你有什么不受欢迎的观点?(一)
What is an unpopular opinion you hold?
译文简介
网友：我觉得女性有保护自己的权利，我认为要是我母亲受辱，我绝对是不能忍受的，一个人无权指责其他人的父母抚养孩子的方式，我觉得任何形式的身体羞辱都不是可取的，支配别人的生活和他们的生活方式不是你的工作，表达正确的感受也不应该遭到反对，无论你是谁......
正文翻译
What is an unpopular opinion you hold?
你有什么不受欢迎的观点?
评论翻译
很赞 ( 0 )
收藏
I believe that women have a right to their own bodies. I think that mom shaming is abhorrent. How dare one judge another parent for how they raise their child. I feel that body shaming of any form at all is petty as fuck. It's not your job to dictate someone's life and what they do with it. Expressing valid feelings should not be frowned upon. Who are you to call someone highly sensitive or look down upon them for having social anxiety, much less depression? There is also the trend of having mental illness. Please don't do that
Basing someone off how attractive vs. unattractive they are is super shallow.
Making fun of someone who is disabled speaks volumes about the type of person you are.
Regardless if someone got plastic surgery or not, they feel better about themselves.
Don't resort to putting someone down or insulting them in the event that you don't agree with their opinion or even just arguing. There are so many effective ways when it comes to handling a situation. Just because someone identifies as an addict or alcoholic does not mean they are less deserving of life. Many are also ignorant as to why they can't just stop using at the drop of a hat for their loved ones. It doesn't mean that just because they can't kick a habit right away, they love their family, friends, or child any less.
我觉得女性有保护自己的权利，我认为要是我母亲受辱，我绝对是不能忍受的，一个人无权指责其他人的父母抚养孩子的方式，我觉得任何形式的身体羞辱都不是可取的，支配别人的生活和他们的生活方式不是你的工作，表达正确的感受也不应该遭到反对，无论你是谁，都不可以因为一个人有社交焦虑就称他为高度敏感的人，或者看不起他，更不用说抑郁了?人们逐渐出现患精神疾病的趋势，所以，请不要把一个人的兴趣或不感兴趣作为评判标准，这是非常肤浅的。取笑残疾人能充分说明你的人品，不管一个人是否做过整形手术，只要他们愿意，那就是好的，你可能不同意别人的观点，或者想和他们争论，但不要贬低或侮辱他们，会有其他的方法解决这种情况，仅仅因为有人认为自己是瘾君子或酗酒者，也并不意味着他们就不能好好活着，许多人也不知道为什么他们不能一有机会就放下手机，这并不意味着他们不能马上改掉这个习惯，或者说他们对家人、朋友或孩子的爱会减少。如果有人认为自己是x, y, z，那我们也应该表示尊重，用他们喜欢的代词称呼他们，不要评论别人的孩子，说他们有多丑，这样做是在欺负一个无辜的孩子。
原创翻译：龙腾网 http://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
I dislike that if you have a learning disability, you are automatically viewed as limited. I've had psych s. I've had tests administered, and I've observed that a psychologist who doesn't even know me beyond administering a clinical, highly biased uation, write scathing paragraphs about me that completely undermine my entire functioning capacity as a whole. You can have a degree or special background, at the end of the day though, I know who I am/ I can identify my weaknesses and strengths. I refuse to allow an IQ test define my life. Don't look down on those who dress differently, have a certain aesthetic, whatever- there is so many stereotypes out there that should not even exist.
我在很多社交平台上都看到过很多冲突，我不明白为什么这个人因为做鬼脸而出名，因为他传递的是嫉妒，我了解到很多有才华的舞者、歌手或作家在社会上被严重埋没忽视，与此同时，隐身的抖音博主却意外走红，最后变得很受欢迎，我不喜欢的画面是，如果你有学习障碍，你就会自动地被认为能力缺失，我做过一些心理评估测试，观察到一个心理学家，除了进行临床的评估之外，根本不了解我，他却写一些关于我的文章，这完全破坏了我的整体形象，他虽然有学位或者特殊的背景，但是说到底，只有我自己才真正了解我的缺点和优点，我拒绝让智商测试定义我的生活，大家也不要轻视那些穿着不同，有某种审美的人，不管怎样，都不应该存在刻板印象。
I HATE celebrities that think they matter. Celebrities DO NOT MATTER. Seriously is every famous actor or singer disappeared we would be fine. We would just find new good -looking people and tell them what to do. If every gas station attendant disappeared the economy would seriously suffer for weeks and people struggle to get gas as transportation and deliveries grind to a halt. Hollywood actors are self-absorbed, self-centered, narcissistic, and elitist. They have a rampant sexual abuse problem and even worse they hide it.
How they think they have ANY moral superiority and ANY right to tell us how to live is beyond me.
They live like kings and consume more stuff than most countries but according to them old Tom and his 2006 F-150 are the problem. They want us all to live in small shacks and take the bus to mitigate their over consumption. If we all lived like them the planet would be destroyed in a week yet THEY judge and speak down to us?
Social media is one of the worst things to happen to mankind ever and it should be banned. Inequality is part of life and it is necessary for innovation. Say you sell chairs- and the other guy you work with sells 5 times as many chairs as you. There is then inequality between you and this other chair salesmen. It then is in your best interest to learn what this other salesperson is doing and copy them. Thus you become better at your job and everyone innovates further. Our brains are biologically hardwired for this. We look for people doing better than us and see what they are doing so we can improve out situation. This used to mean keeping an eye on the neighbor or co-workers.
我讨厌自以为是的名人，但我的看法并不重要，说真的，如果所有著名演员或歌手都消失了，我们也会过得很好，我们会找新的帅哥，然后告诉他们该怎么做，但如果每个加油站的工作人员都消失了，经济将会遭受数周的严重打击，随着运输和配送逐渐停止，人们很难买到汽油。好莱坞演员大多以自我为中心、自恋和精英主义，他们有严重的性虐待问题，更糟糕的是他们还隐瞒事实，他们认为自己有道德优越感，有权利教我们如何生活，简直不可理喻，他们像国王一样生活，比大多数国家消费级别都要高的多他们希望我们都住在小棚子里，坐公交车来减轻他们的过度消费，如果我们都像他们一样生活，这个星球就会在一周内毁灭，但他们却用高人一等的口气评判我们，社交媒体是人类有史以来发生的最糟糕的事情之一，应该被禁止。
不平等一直是生活的一部分，也是创新的必要条件，假设你卖椅子，而你的同事卖的价格是你的5倍，你和其他椅子推销员之间就不平等了，你最好去了解其他销售人员在做什么，然后模仿他们，这样一来，你的工作就会做得更好，这样就能进一步创新，我们的大脑天生就有这种能力，我们寻找比自己更优秀的人，看看他们在做什么，这样我们才能更加努力改善我们的处境，这在过去指的是邻居或同事，但现在我们有了社交媒体，不必那样做了。
原创翻译：龙腾网 http://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Europeans were the most technologically advanced and strongest civilization on earth during the age of Imperialism. Europeans only did what any other civilization would have done. If it were the Mali Empire or Aztec Empire that was the strongest civilization on earth they would have done the same thing as the Europeans. I don’t think we should feel bad for doing what every other culture has done and will do. I don’t think we should repeat it and I think peace and liberty are always preferable to war and slavery. We can admit these things were not very nice but why be guilty?
Alexander the Great was overrated. He was a brilliant commander to be sure. But he was also an over confident hot head that frequently put himself into bad positions and needlessly got his men killed. He started he reign on 3rd base after his father built the strongest army on earth and conquered all of Greece. Any halfway competent general in Alexanders shoes could have done the same exact thing. In fact a calmer general could have done better.
当今社会，不平等正在全面爆发，社交媒体并不适合人类思维，我认为我们可以把很多抑郁症和自卑的案例与社交媒体联系起来。人类的整个历史就是战争、征服、毁灭、和暴力，强者肆无忌惮的放任自己，弱者承受他们必须承受的，非洲部落一直用暴力相互摧毁和征服，阿兹特克人、玛雅人和印加人都极其暴力和好战，他们经常地进行赤裸裸征服战。在帝国主义时代，欧洲人是地球上技术最先进、最强大的文明，他们也只是做了其他任何文明都会做的事，如果马里帝国或阿兹特克帝国是世界上最强大的文明，他们会做和欧洲人一样的事情，我认为我们不应该因为做他人做过的事或准备做的事而感到难过，但我们不应该重复它，我认为和平和自由总是比战争和奴隶制更可取，我们可以承认这些事情不好，但为什么要内疚呢? 亚历山大大帝被高估了，毫无疑问，他是一位杰出的指挥官，但他也过于自信，头脑发热，经常把自己置于不利的位置，并偶然地害死他的手下，在他父亲建立了世界上最强大的军队并征服了整个希腊之后，他开始统治，任何一个有能力的将军都可以做同样的事情，事实上，选一个更冷静的将军可能会做得更好。
Broke? Why don’t you have a job? Got fired? What did you do? Addiction issues? Everyone told you what would happen if you tried that? Wife leave you? Did you not work hard enough on your marriage? Get lung cancer? What did you think would happen when you smoke for 20 years? I do feel bad for the rare circumstances where people just ger relentlessly ravaged by life. But I think when most people are down on their luck. it is self imposed. Jimmy Kimmel is terribly unfunny. He is one of the worst comics I have ever seen preform and his show is unbearable. How he is famous at all I have no idea
我并不为无家可归的人感到难过，我认识很多为他们服务的人，我住的地方有很多无家可归者收容所，这些工作者会告诉你，90%的无家可归者心甘情愿成为这样的人，有帮助无家可归的人，但他们不想要，他们享受着无家可归和完全自由的生活。此外，我不喜欢认为人会倒霉的这个想法，当然，有时候坏事会发生在好人身上，但99%的情况下，是错误的选择导致了你现在的处境，你为什么没有工作?被解雇了吗?你做了什么?成瘾问题?所有人都告诉你如果你这么做会怎么样?妻子离开你吗?你在婚姻上不够努力吗?得了肺癌?你认为吸烟20年后会发生什么?我确实为人们被生活无情地蹂躏的情况而感到难过，但我认为当大多数人都不走运的时候，会自己强化这种情绪。吉米·坎摩尔一点也不搞笑，他是我见过的最糟糕的喜剧演员之一，他的演技令人难以接受，我完全不知道他是怎么出名的。
Feminism in the west. Apparently, according to many querns, we no longer need feminism in the west as all the battles have been won and it's men that are now being oppressed by a group of men-hating 4th wave feminists. My heart bleeds for these poor downtrodden men, struggling manfully against this tidal wave of female domination. Let's look at these major feminist victories that have subjugated the male 50% of the population.
a) Equal pay-apparently achieved, despite all the data showing that the male-female wage gap has remained virtually unchanged over the past 25 years. For example, in USA, in 1996, women earned 73.8% of what a man did, in 2015 that had risen to only 79.6%. (Ref: National Committee on Pay Equity). The recent anomalies shown in the employment practices of the BBC, show that even at a higher level, sexism is still rampant and on many businesses where wages are negotiated individually, all the evidence shows that men earn more-in many cases substantially more.
b) In the FTSE top 250 companies only 6.4% of executive directorships (i.e. actually hands-on) are held by women. Read that again ONLY 6.4%. (Ref Exeter Business School) Are we really to be believe that equality has been achieved whereby 93.6% of the major company board directors are male? Are we to believe that this demonstrates that feminism in the west is no longer needed?
c) Maternity/Paternity leave and child raising. Given new laws allowing paternity leave as well as maternity leave, you might be mistaken in thinking that there is now a greater equality in sharing child-rearing. In fact, in 2018 the Department for Business report suggested that shared leave could be as low as 2%. (Yes, I said 2%). Probably all these poor men are so oppressed now by their wives and partners that they are told to stay at work and are forbidden from helping raise their own kids.
西方的女权主义。
显然，根据许多人的说法，我们在西方不再需要女权主义，因为所有的战斗都已经胜利了，现在是男性被一群讨厌男性的第四波女权主义者压迫，我很心疼这些可怜的受压迫的男人，他们勇敢地对抗着女性统治的浪潮，让我们来了解一下这些主要的女权主义，它们征服了50%的男性人口。
同工同酬，显然已经实现了，尽管所有数据显示男女工资差距在过去25年几乎没有变化，例如，在美国，1996年女性的收入是男性的73.8%，而在2015年，这一比例仅为79.6%(参考文献:全国薪酬平等委员会)。BBC最近的雇佣行为显示出的异常现象表明，即使在更高的职位上，性别歧视仍然猖獗，而且在工资单独谈判的许多企业中，所有证据都表明，男性挣得更多，至少在许多情况下要多得多。
在富时指数前250家公司中，只有6.4%的执行董事(即实际执掌)由女性担任，再强调一遍，只有6.4%(参考埃克塞特商学院)，难道我们真的要相信93.6%的大公司董事会成员是男性就能实现平等吗?我们是否应该认为，这表明西方不再需要女权主义?
产假、陪产假和抚养孩子。鉴于新法律允许休陪产假和产假，你可能会错误地认为现在在分担抚养孩子方面更加平等了，事实上，2018年英国商务部的报告显示，共享假期可能低至2%，是的，我说的是2%，也许所有这些可怜的男人现在都被他们的妻子和伴侣无情压迫，以至于他们被告知要留在工作岗位上，并且被禁止抚养自己的孩子。
家务。男性分担家务的数量自1980年以来几乎没有增加(国家统计办公室)，工作女性多做60%的家务，可怜的男人!当这些完全解放的妇女在一天的辛苦工作后做些简单的“快乐”事，比如做饭，洗烤箱，洗衣服，拖地板后，而男人们被“疯狂”的女人强迫着坐在电视机前，手里拿着啤酒，要是那些讨厌的女人能让她们的男人分享这些“快乐”就平等了!真正的男人，把你的肥屁股从沙发上挪开，(请注意，我并不是说我妻子在的时候，我比现在过的好，我也从来没有说过我受到了压迫。)
f) Rape-don't get me started! This is from the Government Crime survey.
Five out of six victims did not go to the police, according to the survey, largely because they fear a lengthy and intrusive investigation, followed by the ordeal of giving evidence in court. But police, prosecutors and campaigners say that a strict new interpretation of the rules on disclosure, prompted by a review published last summer, has made that situation much worse. Complainants now face a complete loss of privacy, having to hand over their mobile phones, tablets and even work computers, containing a mass of personal material such as text messages, photographs and even medical records. Few people realize that even dexed material will be examined, including pictures that may have been taken while the victim was in an abusive relationship. Some of this material is bound to result in challenging cross-examination in court, even though it might have nothing to do with the alleged assault at the heart of the case.
Astonishingly, there is no equivalent obligation on defendants to hand over phones and computers in a rape investigation.
Now of course there have been some false accusations made by women against men over the years and these have caused immense damage to the lives of these innocent men. But please look at the facts-The Washington Post report showed only 1% of rape cases eventually resulted in successful prosecutions and very few were because of malicious false accusations by women, but much more by women's reluctance to report the crime. So these poor oppressed men are, well basically getting away with it. Another striking case of feminism being unnecessary. I could probably write a book on this topic but I have some other controversial opinions I want to get off my chest.
虐待、强奸、控制行为和其他类似暴行。如果男性如此屈从，我想应该会有几十家旅馆，专门为遭受女性暴力的男性受害者提供住宿，现在，我并不怀疑一些男性家暴的受害者是女性，但根据130年前，独立女性遭受男性伴侣的暴力虐待和25%的女性在她们的一生中会经历家庭暴力显示，每星期有2名妇女死于男性伴侣的暴力行为，这些数字确实令人震惊，如果女性现在真的是占主导地位的性别，那么她们在这方面做得不是很好，男孩们！看看这些数字，然后告诉我女性已经实现了平等!
强奸，我最不想说这个!政府犯罪调查显示，六分之五的受害者没有去警察局报案，主要是因为他们担心调查会旷日持久，会受到干扰，然后还要在法庭上作证，但警方、检察官和活动人士表示，去年夏天发布的一份审查促使对信息披露规则作出了严格的新解释，这让情况变得更糟，申诉人现在面临着完全失去隐私的局面，不得不交出他们的手机、平板电脑甚至工作电脑，这些电脑含有大量的个人资料，如短信、照片甚至医疗记录，同时，很少有人意识到，即使是被删除的材料也会被检查，包括可能是受害者在受虐关系中拍摄的照片，其中一些材料注定会在法庭上引起质疑，即使它可能与本案的核心指控性侵犯没有任何关系，当然，这些年来也有一些女性对男性的错误指控，这些指控给这些无辜的男性的生命造成了巨大的伤害，但请看看《华盛顿邮报》的报告显示，只有1%的强奸案最终被成功起诉，很少是因为女性的恶意诬告，但更多是因为女性不愿举报犯罪行为，所以这些施暴者基本上逃脱了惩罚。
另一个明显的例子是女权主义是不必要的，我可能会写一本关于这个话题的书，我还有其他一些有争议的观点，我想一吐其快。
My controversial view? Free speech is NOT absolute and should be restricted under certain conditions.
a) We cannot allow free speech to groups whose very first action if they got into power would be to ban free speech.
If the Nazis propaganda had been banned in the 1930s, then their rise to power would have been seriously curtailed, indeed it probably would never have happened. Their hatred of the jews would have remained an underground movement instead of becoming the powerful aberration as happened.
b) It has been expanded to allow vicious criticism of individuals and groups such as religious, racial, and sexual minorities. Not in a political or public interest sense or to further reasonable discussion, but just simple hatred and viciousness. I can find no justification in allowing free speech for comments which are just spiteful and potentially threatening to individuals or targeted groups.
言论自由。
我的观点有争议吗?言论自由不是绝对的，在一定条件下应该受到限制。
我们不能允许言论自由的团体，试想如果他们上台后的第一个行动就是禁止言论自由，如果纳粹的宣传在20世纪30年代被禁止，那么他们的崛起就会受到严重限制，事实上，这可能永远不会发生，他们对犹太人的仇恨仍将是一种地下运动，而不是像发生的那样成为一种强大的越轨行为。
它已经扩大到允许对宗教、种族和少数群体等个人和群体进行恶意批评，而这些不是出于政治或公共利益的考虑，也不是为了进一步的合理讨论，仅仅是因为单纯的仇恨和恶意，我找不到任何理由支持这些发表恶意的、对个人或目标群体具有潜在威胁的言论自由。
3) Political correctness has been a force for good. Very unpopular viewpoint I know, but personally I think it's a good thing we don't casually use words like yid nigger paki?± ?°poof, ?°wog?± etc in everyday speech.
These words are usually thrown around by people who've never been racially abused or attacked for their sexuality. But those of us who have been on the receiving end, know just how much they can hurt and lower our self-esteem. Above all, these words set a tone, a background that allows more severe attacks to become acceptable-just look at the increase in verbal and physical violence reported against immigrants in the UK since Brexit. The last time they become the norm and become permitted without question resulted in the rise of the nazis and fascism in the 1930s.
Yes, sometimes it can go too far, sometimes people are too easily offended, but as long as these words and the attitudes behind them can still sting, can still be used to demean groups. it's also ok, then political correctness should have a valued place in our world. It makes the world safer for minorities!
朱利安·阿桑奇，对于某些团体来说，我承认他是一个英雄，因为他发布了那些电子邮件，我也理解为什么，他们有这种感觉，从表面上看，让人们知道国家在做什么，让人们了解这可能是件好事，但也有消极的一面，这意味着，如果随意的评论总是在网络上重复，政府之间就不太可能坦诚相待，我想，这确实再次提出了一个旧问题:“谁来管理警察?”但我们必须对我们选举出来的官员有一定的信任，他们并不都是骗子和恶棍，如果没有信任，他们就无法运作，其次，这些电子邮件中包括14名匿名居住在伊拉克的犹太人的人，此后再也没有听说过他们的名字，推测是这些泄露的电子邮件直接导致了他们的死亡，所以说，言论自由也有其缺点。
政治正确一直是一种有益的力量，我知道这是非常不受欢迎的观点，但我个人认为，我们在日常讲话中不随意使用“yid nigger pak”、“poof”、“wog”等词是一件好事，这些词通常是那些从未因性取向而受到种族歧视或攻击的人说出来的，但我们当中那些曾经遭受过这些的人，知道这些词会对我们造成多大的伤害，会降低我们的自尊，最重要的是，这些话为更严重的袭击事件被接受提供了基础，只要看看英国脱欧后针对移民的口头上和身体暴力就知道了，上一次它们成为规范，并被直接实施，导致了纳粹和法西斯主义在20世纪30年代的崛起，有时言论自由可以发挥长处，有时使人容易被冒犯，但只要这些话背后的态度是好的，还是可以接受的，那么我们的世界应该存在政治正确性，它让世界对少数民族更友好!
原创翻译：龙腾网 http://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处