2 the sperm quality of european men dropped twice . Men are producing less sperm.
A group of researchers from Hebrew University and Mount Sinai medical school published a study showing that sperm counts in the U.S., Europe, Australia, and New Zealand have fallen by more than 50% over the past four decades. And though lower sperm counts probably have led to a small decrease in the number of children being conceived, that decline has been masked by sociological changes driving birth rates down even faster: people in the Western Europe are convinced to have fewer children and they are having them later. The problem is for women “later” often means “never”. It's very dangerous to delay the childbearing because female fertility decreases with aging and stops around the age of 45.
由于第二次世界大战，欧洲失去了5000多万人，其中大部分是年轻和健康的男子。还有数百万人成为残疾人、病人、不孕不育者和创伤后应激障碍患者。为了怀上许多孩子，妇女和男子必须有良好的生育水平和整体完美的身体健康。在人口方面，欧洲本土人口在战后从未恢复。今天欧洲人的生育能力只有战前一代的一半。150年前，我们的欧洲祖先能够在没有任何医疗援助的情况下成功分娩7-15个健康婴儿。
几十年来，奇怪的事情发生了：白人男子变得越来越不能生育，以至于在一代人的时间里，他们可能完全失去了繁殖能力。据研究人员称，二战后，欧洲男性的精子质量下降了两倍。男人产生的精子越来越少。
一组来自希伯来大学和西奈山医学院的研究人员发表的研究报告显示，美国、欧洲、澳大利亚和新西兰的精子数量在过去40年中下降了50%以上。尽管精子数量的减少可能导致了受孕孩子数量的小幅下降，但这种下降被社会学上的使出生率下降得更快的变化所掩盖：西欧的人们被说服生更少的孩子，而且他们生的更晚。问题是对妇女来说，"晚一点"往往意味着 "永远不会"。推迟生育是非常危险的，因为女性的生育能力随着年龄的增长而下降，并在45岁左右停止。
“The present de-population of Europe happened due to catastrophic wars and political turbulences in the 20th century. Europe suffered nearly 150 millions casualties in World War I, civil wars, revolutions and Spanish flu. World war II was the worst, with over 50 million deaths. Post-WW2 events such as the Cold War and Nuclear race, requiring intensive industrialization, technological advancement and female labor, impoverished Europe financially and prevented the demographic recovery of Europe. The collapse of the USSR in 1991 was the final verdict for European demography. From that moment on, the native European population began to die out rapidly and now is facing an anthropological catastrophe……… Avoiding wars and political turbulences with pre-war birth rate, European population should have grown by at least 400% and have at least 2 billion people in 2021. That is, we can say that demographically, due to the wars, Europe lost at least 1.5 billion people.”
Well that is not completely true. I of course do not claim, that the incredibly bloody part of 20th century between 1914–1945 did not negatively influence European population growth. It sure did. But the main reasons for current Europe’s demographics struggle is in the decades of sub-replacement fertility into which Europe as a whole went from 1970 in some countries to 1990 in other countries and the fact that the fertility stayed there since. When you look at the population numbers, you will see that the population of Europe in 1913 was circa 498 millions people. In 1950 it was 552 millions people. So during the most bloody couple of decades in the history of the human kind, population of Europe actually gained some 54 millions Europeans. Now the gains would be much much higher if there was no war, but the wars itself did not stop the growth.
After the wars, there was 25–50 (depends on where) years of high fertility and population growth that drove European population from 552 millions in 1950 to 730 millions in 1992 (some of it was migration but vast majority natural increase). It was only then when the population started to decrease and stagnate and now it is projected to decrease rapidly during this century. But it is not because of the wars and all that, but because Europeans stoped having children 25–50 years after the war. If Europeans did not stop having more children, the population growth would have continue and we could be talking about when we will reach billion and not about European demographic catastrophe. And the demographic impact of world wars would have been totally “neutralised”.
"欧洲目前的人口减少是由于20世纪的灾难性战争和政治动荡造成的。.... ...。也就是说，我们可以说，由于战争，欧洲在人口方面至少损失了15亿人。"
这并不完全正确。当然，我并不是说1914-1945年期间20世纪令人难以置信的血腥部分没有对欧洲人口增长产生负面影响。它确实如此。但是，目前欧洲人口统计学处于挣扎状态的主要原因是欧洲作为一个整体从1970年在一些国家，到1990年在其他国家进入了几十年的亚更替生育率，以及自那时以来生育率一直保持在那里的事实。当你看人口数字时，你会发现1913年欧洲的人口约为4.98亿人。在1950年，它是5.52亿人。因此，在人类历史上最血腥的几十年里，欧洲的人口实际上增加了约5400万欧洲人。如果没有战争，这个数字会高得多，但战争本身并没有阻止人口增长。
战争之后，有25-50年（取决于哪里）的高生育率和人口增长，推动欧洲人口从1950年的5.52亿增加到1992年的7.3亿（其中一些是移民，但绝大多数是自然增长）。直到那时，人口才开始减少和停滞，现在预计欧洲人口在本世纪将迅速减少。但这不是因为战争和所有这些，而是因为欧洲人在战后25-50年内停止了生育。如果欧洲人没有停止生育，人口增长将继续下去，我们完全可以讨论我们何时达到十亿，而不是讨论欧洲的人口统计学灾难。世界大战对人口的影响也会被完全"中和"。
The key thing here is the fact that Europe was the place from which demographic transition started. So European countries had the really exponential growth period in 19th century (UK, western Europe, Germany) up until the first half of 20th century (eastern Europe, Russia). So the European countries grew exponentially, but from comparatively smaller base and thus never reached numbers of Africa or Asia. Asian countries like China and India experienced the rapid growth periods much later and thus from comparatively bigger base (because their populations grew in slower pace the whole time) and they got much more populous. And the last continent to get into this phase is Africa. Because of that, population of Africa is experiencing the rapid growth period right now and its gonna reach really diabolical numbers of around 4 billions, before the fertility fall there too.
Another thing that should not be forgotten when debating the relative not-overpopulation of Europe is the fact, that Europe had been sending its excess population to colonies and settler countries in the time of its booming demographic transition phases and thus populated Americas, Australia, New Zealand, Asian Russia, South Africa and other places with millions of Europeans, that comprises the majority in lot of these places to this day.
与其说是因为世界大战，不如说是人口结构的转型。欧洲经历了人口转型的快速增长期（第2和第3阶段，儿童死亡率迅速下降，生育率在此后的一段时间内保持高位，但人们这时候有点"明白"了，他们不一定要生7个孩子，因为其中一半不会死。所以2个就够了）。因此，说"如果战前的出生率一直保持下去，欧洲现在可能有20亿人口"是错误的，因为生育率无论如何都会下降。人口结构转型正在到处发生。东亚的生育率甚至比欧洲还低（在韩国、台湾（地区）或新加坡，现在还不到1）。中国、印度、巴西、伊朗的生育率正在迅速下降.....几乎所有地方都会越来越低。
最关键的是，欧洲是人口转型的起点。所以欧洲国家在19世纪也有过真正的指数增长期（英国、西欧、德国），直到20世纪上半叶（东欧、俄罗斯）都是如此。因此，欧洲国家人口也是呈指数增长的，但基数相对较小，因此从未达到非洲或亚洲的数字。像中国和印度这样的亚洲国家经历快速增长期要晚得多，因此基数相对较大（因为它们的人口增长速度一直较慢），而且它们的人口也更多。而最后进入这个阶段的大陆是非洲。正因为如此，非洲的人口现在正经历着快速增长期，在生育率下降之前，其人口将达到约40亿的难以承受的数字。
在讨论欧洲人口相对不超标的时候，不应该忘记的另一个事实是，欧洲在其蓬勃发展的人口过渡阶段，一直将其多余的人口送往殖民地和移民国家，从而使美洲、澳大利亚、新西兰、俄罗斯的亚洲部分、南非和其他地方有了数以百万计的欧洲人，至今这些地方的人口仍占大多数。
I agree more with your analysis than with Anna’s.
One other thing that I didn’t add in another comment is that in places such as Japan and Korea (and Italy and Greece) which are strongly patriarchal now that young women can get an education and a job they really don’t want to tie themselves to a man who will keep them at home.
Essentially, women can have a decent life now (and even sex) without having to have a husband. (And I don’t blame them for this choice).
与安娜的分析相比，我更同意你的分析。
我没有在另一条回复中补充的另一件事是在日本和韩国（以及意大利和希腊）等有着强烈父权制的地方，现在年轻女性也可以获得教育和工作了，她们真的不想把自己绑在一个会让她们呆在家里的男人身上。
从本质上讲，妇女现在可以有一个体面的生活（甚至性生活），而不需要有一个丈夫。(我也不怪她们的这种选择）。
If you were to ask my German wife why she never had any, the answer would be that because the taxes are so high as well as the cost of living the income levels can't afford someone to realistically have children without going severely into debt and retiring on next to nothing.
Germans are held responsible for their adult children who have gotten themselves into a financial mess. Unless they divorce themselves officially from their children, they must pay for them when they have, for example, gone bankrupt, which is a real possibility here. Legally divorcing your children also means that they are no longer eligible for inheritance. It's a win-win for the government, a lose-lose situation for the citizens because then the assets go to the state.
How can anyone want children when the meager retirement they have worked a lifetime for must suddenly be used to cover the expenses of someone who is able to work, paid their taxes so that they might enjoy the benefits of those taxes, but still the responsibility lies with the retired parent?
如果你要问我的德国妻子为什么她从来没有生过孩子，答案是，因为税收和生活成本都很高，收入水平无法承担一个人在不严重负债和退休后几乎一无所有的情况下生育一个孩子。
德国人要为自己陷入财务困境的成年子女负责。除非他们与子女正式脱离关系，否则他们必须在子女破产时为他们支付费用，这在这里是一个真正的可能性。在法律上与子女脱离关系也意味着他们不再有资格获得继承权。这对政府来说是双赢，对公民来说却是两败俱伤，因为这样资产就归国家所有了。
当他们工作了一辈子的微薄的退休金必须突然要被用来支付那些能够自己工作的人的费用时，怎么会有人想要孩子呢？纳税是为了让他们享受这些税收的好处，但成年子女的责任仍然在于退休的父母身上吗？
Your wife simply found the comfortable pretext not to have any children and remove herself and you from the gene pool. My advice to you, divorce your wife, find another, more decent wife and make babies.
Non-European migrants in Germany don't have any problem with taxes and making 4–5 children per family. Therefore your wife clearly used taxes as a pretext to cancel motherhood. She simply doesn't love children. Why did you marry such woman?
你的妻子只是找到了一个舒适的不生孩子的借口，把自己和你从基因库中剔除。我给你的建议是，和你妻子离婚，再找一个更体面的妻子，然后生孩子。
在德国的非欧洲移民在纳税和每个家庭制造4-5个孩子方面没有任何问题。因此，你的妻子显然以税收为借口取消了母亲的身份。她根本不爱孩子。你为什么要娶这样的女人？
You are literally skewing facts that white supremacists often use to claim the extinction of whites. You are full of shit.
你简直是在歪曲事实，白人至上主义者经常用这些东西来宣传所谓的白人的灭绝。你根本满脑子都是屎。
Wow, that response was completely unempathetic and at the very least shows a lack of financial responsibility for one's self.
In fact, she is not my first wife and I have two children. She always lamented over not having children and it pains her to even see a child and a mother together. She wanted nothing more, but the economics of it were just not in the cards for her.
Had she found someone like me willing to take the responsibility, financially and emotionally, to share that responsibility, she surely would have. But, that just didn't happen, and honestly I also wouldn't have wanted any more children. So, I guess she's just perfect for me seeing as I don't just see her as a vessel to carry my children.
哇，你这个回复真是完全没有同情心，至少说明对自己缺乏经济责任感。
事实上，她不是我的第一任妻子，我有两个孩子。她总是为没有孩子而感叹，甚至看到别的孩子和母亲在一起，她都会很痛苦。她别无所求，但经济上的问题对她来说这实在是不可能。
如果在我之前她找到一个像我这样愿意在经济上和情感上和她分担这个责任的人，她肯定会生孩子的。但是，这并没有发生，而且说实话，我也不希望再有孩子。所以，我想她对我来说是完美的，因为我不只是把她看作是一个承载我孩子的容器。
There are plenty absurd assumptions in this article, but this one really stands out: “Europeans are an absolute worldwide minority therefore should apply to get a minority status and enjoy the benefits.” You clearly don’t know what a minority is. What do you think “a minority” is, if not something entirely circumspect to the legal duties of a nation state with its citizens? What kind of “benefit” does “a minority” have? To whom would Europeans appeal to for such “benefits”?
这篇文章里有很多荒谬的假设，但这一条真的特别突出："欧洲人是世界范围内的绝对少数族裔，因此应该申请获得少数族裔地位并享受利益"。你显然不知道什么是少数族裔。除了一个民族国家对其公民的法律义务之外，你还认为"少数族裔"是什么？作为“少数族裔”又有什么样的"好处"？欧洲人要向谁诉求这种"好处"？
I think you forgot to mention inportant points. I am pointing out why population soured in last century in different regions across the world.
1. Health care - just take a example of india in 1960–70 healthcare in india started getting better. Having a 5- 6 children was a common thing before 60s but most of this children used to die due to diseases. But acccess to healtcare changed it And population exploded. But now people are getting aware and having less children.
2. Food - during 19-20 centuries the food availibity was limited to the people. Sometimes it was uneven, it was the reason people were less in china. But good food program increased the population of china
3. Education - edcation brings awareness in society regarding best cleaning practices to follow. Which increases the life expectancy.
4. Islam - due to religious beliefs islamic people like to have more children. But more and more people are getting educated this beliefs are changing as well.
Late 2000 cenutry was of Asia. healthcare food and education increased the population of SE asian societies. But as you can see now their population increase is slowing down.
In africa now healthcare , food stability is coming up. it is the reason population in this continent is exploding. But after 21 things will stabilize everywhere.
我认为你错过了重点。在我看来，上个世纪全世界不同地区的人口都在恶化的原因是：
1. 医疗保健--仅以印度为例，1960-70年印度的医疗保健开始变得更好。在60年代之前，生5-6个孩子是一件很普遍的事情，但大多数孩子都会因疾病而死亡。但医疗服务的获得改变了这一状况，而且人口爆炸性增长。但现在人们开始意识到了这一点，并减少了孩子。
2. 食物--在19-20世纪，人们的食物供应是有限的。有时它的分配也是不均匀的，这就是中国人之前较少的原因。但良好的食品计划增加了中国的人口。
3. 教育 - 教育使社会认识到应遵循的最卫生的做法。这增加了人民的预期寿命。
4. 伊斯兰教--由于宗教信仰的原因，伊斯兰教徒喜欢生更多的孩子。但越来越多的人接受了教育，这种信仰也在改变。
2000年末的亚洲，医疗保健、食品和教育水平的提高增加了东南亚社会的人口。但是你可以看到现在他们的人口增长正在放缓。
在非洲，医疗、食品的稳定性正在提高，这也是这个大陆人口正在爆炸的原因。但在21世纪之后，所有的事情都会稳定下来。