外国网友议论嘲讽环保少女格蕾塔的表情包

Antoinette Tuttle
Ask how Miss Gretta gets to all of her various speaking engagements? Ask how many people travel with her? Ask if she has felt the hypocrisy of her own statements. She lives very well, right along with her parents. When you speak of climate change, have you failed to recognize the earth has well documented phases. We just happen to be entering a phase where the poles are shifting and things are happening faster than we expected. As far as we know this is the first time this many people will experience this act of natural law. People are horribly guilty of pollution, we have thrown garbage in our waterways, on land, and we have left toxic waste everywhere we go. We have also gummed up the air we breath. But our contribution to the coming changes have been a drop compared to what the earth experiences on a timed cycle. When you see anyone trying to lecture you about your life style, and you just happen to be a regular person, not a corporation, look where the money goes. Al Gore comes to mind. He made billions off his lies and no one cares. Gretta is being used because she is marketable, she's a kid so she pulls in the younger crowd and the older crowd just thinks shes amazing. But I doubt she has had any original thoughts that her parents haven't implanted in her head. Corruption, greed and the ever increasing monopolies are at the root of our problems. The hypocrisy here seems to be lost on most. Go back and look at the last world summit on climate change, see how many leaders flew in on their own private jets. How much garbage do you think they dropped in the sky? Ask yourself why this wasn't a zoom meeting, if they really gave a damn about earth. Gretta is young she is in no way able to see the pure complexity of earths problems. I don't blame her, she most certainly believes what she's saying. But she has done nothing to stop the real problems here because she can't. She has, however been the recipient of a much better life thanks to her lectures.

问问格蕾塔小姐是如何参加各种演讲活动的？问问有多少人和她一起旅行？问问她是否感觉到自己言辞的虚伪。她和父母过得很好。你在谈论候变化时并没有认识到地球有着多个记载详实的时期。我们只是碰巧进入了地极转移时期，事情发生得比我们预期的要更快而已。据我们所知，这是第一次有这么多人将会经历这种自然法则现象。人类犯下了严重的污染罪行，我们把垃圾扔进水道里，扔在陆地上，还把有毒废弃物遗留在我们所到之处。我们还污染了自己所呼吸的空气。然而与地球在一个时间周期中的经历相比，我们对即将到来的环境变化所做出的贡献不过是沧海一粟。

当你看到有人试图就你的生活方式对你进行说教，并且你只是一个普通人而不是一家公司时，看看钱进了谁的口袋里。我想到了阿尔·戈尔(克林顿执政时期担任美国副总统，在2000年总统选举中输给小布什后退出政界转向环保活动)。他靠谎言赚了几十亿，但没人在乎。格蕾塔被利用是因为她很有市场。她是个孩子，所以她吸引了年轻人群，年长人群只是觉得她很棒。但是我怀疑，她没有自己原创的想法，她的父母还没有将这些想法灌输到她的脑袋里。腐败、贪婪和日益加强的垄断是我们所面临问题的根源。在这里，伪善似乎从大多数人身上消失了回头看看上次气候变化世界峰会，瞧瞧有多少领导人乘坐自己的私人飞机前来参会。你

觉得他们从天上扔下了多少垃圾？再问问你自己，如果他们真的在乎地球，为什么这不是一场通过Zoom(在线会议软件)举行的视频会议。格蕾塔还年轻，她根本看不出地球上问题的纯粹复杂性。我并不会责备她，她肯定相信自己说的话。但她没有做任何事情来阻止地球上真正的问题，因为她做不到。不过她通过演讲过上了更好的生活。

Sam Wilson
If you knew science, you would understand that the Earth’s phases never changed this quickly (except that one time Earth was hit by a giant meteor). It is clearly being caused by human pollution. How is this still being debated? Are we going to debate the existence of gravity next? It’s stupid.

如果你懂科学的话，你就会明白地球的气候期从来没有改变得这么快（除了地球被一颗巨大的流星击中那一次）。这显然是人类污染造成的。怎么还有人在争论这件事？我们接下来是要辩论引力是否存在吗？太蠢了。

Alison Gouws
She doesn’t accept money herself. She also hasn’t bought any new clothes in years. She probably has the smallest carbon footprint of anyone NOT living off the grid. And yes, she grew up in Sweden in a privileged environment and DESPITE that, she chose to fight for a saver environment for this and the next generations. I’m amazed at how people can B!tch about someone actually DOING something about the climate while they themselves are driving fossil fuel cars, eating meat every day, and complaining about the heat waves.

她自己不收钱。她也好几年没买新衣服了。她可能是不依靠电网生活的人中碳足迹最小的。是的，她在瑞典的优越环境中长大，尽管如此，她选择为这代人和后代们争取一个更加节约的环境。令我惊讶的是，人们怎么能一边抱怨某个真正从事气候方面工作的人，另一边却自己开着化石燃料汽车、每天都吃肉还抱怨着热浪的。

Thiago Francisco
This meme suggests Greta favors child labor.
It also suggests its not possible to mine cobalt without child labor.
As much as I dont like Greta myself, this “meme” or whatever it is, is deceptive.

这个表情包在暗示格里塔支持童工。
它还暗示在不使用童工的情况下开采钴是件不可能的事。
尽管我自己不喜欢格里塔，但这个“表情包”或其他什么东西，都是骗人的。

Tiago D'Agostini
That is not the point. The point is there are much more urgent problems for MOST of the countries in the world to focus. Greta speech is classic of someone that have never seen how 80% of the world lives and thinks the world is the cotton candy europe way.

这不是重点。重点是世界上大多数国家都有更紧迫的问题需要关注。格蕾塔的说话方式是某类人的典型口吻。这种人从未见过世界上80%的人是如何生活的，并认为世界就是欧洲这样子的。

Bill Sands
its appeal to mockery and it childish, its the resort of people with no honest argument

这个图片诉诸于嘲弄，而且很幼稚，是没有真诚论据的人所使用的手段。

Bill Sands
Focusing first on cobalt, automakers and other manufacturers have committed to eliminating “artisanal” cobalt from their supply chains, and have also said they will develop batteries that decrease, or do away with, cobalt altogether. But that technology is still in development, and the prence of these mines means these commitments “aren’t realistic,” said Mickaël Daudin of Pact, a nonprofit organization that works with mining communities in Africa.
Instead, Mr. Daudin said, manufacturers need to work with these mines to lessen their environmental footprint and make sure miners are working in safe conditions. If companies acted responsibly, the rise of electric vehicles would be a great opportunity for countries like Congo, he said. But if they don’t, “they will put the environment, and many, many miners’ lives at risk.”
Recycling could be better
As earlier generations of electric vehicles start to reach the end of their lives, preventing a pileup of spent batteries looms as a challenge.

汽车制造商们和其他制造商首先关注的是钴，他们承诺从供应链中剔除“手工”钴，并表示将开发减少钴含量或完全不用钴的电池。但这项技术仍在开发中，这些矿山的普遍存在意味着这些承诺“不现实”在Pact(一个与非洲矿业社区合作的非营利组织)工作的米卡伊尔·道丁说道。
相反地，道丁说，制造商需要与这些矿山合作，以减少它们的环境足迹，并确保矿工在安全的条件下工作。他表示，如果企业们采取负责任行动的话，电动汽车的兴起对于刚果这样的国家来说将是一个巨大的机会。但如果企业们不这样做，“他们将会使环境和许许多多矿工的生命面临危险。”
回收利用可能会更好
随着前几代电动汽车开始走向寿终，防止废旧电池堆积即将成为一项挑战。

Charles Wood
Yeah I agree, affordable public transportation is better idea than the idea that we can keep our cars. And educating women means not as many kids, worth it even though the cost is more educated women like Greta. She isn’t going to have 13 kids like my great great grandma.
As far as I’m concerned, the quicker we go back to about the 3 billion people we had when I was in Junior High, the better for the insects, birds, etc. That’s 5 billion lives that shouldn’t have come into existence during my lifetime. I wouldn’t miss those 5 billion if I woke up tomorrow and they were gone to fertilizer every one. Life is precious, yes, but that’s the way it goes. A wet bulb event for a few days widespread over the American south, unfortunately only a wake up call of a few million deaths in 36 hours, a drop in the bucket, certainly isn’t out of the question. Solves several problems. You hate Greta? You haven’t even begun to recognize how much Nature is indifferent to you. You precious little mamma’s boy.

是的，我同意，民众负担得起的公共交通比我们保留汽车的主意要更好。让女性接受教育意味着世界上不会有那么多的孩子，尽管代价是会出现更多像格蕾塔这样受过教育的女性。她不会像我的曾祖母那样有13个孩子。
就我而言，我们越快回归到我上初中时的约30亿世界人口，就越对昆虫、鸟类等动物有利。有50亿人口在我的有生之年里是不应该存在的。如果我明天醒来，他们都化为了肥料的话，我不会去怀念这50亿人。生命是宝贵的，没错，但事情就是这样。几天来，湿球病在美国南部蔓延开来，不幸的是，这只是36小时内数百万人死亡的警钟，这些人不过是沧海一粟，这当然并非是不可能的。多去解决一些问题吧。你讨厌格蕾塔？你甚至还没有开始认识到大自然对你是多么地漠不关心。你这个可爱的小妈宝。

Felicity Paz
As much as I think that Greta has done a great job to make a stand about climate change, I think that there is a better solution than just eating veggie burgers, driving expensive Teslas and going out once a week to protest about the climate emergency.
While those things are good, I don’t think it’s enough to solve the worlds problems. We need to completely question and change the way we live.
Please check out the video below:
Christian Freeganism: The Answer to the Climate Change Emergency?

尽管我认为格蕾塔在表明气候变化立场方面做得很好，但我认为还有比吃素食汉堡、开昂贵的特斯拉汽车和每周外出一次抗议气候紧急状态更好的解决方案。
虽然这些做法是好的，但我认为这并不足以解决世界上的问题。我们需要彻底质疑并改变我们的生活方式。
请查看下面的视频：
基督教免费素食主义：应对气候变化紧急情况的答案是什么？