The problem with Jews is a kind of Lecterism. Why is Hannibal Lecter the way he is? He is so smart and feels superior that he doesn’t want to live by the rules of the sheeple folks. He wants to write his own rules. This is why he’s at war with normal morality. It hems him in and forces him to repress his superiority.

犹太人存在的问题属于莱克特主义的一种。为什么汉尼拔·莱克特(即《沉默的羔羊》系列的食人魔男主)会成为那样的人?他聪明绝顶,还觉得自己高人一等,所以他在生活方式上不想遵循羊群般庸众定下的规则。他想自己来定规则,这就是为什么他会和正常的道德观开战。后者把他给框死了,还逼着他去压制自己的优越感。


Lecterism is present in David Mamet’s works where it’s all about the game and who can play to win. Those who invoke rules and principles are just mediocrities who can’t play to win, so they use the rule-of-law or ‘justice’ talk as a crutch. It’s like the not-too-bright mafia boss in the Coens’ MILLER’S CROSSING talks of ‘ethics’. Not because he’s particularly ethical or moral but because it offers goal-posts in a game where he often feels lost.

大卫·马梅特的作品中也存在莱克特主义,他的作品全都是关于游戏以及谁能玩赢这个游戏的。那些诉诸规则和原则的人只是庸材,他们是赢不了的,所以他们是把法治或标榜“正义”的言辞当成拐杖来用的。就像科恩兄弟的《米勒的十字路口》中那个不太聪明的黑手党谈论“伦理道德”一样。并不是因为他特别重视伦理或特别讲道德,而是因为伦理道德在经常会让他感到失落的游戏中起到了足球门柱的作用。
(译注:大卫·马梅特1947年出生于美国,被认为是美国最伟大的剧作家之一;《米勒的十字路口》为1990年的高分黑帮电影))

Of course, Jews prefer moral and principled goyim to amoral and nihilistic goyim. Jews certainly preferred rule-bound Anglos with ‘liberal democracy’ to hyper-Nietzschean Nazi Teutons.
So, if Jews had to choose between moral goyim and amoral goyim, they prefer the former.

当然了,犹太人偏爱的是有德也讲原则的非犹太人(goyim),而不是无德且秉持虚无主义的非犹太人。犹太人偏爱的当然是受规则约束还拥有“自由民主”的盎格鲁人了,而不是深度尼采化的纳粹主义日耳曼人。
所以,如果犹太人必须在讲道德的非犹太人和不讲道德的非犹太人之间作选择,他们会更中意前者。

But the problem is… EVEN IF all goyim were decent and moral, it would pose a problem for Jews because a society dominated by goy morality and decency would apply pressure upon to Jews to act within accepted norms. But Jews don’t want to. Jews want to make up their own rules. They want more power and wealth than others. They don’t want to be equal with goyim but above goyim. So, even though Jews will push for ‘equality’ in a world where they are discriminated and repressed, Jews don’t want to settle for equality between Jews and goyim because that would hamstring Jewish Power.

但问题在于,就算所有的非犹太人都是有德的体面人, 也会给犹太人造成一个问题,因为一个由非犹太人的道德和礼仪支配的社会,会向犹太人施压,会迫使他们按照大众认可的行为规范去行事。但犹太人可不想照做。犹太人想自己来建构规范。他们希望比其他人拥有更多的权力和财富。他们可不想和非犹太人平等,他们希望自己的地位能高过非犹太人。所以,就算犹太人愿意在一个受人歧视和压制的世界中努力争取“平等”,他们也不会满足于自己和非犹太人间的这种平等,因为这种平等会阻滞犹太人权势的增长。

When Jews are down and feel oppressed by bad goyim, they appeal to good goyim and the rule of law. But when good goyim prevail over bad goyim and offer Jews equality and protection of rule of law, the story doesn’t end there because Jews want more than rule of law. They want Rule of Jew.

当犹太人处境糟糕,感觉到自己受到非犹太恶人的压迫时,他们会找非犹太好人陈情,并呼吁法治。可是当非犹太好人战胜了非犹太恶人,并向犹太人提供了平等和法治保护,故事到这里也没有结束,因为犹太人想要的可不只是法治。他们要的是由犹太人来统治。

After all, in a fair, decent, and normal world, the US would be fair to both Jews and Palestinians, not support Zionism to the hilt against Palestinians. The US would call on both Iran and Israel to relinquish nuclear weapons technology. US would not let scumbags like Jonathan Pollard to walk free. US would not allow Arnon Milchan to operate as a free man for his crimes against the US. Jews would be called out on Hollywood’s hate campaign against Muslims who, for a time, were depicted only as terrorists.

毕竟,在一个公平、体面和正常的世界里,美国对犹太人和巴勒斯坦人都会很公平,而不会全力支持犹太复国主义对付巴勒斯坦人。美国会呼吁伊朗和以色列都放弃核武器技术。美国不会无罪释放乔纳森·波拉德这样的卑鄙小人。鉴于其对美国犯下的罪行,美国也不会允许阿农·米尔坎逍遥法外。犹太人会因为好莱坞对穆斯林的仇恨宣传而备受指责,有段时间穆斯林只会被描绘成恐怖分子。
(译注:乔纳森·波拉德(1954-),美国政府前情报分析师。1987年,波拉德承认从事间谍活动并向以色列提供机密情报,因违反《间谍法》被判处无期徒刑,是美国历史上唯一一个因为向盟友传递信息而被判处无期徒刑的美国人;阿农·米尔坎(1944-),以色列亿万富翁,电影制片人,60至80年代曾担任以色列情报员)

Jews needed goyim to be moral and decent than monstrous and ‘antisemitic’ in order for Jews to gain emancipation and progress. Jews needed goyim who rejected and fought against crazies like the Nazis and other monsters. But Jews were never content with mere guarantee of rule of law and shared principles. They were insistent on gaining top power and ruling as they wished.
But such behavior is amoral, anti-moral, and finally immoral and evil. And if Jewish Power grown evil insists on goy compliance, then goyim also become evil in their aiding and abetting of Jewish Evil.

为了犹太人的解放和进步,犹太人需要非犹太人有德且体面,而不是荒诞无稽且“反犹”。犹太人需要非犹太人拒斥纳粹之类的魔头和狂人并与之斗争。但犹太人从不满足于仅仅确保法治和共同原则的存在。他们执意要攫取最高权力,并按照自己的意愿进行统治。但这样的行为是僭越了道德的,是反道德的,最后变成了伤风败俗和邪恶。而如果蹈向了邪恶的犹太强权坚持要非犹太人屈从,那么非犹太人也会在佐助犹太人行恶的过程中把自己也变得邪恶。

And so, it’s a kind of paradox. Jews appealed to goy morality against goy amorality of the Nazis. But goy morality that allowed Jews to gain power eventually surrendered to immorality because Jewish Power insisted on trampling on moral rules and ethical principles. Goy morality, in its generosity to Jews, ended up immoral. If goy morality(that offered decency and freedom to Jews) led to Jews using their freedom to bring about a new order in which they’re above the law, then morality paved the way to immorality.

所以,这是一种悖论。犹太人借助非犹太人的道德来对抗纳粹的非犹太人道德.。但犹太人由以攫取到权力的非犹太人道德,最终会向不道德投降,因为犹太强权铁了心要践踏道德准则和伦理原则。非犹太人的道德,尽管宽宏大量地对待犹太人,最终却沦为不道德。如果非犹太人的道德(为犹太人提供了体面和自由)导致犹太人利用自己的自由创造出了一种凌驾于法律的新秩序,那么道德就为不道德的滋生铺平了道路。

Of course, Jews still pontificate about right vs wrong, about the evil Nazis and ‘racism’ and etc. But it’s all bogus morality because it boils down to ‘whites should revere and obey Jews no matter what because Jews are always wise and superior and know best’. Indeed, Jewish Morality lacks sincerity and is really just a mind-game of tricking goyim into serving Jewish Evil as some moral obligation.

当然了,犹太人至今还在目空一切地谈论对与错,谈论邪恶的纳粹和“种族主义”等等。但这些全都是伪道德,因为最终还是会归结为“无论如何白人都应该尊敬并服从犹太人,因为犹太人永远是聪明的,是高人一等的,是最懂世情的”。犹太人的道德实在是缺乏诚意,其实不过是一种心理游戏,即哄骗非犹太人为犹太邪行服务,并将其内化为某种道义上的责任。

Consider the movie LOST IN AMERICA. Albert Brooks the smart Jew finds himself in Middle America. He mostly meets nice decent people there though some are jerks. But even if goy folks were all nice and there wasn’t a jerk in sight, Brooks’ character would still feel stifled because he wants more from life than mere normality and decency. He wants more and more and more and more.

可以把电影《迷失的美国人》(1985)拿来两相参契。聪明的犹太人阿尔伯特·布鲁克斯发现自己身处美国中部。他在那里遇到的大部分人都是很有礼貌的正派人,虽然有些人是混蛋。但就算这些非犹太人的乡民们都心地良善,目力所及之内没有一个是混蛋,但布鲁克斯饰演的那个角色(David Howard)还是会感觉到窒息,因为除了这些正常状态和体面,他还想从生活中得到更多的东西。他总是想要更多东西,无有止境。

Or consider the ending of THE HEARTBREAK KID. Grodin’s character did something outrageous in dumping his Jewish wife and nabbing the shikse blonde goddess wife. The angry father finally relented. But does Grodin’s character look content at the end surrounded by normal and decent people? Not exactly. He wants even more.

也可以参看下《青涩恋情》(1972)的结局。格罗丁饰演的角色做了一件很不像话的事情,他甩掉了自己的犹太妻子,抢来了一个非犹太人的金发女神一样的妻子。那位愤怒的父亲最后还是大发慈悲了。但到最后,被正常的体面人包围的格罗丁看上去心满意足了吗?并没有。他还想要更多。


If you let a weasel into a den of rabbits and if the rabbits accept him as a honorary fellow rabbit, will the weasel be content to just go along? No, it will feel discomfited because it is by nature a unrelenting weasel and doesn’t want to be a rabbit among rabbits, no more than a coyote wants to be a lamb among sheep.

如果你把一只黄鼠狼放进了兔子窝里,如果兔子们也接受了它,把它当成名誉上的同类,黄鼠狼会满足于就这样随波逐流吗?不会的,它会感到狼狈不堪,因为它生来就是一只冷酷的黄鼠狼,它也不想成为兔子堆里的一只兔子,而丛林狼也是一样的,不会想做羊群中的一只小羊羔。

And this is why the goy attempt at being nice and decent toward Jews failed. Jews appreciated the niceness only to the extent that it offered them freedom and social mobility. But feeling superior than goyim, they didn’t want to rise to the level of goyim, be good neighbors, and call it a day. Rather, they felt hampered in by goy rules and sought to break free to do whatever they chose to gain more and more.

而这也是为什么非犹太人试图向犹太人示好并体面对待之,最终会失败。犹太人只会在别人为他们提供了自由和社会流动性时,才会感激这种友善的态度。但他们会觉得自己比非犹太人优越,他们可不想上升到非犹太人的水平,做个好邻居什么的,然后心满意足地过完这一天。相反,他们觉得自己受制于非犹太人的规则,然后就会去寻求突破藩篱,这样只要能从中攫取到越来越多的利益,他们就能为所欲为了。

And yet, another problem is that, even as Jews feel contempt for goy sheeple rules of normality, they rely on goyim being normal and decent in order for themselves to gain supreme power. It’s like Jews won’t get anywhere in a world full of Negroes. As Negroyim are wild and crazy, they can never be too moral or normal. They will just cook Jews in pots and devour them.

然而,另一个问题是,就算犹太人蔑视那些羊群一般的非犹太人定下的常态规则,他们也会依靠非犹太人的正常和体面,由此让自己攫取最高权力。这就像是,犹太人在一个全是黑人的世界里是不会有任何建树的。由于黑人是粗野而疯狂的人,他们绝对做不到太讲道德,也不会特别正常。他们会直接把犹太人扔进锅里煮,然后吞吃掉。

In contrast, white goyim can be normal, decent, and orderly. They can create and manage a civilization. It is in such a setting that Jews can operate and gain power and wealth. But they still want more and don’t to be hamstrung by goy rules.

相反,非犹太人的白人是可以做到正常、体面和井井有条的。他们有能力创造一个文明并治理之。正是在这样一种环境中,犹太人才能正常运转,并攫取权力和财富。但他们还是想得到更多,还是不想被非犹太人的规则拖后腿。

It’s like a rancher wants his animals to be domesticated than wild. Easier to handle domesticated animals than wild ones. Still, it is ultimately to control and slaughter them than to respect them as fellow creatures.

这就像是一个农场主,希望自己的动物是驯服的而不是野生的。相比野生动物,驯服的动物更容易管理。不过,最终还是要控制乃至宰杀它们的,是不会像尊重自己同类一样尊重它们的。

I wonder if Lecter series were meant to be an alllegory of how Jewish amoralists see goy sheeple.
There’s a scene in THE WILD BUNCH where Pike Bishop says of Deke Thorton, “He gave his word”, and Dutch shouts back, “That’s no what counts. It’s whom you give it to.”

我很想知道,《沉默的羔羊》系列是否是刻意表现不讲道德的犹太人对羊群般非犹太人的看法的一则寓言。
在《日落黄沙》(1969)中有一幕,派克·毕晓普谈到了他对迪克·索顿的看法,“他已经作出承诺了”,然后荷兰人大喊着回答说,“这不顶用,重要的是你是在向谁作出承诺"。

Decency and morality are nice, but it seems white goyim made a mistake in offering them to Jews who merely took advantage of them to gain supreme power that would not only allow them to be act amoral and immoral but pressure even decent goyim to just cuck along out of either fear or naivete or perhaps both.

讲体面、守道德是很好,但似乎非犹太人的白人犯了一个错误,就是他们把这些拿来款待犹太人了,可犹太人只是利用了这些来攫取最高权力,而这种最高权力不仅能让他们在行为上僭越道德乃至不道德,还会让那些体面的非犹太人感受到摧眉折腰的压力,而这不是出于恐惧就是出于天真,或是兼而有之。